Cited by 35Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesSoil and Environmental StudiesAncient and Medieval Archaeology Studies

Redefining the timing and circumstances of the chicken's introduction to Europe and north-west Africa

Open access
Best, Julia, Doherty, Sean, Armit, Ian, Boev, Zlatozar, Büster, Lindsey, Cunliffe, Barry, Foster, Alison, Frimet, Ben +13 more·2022·Antiquity

Abstract

Little is known about the early history of the chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus), including the timing and circumstances of its introduction into new cultural environments. To evaluate its spatio-temporal spread across Eurasia and north-west Africa, the authors radiocarbon dated 23 chicken bones from presumed early contexts. Three-quarters returned dates later than those suggested by stratigraphy, indicating the importance of direct dating. The results indicate that chickens did not arrive in Europe until the first millennium BC. Moreover, a consistent time-lag between the introduction of chickens and their consumption by humans suggests that these animals were initially regarded as exotica and only several centuries later recognised as a source of ‘food’.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Direct radiocarbon dating of 23 chicken bones from 16 archaeological sites across Europe and north-west Africa shows that 18 were more recent than their reported stratigraphic dates, undermining pre-Iron Age claims. The results support a revised chronology in which chickens reached Italy by the eighth century BC, France and southern Britain by the sixth–fifth century BC, and Scotland much later, with early birds often treated as exotica rather than food.

Key findings

  • Of 23 dated chicken bones, only five were consistent with their reported stratigraphic phasing; the remaining 18 were more recent. The authors found no evidence for chickens in Europe during the Neolithic, Chalcolithic or Bronze Age, and argue that pre-Iron Age European chicken claims should be rejected unless supported by direct radiocarbon dating.
  • The earliest radiocarbon dates came from Forcello (CKN5) and Orvieto (CKN6) in Italy, both consistent with sixth- and fifth-century BC contexts; their broadest range extends to the mid-eighth century BC, likely reflecting the Hallstatt plateau. Weston Down (CKN8) and Houghton Down (CKN9) were consistent with fourth/third-century BC contexts, and Stonehenge Road (CKN7) extended into the late fifth century BC.
  • At Mogador, Morocco, CKN18 and CKN19 were modern (post-bomb), while CKN20 and CKN21 dated to 893–1024 cal AD and 1031–1167 cal AD, undermining claims of a seventh-century BC presence. Other intrusive specimens included Tiryns CKN23 (c.1300 years younger than its Bronze Age context), Galabovo CKN2 and CKN3 (436–605 cal AD and 215–338 cal AD), Yabalkovo CKN1 (1029–1158 cal AD), and Korucutepe CKN16/CKN17 (thirteenth century AD).
  • The discussion argues early northern European chickens were often articulated, unbutchered, mature animals treated as exotica; later they shifted toward human–chicken co-burials and food. In Britain, 700–800 years elapsed between introduction and dietary acceptance, and at Fishbourne Palace chickens comprised 8% of the assemblage, with direct dates of 1970±30 BP and 1920±30 BP.

Methods

  • Twenty-three chicken bones from 16 archaeological sites were selected for direct radiocarbon dating, covering contexts from Neolithic/Bronze Age to Iron Age in Bulgaria, Turkey, Greece, France, Italy, Morocco, England and Scotland.
  • Dating was undertaken at Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (n=20), Kiel AMS (n=2) and Beta Analytic (n=1); dates were calibrated using OxCal 4.4.2, with IntCal20 except for post-bomb samples 4, 18 and 19, which used Bomb13NH1.
  • Specimens were measured and examined for butchery, sex and age; zooarchaeological analysis, ancient DNA analysis for one large specimen, and δ13C/δ15N isotope analysis were also conducted. C:N ratios for CKN1–CKN21 were 3.2–3.4, indicating well-preserved collagen.

Limitations

  • The paper has no explicit limitations section. Stated caveats include the Hallstatt plateau reducing precision for the Italian dates, CKN22 lacking a 14C age and being post-1954, CKN22/CKN23 being omitted from stable isotope analysis due to graphitisation, and some early Italian specimens not being available for direct dating.
  • Evident from the text: the study directly dates only 23 selected bones from 16 sites, so many early claims remain undated; coverage is geographically and temporally uneven; and the authors note prior reanalyses found some early “chicken” bones were actually pheasants, while their own identifications rely on zooarchaeological analysis with genetic confirmation for only one specimen.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15184/aqy.2021.90

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 62 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data
    § 4. Discussion and Conclusion

    Our results do not support claims of an autochthonous Holocene population of junglefowl in Eastern Europe.

    “nor do our results support claims of an autochthonous Holocene population of junglefowl in Eastern Europe.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning
    § 3. Results

    The morphological and isotopic results from CKN18 and CKN19 appeared closer to those for modern broilers than ancient chickens.

    “This explains the morphological and isotopic results derived from the same bones which appeared closer to those for modern broilers (commercial meat birds) and not ancient chickens”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § 3. Results

    Of the 23 dated chicken bones, only five were consistent with their reported stratigraphic phasing.

    “Of the 23 dated chicken bones, only five were consistent with their reported stratigraphic phasing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § 4.1 A revised spatiotemporal pattern of the spread of chickens

    Our direct dates support the suggestion that chickens were not introduced to the Scottish Isles until the Norse arrivals from c.AD 800.

    “Our direct dates also support the suggestion that chickens were not introduced to the Scottish Isles until the Norse arrivals from c.AD 800 (Best 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Best 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingown data
    § 3. Results

    Both proposed Late Bronze Age specimens from Korucutepe, Turkey (CKN16 and CKN17), dated to the thirteenth century AD.

    “Both proposed Late Bronze Age specimens from Korucutepe in Turkey (CKN16 and CKN17) dated to the thirteenth century AD”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 31
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 19
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 3. Results

    The two chicken bones from Howe, Orkney, returned direct dates of fourteenth-fifteenth century AD (CKN11) and seventeenth-twentieth centuries AD (CKN12), respectively, rather than 200-800 AD.

    “the two chicken bones selected from Howe, Orkney, though supposedly dating between 200-800 AD returned direct dates of fourteenth-fifteenth century AD (CKN11) and seventeenth-twentieth centuries AD (CKN12), respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 3. Results

    The two modern individuals (CKN18 and CKN19) had more positive δ13C values and more negative δ15N values relative to the two medieval-dated specimens (CKN20 and CKN21).

    “The two modern individuals (CKN18 and CKN19) had more positive δ 13 C values and more negative δ 15 N values relative to the two medieval-dated specimens (CKN20 and CKN21)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 3. Results

    Specimen CKN1 from Yabalkovo, Bulgaria, was c.5,000 years younger and dated to the eleventh-twelfth centuries AD.

    “specimen CKN1 from Yabalkovo (Bulgaria) was c.5,000 years younger and dated to the eleventh-twelfth centuries AD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken Relationships

    The hen from Weston Down (CKN8) was mature and had a well-healed leg fracture, which could indicate evidence of human care.

    “Similarly, the hen from Weston Down (CKN8) was mature and had a well-healed leg fracture (Fig 3C) which could indicate evidence of human care.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 3. Results

    The earliest radiocarbon dates were from two Italian sites: Forcello (CKN5) and Orvieto (CKN6), both consistent with their sixth and fifth century BC contexts.

    “The earliest radiocarbon dates were from two Italian sites: Forcello (CKN5) and Orvieto (CKN6), both of which were consistent with their sixth and fifth century BC contexts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.2 The Movement of Chicken Bones through Archaeological Stratigraphies

    Direct dates from the other articulated remains corroborated their stratigraphic phasing, and they are among the earliest regional specimens in our European dataset.

    “However, direct dates from the other articulated remains corroborated their stratigraphic phasing, and they are among the earliest regional specimens in our European dataset.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § 3. Results

    The specimen from Forcello (CKN5) derived from an articulated skeleton.

    “The specimen from Forcello (CKN5) again derived from an articulated skeleton.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § 2.4 Isotope analysis

    The Iron Age Weston Down specimen CKN8 exhibits injured bone.

    “showing healthy bone on the left and injured bone on the right (CKN8)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken Relationships

    Through Late Iron Age and Early Roman Britain, there is an observable shift in frequency of chicken remains and towards human-chicken co-burials.

    “Through Late Iron Age and Early Roman Britain, there is an observable shift not only in the frequency of chicken remains within zooarchaeological assemblages (Fig 5A), but also towards human-chicken co-burials (Fig 5C)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 2.4 Isotope analysis

    Specimen CKN22, thought to date to 1250-1100 BC, was determined to be post-1954 and is not included in the calibrated radiocarbon results.

    “CKN22 (thought to date to 1250-1100 BC) was determined to be 'post-1954' and is not included.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 2.4 Isotope analysis

    Samples CKN1 to CKN21 produced C:N ratios between 3.2-3.4, indicative of well-preserved collagen.

    “Samples CKN1 to CKN21 produced C:N ratios between 3.2-3.4,indicative of well-preserved collagen (DeNiro 1985;Ambrose 1990;van Klinken 1999).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites DeNiro 1985

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ambrose 1990

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites van Klinken 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 1. Introduction

    There is little evidence to support the hypothesis that chickens were domesticated primarily as a food source.

    “though there is little evidence to support this hypothesis”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 4.1 A revised spatiotemporal pattern of the spread of chickens

    It seems likely that chickens were transported throughout the Mediterranean along routes ecologically suited to them, likely via early Greek, Etruscan and Phoenician maritime trade.

    “It seems likely that chickens were transported throughout the Mediterranean along routes ecologically suited to them (Pitt et al. 2016), likely via early Greek, Etruscan and Phoenician maritime trade (Peters et al. in prep).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Pitt et al. 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Peters et al. in prep

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 1. Introduction

    The most significant factor obfuscating the chicken's bio-cultural history is imprecise dating.

    “The most significant factor obfuscating the chicken's bio-cultural history is imprecise dating.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1 A revised spatiotemporal pattern of the spread of chickens

    Current models suggest that, following their ninth-sixth century BC introduction in the Horn of Africa, chickens spread across the continent slowly.

    “This is consistent with current models suggesting that, following their ninth-sixth century BC introduction in the Horn of Africa (Woldekiros & D'Andrea 2016: 334), chickens spread across the continent slowly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Woldekiros & D'Andrea 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1. Introduction

    Such examples of direct dating are rare, yet they have consistently highlighted the fallibility of assigning chicken remains to stratigraphic dates.

    “Such examples of direct dating are rare, yet they have consistently highlighted the fallibility of assigning chicken remains to stratigraphic dates.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken Relationships

    Helms (1993) suggested that, in many cultures, animals and things derived from the 'outer realms' are often attributed with cosmological powers.

    “Helms (1993) suggested that, in many cultures, animals and things derived from the 'outer realms' are often attributed with cosmological powers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Helms 1993

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § 2. Materials and Methods

    Contextual information, and whether specimens were recovered as isolated bones or complete skeletons, can indicate risk of intrusion, whilst also revealing human attitudes towards chickens.

    “Contextual information, and whether specimens were recovered as isolated bones or complete skeletons, can indicate risk of intrusion, whilst also revealing human attitudes towards chickens.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1. Introduction

    Flink et al. (2014) directly dated a chicken bone from an Iron Age context at Altenburg, Germany, and found it to be a recent intrusion (150±30 BP, 1667-1903 cal AD, 95.4%).

    “Flink et al. (2014) directly dated a chicken bone from an Iron Age context (280-15 BC) at Altenburg, Germany, and found it to be a recent intrusion (150±30 BP, 1667-1903 cal AD, 95.4%).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Flink et al. 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Materials and Methods

    Ancient and modern chickens can be differentiated morphologically since modern chickens grow much faster and their bones are larger in every dimension than ancient specimens.

    “Bennett et al. (2018) demonstrated that ancient and modern chickens can be differentiated morphologically since modern chickens grow much faster and their bones are larger in every dimension than ancient specimens.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bennett et al. 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § 4.2 The Movement of Chicken Bones through Archaeological Stratigraphies

    This result highlights the ease with which chicken bones migrate through contexts, thus necessitating confirmation by direct dating.

    “This result highlights the ease with which chicken bones migrate through contexts, thus necessitating confirmation by direct dating.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3. Results

    The broadest radiocarbon date range of Forcello and Orvieto extends to the mid-eighth century BC, likely reflecting the Hallstatt plateau.

    “Their broadest radiocarbon date range extends to the mid-eighth century BC but this likely reflects the Hallstatt plateau, a flat area of the calibration curve that reduces the precision of determinations during this period.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Materials and Methods

    Modern chicken diets contain higher quantities of C4 plants, notably maize, and far lower levels of protein relative to their ancient counterparts.

    “modern chicken diets contain higher quantities of C4 plants, notably maize, and far lower levels of protein relative to their ancient counterparts (Bennett et al. 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bennett et al. 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken Relationships

    In Italy, the earliest identified chicken is from a tenth-ninth century BC tomb, with other possible eighth century examples, although none have been directly dated.

    “The same is true for Italy, where the earliest identified chicken is from a tenth-ninth century BC tomb (Corbino et al. in press), with other possible eighth century examples (see OSM) (De Grossi Mazzorin & Minniti 2019; Trentacoste 2020), although none of these have been directly dated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Corbino et al. in press

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites De Grossi Mazzorin & Minniti 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Trentacoste 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken Relationships

    The trend toward perceiving chickens solely as dietary protein has accelerated to the present day.

    “The trend toward perceiving chickens solely as dietary protein has accelerated to the present day.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation
    § 2.1 Radiocarbon dating

    ORAU maintains a continual programme of quality assurance procedures, in addition to participation in international inter-comparisons, which indicate no laboratory offsets and demonstrate the validity of the precision quoted.

    “ORAU maintains a continual programme of quality assurance procedures, in addition to participation in international inter-comparisons (Scott et al., 2010), which indicate no laboratory offsets and demonstrate the validity of the precision quoted.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Scott et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § 2.3 Genetic analysis

    50% of samples were replicated by extracting twice from independent samples of the same bone followed by PCR amplification and DNA sequencing.

    “50% of samples were replicated by extracting twice from independent samples of the same bone followed by PCR amplification and DNA sequencing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken Relationships

    Of the >70 billion chickens now on the planet, most are commercial broilers that grow exceptionally quickly during their short lives (average slaughter age 42 days).

    “Of the >70 billion chickens now on the planet, most are commercial broilers that grow exceptionally quickly during their short lives (the average slaughter age is 42 days -EFSA 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites EFSA 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § England

    Contrary to popular belief, chickens were not a Roman introduction but rather appear to have been present in low numbers from the Early/Middle Iron Age in England.

    “Contrary to popular belief, chickens were not a Roman introduction but rather appear to have been present in low numbers from the Early/Middle Iron Age”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kitch 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hambleton 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Maltby 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data
    § 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken Relationships

    Recent changes in chicken size, shape, genetics, and diet allow for a more robust assessment of their intrusive status.

    “Though recent changes in chicken size, shape, genetics, and diet allow for a more robust assessment of their intrusive status (Figs. 3 & 4)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premiseown data
    § 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken Relationships

    At Fishbourne Palace, chickens comprised 8% of the total assemblage, far higher than on other Iron Age/Roman sites.

    “Here, chickens comprised 8% of the total assemblage, far higher than on other Iron Age/Roman sites (Fig 5A).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken Relationships

    On other occasions, the inclusion of chickens in graves is more obviously a food offering, a practice that becomes more common through the course of the Roman period.

    “On other occasions, the inclusion of chickens in graves is more obviously a food offering, a practice that becomes more common through the course of the Roman period (White 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites White 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Greece

    Historical, iconographic and zooarchaeological records are in accord that chickens were present in Greece by the fifth century BC but there is less evidence that they were established before the ninth century BC.

    “Historical, iconographic and zooarchaeological records are in accord that chickens were present in Greece by the fifth century BC but there is less evidence that they were established before the ninth century BC”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Johansson 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Richter 1968

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken Relationships

    In the Levant, though chickens were present in the ninth/eighth century BC, it was not until the fourth/third century BC that they became a common meat resource.

    “Similarly, in the Levant, though chickens were present in the ninth/eighth century BC (Peters et al. in prep.) it was not until the fourth/third century BC that they became a common meat resource (Perry-Gal et al. 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Peters et al. in prep.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Perry-Gal et al. 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken Relationships

    These characteristics are also an eloquent expression of how dramatically human-chicken relationships have changed over the last three millennia.

    “these characteristics are also an eloquent expression of how dramatically human-chicken relationships have changed over the last three millennia.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken Relationships

    Elsewhere in Britain, chickens were not regularly consumed until the third century AD, primarily on highly Romanized towns and military sites.

    “Elsewhere in Britain, chickens were not regularly consumed until the third century AD, again primarily on highly Romanized towns and military sites (Maltby et al. 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Maltby et al. 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken Relationships

    Whereas the earliest chickens in Europe were rare and lived into maturity, today this is often inverted.

    “Whereas the earliest chickens in Europe were rare and lived into maturity, today this is often inverted.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken Relationships

    Modern chickens are seldom buried as individuals or together with people, and instead are often disposed of as fast-food refuse, littered in the street.

    “They are seldom buried as individuals or together with people, and instead are often disposed of as fast-food refuse, littered in the street (Fig 5E).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data
    § 2.4 Isotope analysis

    C:N ratios were not generated for samples CKN22 and CKN23 due to the graphitisation process during AMS analysis at the Leibniz Lab for Radiometric Dating (KIA).

    “C:N ratios were not generated for samples CKN22 and CKN23 due to the graphitisation process during AMS analysis at the Leibniz Lab for Radiometric Dating (KIA).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation
    § 2.4 Isotope analysis

    There is an association between zooarchaeological representation and depositional context, ranging from individual burial to foodstuff to litter.

    “The association between A) zooarchaeological representation (Skelton 2019) and depositional context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Skelton 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Morocco

    It is generally accepted that birds were present in the Horn of Africa by the eighth century BC, and it took approximately 1000 years for them to become established across the whole continent, especially the northwest.

    “It is generally accepted that whilst the birds were present in the Horn of Africa by the eighth century BC, it took approximately 1000 years for them to become established across the whole continent, especially the northwest.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites MacDonald 1992

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Mwacharo et al. 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Woldekiros and D'Angela 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § 2.4 Isotope analysis

    Due to isotopic fractionation resulting from this process, samples CKN22 and CKN23 were omitted from the stable isotope analysis.

    “Due to the isotopic fractionation resulting from this process, these samples were omitted from the stable isotope analysis (see Figure 4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § France

    The presence of chickens from c. 600BC (and particularly 500-400 BC) in France is widely accepted but the security of their date of introduction is unclear.

    “The presence of chickens from c. 600BC (and particularly 500-400 BC) in France is widely accepted but the security of their date of introduction is unclear”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Garcia-Petit 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lignereux and Obermaier 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Seigle 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

43 of 43
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 23 dated bones are representative of the earliest claimed chicken specimens in Europe and northwest Africa.

    “Twenty-three chicken bones were selected from 16 archaeological sites for direct radiocarbon dating”
    “we directly radiocarbon dated many of the earliest claimed specimens in Europe and Northwest Africa.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Absence of butchery marks on chicken skeletons indicates the chickens were not consumed by humans.

    “Importantly, none of these skeletons show evidence of butchery or human consumption.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Complete articulated chicken skeletons indicate deliberate burial by humans.

    “In many areas, chickens appear initially not in human burials, but as individually buried skeletons.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Medullary bone is a reliable indicator of female sex.

    “Medullary bone, an endosteal layer of bone which serves as a rapidly mobile calcium reservoir during egg laying, is a reliable indicator of female sex and was recorded by macroscopic analysis.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Associated bone groups (ABGs) are less likely to have become stratigraphically displaced than isolated remains and provide more data on the individual bird.

    “Where possible ABGs (associated bone groups) were targeted since these are less likely to have become stratigraphically displaced than isolated remains and provide more data on the individual bird.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Spurs, spur scars, and spur shields are a probable, but not definite, indicator of male sex.

    “Spurs, spur scars, and spur shields were recorded and considered a probable, but not definite, indicator of male sex.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Direct radiocarbon dating revealed that all presumed Neolithic to Bronze Age chicken remains in Bulgaria, Greece, and France were intrusive, and the earliest sample dated to only 137 to 327 CE.

    “A recent study reevaluated key specimens used to postulate early chicken husbandry, but direct radiocarbon dating of the remains revealed that all the presumed Neolithic to Bronze Age chicken remains in Bulgaria, Greece, and France were intrusive, and that of these, the earliest sample dated to only 137 to 327 CE (13).”

    From The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens (2022) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Materials and Methods and Results report direct dating of selected specimens from Bulgaria, Greece, and France; the specimens proved later than their proposed prehistoric contexts. But Table 2 does not give 137–327 CE for the earliest of them: the earliest dated specimen proposed to be Neolithic or Bronze Age is from Galabovo, Bulgaria, at 215–338 cal AD. The study tested selected remains, not all presumed remains in those countries. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • By the late sixth/early fifth century BCE, chickens were present in the Upper Rhine and Danube River basins and in southeast England.

    “By the late sixth/early fifth century BCE, chickens were present in the Upper Rhine and Danube River basins (76) (Fig. 2), and in southeast England (13).”

    From The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens (2022) · cites this paper as [13]

    The paper’s discussion (section 4.1; page unavailable) says chickens were introduced into southern Britain by the sixth–fifth centuries BCE, supporting the broad timing and location. But the Results (section 3; page unavailable) place its earliest directly dated English specimen only as far back as the late fifth century BCE. The copy does not establish their presence specifically in southeast England by the late sixth or early fifth century BCE. The Upper Rhine and Danube claim is attached to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cut marks on individual chicken bones found as refuse are not present until several centuries later.

    “Cut marks on individual chicken bones found as refuse are not present until several centuries later”

    From The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens (2022) · cites this paper as [13]

    Section 4.3 (page unavailable) says the early buried chicken skeletons show no evidence of butchery and describes a delay of several centuries before chickens were eaten in Britain and Italy. It does not establish the more specific claim that cut marks on individual bones found as refuse were absent throughout that interval. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A recent program of radiocarbon dating demonstrated that numerous early claims for the first appearance of chickens in Europe were spurious.

    “The latter can lead to invalid claims regarding their dating and cultural context, and a recent program of radiocarbon dating demonstrated that numerous early claims for the first appearance of chickens in Europe were spurious (13).”

    From The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens (2022) · cites this paper as [13]

  • Early chickens in European archaeological contexts appear as complete skeletons.

    “A recent study (13) demonstrated that early chickens in European archaeological contexts appear as complete skeletons.”

    From The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens (2022) · cites this paper as [13]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Winklebury citation year differs from the reference list

    Minor

    The supplementary specimen table cites Jones 1997 for Winklebury, whereas the listed Jones publication about the Winklebury excavation is dated 1977.

  • Yabalkovo specimen cites the Hotnitsa publication

    Minor

    The supplementary specimen table cites Boev 2009b for Yabalkovo, but the paper's reference list identifies Boev 2009b as a publication about Hotnitsa.

  • Hotnitsa specimen cites the Yabalkovo publication

    Minor

    The supplementary specimen table cites Boev 2009a for Hotnitsa, but the reference list identifies Boev 2009a as a publication about Yabalkovo.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Peters, 1998, Römische Tierhaltung und Tierzucht: eine Synthese aus archäozoologischer Untersuchung und schriftlich-bildlicher Überlieferung (Passauer Universitätsschriften zur Archäologie 5)
  2. White, 2007, TRAC 2006: proceedings of the sixteenth annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, Cambridge 2006, 115
  3. De Grossi Mazzorin, 2019, The exploitation and mobility of exotic animals: zooarchaeological evidence from Rome, Journal of Roman Archaeology, Supplementary Series, 107, 85
  4. Becker, 2013, Von Sylt bis Kastanas: Festschrift für Helmut Johannes Kroll, 225
  5. Boev, 1995, On the appearance of the domestic fowl (Gallus gallus domestica) in Bulgaria and the Balkan Peninsula and the question of domestication of junglefowls (genus Gallus Brisson, 1760) in south-east Europe, Historia Naturalis Bulgarica, 5, 37
  6. Sykes, 2018, Biogeography, in S.L. López Varela (ed.) The encyclopedia of archaeological sciences
  7. Baker, 2019, Animal bones and archaeology: recovery to archive
  8. Serjeantson, 2009, Birds
  9. Kyselý, 2010, Review of the oldest evidence of domestic fowl Gallus gallus f. domestica from the Czech Republic in its European context, Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, Series A: Vertebrata, 53
  10. Skelton, C. 2019. Food taboos and preferences: how can they be seen in the archaeological record? Unpublished MA dissertation, University of Exeter.
  11. Kitch, 2006, Animal bone from White Horse Stone, Aylesford, Kent (CTRL Specialist Report Series 2006)
  12. Edwards, 1989, Caesar: the Gallic War (Loeb Classical Library 72)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Best, J., Doherty, S., Armit, I., Boev, Z., Büster, L., Cunliffe, B., Foster, A., Frimet, B., Hamilton-Dyer, S., Higham, T., Lebrasseur, O., Miller, H., Peters, J., Seigle, M., Skelton, C., Symmons, R., Thomas, R., Trentacoste, A., Maltby, M., Larson, G., & Sykes, N.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • University of York (GB)
  • Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BG)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Université de Lyon (FR)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • Bournemouth University (GB)
Corresponding author
Sykes, Naomi
Venue
Antiquity
Published
2022-06-07
Volume
96
Issue
388
Pages
868-882
ISSN
  • 0003-598X (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1744
OpenAlex
W4281678786
Cited by
35
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4
FWCI
5.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antiquity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University) (acceptedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NF/2015/2/5)
  • Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/L006979/1, AH/N004558/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil and Environmental Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
Keywords
chickens, domestication, animal introduction, spatiotemporal spread, radiocarbon dating, exotica, Europe, Maghreb, Eurasia, 1st millennium BC

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review