The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems
Abstract
Methodologies for the empirical measurement of situation awareness are reviewed, including a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of each method and the potential limitations of the measures from a theoretical and practical viewpoint. Two studies are presented that investigate questions of validity and intrusiveness regarding a query-based technique. This technique requires that a simulation of the operational tasks be momentarily interrupted in order to query operators on their situation awareness. The results of the two studies indicate that the query technique is not intrusive on normal subject behavior during the trial and does not suffer from limitations of human memory, which provides an indication of empirical validity. The results of other validity studies regarding the technique are discussed along with recommendations for its use in measuring situation awareness in varied settings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Situation Awareness (SA) theory conceptualizes reasoning as a progression through three stages: Perception (noticing elements), Comprehension (interpreting their meaning), and Projection (anticipating consequences) [21, 22].”
From Criticmate: Stagewise Human–AI Co-Critique in Single-Screen UI Evaluation (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“expert evaluators naturally distribute their work across Perception , Comprehension , and Projection [21, 22], weaving together global and local reasoning and gradually moving from surface checks toward root-cause diagnosis.”
From Criticmate: Stagewise Human–AI Co-Critique in Single-Screen UI Evaluation (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cites
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 3×
“est and the administration of the questionnaire (Nisbett and Wilson, 1977).”
BackgroundInfluentialChase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90004-2 · Cited by 4,479
On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.
Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.110.3.306 · Cited by 2,562
Interaction of information in word recognition.
Morton, J. (1969) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0027366 · Cited by 2,206
Cowan, N. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.104.2.163 · Cited by 1,918
How many memory systems are there?
Tulving, E. (1985) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.40.4.385 · Cited by 1,909
Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT)
Endsley, M. R. (2003) · Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference · doi:10.1109/naecon.1988.195097 · Cited by 956
Self-citationToward a theory of memory and attention.
Norman, D. A. (1968) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0026699 · Cited by 786
Situational Awareness Rating Technique (Sart): The Development of a Tool for Aircrew Systems Design
Taylor, R. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315087924-8 · Cited by 530
Situation Awareness: A Critical But Ill-Defined Phenomenon
Sarter, N. B., & Woods, D. D. (1991) · International Journal of Aviation Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0101_4 · Cited by 524
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Bolstad, C. A., 1990, Single versus dual scale range display investigation
- Carmody, M. A., 1993, Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 167
- Endsley, M. R., 1987, SAGAT: A methodology for the measurement of situation awareness
- Endsley, M. R., 1989, Final report: Situation awareness in an advanced strategic mission
- Endsley, M. R., 1989, Tactical simulation 3 test report: Addendum 1 situation awareness evaluations
- Endsley, M. R., 1990, In Situational awareness in aerospace operations
- Endsley, M. R., 1990, Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT): Air-to-air tactical version user guide
- Endsley, M. R., 1990, Situation awareness in dynamic human decision making: Theory and measurement.
- Endsley, M. R., 1994, Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT): En route air traffic control version user's guide
- Fracker, M. L., 1990, Situational awareness in aerospace operations, 6/1
- Herrmann, D. J., 1984, Everyday memory, action and absent-mindedness, 133
- Hogg, D. N., 1993, A situation awareness methodology for the evaluation of process control systems: Studies of feasibility and the implication of use
- Hughes, E. R., 1990, Advanced tactical fighter (ATF) simulation support: Final report
- 10.1037/0096-3445.110.3.306 · DOI
- McDonnell Douglas Aircraft Corporation, 1982, Advanced medium-range air-to-air missile operational utility evaluation (AMRAAM OUE) test final report.
- Mogford, R. H., Presented at the Human Factors Society of Canada Annual Meeting
- Northrop Corporation, 1988, Tactical simulation 2 test report: Addendum 1 situation awareness test results.
- Pew, R. W. (1991). Defining and measuring situation awareness in the commercial aircraft cockpit. In Proceedings of the Conference on Challenges in Aviation Human Factors: The National Plan (pp. 30–31). Washington, DC: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
- Selcon, S. J., 1990, Situational awareness in aerospace operations
- Sheehy, E. J., Presented at the ANS Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control and Man-Machine Interface Technology
- Smolensky, M. W. (1993). Toward the physiological measurement of situation awareness: The case for eye movement measurements. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting (p. 41). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
- Venturino, M., 1990, Performance-based measures of merit for tactical situation awareness
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Borghini, G., Laura Astolfi, A., Vecchiato, G., Donatella Mattia, A., & Babiloni, F. (2012) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.10.003 · Cited by 1,346
ENDSLEY, M. R., & KABER, D. B. (1999) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/001401399185595 · Cited by 1,088
Self-citationTheoretical Underpinnings of Situation Awareness, A Critical Review
Endsley, M. R. (2000) · doi:10.1201/b12461-7 · Cited by 902
Self-citationInternet of Things: Converging Technologies for Smart Environments and Integrated Ecosystems
Vermesan, O., & Friess, P. (2013) · Cited by 873
Making Sense of Sensemaking 1: Alternative Perspectives
Klein, G. A., Moon, B., & Hoffman, R. R. (2006) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2006.75 · Cited by 848
KABER, D. B., & Endsley, M. R. (2004) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1463922021000054335 · Cited by 854
Self-citationCommon metrics for human-robot interaction
Steinfeld, A. M., Fong, T., KABER, D. B., Lewis, M., Scholtz, J. C., Schultz, A. C., & Goodrich, M. A. (2006) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/1121241.1121249 · Cited by 771
Driver Inattention Monitoring System for Intelligent Vehicles: A Review
Dong, Y., Hu, Z., Uchimura, K., & Murayama, N. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2010.2092770 · Cited by 732
Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T., & Wickens, C. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1518/155534308x284417 · Cited by 729
The Situational Eight DIAMONDS: A taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics.
Rauthmann, J. F., Gallardo‐Pujol, D., Guillaume, E. M., Todd, E., Nave, C. S., Sherman, R. A., Ziegler, M. D., Jones, A. B., & Funder, D. C. (2014) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037250 · Cited by 648
Koo, J., Kwac, J., Ju, W. G., Steinert, M., LEIFER, L. J., & Nass, C. (2014) · International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) · doi:10.1007/s12008-014-0227-2 · Cited by 495
Dinev, T., & Hu, Q. (2007) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00133 · Cited by 451
Principles of Situation Research: Towards a Better Understanding of Psychological Situations
Rauthmann, J. F., Sherman, R. A., & Funder, D. C. (2015) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.1994 · Cited by 444
Situation awareness measurement: A review of applicability for C4i environments
Salmon, P. M., Stanton, N. A., Walker, G. H., & Green, D. (2005) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2005.02.001 · Cited by 391
Towards a cognitive approach to human–machine cooperation in dynamic situations
HOC, J.-M. (2001) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.2000.0454 · Cited by 387
Visual attention and the transition from novice to advanced driver
Underwood, G. (2007) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140130701318707 · Cited by 375
Yeo, G., & Neal, A. F. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.231 · Cited by 368
Measuring Situation Awareness in complex systems: Comparison of measures study
Salmon, P. M., Stanton, N. A., Walker, G. H., Jenkins, D., Ladva, D., Rafferty, L. A., & Young, M. S. (2008) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2008.10.010 · Cited by 362
What really is going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams
Salmon, P. M., Stanton, N. A., Walker, G. H., Baber, C., Jenkins, D. P., McMaster, R., & Young, M. S. (2008) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/14639220701561775 · Cited by 360
Complex problem solving: a case for complex cognition?
Funke, J. (2009) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-009-0345-0 · Cited by 380
Wickens, C. D. (2008) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872008x288420 · Cited by 338
Passenger and cell phone conversations in simulated driving.
Drews, F. A., Pasupathi, M., & Strayer, D. L. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/a0013119 · Cited by 336
Direct Measurement of Situation Awareness: Validity and Use of SAGAT
Endsley, M. R. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315087924-9 · Cited by 336
Self-citationControl Task Substitution in Semiautomated Driving
Carsten, O., Lai, F. C. H., Barnard, Y. F., Jamson, A. H., & Merat, N. (2012) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720812460246 · Cited by 334
Turner, K., & McCarthy, V. L. (2016) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2016.11.002 · Cited by 305
Driving simulator validation with hazard perception
Underwood, G., Crundall, D. E., & Chapman, P. (2011) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2011.04.008 · Cited by 302
Measuring team situation awareness in decentralized command and control environments
Gorman, J. C., Cooke, N. J., & Winner, J. L. (2006) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140130600612788 · Cited by 297
Situation awareness and workload in driving while using adaptive cruise control and a cell phone
Ma, R., & KABER, D. B. (2005) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2005.04.002 · Cited by 290
A Comparative Analysis of Sagat and Sart for Evaluations of Situation Awareness
Endsley, M. R., Selcon, S. J., Hardiman, T. D., & Croft, D. G. (1998) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193129804200119 · Cited by 288
Self-citationAuditory Distraction and Short-Term Memory: Phenomena and Practical Implications
Banbury, S. P., Macken, W. J., Tremblay, S., & Jones, D. M. (2001) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872001775992462 · Cited by 280
Objective measures of situation awareness in a simulated medical environment
Wright, M. C. (2004) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/qshc.2004.009951 · Cited by 262
Advances in measuring team cognition.
Cooke, N. J., Eduardo Salas, A., Kiekel, P. A., & Bell, B. (2004) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10690-005 · Cited by 257
Situation Awareness in Anesthesia: Concept and Research
Schulz, C. M., Endsley, M. R., Kochs, E. F., Gelb, A. W., & Wagner, K. J. (2013) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e318280a40f · Cited by 257
Self-citationEndsley, M. R. (2019) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720819875376 · Cited by 250
Self-citationBrady, P. W., Muething, S. E., Kotagal, U. R., Ashby, M., Gallagher, R., Hall, D., Goodfriend, M., White, C. M., Bracke, T. M., DeCastro, V., et al. (2012) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2012-1364 · Cited by 236
Awareness and teamwork in computer-supported collaborations
Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., Convertino, G., & Ganoe, C. H. (2005) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2005.05.005 · Cited by 231
Physiological Measurements of Situation Awareness: A Systematic Review
Zhang, T., Yang, J., Liang, N., Pitts, B. J., Prakah-Asante, K. O., Curry, R., Duerstock, B. S., Wachs, J. P., & Yu, D. (2020) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720820969071 · Cited by 228
Situation awareness during driving: Explicit and implicit knowledge in dynamic spatial memory.
Gugerty, L. J. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.3.1.42 · Cited by 227
Flow in Knowledge Work: High Performance Experience in the Design of National Security Technology
Quinn, R. W. (2005) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.50.4.610 · Cited by 238
Minds “At Attention”: Mindfulness Training Curbs Attentional Lapses in Military Cohorts
Jha, A. P., Morrison, A. B., Dainer‐Best, J., Parker, S. C., Rostrup, N., & Stanley, E. A. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0116889 · Cited by 245
Making patient safety the focus: Crisis Resource Management in the undergraduate curriculum
Flanagan, B. T., Nestel, D., & Joseph, M. (2004) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2004.01701.x · Cited by 225
Information control and terrorism: Tracking the Mumbai terrorist attack through twitter
Oh, O., Agrawal, M., & Rao, H. (2011) · Inf. Syst. Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-010-9275-8 · Cited by 230
Huddling for high reliability and situation awareness
Goldenhar, L. M., Brady, P. W., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Muething, S. E. (2013) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001467 · Cited by 228
Supervisory Control of Multiple Robots: Human-Performance Issues and User-Interface Design
Chen, J. Y. C., Barnes, M., & Harper-Sciarini, M. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2010.2056682 · Cited by 246
Xing, Y., Lv, C., Cao, D., & Hang, P. (2021) · Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2021.103199 · Cited by 231
Hannah, S. T., Balthazard, P. A., Waldman, D. A., Jennings, P. L., & Thatcher, R. W. (2013) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0032257 · Cited by 226
Decision Making in Complex Naval Command-and-Control Environments
Kaempf, G. L., Klein, G. A., Thordsen, M. L., & WOLF, S. (1996) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872089606380204 · Cited by 207
Zhou, F., Yang, X. J., & de Winter, J. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2021.3069776 · Cited by 206
Situation Awareness In Aviation Systems
Endsley, M. R. (1999) · Cited by 200
Self-citationThe role of shared mental models in human-AI teams: a theoretical review
Andrews, R. W., Lilly, J. M., Srivastava, D., & Feigh, K. M. (2022) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1463922x.2022.2061080 · Cited by 231
Kinateder, M. T., Kuligowski, E. D., Reneke, P. A., & Peacock, R. D. (2015) · Fire Science Reviews · doi:10.1186/s40038-014-0005-z · Cited by 212
Chen, J., Song, X., & Lin, Z. (2016) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2015.12.018 · Cited by 204
Beyond monitoring: distributed situation awareness in anaesthesia
Fioratou, E., Flin, R. H., Glavin, R., & Patey, R. E. (2010) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aeq137 · Cited by 192
A Review of Situation Awareness Assessment Approaches in Aviation Environments
Nguyen, T. T., Lim, C. P., Nguyen, N. D., Gordon-Brown, L., & Nahavandi, S. (2019) · IEEE Systems Journal · doi:10.1109/jsyst.2019.2918283 · Cited by 192
Eye Movements as an Indicator of Situation Awareness in a Flight Simulator Experiment
van de Merwe, K., van Dijk, H., & Zon, R. (2012) · International Journal of Aviation Psychology · doi:10.1080/10508414.2012.635129 · Cited by 189
Parasuraman, R., Cosenzo, K. A., & de Visser, E. J. (2009) · Military Psychology · doi:10.1080/08995600902768800 · Cited by 188
Naturalistic Decision Making and Macrocognition
Maarten, S. J., Militello, L. G., Ormerod, T., & Lipshitz, R. (2017) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315597584 · Cited by 187
Using Formal Verification to Evaluate Human-Automation Interaction: A Review
Bolton, M. L., Bass, E. J., & Siminiceanu, R. I. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems · doi:10.1109/tsmca.2012.2210406 · Cited by 173
Practice Is Protective: Mindfulness Training Promotes Cognitive Resilience in High-Stress Cohorts
Jha, A. P., Morrison, A. B., Parker, S. C., & Stanley, E. A. (2016) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-015-0465-9 · Cited by 189
Psychological Antecedents of Risk-Taking Behavior in Construction
Tixier, A. J. ‐., Hallowell, M. R., Albert, A., Leaf Van Boven, A., & Kleiner, B. M. (2014) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000894 · Cited by 175
Human Error in Maritime Operations: Analyses of Accident Reports Using the Leximancer Tool
Grech, M. R., Horberry, T., & Smith, A. (2002) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193120204601906 · Cited by 169
Choi, B., Jebelli, H., & Lee, S. H. (2019) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.01.022 · Cited by 165
Situational Awareness, Driver’s Trust in Automated Driving Systems and Secondary Task Performance
Petersen, L., Robert, L., Yang, X. J., & Tilbury, D. M. (2019) · SAE International Journal of Connected and Automated Vehicles · doi:10.4271/12-02-02-0009 · Cited by 178
MarkVollrath, Schleicher, S., & Gelau, C. (2011) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.023 · Cited by 158
Understanding diagnostic errors in medicine: a lesson from aviation
Singh, H. (2006) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.2005.016444 · Cited by 156
Evaluation of Ecological Interface Design for Nuclear Process Control: Situation Awareness Effects
Burns, C. M., Skraaning, G., Jamieson, G. A., Lau, N. K. C., Kwok, J., Welch, R., & Andresen, G. (2008) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872008x312305 · Cited by 153
Situation awareness based on eye movements in relation to the task environment
de Winter, J., Eisma, Y. B., Cabrall, C. D. D., Hancock, P. A., & Stanton, N. A. (2018) · Cognition Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-018-0527-6 · Cited by 150
Measuring team-related expertise in complex environments.
Smith‐Jentsch, K. A., Johnston, J. H., & Payne, S. C. (1998) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10278-003 · Cited by 147
KABER, D. B., Perry, C. M., Segall, N., McClernon, C. K., & Prinzel, L. J. (2006) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2006.01.008 · Cited by 146
HOGG, D. N., FOLLES⊘, K., STRAND-VOLDEN, F., & Torralba, B. (1995) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139508925275 · Cited by 146
Human factors in preventing complications in anaesthesia: a systematic review
Jones, C. P. L., Fawkner-Corbett, J., Groom, P., Morton, B., Lister, C., & Mercer, S. J. (2018) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/anae.14136 · Cited by 151
Is situation awareness all in the mind?
Stanton, N. A., Salmon, P. M., Walker, G. H., & Jenkins, D. P. (2009) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/14639220903009938 · Cited by 143
Saus, E.-R., Johnsen, B. H., Eid, J., Riisem, P. K., Andersen, R., & Thayer, J. F. (2006) · Military Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327876mp1803s_2 · Cited by 141
McKendrick, R. D., Parasuraman, R., Murtza, R., Formwalt, A., Baccus, W., Paczynski, M., & Ayaz, H. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00216 · Cited by 153
Predicting Controller Capacity in Supervisory Control of Multiple UAVs
Cummings, M. L., & Mitchell, P. J. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and Humans · doi:10.1109/tsmca.2007.914757 · Cited by 140
Eduardo Salas, A., Maurino, D., & Curtis, M. T. (2010) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-374518-7.00001-8 · Cited by 140
Situation awareness in power systems: Theory, challenges and applications
Panteli, M., & Kirschen, D. S. (2015) · Electric Power Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2015.01.008 · Cited by 139
Trauma Resuscitation Errors and Computer-Assisted Decision Support
Fitzgerald, M. (2011) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.2010.333 · Cited by 139
Hudlická, E., & McNeese, M. D. (2002) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1023/a:1013337427135 · Cited by 140
Video-based road commentary training improves hazard perception of young drivers in a dual task
Isler, R. B., Starkey, N. J., & Williamson, A. (2009) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2008.12.016 · Cited by 147
Orchestrating Human-Centered Design
Boy, G. A. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-4339-0 · Cited by 134
Evaluation of high fidelity patient simulator in assessment of performance of anaesthetists
Weller, J. M., Bloch, M., Young, S., Maze, M., Oyesola, S., Wyner, J., Dob, D. P., Haire, K., Durbridge, J., Walker, T., et al. (2002) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/90.1.43 · Cited by 130
The Divergence of Objective and Subjective Situation Awareness: A Meta-Analysis
Endsley, M. R. (2019) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/1555343419874248 · Cited by 128
Self-citationOn the value of Virtual Worlds for collaborative design
Koutsabasis, P., Vosinakis, S., Malisova, K., & Paparounas, N. (2011) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/j.destud.2011.11.004 · Cited by 127
Salmon, P. M., Stanton, N. A., & Young, K. L. (2011) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1463922x.2010.539289 · Cited by 124
A Methodology for Enhancing Crew Resource Management Training
Eduardo Salas, A., Prince, C., Bowers, C. A., Stout, R. J., Oser, R. L., & Cannon‐Bowers, J. A. (1999) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872099779577255 · Cited by 124
Patient safety: latent risk factors
van Beuzekom, M., Boer, F., Akerboom, S., & Hudson, P. T. W. (2010) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aeq135 · Cited by 123
Agent Transparency: A Review of Current Theory and Evidence
Bhaskara, A., Skinner, M., & Loft, S. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2020.2965529 · Cited by 95
Towards Effective Interface Designs for Collaborative HRI in Manufacturing
Marvel, J. A., Bagchi, S., Zimmerman, M., & Antonishek, B. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3385009 · Cited by 133
Endsley, M. R. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119636113.ch17 · Cited by 120
Self-citationAssessment of operator's situation awareness for smart operation of mobile cranes
Fang, Y., Cho, Y. K., Durso, F., & Seo, J. (2017) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2017.10.007 · Cited by 119
Sanneman, L., & Shah, J. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2081282 · Cited by 118
WORKSPACE AWARENESS IN REAL-TIME DISTRIBUTED GROUPWARE
Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (1995) · Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · doi:10.11575/prism/20172 · Cited by 118
Situation Models: An Avenue to the Modeling of Mental Models
Endsley, M. R. (2000) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193120004400117 · Cited by 117
Self-citationSituation Awareness: Understanding Dynamic Environments
Durso, F. T., & Sethumadhavan, A. (2008) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872008x288448 · Cited by 116
Sohn, Y. W., & Doane, S. M. (2004) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.46.3.461.50392 · Cited by 120
Resource management coordination with level 2/3 fusion issues and challenges [Panel Report]
Blasch, E., Salerno, J., Kadar, I., Hintz, K. J., Biermann, J., & Das, S. K. (2008) · IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine · doi:10.1109/maes.2008.4476103 · Cited by 112
Matsas, E., Vosniakos, G.-C., & Batras, D. (2017) · Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2017.09.005 · Cited by 111
Development of a Novel Measure of Situation Awareness: The Case for Eye Movement Analysis
Moore, K. S., & Gugerty, L. J. (2010) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193121005401961 · Cited by 111
Acting under uncertainty: The core-task analysis in ecological study of work
Norros, L. (2004) · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Endsley, M. R.
- Affiliations
- Texas Tech University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Endsley, Mica R.
- ORCID
- Endsley, Mica R.
- Venue
- Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 65-84
- ISSN
- 0018-7208 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-8181
- OpenAlex
- W2069757512
- Cited by
- 2,039
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 90 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 126 · 2018: 88 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 97 · 2015: 105 · 2014: 85 · 2013: 76 · 2012: 72
- FWCI
- 27.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Military Strategy and Technology
- Keywords
- situational awareness, situation awareness measurement, measurement validity, intrusiveness, dynamical systems, operator performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review