The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems
Abstract
Methodologies for the empirical measurement of situation awareness are reviewed, including a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of each method and the potential limitations of the measures from a theoretical and practical viewpoint. Two studies are presented that investigate questions of validity and intrusiveness regarding a query-based technique. This technique requires that a simulation of the operational tasks be momentarily interrupted in order to query operators on their situation awareness. The results of the two studies indicate that the query technique is not intrusive on normal subject behavior during the trial and does not suffer from limitations of human memory, which provides an indication of empirical validity. The results of other validity studies regarding the technique are discussed along with recommendations for its use in measuring situation awareness in varied settings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Situation Awareness (SA) theory conceptualizes reasoning as a progression through three stages: Perception (noticing elements), Comprehension (interpreting their meaning), and Projection (anticipating consequences) [21, 22].”
From Criticmate: Stagewise Human–AI Co-Critique in Single-Screen UI Evaluation (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“expert evaluators naturally distribute their work across Perception , Comprehension , and Projection [21, 22], weaving together global and local reasoning and gradually moving from surface checks toward root-cause diagnosis.”
From Criticmate: Stagewise Human–AI Co-Critique in Single-Screen UI Evaluation (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cites
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 3×
“est and the administration of the questionnaire (Nisbett and Wilson, 1977).”
BackgroundInfluentialChase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90004-2 · Cited by 4,479
On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.
Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.110.3.306 · Cited by 2,562
Interaction of information in word recognition.
Morton, J. (1969) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0027366 · Cited by 2,206
Cowan, N. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.104.2.163 · Cited by 1,918
How many memory systems are there?
Tulving, E. (1985) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.40.4.385 · Cited by 1,909
Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT)
Endsley, M. R. (2003) · Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference · doi:10.1109/naecon.1988.195097 · Cited by 956
Self-citationToward a theory of memory and attention.
Norman, D. A. (1968) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0026699 · Cited by 786
Situational Awareness Rating Technique (Sart): The Development of a Tool for Aircrew Systems Design
Taylor, R. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315087924-8 · Cited by 530
Situation Awareness: A Critical But Ill-Defined Phenomenon
Sarter, N. B., & Woods, D. D. (1991) · International Journal of Aviation Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0101_4 · Cited by 524
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Bolstad, C. A., 1990, Single versus dual scale range display investigation
- Carmody, M. A., 1993, Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 167
- Endsley, M. R., 1987, SAGAT: A methodology for the measurement of situation awareness
- Endsley, M. R., 1989, Final report: Situation awareness in an advanced strategic mission
- Endsley, M. R., 1989, Tactical simulation 3 test report: Addendum 1 situation awareness evaluations
- Endsley, M. R., 1990, In Situational awareness in aerospace operations
- Endsley, M. R., 1990, Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT): Air-to-air tactical version user guide
- Endsley, M. R., 1990, Situation awareness in dynamic human decision making: Theory and measurement.
- Endsley, M. R., 1994, Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT): En route air traffic control version user's guide
- Fracker, M. L., 1990, Situational awareness in aerospace operations, 6/1
- Herrmann, D. J., 1984, Everyday memory, action and absent-mindedness, 133
- Hogg, D. N., 1993, A situation awareness methodology for the evaluation of process control systems: Studies of feasibility and the implication of use
- Hughes, E. R., 1990, Advanced tactical fighter (ATF) simulation support: Final report
- 10.1037/0096-3445.110.3.306 · DOI
- McDonnell Douglas Aircraft Corporation, 1982, Advanced medium-range air-to-air missile operational utility evaluation (AMRAAM OUE) test final report.
- Mogford, R. H., Presented at the Human Factors Society of Canada Annual Meeting
- Northrop Corporation, 1988, Tactical simulation 2 test report: Addendum 1 situation awareness test results.
- Pew, R. W. (1991). Defining and measuring situation awareness in the commercial aircraft cockpit. In Proceedings of the Conference on Challenges in Aviation Human Factors: The National Plan (pp. 30–31). Washington, DC: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
- Selcon, S. J., 1990, Situational awareness in aerospace operations
- Sheehy, E. J., Presented at the ANS Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control and Man-Machine Interface Technology
- Smolensky, M. W. (1993). Toward the physiological measurement of situation awareness: The case for eye movement measurements. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting (p. 41). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
- Venturino, M., 1990, Performance-based measures of merit for tactical situation awareness
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,003
Can a glass cockpit display help (or hinder) performance of novices in simulated flight training?
Wright, S. J., & O’Hare, D. (2014) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2014.10.017 · Cited by 32
Jalote-Parmar, A., Badke‐Schaub, P., Ali, W., & Samset, E. (2009) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.001 · Cited by 32
Predicting real-time adaptive performance in a dynamic decision-making context
Good, D. J. (2014) · Journal of Management & Organization · doi:10.1017/jmo.2014.54 · Cited by 33
Identification of Levels of Sustainable Consciousness of Teachers in Training through an E-Portfolio
Bravo, M. P. C., Magnoler, P., & Jiménez, J. C. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10103700 · Cited by 32
Dewan, M. L., Muthu, N., Shelov, E. D., Bonafide, C. P., Brady, P. W., Davis, D. H., Kirkendall, E. S., Niles, D. E., Sutton, R. M., Traynor, D., et al. (2019) · Pediatric Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/pcc.0000000000002106 · Cited by 32
Autonomous mission management for unmanned aerial vehicles
Barbier, M., & Chanthery, É. (2004) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2004.01.003 · Cited by 32
Ciceri, M. R., & Ruscio, D. (2013) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2013.11.001 · Cited by 33
Augenstein, T., Schneider, A., Wehler, M., & Weigl, M. (2021) · Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13049-020-00824-8 · Cited by 31
Burkolter, D., Kluge, A., Sauer, J., & Ritzmann, S. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.011 · Cited by 31
Assessing Team Situation Awareness in Simulated Military Missions
Entin, E. B., & Entin, E. E. (2000) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193120004400120 · Cited by 31
Golightly, D., Ryan, B., Dadashi, N., Pickup, L., & Wilson, J. R. (2012) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2012.08.007 · Cited by 31
Dynamic management of human error to reduce total risk
Jo, Y.-D., & Park, K. (2003) · Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries · doi:10.1016/s0950-4230(03)00019-6 · Cited by 31
Endsley, M. R., & Hoffman, R. R. (2002) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2002.1134367 · Cited by 31
Self-citationSætrevik, B., & Eid, J. (2013) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/1555343413514585 · Cited by 31
Deriving Expert Knowledge of Situational Awareness in Policing: a Mixed-Methods Study
Huhta, J., Nota, P. M. D., Hietanen, T., & Ropo, E. (2023) · Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11896-023-09574-6 · Cited by 30
The impact of computer-based procedures on team performance, communication, and situation awareness
Lin, C. J., Hsieh, T., Yang, C., & Huang, R.-J. (2015) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2014.12.001 · Cited by 30
The Chronic Detrimental Impact of Interruptions in a Simulated Submarine Track Management Task
Loft, S. D., Sadler, A., Braithwaite, J. E., & Huf, S. (2015) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720815599518 · Cited by 30
A Situated Approach to the Understanding of Dynamic Situations
Chiappe, D. L., Strybel, T. Z., & Vu, K. L. (2015) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/1555343414559053 · Cited by 34
An epistemological approach to human systems integration
Boy, G. A. (2023) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102298 · Cited by 30
Usability Evaluation of a Gui Prototype for a Ventilator Machine
Liu, Y., Tech., L., & Osvalder, A. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing · doi:10.1007/s10877-005-7997-9 · Cited by 30
Enhancing situation awareness via automated situation assessment
Holsopple, J., Sudit, M., Nusinov, M., Liu, D., Du, H., & Yang, S. J. (2010) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2010.5434386 · Cited by 30
Managing Workload, Performance, and Situation Awareness in Aviation Systems
Durso, F. T., & Alexander, A. L. (2010) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-374518-7.00008-0 · Cited by 30
Neville, T. J., & Salmon, P. M. (2015) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2015.1100758 · Cited by 30
Mogilever, N. B., Zuccarelli, L., Burles, F., Iaria, G., Strapazzon, G., Bessone, L., & Coffey, E. B. J. (2018) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00407 · Cited by 30
Reinerman-Jones, L., Hughes, N., D’Agostino, A., & Matthews, G. (2018) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2018.12.001 · Cited by 30
Park, S. H., & Woldstad, J. C. (2000) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872000779698060 · Cited by 30
Satuf, E. N., Kaszkurewicz, E., Schirru, R., & de Campos, M. C. M. M. (2016) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2016.01.002 · Cited by 29
Kearney, P., Li, W., & Lin, J. J. H. (2016) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2016.09.002 · Cited by 29
Game-based situation awareness training for child and adult cyclists
Lehtonen, E., Airaksinen, J., Kanerva, K., Anna, R., Ränninranta, R., & Åberg, V. (2017) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.160823 · Cited by 29
Vandecasteele, F., Merci, B., & Verstockt, S. (2017) · Fire Safety Journal · doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.03.083 · Cited by 29
Weiler, D. T., Gibson, A. L., & Saleem, J. J. (2018) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.01.012 · Cited by 29
Kearney, P., & Li, W. (2018) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2018.06.005 · Cited by 29
Raza, M. A., Salehi, S., Ghazal, S., Ybarra, V. T., Naqvi, S. A. M., Cokely, E. T., & Teodoriu, C. (2019) · Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries · doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2019.103921 · Cited by 29
Tseng, L.-P., Chuang, M., & Liu, Y. (2021) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103633 · Cited by 29
User Requirements Analysis on Augmented Reality-Based Maintenance in Manufacturing
Runji, J. M., Lee, Y., & Chu, C. (2022) · Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4053410 · Cited by 29
Customization of user interfaces to reduce errors and enhance user acceptance
Burkolter, D., Weyers, B., Kluge, A., & Luther, W. J. (2013) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2013.04.017 · Cited by 29
Assessing the Situation Awareness of Pilots Engaged in Self Spacing
Strybel, T. Z., Vu, K. L., Kraft, J., & Minakata, K. (2008) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193120805200104 · Cited by 29
Cyber Situational Awareness Testing
Brynielsson, J., Franke, U., & Varga, S. (2016) · Advanced sciences and technologies for security applications · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-38930-1_12 · Cited by 29
Situation Awareness in Hri with Collaborating Remotely Piloted Vehicles
Riley, J. M., & Endsley, M. R. (2005) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193120504900341 · Cited by 29
Self-citationSituation Awareness Measurement and the Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique
Jones, D. G., & KABER, D. B. (2004) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780203489925.ch42 · Cited by 29
HAZARD PERCEPTION BY INEXPERIENCED MOTORCYCLISTS
Haworth, N. L., Symmons, M. A., & Kowadlo, N. (2000) · Cited by 29
Can increased automation transparency mitigate the effects of time pressure on automation use?
Tatasciore, M., & Loft, S. D. (2023) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104142 · Cited by 28
Using Eye-Tracking to Measure Worker Situation Awareness in Augmented Reality
Wu, S., Chen, H., Hou, L., Zhang, G., & Li, C. (2024) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105582 · Cited by 28
Atweh, J. A., & Riggs, S. L. (2024) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208241272060 · Cited by 28
Benthem, K. V., & Herdman, C. M. (2020) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104892 · Cited by 29
Measure Utility, Gain Trust: Practical Advice for XAI Researchers
Davis, B., Glenski, M., Sealy, W. I. N., & Arendt, D. (2020) · IEEE Workshop on TRust and EXpertise in Visual Analytics (TREX) · doi:10.1109/trex51495.2020.00005 · Cited by 31
The validity of situation awareness for performance: a meta-analysis
Bakdash, J. Z., Marusich, L. R., Cox, K. R., Geuss, M. N., Zaroukian, E. G., & Morris, K. (2021) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1463922x.2021.1921310 · Cited by 29
Optimizing Situation Awareness to Reduce Emergency Transfers in Hospitalized Children
Sosa, T. K., Sitterding, M., Dewan, M. L., Coleman, M., Seger, B., Bedinghaus, K., Hawkins, D., Maddock, B., Hausfeld, J., Falcone, R. A., et al. (2021) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2020-034603 · Cited by 28
Trust in high-reliability organizations
Schöbel, M. (2009) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/0539018409102416 · Cited by 31
A Knowledge Elicitation Approach to the Measurement of Team Situation Awareness
Cooke, N. J., Stout, R. J., & Eduardo Salas, A. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315087924-10 · Cited by 28
Errors in situation assessment: Implications for system design
Endsley, M. R. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/bfb0110451 · Cited by 28
Self-citationZhu, Y., Li, C., Qiao, Z., Qu, R., Wang, Y., Xiong, J., & Liu, W. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2350840 · Cited by 27
Key, C. E. J., Morris, A. P., & Mansfield, N. J. (2016) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2016.04.011 · Cited by 27
Design and Implementation of a Pediatric ICU Acuity Scoring Tool as Clinical Decision Support
Shelov, E. D., Muthu, N., Wolfe, H. A., Traynor, D., Craig, N., Bonafide, C. P., Nadkarni, V., Davis, D. H., & Dewan, M. L. (2018) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1667122 · Cited by 27
Husák, M., Jirsík, T., & Yang, S. J. (2020) · International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES) · doi:10.1145/3407023.3407062 · Cited by 27
Ambient Intelligence to Improve Construction Site Safety: Case of High-Rise Building in Thailand
Panuwatwanich, K., Roongsrisoothiwong, N., Petcharayuthapant, K., Dummanonda, S., & Mohamed, S. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17218124 · Cited by 27
Seafarers’ awareness-based domain modelling in restricted areas
Lee, H., Furukawa, Y., & Park, D.-J. (2021) · Journal of Navigation · doi:10.1017/s0373463321000394 · Cited by 27
Rezaeifam, S., Ergen, E., & Günaydın, H. M. (2022) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105531 · Cited by 27
Delegation and Transparency: Coordinating Interactions So Information Exchange Is No Surprise
Miller, C. A. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07458-0_19 · Cited by 27
Impact of Functional and Schematic Overview Displays on Console Operators’ Situation Awareness
Tharanathan, A., Bullemer, P., Laberge, J., Reising, D. V., & Mclain, R. (2012) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/1555343412440694 · Cited by 31
A framework for understanding outcomes of integrated care programs for the hospitalized elderly
Hartgerink, J. M., Cramm, J. M., van Wijngaarden, J. D. H., Bakker, T. J. E. M., Mackenbach, J. P., & Nieboer, A. P. (2013) · International Journal of Integrated Care · doi:10.5334/ijic.1063 · Cited by 27
Lo, J. C., Sehic, E., Brookhuis, K., & Meijer, S. (2016) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2016.09.006 · Cited by 32
Driver Readiness Model for Regulating the Transfer from Automation to Human Control
Mioch, T., Kroon, L., & Neerincx, M. A. (2017) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3025171.3025199 · Cited by 27
Gore, J., Banks, A. P., & McDowall, A. (2018) · Cognition Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-018-0502-2 · Cited by 31
van de Merwe, K., Oprins, E. A. P. B., Eriksson, F., & van der Plaat, A. (2012) · International Journal of Aviation Psychology · doi:10.1080/10508414.2012.663241 · Cited by 27
TRAINING FOR SITUATION AWARENESS
Endsley, M. R., & Robertson, M. M. (2000) · Cited by 27
Self-citationTaxonomy of Mitigation Strategies for Driver Distraction
Donmez, B., Boyle, L. N., & Lee, J. D. (2003) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193120304701607 · Cited by 27
Nasarwanji, M. F., Werner, N. E., Carl, K., Hohl, D., Leff, B. A., Gürses, A. P., & Arbaje, A. I. (2015) · Home Health Care Services Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01621424.2015.1092908 · Cited by 28
Márquez, J. J., Miller, M. J., Cohen, T. E., Deliz, I., Lees, D. S., Zheng, J., Lee, Y. J., Kanefsky, B., Norheim, J. J., Deans, M. C., et al. (2019) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2018.1838 · Cited by 26
Ceschi, A., Costantini, A., Zagarese, V., Avi, E., & Sartori, R. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00902 · Cited by 26
Human-Centered Manufacturing Challenges Affecting European Industry 4.0 Enabling Technologies
Oliveira, M., Arica, E., Pinzone, M., Fantini, P., & Taisch, M. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30033-3_39 · Cited by 26
Hedayati, S., Sadeghi‐Firoozabadi, V., Bagheri, M., Heidari, M., & Sze, N. N. (2021) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105208 · Cited by 26
Explaining Autonomous Decisions in Swarms of Human-on-the-Loop Small Unmanned Aerial Systems
Agrawal, A., & Cleland‐Huang, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing · doi:10.1609/hcomp.v9i1.18936 · Cited by 26
EEG Feature Analysis Related to Situation Awareness Assessment and Discrimination
Feng, C., Liu, S., Wanyan, X., Chen, H., Min, Y., & Ma, Y. (2022) · Aerospace · doi:10.3390/aerospace9100546 · Cited by 26
Lozano, M. A., Pérez-Llopis, I., & Domingo, M. E. (2023) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc7020065 · Cited by 29
Construction and Analysis of Driver Takeover Behavior Modes Based on Situation Awareness Theory
Chen, H., Zhao, X., Li, Z., Fu, Q., Wang, Q.-H., & Zhao, L. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles · doi:10.1109/tiv.2023.3280077 · Cited by 26
The Impact of Automation Assisted Aircraft Separation on Situation Awareness
Dao, A.-Q. V., Brandt, S. L., Battiste, V., Vu, K. L., Strybel, T. Z., & Johnson, W. W. (2009) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02559-4_80 · Cited by 26
Formal foundations for situation awareness based on dependent type theory
Dapoigny, R., & Barlatier, P. (2012) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2012.02.006 · Cited by 26
Emergency department patient-tracking system evaluation
Pennathur, P. R., Cao, D., Bisantz, A. M., Lin, L., Fairbanks, R. J. T., Wears, R. L., Perry, S. J., Guarrera, T. K., Brown, J. L., & Sui, Z. (2011) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2011.02.003 · Cited by 26
Silva, S. S., & Hansman, R. J. (2015) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/1555343415597344 · Cited by 26
Bayesian Analysis of Behaviors and Interactions for Situation Awareness in Transportation Systems
Castaldo, F., Palmieri, F., & Regazzoni, C. S. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2015.2466695 · Cited by 26
Surface Telerobotics: Development and Testing of a Crew Controlled Planetary Rover System
Bualat, M. G., Fong, T., Allan, M., Bouyssounouse, X., Cohen, T. E., Flückiger, L., Gogna, R., Kobayashi, L., Lee, G., Lee, S., et al. (2013) · AIAA SPACE Conference & Exposition · doi:10.2514/6.2013-5475 · Cited by 26
Eid, J., Meland, N. T., Matthews, M. D., & Johnsen, B. H. (2005) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.100.3.649-658 · Cited by 26
Zartaloudi, E., Laws, K. R., & Bramon, E. (2019) · Psychiatric Genetics · doi:10.1097/ypg.0000000000000241 · Cited by 25
The Effect of Pick-by-Light-Systems on Situation Awareness in Order Picking Activities
Stockinger, C., Steinebach, T., Petrat, D., Bruns, R., & Zöller, I. (2020) · Procedia Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.078 · Cited by 25
Situation Awareness in sports: A scoping review
Huffman, S., Crundall, D. E., Smith, H. M. J., & Mackenzie, A. (2021) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102132 · Cited by 25
Sun, Y., Li, X., Liu, H., Li, Y., Gui, J., Zhang, X., Li, X., Sun, L., Zhang, L., Wang, C., et al. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05104-y · Cited by 27
EEG and fNIRS are associated with situation awareness (hazard) prediction during a driving task
Festa, E. K., Bracken, B. K., Desrochers, P. C., Winder, A. T., Strong, P. K., & Endsley, M. R. (2024) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2024.2367163 · Cited by 25
Self-citationPrasolova‐Førland, E., Fominykh, M., Darisiro, R., & Mørch, A. I. (2013) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2013.571 · Cited by 25
Edgar, G. K., Catherwood, D., Baker, S., Sallis, G., Bertels, M., Edgar, H. E., Nikolla, D., Buckle, S., Goodwin, C., & Whelan, A. (2017) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2017.1420238 · Cited by 25
Effectiveness of a strategic hazard anticipation training intervention in high risk scenarios
Krishnan, A., Samuel, S., Yamani, Y., Romoser, M. R. E., & Fisher, D. L. (2019) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.10.004 · Cited by 25
Cognitive States Matter: Design Guidelines for Driving Situation Awareness in Smart Vehicles
Park, D.-H., Yoon, W. C., & Lee, U. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20102978 · Cited by 25
The Effectiveness of a Mnemonic-Type Startle and Surprise Management Procedure for Pilots
Landman, A., van Middelaar, S. H., Groen, E. L., van Paassen, M. M., Bronkhorst, A. W., & Mulder, M. (2020) · The International Journal of Aerospace Psychology · doi:10.1080/24721840.2020.1763798 · Cited by 25
Li, P., Wang, Y., Chen, J., Luo, Z.-H., & Dai, L. (2021) · Nuclear Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111112 · Cited by 25
Team Situation Awareness Using Web-based Fuzzy Group Decision Support Systems
Jie Lu, B., Zhang, G., & Wu, F. (2008) · International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems · doi:10.2991/ijcis.2008.1.1.4 · Cited by 25
Anderson, C. I., Nelson, C. S., Graham, C. F., Mosher, B. D., Gohil, K. N., Morrison, C. A., Schneider, P. D., & Kepros, J. P. (2012) · Journal of Surgical Research · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2012.05.007 · Cited by 25
Situation Awareness and campaign assessments
Zuparic, M. L., Jobst, M., & Macleod, I. D. G. (2016) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.2016.43 · Cited by 25
Hamilton, K., Mancuso, V., Mohammed, S., Tesler, R., & McNeese, M. D. (2017) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/1555343417731429 · Cited by 25
Belletier, C., Charkhabi, M., Silva, G. P. D. A., Ametepe, K., Lutz, M., & Izaute, M. (2019) · Cognition, Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-019-00610-2 · Cited by 24
Research of Physiological Factors Affecting Pilot Performance in Flight Simulation Training Device
Novák, A., & Maria, M. (2015) · Communications - Scientific letters of the University of Zilina · doi:10.26552/com.c.2015.3.103-107 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Endsley, M. R.
- Affiliations
- Texas Tech University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Endsley, Mica R.
- ORCID
- Endsley, Mica R.
- Venue
- Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 65-84
- ISSN
- 0018-7208 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-8181
- OpenAlex
- W2069757512
- Cited by
- 2,039
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 90 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 126 · 2018: 88 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 97 · 2015: 105 · 2014: 85 · 2013: 76 · 2012: 72
- FWCI
- 27.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Military Strategy and Technology
- Keywords
- situational awareness, situation awareness measurement, measurement validity, intrusiveness, dynamical systems, operator performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review