Cited by 286Smoking Behavior and CessationPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsCardiac Health and Mental Health

Risk of serious adverse cardiovascular events associated with varenicline: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Singh, S., Loke, Y. K., Spangler, J. G., Furberg, C. D.·2011·Canadian Medical Association Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There have been postmarketing reports of adverse cardiovascular events associated with the use of varenicline, a widely used smoking cessation drug. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to ascertain the serious adverse cardiovascular effects of varenicline compared with placebo among tobacco users. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, websites of regulatory authorities and registries of clinical trials, with no date or language restrictions, through September 2010 (updated March 2011) for published and unpublished studies. We selected double-blind randomized controlled trials of at least one week's duration involving smokers or people who used smokeless tobacco that reported on cardiovascular events (ischemia, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, sudden death or cardiovascular-related death) as serious adverse events asociated with the use of varenicline. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 14 double-blind randomized controlled trials involving 8216 participants. The trials ranged in duration from 7 to 52 weeks. Varenicline was associated with a significantly increased risk of serious adverse cardiovascular events compared with placebo (1.06% [52/4908] in varenicline group v. 0.82% [27/3308] in placebo group; Peto odds ratio [OR] 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-2.71; I(2) = 0%). The results of various sensitivity analyses were consistent with those of the main analysis, and a funnel plot showed no publication bias. There were too few deaths to allow meaningful comparisons of mortality. INTERPRETATION: Our meta-analysis raises safety concerns about the potential for an increased risk of serious adverse cardiovascular events associated with the use of varenicline among tobacco users.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1503/cmaj.110218

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A meta-analysis of 14 randomized trials (8216 patients) found a small but significant rise in cardiovascular events with varenicline.

    “A meta-analysis based on 14 RCTs including 8216 patients has indicated a small but significantly increased risk of cardiovascular events associated with the use of varenicline.262”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Josefberg H. Approval package for: application number NDA 21- 928 [clinical safety review: varenicline tartrate]. Rockville (MD): US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; 2006. p. 277, 402. Available: www .accessdata .fda .gov /drugsatfda _docs /nda /2006 /021928 _s000 _Chantix _MedR .pdf (ac cessed 2011 Apr. 14).
  2. Montastruc G, Degand B, Montastruc JL, et al. Cardiac arrest with varenicline: a case report [article in French]. Therapie 2009; 64: 65-6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, S., Loke, Y. K., Spangler, J. G., & Furberg, C. D.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Canadian Medical Association Journal
Published
2011-07-04
Volume
183
Issue
12
Pages
1359-1366
ISSN
  • 0820-3946 (ISSN-L)
  • 1488-2329
OpenAlex
W2160161905
Cited by
286
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 56
FWCI
5.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Medical Association Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (KL2RR025006)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
varenicline, cardiovascular adverse events, smoking cessation, nicotine replacement therapy, myocardial ischemia, cardiac arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, sudden death, tobacco users, drug safety
MeSH terms
Varenicline, Benzazepines, Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Product Surveillance, Postmarketing, Quinoxalines, Risk, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Nicotinic Agonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review