Cited by 11Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal AbnormalitiesSexual Differentiation and DisordersReproductive Biology and Fertility

Karyotype is associated with timing of ovarian failure in women with Turner syndrome

Fitz, Victoria W., Law, Jennifer R., Peavey, Mary·2021·Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the age of ovarian failure in Turner Syndrome (TS) patients by karyotype. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of individuals with TS at an academic university hospital. Subjects were seen in TS Clinic at UNC Hospital between 2014 and 2018. Individuals were analyzed by karyotype category (45X, 45X/46XX mosaicism, miscellaneous) and percentage of 45X cells. Age at follicle-stimulating hormone> 30 was defined as the age at loss of ovarian function. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients were identified after excluding individuals with unknown ovarian function and those with Y chromosome material. Thirty-eight percent were 45X monosomic, 62% were 45X/46XX mosaic or miscellaneous karyotypes. Fifty-five of 79 (70%) patients had evidence of ovarian failure, median age of failure 11 years (IQR: 4,12). Ovarian failure was more prevalent among individuals with 45X karyotype (100%). The median age of ovarian failure for 45X patients (n=30) was 10 years old, which is significantly younger than other karyotypes (n=49), with a median of 15 years, p<0.01. Linear regression analysis found that 1 percentage point increase in 45X cells in the peripheral karyotype is associated with a 0.09 year decrease in age of ovarian failure (p value=0.01). Only 9% of individuals were referred for fertility counseling. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lower prevalence of ovarian failure among individuals with mosaic TS karyotypes, and referral rate for fertility counseling of patients with TS is low. These findings are in line with published literature. The finding that percentage of 45X cells in peripheral karyotype is associated with earlier age of ovarian failure is novel and warrants further investigation in a larger prospective cohort.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/jpem-2020-0304

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fitz, V. W., Law, J. R., & Peavey, M.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Fitz, Victoria W.
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism
Published
2021-02-26
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
319-323
ISSN
  • 0334-018X (ISSN-L)
  • 2191-0251
OpenAlex
W3133739511
Cited by
11
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
Turner syndrome, ovarian failure, karyotype, follicle-stimulating hormone, fertility counseling
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Child, Female, Humans, Mosaicism, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Turner Syndrome, Primary Ovarian Insufficiency, Karyotype

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review