Cited by 400Social and Intergroup PsychologyCultural Identity and RepresentationSocial Power and Status Dynamics

Chapter 6 Social Identity Theory

Hogg, Michael A.·2006·Contemporary Social Psychological Theories

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9780804768047-008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These findings indicate there may be an in-group advantage for moral contagion; moral-emotional language may spread more widely within in-group networks than out-group networks.

    “These findings indicate there may be an in-group advantage (22,33) for moral contagion; that is, moral-emotional language may spread more widely within in-group networks than out-group networks”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hogg, M. A.
Corresponding author
Hogg, Michael A.
Venue
Contemporary Social Psychological Theories
Published
2006-05-01
Pages
111-136
OpenAlex
W4299968645
Cited by
400
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
FWCI
28.44
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Stanford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Cultural Identity and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
social identity theory, social identity, group identity, intergroup relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review