CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 57Smoking Behavior and CessationGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Evaluation of Population-Level Tobacco Control Interventions and Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access
Akter, Shamima, Islam, Md. Rashedul, Rahman, Md. Mizanur, Rouyard, Thomas, Nsashiyi, Raïssa Shiyghan, Hossain, Fahima, Nakamura, Ryota·2023·JAMA Network Open
DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.22341PMC PMC10329215
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Importance: Smoking causes considerable noncommunicable diseases, perinatal morbidity, and mortality. Objective: To investigate the associations of population-level tobacco-control policies with health outcomes. Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and EconLit were searched from inception to March 2021 (updated on 1 March 2022). References were manually searched. Study Selection: Studies reporting on associations of population-level tobacco control policies with health-related outcomes were included. Data were analyzed from May to July 2022. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were extracted by 1 investigator and cross-checked by a second investigator. Analyses were conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guideline. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were respiratory system disease (RSD), cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, mortality, hospitalization, and health care utilization. The secondary outcomes were adverse birth outcomes, such as low birth weight and preterm birth. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. Results: Of 4952 records identified, 144 population-level studies were included in the final analysis; 126 studies (87.5%) were of high or moderate quality. The most frequently reported policies were smoke-free legislation (126 studies), followed by tax or price increases (14 studies), multicomponent tobacco control programs (12 studies), and a minimum cigarette purchase age law (1 study). Smoke-free legislation was associated with decreased risk of all CVD events (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.86-0.94), RSD events (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72-0.96), hospitalization due to CVD or RSD (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87-0.95), and adverse birth outcomes (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92-0.96). These associations persisted in all sensitivity and subgroup analyses, except for the country income category, for which a significant reduction was only observed in high-income countries. In meta-analysis, there was no clear association of tax or price increases with adverse health outcomes. However, for the narrative synthesis, all 8 studies reported statistically significant associations between tax increases and decreases in adverse health events. Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, smoke-free legislation was associated with significant reductions in morbidity and mortality related to CVD, RSD, and perinatal outcomes. These findings support the need to accelerate the implementation of smoke-free laws to protect populations against smoking-related harm.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.22341

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies of the effects of smoke-free laws found that hospital admission and mortality rates for cardiovascular and respiratory conditions decreased after implementation of smoking bans.

    “Studies of the effects of smoke-free laws found that hospital admission and mortality rates for cardiovascular and respiratory conditions decreased after the implementation of smoking bans455–459.”

    From Health effects associated with exposure to secondhand smoke: a Burden of Proof study (2024) · cites this paper as [456]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 170

  1. [1]Hoffman SJ, Tan C. Overview of systematic reviews on the health-related effects of government tobacco control policies. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15: 744. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2041-6 26242915 PMC4526291 · DOI
  2. [2]Leigh J, Rafiee A, Oancea B,; GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020; 396(10258): 1223- 1249. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2 33069327 PMC7566194 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Jaakkola MS, Piipari R, Jaakkola N, Jaakkola JJ. Environmental tobacco smoke and adult-onset asthma: a population-based incident case-control study. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93(12): 2055- 2060. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.93.12.2055 14652334 PMC1448152 · DOI
  4. [4]Kawachi I, Colditz GA, Speizer FE,. A prospective study of passive smoking and coronary heart disease. Circulation. 1997; 95(10): 2374- 2379. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.95.10.2374 9170399 · DOI
  5. [5]Skorge TD, Eagan TM, Eide GE, Gulsvik A, Bakke PS. The adult incidence of asthma and respiratory symptoms by passive smoking in uterus or in childhood. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005; 172(1): 61- 66. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200409-1158OC 15805186 · DOI
  6. [6]Steenland K, Thun M, Lally C, Heath C Jr. Environmental tobacco smoke and coronary heart disease in the American Cancer Society CPS-II cohort. Circulation. 1996; 94(4): 622- 628. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.94.4.622 8772680 · DOI
  7. [7]Vineis P, Airoldi L, Veglia F,. Environmental tobacco smoke and risk of respiratory cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in former smokers and never smokers in the EPIC prospective study. BMJ. 2005; 330(7486): 277. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38327.648472.82 15681570 PMC548173 · DOI
  8. [8]Zhong L, Goldberg MS, Parent ME, Hanley JA. Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and the risk of lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Lung Cancer. 2000; 27(1): 3- 18. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5002(99)00093-8 10672779 · DOI
  9. [9]Bonita R, Duncan J, Truelsen T, Jackson RT, Beaglehole R. Passive smoking as well as active smoking increases the risk of acute stroke. Tob Control. 1999; 8(2): 156- 160. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.2.156 10478399 PMC1759715 · DOI
  10. [12]Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Strategies for reducing exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, increasing tobacco-use cessation, and reducing initiation in communities and health-care systems: a report on recommendations of the Task Force on Community Preventive Services. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2000; 49(RR-12): 1- 11. 15580784
  11. [13]Been JV, Nurmatov UB, Cox B, Nawrot TS, van Schayck CP, Sheikh A. Effect of smoke-free legislation on perinatal and child health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2014; 383(9928): 1549- 1560. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60082-9 24680633 · DOI
  12. [14]Dinno A, Glantz S. Clean indoor air laws immediately reduce heart attacks. Prev Med. 2007; 45(1): 9- 11. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.03.013 17499350 PMC2693058 · DOI
  13. [15]Faber T, Kumar A, Mackenbach JP,. Effect of tobacco control policies on perinatal and child health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2017; 2(9): e420- e437. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30144-5 28944313 PMC5592249 · DOI
  14. [16]Frazer K, Callinan JE, McHugh J,. Legislative smoking bans for reducing harms from secondhand smoke exposure, smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 2(2): CD005992. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005992.pub3 26842828 PMC6486282 · DOI
  15. [17]Gao M, Li Y, Wang F,. The effect of smoke-free legislation on the mortality rate of acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1): 1269. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7408-7 31533693 PMC6749716 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [18]Jones MR, Barnoya J, Stranges S, Losonczy L, Navas-Acien A. Cardiovascular events following smoke-free legislations: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2014; 1(3): 239- 249. doi: 10.1007/s40572-014-0020-1 25328861 PMC4198310 · DOI
  17. [19]Lightwood JM, Glantz SA. Declines in acute myocardial infarction after smoke-free laws and individual risk attributable to secondhand smoke. Circulation. 2009; 120(14): 1373- 1379. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.870691 19770392 PMC2967202 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [20]Lin H, Wang H, Wu W, Lang L, Wang Q, Tian L. The effects of smoke-free legislation on acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2013; 13: 529. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-529 23721370 PMC3671962 · DOI
  19. [21]Mackay DF, Irfan MO, Haw S, Pell JP. Meta-analysis of the effect of comprehensive smoke-free legislation on acute coronary events. Heart. 2010; 96(19): 1525- 1530. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.199026 20736203 · DOI
  20. [23]Rando-Matos Y, Pons-Vigués M, López MJ,. Smokefree legislation effects on respiratory and sensory disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017; 12(7): e0181035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181035 28759596 PMC5536320 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [24]Tan CE, Glantz SA. Association between smoke-free legislation and hospitalizations for cardiac, cerebrovascular, and respiratory diseases: a meta-analysis. Circulation. 2012; 126(18): 2177- 2183. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.121301 23109514 PMC3501404 · DOI
  22. [25]Faber T, Kumar A, Mackenbach JP,. Tobacco control policies and perinatal and child health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tob Induc Dis. 2018; 16(1): 157. doi: 10.18332/tid/83921 · DOI
  23. [26]Radó MK, Laverty AA, Hone T,. Cigarette taxation and neonatal and infant mortality: a longitudinal analysis of 159 countries. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022; 2(3): e0000042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000042 36962262 PMC10021450 · DOI
  24. [28]Wheldon MC, Raftery AE, Clark SJ, Gerland P. Reconstructing past populations with uncertainty from fragmentary data. J Am Stat Assoc. 2013; 108(501): 96- 110. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2012.737729 23579202 PMC3613971 · DOI
  25. [29]Schmidt CO, Kohlmann T. When to use the odds ratio or the relative risk? Int J Public Health. 2008; 53(3): 165- 167. doi: 10.1007/s00038-008-7068-3 19127890 · DOI
  26. [31]Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. 2000; 56(2): 455- 463. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x 10877304 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [32]Agüero F, Dégano IR, Subirana I,. Impact of a partial smoke-free legislation on myocardial infarction incidence, mortality and case-fatality in a population-based registry: the REGICOR Study. PLoS One. 2013; 8(1): e53722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053722 23372663 PMC3553094 · DOI
  28. [34]Bakolis I, Kelly R, Fecht D,. Protective effects of smoke-free legislation on birth outcomes in England: a regression discontinuity design. Epidemiology. 2016; 27(6): 810- 818. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000534 27428672 PMC5424880 · DOI
  29. [35]Bannon F, Devlin A, McElwee G, Gavin A. Greater gains from smoke-free legislation for non-smoking bar staff in Belfast. Eur J Public Health. 2009; 19(6): 638- 643. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp087 19567658 · DOI
  30. [36]Barnett R, Pearce J, Moon G, Elliott J, Barnett P. Assessing the effects of the introduction of the New Zealand Smokefree Environment Act 2003 on acute myocardial infarction hospital admissions in Christchurch, New Zealand. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2009; 33(6): 515- 520. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00446.x 20078567 · DOI
  31. [37]Barone-Adesi F, Gasparrini A, Vizzini L, Merletti F, Richiardi L. Effects of Italian smoking regulation on rates of hospital admission for acute coronary events: a country-wide study. PLoS One. 2011; 6(3): e17419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017419 21399685 PMC3047543 · DOI
  32. [38]Barone-Adesi F, Vizzini L, Merletti F, Richiardi L. Short-term effects of Italian smoking regulation on rates of hospital admission for acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27(20): 2468- 2472. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl201 16940340 · DOI · Paper page
  33. [39]Barrio G, Belza MJ, Carmona R, Hoyos J, Ronda E, Regidor E. The limits of single-group interrupted time series analysis in assessing the impact of smoke-free laws on short-term mortality. Int J Drug Policy. 2019; 73: 112- 120. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.07.018 31470256 · DOI
  34. [40]Bartecchi C, Alsever RN, Nevin-Woods C,. Reduction in the incidence of acute myocardial infarction associated with a citywide smoking ordinance. Circulation. 2006; 114(14): 1490- 1496. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.615245 17000911 · DOI · Paper page
  35. [41]Bartholomew KS, Abouk R. The effect of local smokefree regulations on birth outcomes and prenatal smoking. Matern Child Health J. 2016; 20(7): 1526- 1538. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-1952-x 26987859 · DOI
  36. [42]Basel P, Bartelson BB, Le Lait MC, Krantz MJ. The effect of a statewide smoking ordinance on acute myocardial infarction rates. Am J Med. 2014; 127(1): 94.e1- 94.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.09.014 24384105 · DOI
  37. [43]Been JV, Mackay DF, Millett C, Pell JP, van Schayck OC, Sheikh A. Impact of smoke-free legislation on perinatal and infant mortality: a national quasi-experimental study. Sci Rep. 2015; 5: 13020. doi: 10.1038/srep13020 26268789 PMC4534797 · DOI
  38. [44]Been JV, Millett C, Lee JT, van Schayck CP, Sheikh A. Smoke-free legislation and childhood hospitalisations for respiratory tract infections. Eur Respir J. 2015; 46(3): 697- 706. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00014615 26022951 · DOI
  39. [45]Been JV, Szatkowski L, van Staa TP,. Smoke-free legislation and the incidence of paediatric respiratory infections and wheezing/asthma: interrupted time series analyses in the four UK nations. Sci Rep. 2015; 5: 15246. doi: 10.1038/srep15246 26463498 PMC4604467 · DOI
  40. [46]Bowser D, Canning D, Okunogbe A. The impact of tobacco taxes on mortality in the USA, 1970-2005. Tob Control. 2016; 25(1): 52- 59. 25352561
  41. [47]Bruintjes G, Bartelson BB, Hurst P, Levinson AH, Hokanson JE, Krantz MJ. Reduction in acute myocardial infarction hospitalization after implementation of a smoking ordinance. Am J Med. 2011; 124(7): 647- 654. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.02.022 21683831 · DOI
  42. [48]Cesaroni G, Forastiere F, Agabiti N, Valente P, Zuccaro P, Perucci CA. Effect of the Italian smoking ban on population rates of acute coronary events. Circulation. 2008; 117(9): 1183- 1188. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.729889 18268149 · DOI · Paper page
  43. [49]Ciaccio CE, Gurley-Calvez T, Shireman TI. Indoor tobacco legislation is associated with fewer emergency department visits for asthma exacerbation in children. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016; 117(6): 641- 645. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.10.005 27979021 PMC5166981 · DOI
  44. [50]Cox B, Vangronsveld J, Nawrot TS. Impact of stepwise introduction of smoke-free legislation on population rates of acute myocardial infarction deaths in Flanders, Belgium. Heart. 2014; 100(18): 1430- 1435. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305613 25147283 · DOI
  45. [51]Croghan IT, Ebbert JO, Hays JT,. Impact of a countywide smoke-free workplace law on emergency department visits for respiratory diseases: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pulm Med. 2015; 15: 6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-15-6 25608660 PMC4417313 · DOI
  46. [52]Carrión-Valero F, Quiles-Izquierdo J, González-Monte C,. Impact of the 2005 and 2010 Spanish smoking laws on hospital admissions for tobacco-related diseases in Valencia, Spain. Public Health. 2020; 180: 29- 37. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.10.016 31838343 · DOI
  47. [53]Dilley JA, Harris JR, Boysun MJ, Reid TR. Program, policy, and price interventions for tobacco control: quantifying the return on investment of a state tobacco control program. Am J Public Health. 2012; 102(2): e22- e28. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300506 22390458 PMC3484005 · DOI
  48. [54]Dove MS, Dockery DW, Connolly GN. Smoke-free air laws and asthma prevalence, symptoms, and severity among nonsmoking youth. Pediatrics. 2011; 127(1): 102- 109. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1532 21149426 PMC3375465 · DOI
  49. [55]Fernández E, Fu M, Pascual JA,; Spanish Smoking Law Evaluation Group. Impact of the Spanish smoking law on exposure to second-hand smoke and respiratory health in hospitality workers: a cohort study. PLoS One. 2009; 4(1): e4244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004244 19165321 PMC2621339 · DOI
  50. [56]Ferrante D, Linetzky B, Virgolini M, Schoj V, Apelberg B. Reduction in hospital admissions for acute coronary syndrome after the successful implementation of 100% smoke-free legislation in Argentina: a comparison with partial smoking restrictions. Tob Control. 2012; 21(4): 402- 406. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.042325 21602536 · DOI
  51. [57]Fichtenberg CM, Glantz SA. Association of the California Tobacco Control Program with declines in cigarette consumption and mortality from heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343(24): 1772- 1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200012143432406 11114317 · DOI
  52. [58]Gasparrini A, Gorini G, Barchielli A. On the relationship between smoking bans and incidence of acute myocardial infarction. Eur J Epidemiol. 2009; 24(10): 597- 602. doi: 10.1007/s10654-009-9377-0 19649714 · DOI
  53. [59]Hahn EJ, Rayens MK, Burkhart PV, Moser DK. Smoke-free laws, gender, and reduction in hospitalizations for acute myocardial infarction. Public Health Rep. 2011; 126(6): 826- 833. doi: 10.1177/003335491112600608 22043098 PMC3185318 · DOI
  54. [60]Hatoun J, Davis-Plourde K, Penti B, Cabral H, Kazis L. Tobacco control laws and pediatric asthma. Pediatrics. 2018; 141(suppl 1): S130- S136. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1026P 29292313 · DOI · Paper page
  55. [61]Hawkins SS, Hristakeva S, Gottlieb M, Baum CF. Reduction in emergency department visits for children’s asthma, ear infections, and respiratory infections after the introduction of state smoke-free legislation. Prev Med. 2016; 89: 278- 285. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.06.005 27283094 PMC8323994 · DOI
  56. [62]Head P, Jackson BE, Bae S, Cherry D. Hospital discharge rates before and after implementation of a city-wide smoking ban in a Texas city, 2004-2008. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012; 9: E179. doi: 10.5888/pcd9.120079 23270668 PMC3534134 · DOI
  57. [63]Ho V, Ross JS, Steiner CA,. A nationwide assessment of the association of smoking bans and cigarette taxes with hospitalizations for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia. Med Care Res Rev. 2017; 74(6): 687- 704. doi: 10.1177/1077558716668646 27624634 PMC5665160 · DOI · Paper page
  58. [64]Humair JP, Garin N, Gerstel E,. Acute respiratory and cardiovascular admissions after a public smoking ban in Geneva, Switzerland. PLoS One. 2014; 9(3): e90417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090417 24599156 PMC3944023 · DOI
  59. [65]Hurt RD, Weston SA, Ebbert JO,. Myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death in Olmsted County, Minnesota, before and after smoke-free workplace laws. Arch Intern Med. 2012; 172(21): 1635- 1641. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.46 23108571 PMC3615114 · DOI
  60. [66]Jan C, Lee M, Roa R, Herrera V, Politis M, Motta J. The association of tobacco control policies and the risk of acute myocardial infarction using hospital admissions data. PLoS One. 2014; 9(2): e88784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088784 24520421 PMC3919809 · DOI
  61. [68]Kabir Z, Clarke V, Conroy R, McNamee E, Daly S, Clancy L. Low birthweight and preterm birth rates 1 year before and after the Irish workplace smoking ban. BJOG. 2009; 116(13): 1782- 1787. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02374.x 19832830 · DOI
  62. [69]Kalkhoran S, Sebrié EM, Sandoya E, Glantz SA. Effect of Uruguay’s national 100% smokefree law on emergency visits for bronchospasm. Am J Prev Med. 2015; 49(1): 85- 88. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.12.009 25997906 PMC4476915 · DOI
  63. [70]Kent BD, Sulaiman I, Nicholson TT, Lane SJ, Moloney ED. Acute pulmonary admissions following implementation of a national workplace smoking ban. Chest. 2012; 142(3): 673- 679. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2757 22383660 · DOI
  64. [71]Larsson M, Boëthius G, Axelsson S, Montgomery SM. Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and health effects among hospitality workers in Sweden—before and after the implementation of a smoke-free law. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2008; 34(4): 267- 277. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1243 18815714 · DOI
  65. [72]Lemstra M, Neudorf C, Opondo J. Implications of a public smoking ban. Can J Public Health. 2008; 99(1): 62- 65. doi: 10.1007/BF03403743 18435394 PMC6975881 · DOI · Paper page
  66. [73]Liu A, Guzman Castillo M, Capewell S, Lucy J, O’Flaherty M. Reduction in myocardial infarction admissions in Liverpool after the smoking ban: potential socioeconomic implications for policymaking. BMJ Open. 2013; 3(11): e003307. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003307 24282240 PMC3845049 · DOI
  67. [74]Loomis BR, Juster HR. Association of indoor smoke-free air laws with hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction and stroke in three states. J Environ Public Health. 2012; 2012: 589018. doi: 10.1155/2012/589018 22778759 PMC3388299 · DOI
  68. [75]Mayne SL, Widome R, Carroll AJ,. Longitudinal associations of smoke-free policies and incident cardiovascular disease: CARDIA study. Circulation. 2018; 138(6): 557- 566. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032302 29735485 PMC6202173 · DOI
  69. [76]McAlister AL, Huang P, Ramirez AG, Harrist RB, Fonseca VP. Reductions in cigarette smoking and acute myocardial infarction mortality in Jefferson County, Texas. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100(12): 2391- 2392. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.192211 20966365 PMC2978173 · DOI
  70. [77]McKinnon B, Auger N, Kaufman JS. The impact of smoke-free legislation on educational differences in birth outcomes. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015; 69(10): 937- 943. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-205779 25987722 · DOI
  71. [78]Millett C, Lee JT, Laverty AA, Glantz SA, Majeed A. Hospital admissions for childhood asthma after smoke-free legislation in England. Pediatrics. 2013; 131(2): e495- e501. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2592 23339216 PMC4528337 · DOI
  72. [79]Moraros J, Bird Y, Chen S,. The impact of the 2002 Delaware smoking ordinance on heart attack and asthma. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010; 7(12): 4169- 4178. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7124169 21318001 PMC3037047 · DOI
  73. [80]Page RL II, Slejko JF, Libby AM. A citywide smoking ban reduced maternal smoking and risk for preterm births: a Colorado natural experiment. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012; 21(6): 621- 627. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2011.3305 22401497 · DOI
  74. [81]Patanavanich R, Glantz SA. Association between tobacco control policies and hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction in Thailand, 2006-2017: a time series analysis. PLoS One. 2020; 15(12): e0242570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242570 33264315 PMC7710088 · DOI
  75. [82]Polus S, Burns J, Hoffmann S,. Interrupted time series study found mixed effects of the impact of the Bavarian smoke-free legislation on pregnancy outcomes. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1): 4209. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83774-0 33603103 PMC7892567 · DOI
  76. [83]Séguret F, Ferreira C, Cambou JP, Carrière I, Thomas D. Changes in hospitalization rates for acute coronary syndrome after a two-phase comprehensive smoking ban. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014; 21(12): 1575- 1582. doi: 10.1177/2047487313500569 23918841 · DOI
  77. [84]Stallings-Smith S, Goodman P, Kabir Z, Clancy L, Zeka A. Socioeconomic differentials in the immediate mortality effects of the national Irish smoking ban. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6): e98617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098617 24887027 PMC4041857 · DOI
  78. [86]Villalbí JR, Sánchez E, Benet J,; Barcelona Group for Smoking Regulation Policies Evaluation. The extension of smoke-free areas and acute myocardial infarction mortality: before and after study. BMJ Open. 2011; 1(1): e000067. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000067 22021746 PMC3191414 · DOI
  79. [87]Xiao H, Qi F, Jia X,. Impact of Qingdao’s smoke-free legislation on hospitalizations and mortality from acute myocardial infarction and stroke: an interrupted time-series analysis. Addiction. 2020; 115(8): 1561- 1570. doi: 10.1111/add.14970 31961014 · DOI
  80. [88]Xiao H, Zhang H, Wang D,. Impact of smoke-free legislation on acute myocardial infarction and stroke mortality: Tianjin, China, 2007-2015. Tob Control. 2020; 29(1): 61- 67. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054477 30692165 PMC6952839 · DOI
  81. [89]Yang YN, Huang YT, Yang CY. Effects of a national smoking ban on hospital admissions for cardiovascular diseases: a time-series analysis in Taiwan. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2017; 80(10-12): 562- 568. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2017.1367085 28880815 · DOI
  82. [90]Alsever R, Thomas W, Nevin-Woods C,; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Reduced hospitalizations for acute myocardial infarction after implementation of a smoke-free ordinance—City of Pueblo, Colorado, 2002-2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009; 57(51): 1373- 1377. 19116606
  83. [91]Sebrié EM, Sandoya E, Hyland A, Bianco E, Glantz SA, Cummings KM. Hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction before and after implementation of a comprehensive smoke-free policy in Uruguay. Tob Control. 2013; 22(e1): e16- e20. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050134 22337557 PMC3374906 · DOI
  84. [92]de Korte-de Boer D, Kotz D, Viechtbauer W,. Effect of smoke-free legislation on the incidence of sudden circulatory arrest in the Netherlands. Heart 2012;98:995-9. Heart. 2012; 98(22): 1680. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302752 22668867 · DOI
  85. [93]Abe TMO, Scholz J, de Masi E, Nobre MRC, Filho RK. Decrease in mortality rate and hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction after the enactment of the smoking ban law in São Paulo city, Brazil. Tob Control. 2017; 26(6): 656- 662. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053261 27794066 · DOI
  86. [94]Abreu D, Sousa P, Matias-Dias C, Pinto FJ. Longitudinal impact of the smoking ban legislation in acute coronary syndrome admissions. Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017: 6956941. doi: 10.1155/2017/6956941 28265574 PMC5318631 · DOI
  87. [95]Adams EK, Markowitz S, Dietz PM, Tong VT. Expansion of Medicaid covered smoking cessation services: maternal smoking and birth outcomes. Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2013; 3(3): E1- E23. doi: 10.5600/mmrr.003.03.a02 24753968 PMC3983727 · DOI
  88. [96]Allwright S, Paul G, Greiner B,. Legislation for smoke-free workplaces and health of bar workers in Ireland: before and after study. BMJ. 2005; 331(7525): 1117. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38636.499225.55 16230313 PMC1283274 · DOI
  89. [97]Ayres JG, Semple S, MacCalman L,. Bar workers’ health and environmental tobacco smoke exposure (BHETSE): symptomatic improvement in bar staff following smoke-free legislation in Scotland. Occup Environ Med. 2009; 66(5): 339- 346. doi: 10.1136/oem.2008.040311 19208693 · DOI
  90. [99]Barr CD, Diez DM, Wang Y, Dominici F, Samet JM. Comprehensive smoking bans and acute myocardial infarction among Medicare enrollees in 387 US counties: 1999-2008. Am J Epidemiol. 2012; 176(7): 642- 648. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws267 22986145 PMC3530376 · DOI
  91. [100]Bharadwaj P, Johnsen JV, Løken KV. Smoking bans, maternal smoking and birth outcomes. J Public Econ. 2014; 115: 72- 93. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.04.008 · DOI
  92. [101]Bianchi M, Campi R, Bonati M. Smoke-free legislation and asthma. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(1): 87- 88. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1011724 21208120 · DOI
  93. [102]Bonetti PO, Trachsel LD, Kuhn MU,. Incidence of acute myocardial infarction after implementation of a public smoking ban in Graubünden, Switzerland: two year follow-up. Swiss Med Wkly. 2011; 141: w13206. doi: 10.4414/smw.2011.13206 21623477 · DOI
  94. [103]Carrión-Valero F, Quiles-Izquierdo J, González-Monte C,. Association between a comprehensive smoking ban and hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction: an observational study in the Autonomous Community of Valencia, Spain. Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2020; 39(2): 77- 84. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2019.04.009 32291119 · DOI
  95. [104]Cronin EM, Kearney PM, Kearney PP, Sullivan P, Perry IJ; Coronary Heart Attack Ireland Registry (CHAIR) Working Group. Impact of a national smoking ban on hospital admission for acute coronary syndromes: a longitudinal study. Clin Cardiol. 2012; 35(4): 205- 209. doi: 10.1002/clc.21014 22278857 PMC6652533 · DOI
  96. [105]Dove MS, Dockery DW, Mittleman MA,. The impact of Massachusetts’ smoke-free workplace laws on acute myocardial infarction deaths. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100(11): 2206- 2212. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.189662 20864706 PMC2951939 · DOI · Paper page
  97. [106]Durham AD, Bergier S, Morisod X,. Improved health of hospitality workers after a Swiss cantonal smoking ban. Swiss Med Wkly. 2011; 141: w13317. doi: 10.4414/smw.2011.13317 22252843 · DOI
  98. [107]Eagan TM, Hetland J, Aarø LE. Decline in respiratory symptoms in service workers five months after a public smoking ban. Tob Control. 2006; 15(3): 242- 246. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.015479 16728756 PMC2564667 · DOI
  99. [108]Eisner MD, Smith AK, Blanc PD. Bartenders’ respiratory health after establishment of smoke-free bars and taverns. JAMA. 1998; 280(22): 1909- 1914. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.22.1909 9851475 · DOI
  100. [109]Evans WN, Ringel JS. Can higher cigarette taxes improve birth outcomes? J Public Econ. 1999; 72(1): 135- 154. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00090-5 · DOI
  101. [110]Farrelly MC, Nonnemaker JM, Chou R, Hyland A, Peterson KK, Bauer UE. Changes in hospitality workers’ exposure to secondhand smoke following the implementation of New York’s smoke-free law. Tob Control. 2005; 14(4): 236- 241. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.008839 16046685 PMC1748080 · DOI
  102. [111]Galán I, Simón L, Boldo E,. Changes in hospitalizations for chronic respiratory diseases after two successive smoking bans in Spain. PLoS One. 2017; 12(5): e0177979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177979 28542337 PMC5443522 · DOI
  103. [112]Galán I, Simón L, Boldo E,. Impact of 2 successive smoking bans on hospital admissions for cardiovascular diseases in Spain. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2018; 71(9): 726- 734. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2017.10.055 29673904 · DOI
  104. [113]Galán I, Simón L, Flores V,. Assessing the effects of the Spanish partial smoking ban on cardiovascular and respiratory diseases: methodological issues. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(12): e008892. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008892 26628524 PMC4679921 · DOI
  105. [114]Gao J, Baughman RA. Do smoking bans improve infant health: evidence from U.S. Births: 1995–2009. East Econ J. 2017; 43(3): 472- 495. doi: 10.1057/s41302-016-0010-0 · DOI
  106. [115]Gaudreau K, Sanford CJ, Cheverie C, McClure C. The effect of a smoking ban on hospitalization rates for cardiovascular and respiratory conditions in Prince Edward Island, Canada. PLoS One. 2013; 8(3): e56102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056102 23520450 PMC3592861 · DOI
  107. [116]Goodman P, Agnew M, McCaffrey M, Paul G, Clancy L. Effects of the Irish smoking ban on respiratory health of bar workers and air quality in Dublin pubs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007; 175(8): 840- 845. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200608-1085OC 17204724 · DOI
  108. [117]Gupta R, Luo J, Anderson RH, Ray A. Clean indoor air regulation and incidence of hospital admissions for acute coronary syndrome in Kanawha County, West Virginia. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011; 8(4): A77. 21672401 PMC3136970
  109. [118]Hajdu T, Hajdu G. Smoking ban and health at birth: evidence from Hungary. Econ Hum Biol. 2018; 30: 37- 47. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2018.05.003 29908431 · DOI
  110. [119]Hankins S, Tarasenko Y. Do smoking bans improve neonatal health? Health Serv Res. 2016; 51(5): 1858- 1878. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12451 26841359 PMC5034216 · DOI
  111. [120]Hawkins SS, Baum CF. Impact of state tobacco control policies on birth defects. Prev Med. 2019; 127: 105791. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105791 31398414 · DOI
  112. [121]Hawkins SS, Baum CF. The downstream effects of state tobacco control policies on maternal smoking during pregnancy and birth outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019; 205: 107634. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107634 31669802 · DOI
  113. [122]Hawkins SS, Baum CF, Oken E, Gillman MW. Associations of tobacco control policies with birth outcomes. JAMA Pediatr. 2014; 168(11): e142365. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.2365 25365250 PMC4240616 · DOI
  114. [123]Herman PM, Walsh ME. Hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction, angina, stroke, and asthma after implementation of Arizona’s comprehensive statewide smoking ban. Am J Public Health. 2011; 101(3): 491- 496. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.179572 20466955 PMC3036684 · DOI · Paper page
  115. [125]Hone T, Szklo AS, Filippidis FT,. Smoke-free legislation and neonatal and infant mortality in Brazil: longitudinal quasi-experimental study. Tob Control. 2020; 29(3): 312- 319. 31152114
  116. [126]Jarlenski M, Bleich SN, Bennett WL, Stuart EA, Barry CL. Medicaid enrollment policy increased smoking cessation among pregnant women but had no impact on birth outcomes. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014; 33(6): 997- 1005. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1167 24889949 PMC4248559 · DOI
  117. [127]Jiang H, Livingston M, Room R, Gan Y, English D, Chenhall R. Can public health policies on alcohol and tobacco reduce a cancer epidemic: Australia’s experience. BMC Med. 2019; 17(1): 213. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1453-z 31771596 PMC6880568 · DOI
  118. [128]Johnson EL, Beal JR. Impact of a comprehensive smoke-free law following a partial smoke-free law on incidence of heart attacks at a rural community hospital. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013; 15(3): 745- 747. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts216 23024248 · DOI
  119. [129]Kabir Z, Daly S, Clarke V, Keogan S, Clancy L. Smoking ban and small-for-gestational age births in Ireland. PLoS One. 2013; 8(3): e57441. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057441 23555561 PMC3608631 · DOI
  120. [131]Kim J, Kwon HJ, Lee K,. Air quality, biomarker levels, and health effects on staff in Korean restaurants and pubs before and after a smoking ban. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015; 17(11): 1337- 1346. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv012 25649052 · DOI
  121. [132]Kong AY, Baggett CD, Gottfredson NC, Ribisl KM, Delamater PL, Golden SD. Associations of tobacco retailer availability with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease related hospital outcomes, United States, 2014. Health Place. 2021; 67: 102464. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102464 33276261 PMC7854476 · DOI
  122. [133]Landers G. The impact of smoke-free laws on asthma discharges: a multistate analysis. Am J Public Health. 2014; 104(2): e74- e79. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301697 24328638 PMC3935700 · DOI
  123. [134]Lee SL, Wong WH, Lau YL. Smoke-free legislation reduces hospital admissions for childhood lower respiratory tract infection. Tob Control. 2016; 25(e2): e90- e94. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052541 26769122 · DOI
  124. [135]Li X, Gao J, Zhang Z,. Lessons from an evaluation of a provincial-level smoking control policy in Shanghai, China. PLoS One. 2013; 8(9): e74306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074306 24058544 PMC3769237 · DOI
  125. [136]Lippert WC, Gustat J. Clean indoor air acts reduce the burden of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Public Health. 2012; 126(4): 279- 285. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2012.01.005 22342076 · DOI
  126. [137]Ma ZQ, Kuller LH, Fisher MA, Ostroff SM. Use of interrupted time-series method to evaluate the impact of cigarette excise tax increases in Pennsylvania, 2000-2009. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013; 10: E169. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120268 24135393 PMC3804017 · DOI
  127. [138]MacCalman L, Semple S, Galea KS,. The relationship between workers’ self-reported changes in health and their attitudes towards a workplace intervention: lessons from smoke-free legislation across the UK hospitality industry. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12: 324. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-324 22551087 PMC3407478 · DOI
  128. [139]Mackay D, Haw S, Ayres JG, Fischbacher C, Pell JP. Smoke-free legislation and hospitalizations for childhood asthma. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(12): 1139- 1145. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002861 20843248 · DOI
  129. [140]Mackay DF, Haw S, Newby DE,. Impact of Scotland’s comprehensive, smoke-free legislation on stroke. PLoS One. 2013; 8(5): e62597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062597 23667497 PMC3648581 · DOI
  130. [141]Mackay DF, Nelson SM, Haw SJ, Pell JP. Impact of Scotland’s smoke-free legislation on pregnancy complications: retrospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2012; 9(3): e1001175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001175 22412353 PMC3295815 · DOI
  131. [142]Madureira J, Mendes A, Teixeira JP. Evaluation of a smoke-free law on indoor air quality and on workers’ health in Portuguese restaurants. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2014; 11(4): 201- 209. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2013.852279 24579749 · DOI
  132. [143]Mallma P, Carcamo C, Kaufman JS. The impact of anti-tobacco legislation on birth weight in Peru. Glob Health Res Policy. 2020; 5: 5. doi: 10.1186/s41256-020-00136-5 32161814 PMC7048150 · DOI
  133. [144]Markowitz S. The effectiveness of cigarette regulations in reducing cases of sudden infant death syndrome. J Health Econ. 2008; 27(1): 106- 133. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.03.006 17498829 · DOI
  134. [145]Markowitz S, Adams EK, Dietz PM, Tong VT, Kannan V. Tobacco control policies, birth outcomes, and maternal human capital. J Hum Cap. 2013; 7(2): 130- 160. doi: 10.1086/671020 · DOI
  135. [146]Mayne SL, Jacobs DR Jr, Schreiner PJ, Widome R, Gordon-Larsen P, Kershaw KN. Associations of smoke-free policies in restaurants, bars, and workplaces with blood pressure changes in the CARDIA study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018; 7(23): e009829. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009829 30571595 PMC6405556 · DOI
  136. [147]McGhee SM, Wong CM, Schooling CM,. Smoke-free policies on population health outcomes. Hong Kong Med J. 2014; 20(3)(suppl 3): 36- 41. 25001035
  137. [148]Menzies D, Nair A, Williamson PA,. Respiratory symptoms, pulmonary function, and markers of inflammation among bar workers before and after a legislative ban on smoking in public places. JAMA. 2006; 296(14): 1742- 1748. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.14.1742 17032987 · DOI
  138. [150]Ozierański K, Witkowska A, Wojtyniak B,. Smoking ban in public places and myocardial infarction hospitalizations in a European country with high cardiovascular risk: insights from the Polish nationwide AMI-PL database. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2019; 129(6): 386- 391. doi: 10.20452/pamw.14862 31169258 · DOI
  139. [151]Patrick SW, Warner KE, Pordes E, Davis MM. Cigarette tax increase and infant mortality. Pediatrics. 2016; 137(1): e20152901. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-2901 26628730 PMC4702024 · DOI
  140. [152]Peelen MJ, Sheikh A, Kok M,. Tobacco control policies and perinatal health: a national quasi-experimental study. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 23907. doi: 10.1038/srep23907 27103591 PMC4840332 · DOI
  141. [154]Rajkumar S, Schmidt-Trucksäss A, Wellenius GA,. The effect of workplace smoking bans on heart rate variability and pulse wave velocity of non-smoking hospitality workers. Int J Public Health. 2014; 59(4): 577- 585. doi: 10.1007/s00038-014-0545-y 24504155 PMC4179883 · DOI
  142. [155]Rodu B, Peiper N, Cole P. Acute myocardial infarction mortality before and after state-wide smoking bans. J Community Health. 2012; 37(2): 468- 472. doi: 10.1007/s10900-011-9464-5 21877107 · DOI
  143. [156]Sargent JD, Demidenko E, Malenka DJ, Li Z, Gohlke H, Hanewinkel R. Smoking restrictions and hospitalization for acute coronary events in Germany. Clin Res Cardiol. 2012; 101(3): 227- 235. doi: 10.1007/s00392-011-0385-1 22350716 PMC3719165 · DOI
  144. [157]Sargent RP, Shepard RM, Glantz SA. Reduced incidence of admissions for myocardial infarction associated with public smoking ban: before and after study. BMJ. 2004; 328(7446): 977- 980. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38055.715683.55 15066887 PMC404491 · DOI · Paper page
  145. [158]Schoj V, Alderete M, Ruiz E, Hasdeu S, Linetzky B, Ferrante D. The impact of a 100% smoke-free law on the health of hospitality workers from the city of Neuquén, Argentina. Tob Control. 2010; 19(2): 134- 137. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.032862 20378587 PMC2989166 · DOI
  146. [159]Sen A, Piérard E. Estimating the effects of cigarette taxes on birth outcomes. Can Public Policy. 2011; 37(2): 257- 276. doi: 10.3138/cpp.37.2.257 22073425 · DOI
  147. [161]Shelley D, Yerneni R, Hung D, Das D, Fahs M. The relative effect of household and workplace smoking restriction on health status among Chinese Americans living in New York City. J Urban Health. 2007; 84(3): 360- 371. doi: 10.1007/s11524-007-9190-6 17410472 PMC2231828 · DOI
  148. [162]Shetty KD, DeLeire T, White C, Bhattacharya J. Changes in U.S. hospitalization and mortality rates following smoking bans. J Policy Anal Manage. 2010; 30(1): 6- 28. doi: 10.1002/pam.20548 21465828 · DOI
  149. [163]Simón L, Pastor-Barriuso R, Boldo E,. Smoke-free legislation in Spain and prematurity. Pediatrics. 2017; 139(6): e20162068. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2068 28562257 · DOI
  150. [164]Sims M, Maxwell R, Bauld L, Gilmore A. Short term impact of smoke-free legislation in England: retrospective analysis of hospital admissions for myocardial infarction. BMJ. 2010; 340: c2161. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2161 20530563 PMC2882555 · DOI
  151. [165]Thach TQ, McGhee SM, So JC,. The smoke-free legislation in Hong Kong: its impact on mortality. Tob Control. 2016; 25(6): 685- 691. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052496 26585706 · DOI
  152. [166]Trachsel LD, Kuhn MU, Reinhart WH, Schulzki T, Bonetti PO. Reduced incidence of acute myocardial infarction in the first year after implementation of a public smoking ban in Graubuenden, Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2010; 140(9-10): 133- 138. 20069475
  153. [167]Di Valentino M, Muzzarelli S, Limoni C,. Reduction of ST-elevation myocardial infarction in Canton Ticino (Switzerland) after smoking bans in enclosed public places—No Smoke Pub Study. Eur J Public Health. 2015; 25(2): 195- 199. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku067 24895081 · DOI
  154. [168]Vander Weg MW, Rosenthal GE, Vaughan Sarrazin M. Smoking bans linked to lower hospitalizations for heart attacks and lung disease among medicare beneficiaries. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012; 31(12): 2699- 2707. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0385 23213154 · DOI
  155. [169]Vartiainen E. The North Karelia Project: cardiovascular disease prevention in Finland. Glob Cardiol Sci Pract. 2018; 2018(2): 13. doi: 10.21542/gcsp.2018.13 30083543 PMC6062761 · DOI
  156. [170]Vicedo-Cabrera AM, Röösli M, Radovanovic D,. Cardiorespiratory hospitalisation and mortality reductions after smoking bans in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2016; 146: w14381. doi: 10.4414/smw.2016.14381 28102874 · DOI
  157. [171]Vicedo-Cabrera AM, Schindler C, Radovanovic D,. Benefits of smoking bans on preterm and early-term births: a natural experimental design in Switzerland. Tob Control. 2016; 25(e2): e135- e141. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052739 27118814 · DOI
  158. [172]Weaver AM, Wang Y, Rupp K, Watson DP. Effects of smoke-free air law on acute myocardial infarction hospitalization in Indianapolis and Marion County, Indiana. BMC Public Health. 2018; 18(1): 232. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5153-y 29426315 PMC5810184 · DOI
  159. [173]Wilson T, Shamo F, Boynton K, Kiley J. The impact of Michigan’s Dr Ron Davis smoke-free air law on levels of cotinine, tobacco-specific lung carcinogen and severity of self-reported respiratory symptoms among non-smoking bar employees. Tob Control. 2012; 21(6): 593- 595. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050328 22705599 · DOI
  160. [174]Wu Y, Wang Z, Zheng Y,. The impact of comprehensive tobacco control policies on cardiovascular diseases in Beijing, China. Addiction. 2021; 116(8): 2175- 2184. doi: 10.1111/add.15406 33404152 · DOI
  161. [175]Yan J. The effects of a minimum cigarette purchase age of 21 on prenatal smoking and infant health. East Econ J. 2014; 40(3): 289- 308. doi: 10.1057/eej.2013.42 · DOI
  162. [176]Yıldız F, Barış SA, Başyiğit I, Boyacı H, Aydınlık H, Sönmez PÖ. Role of smoke-free legislation on emergency department admissions for smoking-related diseases in Kocaeli, Turkey. East Mediterr Health J. 2015; 20(12): 774- 780. doi: 10.26719/2014.20.12.774 25664515 · DOI
  163. [177]Flor LS, Reitsma MB, Gupta V, Ng M, Gakidou E. The effects of tobacco control policies on global smoking prevalence. Nat Med. 2021; 27(2): 239- 243. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-01210-8 33479500 PMC7884287 · DOI · Paper page
  164. [178]Levy DT, Tam J, Kuo C, Fong GT, Chaloupka F. The impact of implementing tobacco control policies: the 2017 Tobacco Control Policy Scorecard. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018; 24(5): 448- 457. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000780 29346189 PMC6050159 · DOI · Paper page
  165. [179]Pechacek TF, Babb S. How acute and reversible are the cardiovascular risks of secondhand smoke? BMJ. 2004; 328(7446): 980- 983. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7446.980 15105323 PMC404492 · DOI
  166. [180]Otsuka R, Watanabe H, Hirata K,. Acute effects of passive smoking on the coronary circulation in healthy young adults. JAMA. 2001; 286(4): 436- 441. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.4.436 11466122 · DOI
  167. [181]Eisner MD, Iribarren C, Yelin EH,. The impact of SHS exposure on health status and exacerbations among patients with COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2009; 4: 169- 176. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S4681 19516915 PMC2685143 · DOI
  168. [182]Eisner MD, Balmes J, Yelin EH,. Directly measured secondhand smoke exposure and COPD health outcomes. BMC Pulm Med. 2006; 6: 12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-6-12 16756671 PMC1524811 · DOI
  169. [183]Faber T, Been JV, Reiss IK, Mackenbach JP, Sheikh A. Smoke-free legislation and child health. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2016; 26: 16067. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.67 27853176 PMC5113157 · DOI
  170. [184]Goodwin RD. Impact of cannabis use on nicotine and tobacco use outcomes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020; 22(8): 1257- 1259. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa096 32480403 PMC7364827 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akter, S., Islam, M. R., Rahman, M. M., Rouyard, T., Nsashiyi, R. S., Hossain, F., & Nakamura, R.
Affiliations
  • Hitotsubashi University (JP)
  • Institute for Nature, Health, and Agricultural Research (INHAR), Yaoundé, Cameroon
  • Global Public Health Research Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Corresponding author
Nakamura, Ryota
ORCID
Venue
JAMA Network Open
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
2023-07-07
Volume
6
Issue
7
Pages
e2322341
ISSN
2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.22341
PMC
PMC10329215
OpenAlex
W4383484460
Cited by
57
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21H04396)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
tobacco control, smoking bans, tobacco taxation, tobacco price increases, cardiovascular disease, respiratory diseases, cancer, mortality, hospitalization, health care utilization, low birth weight, preterm birth, adverse birth outcomes, population health outcomes, non-communicable diseases, perinatal health, country income level
MeSH terms
Tobacco Control, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Premature Birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review