The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems
Abstract
Methodologies for the empirical measurement of situation awareness are reviewed, including a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of each method and the potential limitations of the measures from a theoretical and practical viewpoint. Two studies are presented that investigate questions of validity and intrusiveness regarding a query-based technique. This technique requires that a simulation of the operational tasks be momentarily interrupted in order to query operators on their situation awareness. The results of the two studies indicate that the query technique is not intrusive on normal subject behavior during the trial and does not suffer from limitations of human memory, which provides an indication of empirical validity. The results of other validity studies regarding the technique are discussed along with recommendations for its use in measuring situation awareness in varied settings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Situation Awareness (SA) theory conceptualizes reasoning as a progression through three stages: Perception (noticing elements), Comprehension (interpreting their meaning), and Projection (anticipating consequences) [21, 22].”
From Criticmate: Stagewise Human–AI Co-Critique in Single-Screen UI Evaluation (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“expert evaluators naturally distribute their work across Perception , Comprehension , and Projection [21, 22], weaving together global and local reasoning and gradually moving from surface checks toward root-cause diagnosis.”
From Criticmate: Stagewise Human–AI Co-Critique in Single-Screen UI Evaluation (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cites
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 3×
“est and the administration of the questionnaire (Nisbett and Wilson, 1977).”
BackgroundInfluentialChase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90004-2 · Cited by 4,479
On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.
Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.110.3.306 · Cited by 2,562
Interaction of information in word recognition.
Morton, J. (1969) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0027366 · Cited by 2,206
Cowan, N. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.104.2.163 · Cited by 1,918
How many memory systems are there?
Tulving, E. (1985) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.40.4.385 · Cited by 1,909
Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT)
Endsley, M. R. (2003) · Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference · doi:10.1109/naecon.1988.195097 · Cited by 956
Self-citationToward a theory of memory and attention.
Norman, D. A. (1968) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0026699 · Cited by 786
Situational Awareness Rating Technique (Sart): The Development of a Tool for Aircrew Systems Design
Taylor, R. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315087924-8 · Cited by 530
Situation Awareness: A Critical But Ill-Defined Phenomenon
Sarter, N. B., & Woods, D. D. (1991) · International Journal of Aviation Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0101_4 · Cited by 524
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Bolstad, C. A., 1990, Single versus dual scale range display investigation
- Carmody, M. A., 1993, Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 167
- Endsley, M. R., 1987, SAGAT: A methodology for the measurement of situation awareness
- Endsley, M. R., 1989, Final report: Situation awareness in an advanced strategic mission
- Endsley, M. R., 1989, Tactical simulation 3 test report: Addendum 1 situation awareness evaluations
- Endsley, M. R., 1990, In Situational awareness in aerospace operations
- Endsley, M. R., 1990, Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT): Air-to-air tactical version user guide
- Endsley, M. R., 1990, Situation awareness in dynamic human decision making: Theory and measurement.
- Endsley, M. R., 1994, Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT): En route air traffic control version user's guide
- Fracker, M. L., 1990, Situational awareness in aerospace operations, 6/1
- Herrmann, D. J., 1984, Everyday memory, action and absent-mindedness, 133
- Hogg, D. N., 1993, A situation awareness methodology for the evaluation of process control systems: Studies of feasibility and the implication of use
- Hughes, E. R., 1990, Advanced tactical fighter (ATF) simulation support: Final report
- 10.1037/0096-3445.110.3.306 · DOI
- McDonnell Douglas Aircraft Corporation, 1982, Advanced medium-range air-to-air missile operational utility evaluation (AMRAAM OUE) test final report.
- Mogford, R. H., Presented at the Human Factors Society of Canada Annual Meeting
- Northrop Corporation, 1988, Tactical simulation 2 test report: Addendum 1 situation awareness test results.
- Pew, R. W. (1991). Defining and measuring situation awareness in the commercial aircraft cockpit. In Proceedings of the Conference on Challenges in Aviation Human Factors: The National Plan (pp. 30–31). Washington, DC: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
- Selcon, S. J., 1990, Situational awareness in aerospace operations
- Sheehy, E. J., Presented at the ANS Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control and Man-Machine Interface Technology
- Smolensky, M. W. (1993). Toward the physiological measurement of situation awareness: The case for eye movement measurements. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting (p. 41). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
- Venturino, M., 1990, Performance-based measures of merit for tactical situation awareness
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,003
Saleh, J. H., Haga, R. A., Favarò, F., & Bakolas, E. (2013) · Engineering Failure Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.09.014 · Cited by 64
Effects of Integrated Graphical Displays on Situation Awareness in Anaesthesiology
Zhang, Y., Drews, F., Westenskow, D., Foresti, S., Agutter, J., Bermudez, J. C., Blike, G., & Loeb, R. (2002) · Cognition, Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s101110200007 · Cited by 74
A Survey on Cyber Situation-awareness Systems: Framework, Techniques, and Insights
Alavizadeh, H., Jang‐Jaccard, J., Enoch, S. Y., Al-Sahaf, H., Welch, I. S., Camtepe, S. A., & Kim, D. S. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3530809 · Cited by 68
Tactical Driving Behavior With Different Levels of Automation
Kircher, K., Larsson, A. F. L., & Hultgren, J. A. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2013.2277725 · Cited by 62
Man, Y., Weber, R., Cimbritz, J., Lundh, M., & MacKinnon, S. N. (2018) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2018.08.005 · Cited by 62
A Situation Awareness-Based Framework for Design and Evaluation of Explainable AI
Sanneman, L., & Shah, J. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-51924-7_6 · Cited by 62
Internet of Things Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda
Vermesan, O., Friess, P., Guillemin, P., Sundmaeker, H., Eisenhauer, M., Moessner, K., Gall, F. L., & Cousin, P. (2022) · River Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781003338659-2 · Cited by 62
Internet of Things beyond the Hype: Research, Innovation and Deployment
Vermesan, O., Friess, P., Guillemin, P., Giaffreda, R., Grindvoll, H., Eisenhauer, M., Serrano, M., Moessner, K., Spirito, M. A., Blystad, L.-C., et al. (2022) · River Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781003337454-3 · Cited by 62
An Ecological Perspective on Team Cognition
Cooke, N. J., Gorman, J. C., & Rowe, L. J. (2008) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203889312-15 · Cited by 62
Toward Measurement of Situation Awareness in Autonomous Vehicles
Sirkin, D., Martelaro, N., Johns, M., & Ju, W. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025822 · Cited by 61
Smart Driver Monitoring: When Signal Processing Meets Human Factors: In the driver's seat
Aghaei, A. S., Donmez, B., Liu, C. C., He, D., Liu, G., Plataniotis, K. N., Chen, H.-Y. W., & Sojoudi, Z. (2016) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2016.2602379 · Cited by 61
User Web browsing characteristics using palm handhelds for information retrieval
Albers, M. J., & Kim, L. (2002) · ACM International Conference on Systems Documentation (SIGDOC) · doi:10.1109/ipcc.2000.887269 · Cited by 61
de Carvalho, P. V. R., Gomes, J. O., Huber, G. J., & Vidal, M. C. (2009) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2008.11.013 · Cited by 60
Effects of Conversation on Situation Awareness and Working Memory in Simulated Driving
Heenan, A., Herdman, C. M., Brown, M. S., & Robert, N. D. (2014) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720813519265 · Cited by 64
Patterson, E. S. (2018) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720818762546 · Cited by 60
Brennan, P. A., Holden, C., Shaw, G., Morris, S., & Oeppen, R. S. (2020) · British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.01.030 · Cited by 63
Li, R., Wang, L., & Sourina, O. (2021) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.04.009 · Cited by 60
Salmon, P. M., Stanton, N. A., Walker, G. H., Jenkins, D. P., & Rafferty, L. A. (2009) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/14639220903009953 · Cited by 59
“If It Feels Right, Do It”: Intuitive Decision Making in a Sample of High-Level Sport Coaches
Collins, D. J., Collins, L., & Carson, H. J. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00504 · Cited by 59
Rosenman, E. D., Dixon, A. J., Webb, J. M., Brolliar, S. M., Golden, S. J., Jones, K. A., Shah, S. P., Grand, J. A., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Chao, G. T., et al. (2017) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/acem.13257 · Cited by 59
The Employment of an Iterative Design Process to Develop a Pulmonary Graphical Display
Wachter, S. B. (2003) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1207 · Cited by 59
Bibliometric Analysis of Human Factors (1970-2000): A Quantitative Description of Scientific Impact
Lee, J. D., Cassano-Piché, A., & Vicente, K. J. (2005) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872005775570970 · Cited by 58
Gorman, J. C., Demir, M., Cooke, N. J., & Grimm, D. (2018) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2018.1557750 · Cited by 58
The future role of human operators in highly automated electric power systems
Prostejovsky, A., Brosinsky, C., Heussen, K., Westermann, D., Kreusel, J., & Marinelli, M. (2019) · Electric Power Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2019.105883 · Cited by 67
Gartenberg, D., Breslow, L. A., McCurry, J. M., & Trafton, J. G. (2013) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720813506223 · Cited by 61
Walshe, N., Ryng, S., Drennan, J., O'Connor, P. E., O’Brien, S., Crowley, C. M., & Hegarty, J. M. (2021) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104086 · Cited by 66
Team Cognition and Adaptability in Dynamic Settings: A Review of Pertinent Work
Uitdewilligen, S., Waller, M. J., & Zijlstra, F. (2010) · Wiley-Blackwell eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470661628.ch8 · Cited by 61
Fekete, A., Tzavella, K., Armaș, I., Binner, J. M., Garschagen, M., Giupponi, C., Mojtahed, V., Petitta, M., Schneiderbauer, S., & Serre, D. (2015) · ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information · doi:10.3390/ijgi4041848 · Cited by 57
Human performance in industrial scheduling: A framework for understanding
MacCarthy, B. L., Wilson, J. R., & Crawford, S. (2001) · Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries · doi:10.1002/hfm.1016 · Cited by 59
Weigl, M., Catchpole, K., Wehler, M., & Schneider, A. (2020) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103155 · Cited by 56
Basic Perception in Head-Worn Augmented Reality Displays
Livingston, M. A., Gabbard, J. L., Swan, J. E., Sibley, C. M., & Barrow, J. H. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-4205-9_3 · Cited by 56
Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making: An Overview and Future Course
Endsley, M. R., Hoffman, R. R., KABER, D. B., & Roth, E. M. (2007) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/155534340700100101 · Cited by 56
Self-citationImplementing Adaptive Function Allocation
Scallen, S. F., & Hancock, P. A. (2001) · International Journal of Aviation Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap1102_05 · Cited by 56
Türkistanlı, T. T. (2023) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.22690 · Cited by 55
Preventing human errors in aviation maintenance using an on-line maintenance assistance platform
Liang, G., Lin, J., Hwang, S., Wang, E. M., & Patterson, P. E. (2010) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2010.01.001 · Cited by 55
The ShadowBox Approach to Cognitive Skills Training
Klein, G. A., & Borders, J. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/1555343416636515 · Cited by 55
Li, S., Blythe, P. T., Guo, W., Namdeo, A. K., Edwards, S. J., Goodman, P. S., & Hill, G. A. (2019) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.10.009 · Cited by 55
Assessing the scalability of a multiple robot interface
Humphrey, C. M., Henk, C., Sewell, G., Williams, B. W., & Adams, J. A. (2007) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/1228716.1228749 · Cited by 55
Tseng, L.-P., Hou, T., Huang, L., & Ou, Y. (2021) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-021-00744-7 · Cited by 54
Langer, N., Slaughter, S. A., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (2014) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2014.0523 · Cited by 54
Potential Individual Differences Regarding Automation Effects in Automated Driving
Körber, M., & Bengler, K. (2014) · Interacción · doi:10.1145/2662253.2662275 · Cited by 61
Chang, A. L., Dym, A. A., Venegas-Borsellino, C. P., Bangar, M. D., Kazzi, M. G., Lisenenkov, D., Qadir, N., Keene, A. B., & Eisen, L. A. (2017) · Annals of the American Thoracic Society · doi:10.1513/annalsats.201612-950oc · Cited by 54
Ocean front detection and tracking using a team of heterogeneous marine vehicles
McCammon, S., dos Santos, G. M., Frantz, M., Welch, T. P., Best, G., Shearman, R. K., Nash, J. D., Barth, J. A., Adams, J. A., & Hollinger, G. A. (2021) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.22014 · Cited by 54
McGuinness, B. (2004) · Cited by 54
A REVIEW OF IMPORTANT COGNITIVE CONCEPTS IN AVIATION
Martins, A. P. G. (2016) · Aviation · doi:10.3846/16487788.2016.1196559 · Cited by 53
Assessing the Impact of Automation on the Air Traffic Controller: The SHAPE Questionnaires
Dehn, D. M. (2008) · Air Traffic Control Quarterly · doi:10.2514/atcq.16.2.127 · Cited by 53
On Social Interactions of Merging Behaviors at Highway On-Ramps in Congested Traffic
Wang, H., Wang, W., Yuan, S., Li, X., & Sun, L. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2021.3102407 · Cited by 53
Investigation of multi-modal interface features for adaptive automation of a human–robot system
KABER, D. B., Wright, M. C., & Sheik-Nainar, M. A. (2005) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.11.003 · Cited by 53
Ratwani, R. M., McCurry, J. M., & Trafton, J. G. (2010) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.5555/1734454.1734549 · Cited by 52
Making Sense When It Matters Most: An Exploratory Study of Leadership In Extremis
Dixon, D. P., Weeks, M., Boland, R., & Perelli, S. J. (2016) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/1548051816679356 · Cited by 57
Gaps and Opportunities in Situational Awareness for Cybersecurity
Gutzwiller, R. S., Dykstra, J., & Payne, B. D. (2020) · Digital Threats Research and Practice · doi:10.1145/3384471 · Cited by 52
Modeling Shared Situation Awareness
Bolstad, C. A., Cuevas, H. M., González, C., Schneider, M., & Avenue, F. (2005) · Cited by 52
Role of memory in air traffic control.
Gronlund, S. D., Ohrt, D. D., Dougherty, M. R. P., Perry, J. L., & Manning, C. A. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.4.3.263 · Cited by 52
Ha, J., Seong, P. H., Lee, M. S., & Hong, J.-H. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · doi:10.1109/tns.2007.907549 · Cited by 52
A review of situation awareness literature relevant to pilot surveillance functions.
Uhlarik, J. J., & Comerford, D. A. (2002) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e426142004-001 · Cited by 52
Ahmadi, N., Sasangohar, F., Yang, J., Yu, D., Danesh, V. C., Klahn, S., & Masud, F. N. (2022) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208221085335 · Cited by 51
Hussain, R., Zaidi, S. F. A., Pedro, A., Lee, H., & Park, C. (2024) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106526 · Cited by 51
Luokkala, P., & Virrantaus, K. (2013) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.11.014 · Cited by 51
Wei, H., Zhuang, D., Wanyan, X., & Wang, Q. (2013) · Chinese Journal of Aeronautics · doi:10.1016/j.cja.2013.04.053 · Cited by 51
A situation risk awareness approach for process systems safety
Naderpour, M., Jie Lu, B., & Zhang, G. (2014) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.12.005 · Cited by 51
Kim, H., & Billington, R. (2016) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amv075 · Cited by 51
Humans and Intelligent Vehicles: The Hope, the Help, and the Harm
Fisher, D. L., Lohrenz, M. C., Moore, D., Nadler, E. D., & Pollard, J. K. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles · doi:10.1109/tiv.2016.2555626 · Cited by 53
Intuitive Cognition and Models of Human–Automation Interaction
Patterson, R. (2017) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720816659796 · Cited by 55
Hutchinson, M., Hurley, J., Kozlowski, D., & Whitehair, L. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.14106 · Cited by 51
Li, W., Zhang, J., Minh, T., Cao, J., & Wang, L. (2019) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2019.04.003 · Cited by 51
Bleakley, A., Allard, J., & Hobbs, A. (2012) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-012-9351-6 · Cited by 50
Lindemann, P., Lee, T. Y., & Rigoll, G. (2018) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti2040071 · Cited by 50
Effects of display design on performance in a simulated ship navigation environment
Sauer, J., Wastell, D. G., Hockey, G. R. J., Crawshaw, C. M., Ishak, M. S., & Downing, J. C. (2002) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140130110116128 · Cited by 50
Salmon, P. M., & Plant, K. L. (2021) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103599 · Cited by 49
Xu, J., Pan, S., Sun, P. Z. H., Guo, K., Park, S. H., Yan, F., Gao, M., Wanyan, X., Cheng, H., & Wu, E. Q. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2025.3558085 · Cited by 49
Millot, P., & Pacaux‐Lemoine, M. (2013) · IFAC Proceedings Volumes · doi:10.3182/20130811-5-us-2037.00061 · Cited by 49
The Impact of Higher Levels of Automation on Performance and Situation Awareness
Jipp, M., & Ackerman, P. L. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/1555343416637517 · Cited by 49
Measurement of Team Situation Awareness in Low Experience Level Aviators
Prince, C., Ellis, E., Brannick, M. Τ., & Eduardo Salas, A. (2007) · International Journal of Aviation Psychology · doi:10.1080/10508410709336936 · Cited by 49
Bolton, M. L., Biltekoff, E., & Humphrey, L. R. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2021.3121960 · Cited by 48
Self-improving situation awareness for human–robot-collaboration using intelligent Digital Twin
Müller, M. S., Ruppert, T., Jazdi, N., & Weyrich, M. (2023) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-023-02138-9 · Cited by 48
Situation Awareness in Dynamic Decision Making: Effects of Practice and Working Memory
González, C., & Wimisberg, J. K. (2007) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/155534340700100103 · Cited by 48
The role of situation awareness for understanding signalling and control in rail operations
Golightly, D., Wilson, J. R., Lowe, E., & Sharples, S. (2009) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/14639220903009961 · Cited by 48
Learning game for training child bicyclists’ situation awareness
Lehtonen, E., Sahlberg, H., Rovamo, E., & Summala, H. (2016) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.036 · Cited by 48
Randell, R., Honey, S., Hindmarsh, J., Alvarado, N., Greenhalgh, J., Pearman, A. D., Long, A., Cope, A., Gill, A., Gardner, P. H., et al. (2017) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr05200 · Cited by 48
Mohammadfam, I., Mahdinia, M., Soltanzadeh, A., Aliabadi, M. M., & Soltanian, A. R. (2021) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103144 · Cited by 48
On the Philosophical Foundations of the Distracted Driver and Driving Distraction
Hancock, P. A., Mouloua, M., & Senders, J. W. (2008) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420007497.pt2 · Cited by 48
The Auto-Correlation Function Aided Sparse Support Matrix Machine for EEG-Based Fatigue Detection
Li, Y., Wang, D., & Liu, F. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express Briefs · doi:10.1109/tcsii.2022.3211931 · Cited by 47
Situation awareness as judgment I: Statistical modeling and quantitative measurement
Kirlik, A., & Strauss, R. (2006) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2006.01.009 · Cited by 47
Design and evaluation of a head-mounted display for immersive 3D teleoperation of field robots
Martins, H., Oakley, I., & Ventura, R. (2014) · Robotica · doi:10.1017/s026357471400126x · Cited by 47
Barach, P. R., & Weinger, M. B. (2007) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.3109/9781420052442-11 · Cited by 47
Local danger warnings for drivers
Cao, Y., Mahr, A., Castronovo, S., Theune, M., Stahl, C., & Müller, C. A. (2010) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/1719970.1720004 · Cited by 47
A computational situation assessment model for nuclear power plant operations
Miao, A. X., Zacharias, G. L., & Kao, S.-P. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and Humans · doi:10.1109/3468.634636 · Cited by 47
Situation awareness: some remaining questions
Dekker, S. W. A., Hummerdal, D. H., & Smith, K. C. S. (2009) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/14639220903010092 · Cited by 46
Lowe, D. J., Ireland, A., Ross, A. J., & Ker, J. (2016) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133772 · Cited by 48
Toward a Research Agenda for the Study of Situation Perceptions: A Variance Componential Framework
Rauthmann, J. F., & Sherman, R. A. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868318765600 · Cited by 52
Educational Interventions to Enhance Situation Awareness
Walshe, N., Crowley, C. M., O’Brien, S., Browne, J. P., & Hegarty, J. M. (2019) · Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · doi:10.1097/sih.0000000000000376 · Cited by 47
Modeling Cognitive Loads for Evolving Shared Mental Models in Human–Agent Collaboration
Fan, X., & Yen, J. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B (Cybernetics) · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2010.2053705 · Cited by 46
Mohammed, S., Hamilton, K., Sánchez‐Manzanares, M., & Rico, R. (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118909997.ch16 · Cited by 46
Measures of Platoon Leader Situation Awareness in Virtual Decision-Making Exercises
Strater, L. D., Endsley, M. R., Pleban, R. J., & Matthews, M. D. (2001) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e500592012-001 · Cited by 46
Self-citationInterruption of people in human-computer interaction
McFarlane, D. C., & Sibert, J. L. (1998) · Cited by 45
Keller, L., Cortina, K. S., Müller, K., & Miller, K. F. (2021) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-021-09570-5 · Cited by 44
Adaptive automation: Status of research and future challenges
Bernabei, M., & Costantino, F. (2024) · Robotics Comput. Integr. Manuf. · doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2024.102724 · Cited by 39
The Use of Simulation in the Development of Individual Cognitive Expertise in Emergency Medicine
Bond, W. F., Kuhn, G. J., Binstadt, E. S., Quirk, M. E., Wu, T., Tews, M. C., Dev, P., & Ericsson, K. A. (2008) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00229.x · Cited by 44
Mechanisms for the acquisition of situation awareness in situated agents
Chiappe, D. L., Strybel, T. Z., & Vu, K. L. (2011) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1463922x.2011.611267 · Cited by 49
Lau, N. K. C., Jamieson, G. A., Skraaning, G., & Burns, C. M. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · doi:10.1109/tns.2008.2005725 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Endsley, M. R.
- Affiliations
- Texas Tech University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Endsley, Mica R.
- ORCID
- Endsley, Mica R.
- Venue
- Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 65-84
- ISSN
- 0018-7208 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-8181
- OpenAlex
- W2069757512
- Cited by
- 2,039
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 90 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 126 · 2018: 88 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 97 · 2015: 105 · 2014: 85 · 2013: 76 · 2012: 72
- FWCI
- 27.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Military Strategy and Technology
- Keywords
- situational awareness, situation awareness measurement, measurement validity, intrusiveness, dynamical systems, operator performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review