Cited by 8Advanced Glycation End Products researchDiabetes Management and ResearchChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes

Elevated endogenous secretory receptor for advanced glycation end products (esRAGE) levels are associated with circulating soluble RAGE levels in diabetic children

Saito, Reiko, Araki, Shunsuke, Yamamoto, Yukiyo, Kusuhara, Koichi·2017·Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism

Abstract

Background: Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and the receptor for AGE (RAGE) play an important role in the development of diabetic vascular complications. This study aimed at investigating the relationship between the soluble form of RAGE (sRAGE), endogenous secretory RAGE (esRAGE), and pentosidine in childhood diabetes. Methods: The study included 18 children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), 10 with type 2 DM (T2DM), and 22 age-matched, non-diabetic children (control). Results: Serum sRAGE levels in the T1DM (2557.7 pg/mL) were significantly higher than both T2DM (1956.4 pg/mL) and control (1658.5 pg/mL). The circulating levels of esRAGE in T1DM and T2DM children were similar, but significantly higher than those of control. Serum pentosidine levels in the T1DM group were positively correlated with serum sRAGE and esRAGE levels, but not with anthropometric or biochemical measurements. The duration of diabetes and esRAGE levels were independent predictors of the circulating sRAGE levels. Conclusions: Unlike adults, children with diabetes exhibit high circulating esRAGE levels, and both sRAGE and esRAGE levels are correlated with pentosidine levels. These results suggest that circulating sRAGE and esRAGE in children may be surrogate markers for progressive glucose toxicity in pediatric patients with childhood-onset diabetes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/jpem-2016-0262

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saito, R., Araki, S., Yamamoto, Y., & Kusuhara, K.
Affiliations
University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan (JP)
Corresponding author
Araki, Shunsuke
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism
Published
2017-01-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
63-69
ISSN
  • 0334-018X (ISSN-L)
  • 2191-0251
OpenAlex
W2563062922
Cited by
8
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (26461535)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Advanced Glycation End Products research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Keywords
advanced glycation end products, receptor for advanced glycation end products, soluble RAGE, pentosidine, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, pediatric diabetes, diabetic vascular complications, glucotoxicity, biomarkers, diabetes duration
MeSH terms
Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Prognosis, Biomarkers, Glycation End Products, Advanced, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review