Redefining the timing and circumstances of the chicken's introduction to Europe and north-west Africa
Open accessAbstract
Little is known about the early history of the chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus), including the timing and circumstances of its introduction into new cultural environments. To evaluate its spatio-temporal spread across Eurasia and north-west Africa, the authors radiocarbon dated 23 chicken bones from presumed early contexts. Three-quarters returned dates later than those suggested by stratigraphy, indicating the importance of direct dating. The results indicate that chickens did not arrive in Europe until the first millennium BC. Moreover, a consistent time-lag between the introduction of chickens and their consumption by humans suggests that these animals were initially regarded as exotica and only several centuries later recognised as a source of ‘food’.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Direct radiocarbon dating of 23 chicken bones from 16 archaeological sites across Europe and north-west Africa shows that 18 were more recent than their reported stratigraphic dates, undermining pre-Iron Age claims. The results support a revised chronology in which chickens reached Italy by the eighth century BC, France and southern Britain by the sixth–fifth century BC, and Scotland much later, with early birds often treated as exotica rather than food.
Key findings
- Of 23 dated chicken bones, only five were consistent with their reported stratigraphic phasing; the remaining 18 were more recent. The authors found no evidence for chickens in Europe during the Neolithic, Chalcolithic or Bronze Age, and argue that pre-Iron Age European chicken claims should be rejected unless supported by direct radiocarbon dating.
- The earliest radiocarbon dates came from Forcello (CKN5) and Orvieto (CKN6) in Italy, both consistent with sixth- and fifth-century BC contexts; their broadest range extends to the mid-eighth century BC, likely reflecting the Hallstatt plateau. Weston Down (CKN8) and Houghton Down (CKN9) were consistent with fourth/third-century BC contexts, and Stonehenge Road (CKN7) extended into the late fifth century BC.
- At Mogador, Morocco, CKN18 and CKN19 were modern (post-bomb), while CKN20 and CKN21 dated to 893–1024 cal AD and 1031–1167 cal AD, undermining claims of a seventh-century BC presence. Other intrusive specimens included Tiryns CKN23 (c.1300 years younger than its Bronze Age context), Galabovo CKN2 and CKN3 (436–605 cal AD and 215–338 cal AD), Yabalkovo CKN1 (1029–1158 cal AD), and Korucutepe CKN16/CKN17 (thirteenth century AD).
- The discussion argues early northern European chickens were often articulated, unbutchered, mature animals treated as exotica; later they shifted toward human–chicken co-burials and food. In Britain, 700–800 years elapsed between introduction and dietary acceptance, and at Fishbourne Palace chickens comprised 8% of the assemblage, with direct dates of 1970±30 BP and 1920±30 BP.
Methods
- Twenty-three chicken bones from 16 archaeological sites were selected for direct radiocarbon dating, covering contexts from Neolithic/Bronze Age to Iron Age in Bulgaria, Turkey, Greece, France, Italy, Morocco, England and Scotland.
- Dating was undertaken at Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (n=20), Kiel AMS (n=2) and Beta Analytic (n=1); dates were calibrated using OxCal 4.4.2, with IntCal20 except for post-bomb samples 4, 18 and 19, which used Bomb13NH1.
- Specimens were measured and examined for butchery, sex and age; zooarchaeological analysis, ancient DNA analysis for one large specimen, and δ13C/δ15N isotope analysis were also conducted. C:N ratios for CKN1–CKN21 were 3.2–3.4, indicating well-preserved collagen.
Limitations
- The paper has no explicit limitations section. Stated caveats include the Hallstatt plateau reducing precision for the Italian dates, CKN22 lacking a 14C age and being post-1954, CKN22/CKN23 being omitted from stable isotope analysis due to graphitisation, and some early Italian specimens not being available for direct dating.
- Evident from the text: the study directly dates only 23 selected bones from 16 sites, so many early claims remain undated; coverage is geographically and temporally uneven; and the authors note prior reanalyses found some early “chicken” bones were actually pheasants, while their own identifications rely on zooarchaeological analysis with genetic confirmation for only one specimen.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 62 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data§ 4. Discussion and Conclusion
Our results do not support claims of an autochthonous Holocene population of junglefowl in Eastern Europe.
“nor do our results support claims of an autochthonous Holocene population of junglefowl in Eastern Europe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 3. Results
The morphological and isotopic results from CKN18 and CKN19 appeared closer to those for modern broilers than ancient chickens.
“This explains the morphological and isotopic results derived from the same bones which appeared closer to those for modern broilers (commercial meat birds) and not ancient chickens”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3. Results
Of the 23 dated chicken bones, only five were consistent with their reported stratigraphic phasing.
“Of the 23 dated chicken bones, only five were consistent with their reported stratigraphic phasing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.1 A revised spatiotemporal pattern of the spread of chickens
Our direct dates support the suggestion that chickens were not introduced to the Scottish Isles until the Norse arrivals from c.AD 800.
“Our direct dates also support the suggestion that chickens were not introduced to the Scottish Isles until the Norse arrivals from c.AD 800 (Best 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Best 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ 3. Results
Both proposed Late Bronze Age specimens from Korucutepe, Turkey (CKN16 and CKN17), dated to the thirteenth century AD.
“Both proposed Late Bronze Age specimens from Korucutepe in Turkey (CKN16 and CKN17) dated to the thirteenth century AD”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data§ 3. Results
The radiocarbon dates associated with the remaining 18 were more recent than their reported dates.
“The radiocarbon dates associated with the remaining 18 were more recent than their reported dates”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.1 A revised spatiotemporal pattern of the spread of chickens
Our results undermine claims of a seventh century BC presence in northwest Africa (Mogador, Morocco).
“Our results undermine claims of a seventh century BC presence in northwest Africa (Mogador, Morocco)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3. Results
The isotope values of CKN20 and CKN21 plot within the distribution of other ancient chicken remains.
“whose isotope values plot within the distribution of other ancient chicken remains (Fig 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken Relationships
The long spurs on the Houghton Down cockerel suggest it was over two years old.
“the long spurs on the Houghton Down cockerel (Fig 5B) suggest it was over two years old (Doherty et al. 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Doherty et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ 3. Results
At Covesea Cave 2, Scotland, specimen CKN15 was shown to be seventeenth-twentieth century AD rather than Iron Age (800 BC - AD 800).
“At Covesea Cave 2 (Scotland) specimen CKN15 was shown to be seventeenth-twentieth century AD rather than Iron Age (800 BC -AD 800).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.1 A revised spatiotemporal pattern of the spread of chickens
Specimens from Mogador, Morocco, did date to ninth-twelfth centuries AD.
“but specimens from this site did date to ninth-twelfth centuries AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken Relationships
None of these skeletons show evidence of butchery or human consumption.
“Importantly, none of these skeletons show evidence of butchery or human consumption.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3. Results
The purportedly Iron Age skeleton from Winklebury (CKN10, England) returned a post-medieval/modern date.
“Despite this, the purportedly Iron Age skeleton from Winklebury (CKN10, England) returned a post-medieval/modern date.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3. Results
CKN18 and CKN19 from Mogador, Morocco, were modern (post-bomb).
“Age/Roman Mogador (Morocco: CKN18 and CKN19) were modern (post-bomb).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3. Results
CKN13 from Boulancourt, le Châtelet, France, was medieval rather than Bronze Age.
“CKN13 from Boulancourt, le Châtelet (France) was also medieval rather than Bronze Age.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3. Results
Specimen CKN23 from Tiryns, Greece, was c.1300 years younger than its Bronze Age context.
“Other intrusive chicken bones include specimen CKN23 from Tiryns (Greece) which was c.1300 years younger than its Bronze Age context.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.2 The Movement of Chicken Bones through Archaeological Stratigraphies
With one exception, all of the specimens that did not match their contextually assigned dates were isolated bones.
“With one exception, all of the specimens that did not match their contextually assigned dates were isolated bones.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ 4.1 A revised spatiotemporal pattern of the spread of chickens
Our results support the accepted chronology that chickens were present in Italy by the eighth century BC.
“Our results also support the accepted chronology that chickens were present in Italy by the eighth century BC (Corbino et al. in press;Trentacoste 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Corbino et al. in press
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Trentacoste 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ 3. Results
The skeletons from Weston Down (CKN8) and Houghton Down (CKN9) were consistent with their fourth/third century BC contexts.
“The skeletons from Weston Down (CKN8) and Houghton Down (CKN9) were, however, consistent with their fourth/third century BC contexts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3. Results
Two specimens from Galabovo, Bulgaria, were over 3500 years younger than originally claimed (CKN3: 215-338 cal AD and CKN2: 436-605 cal AD).
“Two specimens from Galabovo (Bulgaria) were over 3500 years younger than originally claimed (CKN3: 215-338 cal AD and CKN2: 436-605 cal AD)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3. Results
The isolated chicken bone from Stonehenge Road Improvement (CKN7) appears slightly earlier, extending into the late fifth century BC.
“The isolated chicken bone from Stonehenge Road Improvement (CKN7) appears slightly earlier, extending into the late fifth century BC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4. Discussion and Conclusion
We found no evidence for chickens in Europe during the Neolithic, Chalcolithic or Bronze Age.
“Specifically, we found no evidence for chickens in Europe during the Neolithic, Chalcolithic or Bronze Age”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3. Results
Specimen CKN14 from Marseille, France, thought to be from a secure Iron Age context, was found to be Roman.
“Specimen CKN14 from Marseille (France), thought to be from a secure Iron Age context, was found to be Roman.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ Scotland (including mainland and the Scottish Islands)
Several of the proposed chicken finds from the Iron Age levels of Howe were reidentified as red grouse.
“Several of the proposed chicken finds from the Iron Age levels of this site were reidentified as red grouse.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken Relationships
Our survey of British co-burials indicates that these funerary rites were often strongly gendered: males were buried with cockerels, females with hens.
“Our survey of British co-burials indicates that these funerary rites were often strongly gendered: males were buried with cockerels, females with hens (as at Broughton, Yorkshire, Fig 5B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ Abstract
Radiocarbon dating redefines the timing and circumstances of the chicken's introduction to Europe and northwest Africa.
“Radiocarbon dating redefines the timing and circumstances of the chicken's introduction to Europe and northwest Africa”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1. Introduction
Reanalyses by Eda et al. (2016) and Peters et al. (2016) revealed that several bones identified as early chicken remains were actually pheasants.
“reanalyses by Eda et al. (2016) and Peters et al. (2016) revealed that several bones identified as early chicken remains were actually pheasants”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Eda et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Peters et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ 4.1 A revised spatiotemporal pattern of the spread of chickens
Chickens were introduced into France and southern Britain by the sixth-fifth century BC.
“whilst chickens were introduced into France and southern Britain by the sixth-fifth century BC (Peters et al. in prep.)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Peters et al. in prep.
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 1. Introduction
Issues of taphonomy and recovery bias can lead to an under-representation of archaeological chicken bones, making it difficult to accurately reconstruct ancient distributions.
“Issues of taphonomy and recovery bias can lead to an under-representation of archaeological chicken bones, making it difficult to accurately reconstruct ancient distributions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Serjeantson 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dirrigl et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ 4. Discussion and Conclusion
All claims for the presence of pre-Iron Age European chickens should be rejected unless supported by direct radiocarbon dating of the bones themselves.
“our results suggest that all claims for the presence of pre-Iron Age European chickens should be rejected unless supported by direct radiocarbon dating of the bones themselves.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken Relationships
Globally, the first convincing evidence for domestic chickens comes from complete skeletons placed within Bronze Age human burials in Thailand and China.
“Globally, the first convincing evidence for domestic chickens comes from complete skeletons placed within Bronze Age human burials in Thailand (e.g.Ban Non Wat c.800 BC) and China (Dasikongcun royal cemetery, 1320-1046 BC) (Peters et al. in prep).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Peters et al. in prep
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken Relationships
Rather than being considered 'food', these early arrivals to northern Europe were more likely viewed and treated as exotica, especially given their limited population size at the time.
“Rather than being considered 'food', these early arrivals to northern Europe were more likely viewed and treated as exotica, especially given their limited population size at the time (Fig 5A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken Relationships
In many areas, chickens appear initially not in human burials, but as individually buried skeletons.
“In many areas, chickens appear initially not in human burials, but as individually buried skeletons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken Relationships
The idea that chickens were too rare or too important to be slaughtered for meat is consistent with Caesar's De Bello Gallico.
“The idea that chickens were too rare or too important to be slaughtered for meat is consistent with Caesar's De Bello Gallico that states”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Caesar's De Bello Gallico
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3. Results
Articulated skeletons are generally acknowledged to be reliable indicators of a secure context.
“Articulated skeletons are generally acknowledged to be reliable indicators of a secure context (Baker & Worley 2019: 18).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baker & Worley 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 4.1 A revised spatiotemporal pattern of the spread of chickens
For mainland Scotland, rather than being introduced from the south, chickens may have arrived via Scandinavia or Ireland.
“The same appears to be true for mainland Scotland where, rather than being introduced from the south, chickens may have arrived via Scandinavia or Ireland.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1. Introduction
Ledoger et al. (2018) demonstrated that proposed Neolithic specimens from a Ukrainian cave were intrusive.
“Ledoger et al. (2018) demonstrated that proposed Neolithic specimens from a Ukrainian cave were also intrusive.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ledoger et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ 4. Discussion and Conclusion
This programme of radiocarbon dating redefines the established chronology for the arrival and dispersal of chickens across Europe.
“This programme of radiocarbon dating redefines the established chronology for the arrival and dispersal of chickens across Europe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2. Materials and Methods
Advances in poultry feeding and selective breeding have resulted in significant genetic changes in modern chickens.
“This is due to advances in poultry feeding and selective breeding that have resulted in significant genetic changes (Flink et al. 2014;Loog et al. 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Flink et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Loog et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ 1. Introduction
Chicken bones are prone to stratigraphic movement via bioturbation or through building and agricultural activities.
“Chicken bones are prone to stratigraphic movement via bioturbation or through building and agricultural activities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data§ 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken Relationships
For northern Europe, and in particular Britain, there is a sufficient body of securely dated evidence to propose a model for how attitudes to chickens changed through time.
“For northern Europe, and in particular Britain, there is a sufficient body of securely dated evidence to propose a model for how attitudes to chickens changed through time (Fig 5A-E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 4.1 A revised spatiotemporal pattern of the spread of chickens
It took almost 1,000 years longer for thermophilic chickens to become established in the colder climates of Scotland, Ireland, Scandinavia and Iceland.
“It took almost 1,000 years longer for thermophilic chickens to become established in the colder climates of Scotland, Ireland, Scandinavia and Iceland (Best 2014;Best & Mulville 2014;Sykes 2018;Walker & Meijer 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Best 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Best & Mulville 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sykes 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken Relationships
In Britain, 700-800 years elapsed between the initial introduction of chickens as newly arrived exotic (whose flesh was prohibited for consumption) and the acceptance of chickens as a source of dietary protein.
“This evidence suggests that, in Britain, 700-800 years elapsed between their initial introduction as newly arrived exotic (whose flesh was prohibited for consumption), and the acceptance of chickens as a source of dietary protein.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Italy
The earliest chicken bones in Italy have been identified in a tenth/ninth-century BC cremation tomb at Monte Cucco, Castel Gandolfo.
“The earliest chicken bones in Italy have been identified in a tenth/ninth-century BC cremation tomb (De Grossi Mazzorin 2005; De Grossi Mazzorin and Minniti 2019,10; date following the high Latial chronology, see van der Plicht et al. 2009; Guidi 2018) at Monte Cucco, Castel Gandolfo”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites De Grossi Mazzorin 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites De Grossi Mazzorin and Minniti 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Scotland (including mainland and the Scottish Islands)
The northward dispersal of chickens to Scotland is known to have been delayed relative to their spread in southern Britain.
“The northward dispersal of chickens to Scotland is known to have been delayed relative to their spread in southern Britain”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Best 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Best and Mulville 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Serjeantson 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Italy
From the mid-first millennium BC chicken remains become increasingly common in the Italian zooarchaeological record, including non-funerary contexts.
“From the mid-first millennium BC chicken remains become increasingly common in the Italian zooarchaeological record, including non-funerary contexts”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites De Grossi Mazzorin 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Trentacoste 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Trentacoste 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Italy
Roman expansion encouraged the spread and uptake of chickens in western and northern Europe.
“Roman expansion is known to have encouraged the spread and uptake of chickens in western and northern Europe (e.g.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Maltby 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Maltby et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken Relationships
The spread of the Roman Empire popularised chickens and eggs as a foodstuff.
“The spread of the Roman Empire popularised chickens and eggs as a foodstuff (e.g.Maltby et al. 2018;Peters 1998).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Maltby et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Peters 1998
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken Relationships
In Britain, the earliest evidence for high levels of chicken consumption comes from Fishbourne Palace, Sussex, where exceptional numbers of chickens were eaten as early as the first century AD.
“In Britain, the earliest evidence for high levels of chicken consumption comes from the 'Romanized' site of Fishbourne Palace, Sussex, where Allen (2010) demonstrated that exceptional numbers of chickens were eaten as early as the first century AD”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Allen 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 31
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 19
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3. ResultsThe two chicken bones from Howe, Orkney, returned direct dates of fourteenth-fifteenth century AD (CKN11) and seventeenth-twentieth centuries AD (CKN12), respectively, rather than 200-800 AD.
“the two chicken bones selected from Howe, Orkney, though supposedly dating between 200-800 AD returned direct dates of fourteenth-fifteenth century AD (CKN11) and seventeenth-twentieth centuries AD (CKN12), respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3. ResultsThe two modern individuals (CKN18 and CKN19) had more positive δ13C values and more negative δ15N values relative to the two medieval-dated specimens (CKN20 and CKN21).
“The two modern individuals (CKN18 and CKN19) had more positive δ 13 C values and more negative δ 15 N values relative to the two medieval-dated specimens (CKN20 and CKN21)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3. ResultsSpecimen CKN1 from Yabalkovo, Bulgaria, was c.5,000 years younger and dated to the eleventh-twelfth centuries AD.
“specimen CKN1 from Yabalkovo (Bulgaria) was c.5,000 years younger and dated to the eleventh-twelfth centuries AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken RelationshipsThe hen from Weston Down (CKN8) was mature and had a well-healed leg fracture, which could indicate evidence of human care.
“Similarly, the hen from Weston Down (CKN8) was mature and had a well-healed leg fracture (Fig 3C) which could indicate evidence of human care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3. ResultsThe earliest radiocarbon dates were from two Italian sites: Forcello (CKN5) and Orvieto (CKN6), both consistent with their sixth and fifth century BC contexts.
“The earliest radiocarbon dates were from two Italian sites: Forcello (CKN5) and Orvieto (CKN6), both of which were consistent with their sixth and fifth century BC contexts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4.2 The Movement of Chicken Bones through Archaeological StratigraphiesDirect dates from the other articulated remains corroborated their stratigraphic phasing, and they are among the earliest regional specimens in our European dataset.
“However, direct dates from the other articulated remains corroborated their stratigraphic phasing, and they are among the earliest regional specimens in our European dataset.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 3. ResultsThe specimen from Forcello (CKN5) derived from an articulated skeleton.
“The specimen from Forcello (CKN5) again derived from an articulated skeleton.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ 2.4 Isotope analysisThe Iron Age Weston Down specimen CKN8 exhibits injured bone.
“showing healthy bone on the left and injured bone on the right (CKN8)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken RelationshipsThrough Late Iron Age and Early Roman Britain, there is an observable shift in frequency of chicken remains and towards human-chicken co-burials.
“Through Late Iron Age and Early Roman Britain, there is an observable shift not only in the frequency of chicken remains within zooarchaeological assemblages (Fig 5A), but also towards human-chicken co-burials (Fig 5C)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 2.4 Isotope analysisSpecimen CKN22, thought to date to 1250-1100 BC, was determined to be post-1954 and is not included in the calibrated radiocarbon results.
“CKN22 (thought to date to 1250-1100 BC) was determined to be 'post-1954' and is not included.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 2.4 Isotope analysisSamples CKN1 to CKN21 produced C:N ratios between 3.2-3.4, indicative of well-preserved collagen.
“Samples CKN1 to CKN21 produced C:N ratios between 3.2-3.4,indicative of well-preserved collagen (DeNiro 1985;Ambrose 1990;van Klinken 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites DeNiro 1985
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ambrose 1990
Not checked in the free run.
- cites van Klinken 1999
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 1. IntroductionThere is little evidence to support the hypothesis that chickens were domesticated primarily as a food source.
“though there is little evidence to support this hypothesis”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 4.1 A revised spatiotemporal pattern of the spread of chickensIt seems likely that chickens were transported throughout the Mediterranean along routes ecologically suited to them, likely via early Greek, Etruscan and Phoenician maritime trade.
“It seems likely that chickens were transported throughout the Mediterranean along routes ecologically suited to them (Pitt et al. 2016), likely via early Greek, Etruscan and Phoenician maritime trade (Peters et al. in prep).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Pitt et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Peters et al. in prep
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 1. IntroductionThe most significant factor obfuscating the chicken's bio-cultural history is imprecise dating.
“The most significant factor obfuscating the chicken's bio-cultural history is imprecise dating.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.1 A revised spatiotemporal pattern of the spread of chickensCurrent models suggest that, following their ninth-sixth century BC introduction in the Horn of Africa, chickens spread across the continent slowly.
“This is consistent with current models suggesting that, following their ninth-sixth century BC introduction in the Horn of Africa (Woldekiros & D'Andrea 2016: 334), chickens spread across the continent slowly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Woldekiros & D'Andrea 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. IntroductionSuch examples of direct dating are rare, yet they have consistently highlighted the fallibility of assigning chicken remains to stratigraphic dates.
“Such examples of direct dating are rare, yet they have consistently highlighted the fallibility of assigning chicken remains to stratigraphic dates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken RelationshipsHelms (1993) suggested that, in many cultures, animals and things derived from the 'outer realms' are often attributed with cosmological powers.
“Helms (1993) suggested that, in many cultures, animals and things derived from the 'outer realms' are often attributed with cosmological powers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Helms 1993
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone given§ 2. Materials and MethodsContextual information, and whether specimens were recovered as isolated bones or complete skeletons, can indicate risk of intrusion, whilst also revealing human attitudes towards chickens.
“Contextual information, and whether specimens were recovered as isolated bones or complete skeletons, can indicate risk of intrusion, whilst also revealing human attitudes towards chickens.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. IntroductionFlink et al. (2014) directly dated a chicken bone from an Iron Age context at Altenburg, Germany, and found it to be a recent intrusion (150±30 BP, 1667-1903 cal AD, 95.4%).
“Flink et al. (2014) directly dated a chicken bone from an Iron Age context (280-15 BC) at Altenburg, Germany, and found it to be a recent intrusion (150±30 BP, 1667-1903 cal AD, 95.4%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Flink et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2. Materials and MethodsAncient and modern chickens can be differentiated morphologically since modern chickens grow much faster and their bones are larger in every dimension than ancient specimens.
“Bennett et al. (2018) demonstrated that ancient and modern chickens can be differentiated morphologically since modern chickens grow much faster and their bones are larger in every dimension than ancient specimens.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bennett et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 4.2 The Movement of Chicken Bones through Archaeological StratigraphiesThis result highlights the ease with which chicken bones migrate through contexts, thus necessitating confirmation by direct dating.
“This result highlights the ease with which chicken bones migrate through contexts, thus necessitating confirmation by direct dating.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3. ResultsThe broadest radiocarbon date range of Forcello and Orvieto extends to the mid-eighth century BC, likely reflecting the Hallstatt plateau.
“Their broadest radiocarbon date range extends to the mid-eighth century BC but this likely reflects the Hallstatt plateau, a flat area of the calibration curve that reduces the precision of determinations during this period.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2. Materials and MethodsModern chicken diets contain higher quantities of C4 plants, notably maize, and far lower levels of protein relative to their ancient counterparts.
“modern chicken diets contain higher quantities of C4 plants, notably maize, and far lower levels of protein relative to their ancient counterparts (Bennett et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bennett et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken RelationshipsIn Italy, the earliest identified chicken is from a tenth-ninth century BC tomb, with other possible eighth century examples, although none have been directly dated.
“The same is true for Italy, where the earliest identified chicken is from a tenth-ninth century BC tomb (Corbino et al. in press), with other possible eighth century examples (see OSM) (De Grossi Mazzorin & Minniti 2019; Trentacoste 2020), although none of these have been directly dated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Corbino et al. in press
Not checked in the free run.
- cites De Grossi Mazzorin & Minniti 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Trentacoste 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken RelationshipsThe trend toward perceiving chickens solely as dietary protein has accelerated to the present day.
“The trend toward perceiving chickens solely as dietary protein has accelerated to the present day.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitation§ 2.1 Radiocarbon datingORAU maintains a continual programme of quality assurance procedures, in addition to participation in international inter-comparisons, which indicate no laboratory offsets and demonstrate the validity of the precision quoted.
“ORAU maintains a continual programme of quality assurance procedures, in addition to participation in international inter-comparisons (Scott et al., 2010), which indicate no laboratory offsets and demonstrate the validity of the precision quoted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Scott et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone given§ 2.3 Genetic analysis50% of samples were replicated by extracting twice from independent samples of the same bone followed by PCR amplification and DNA sequencing.
“50% of samples were replicated by extracting twice from independent samples of the same bone followed by PCR amplification and DNA sequencing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken RelationshipsOf the >70 billion chickens now on the planet, most are commercial broilers that grow exceptionally quickly during their short lives (average slaughter age 42 days).
“Of the >70 billion chickens now on the planet, most are commercial broilers that grow exceptionally quickly during their short lives (the average slaughter age is 42 days -EFSA 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites EFSA 2010
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ EnglandContrary to popular belief, chickens were not a Roman introduction but rather appear to have been present in low numbers from the Early/Middle Iron Age in England.
“Contrary to popular belief, chickens were not a Roman introduction but rather appear to have been present in low numbers from the Early/Middle Iron Age”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Kitch 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hambleton 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Maltby 1997
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken RelationshipsRecent changes in chicken size, shape, genetics, and diet allow for a more robust assessment of their intrusive status.
“Though recent changes in chicken size, shape, genetics, and diet allow for a more robust assessment of their intrusive status (Figs. 3 & 4)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premiseown data§ 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken RelationshipsAt Fishbourne Palace, chickens comprised 8% of the total assemblage, far higher than on other Iron Age/Roman sites.
“Here, chickens comprised 8% of the total assemblage, far higher than on other Iron Age/Roman sites (Fig 5A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken RelationshipsOn other occasions, the inclusion of chickens in graves is more obviously a food offering, a practice that becomes more common through the course of the Roman period.
“On other occasions, the inclusion of chickens in graves is more obviously a food offering, a practice that becomes more common through the course of the Roman period (White 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites White 2007
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ GreeceHistorical, iconographic and zooarchaeological records are in accord that chickens were present in Greece by the fifth century BC but there is less evidence that they were established before the ninth century BC.
“Historical, iconographic and zooarchaeological records are in accord that chickens were present in Greece by the fifth century BC but there is less evidence that they were established before the ninth century BC”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Johansson 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Richter 1968
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken RelationshipsIn the Levant, though chickens were present in the ninth/eighth century BC, it was not until the fourth/third century BC that they became a common meat resource.
“Similarly, in the Levant, though chickens were present in the ninth/eighth century BC (Peters et al. in prep.) it was not until the fourth/third century BC that they became a common meat resource (Perry-Gal et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Peters et al. in prep.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Perry-Gal et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken RelationshipsThese characteristics are also an eloquent expression of how dramatically human-chicken relationships have changed over the last three millennia.
“these characteristics are also an eloquent expression of how dramatically human-chicken relationships have changed over the last three millennia.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken RelationshipsElsewhere in Britain, chickens were not regularly consumed until the third century AD, primarily on highly Romanized towns and military sites.
“Elsewhere in Britain, chickens were not regularly consumed until the third century AD, again primarily on highly Romanized towns and military sites (Maltby et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Maltby et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken RelationshipsWhereas the earliest chickens in Europe were rare and lived into maturity, today this is often inverted.
“Whereas the earliest chickens in Europe were rare and lived into maturity, today this is often inverted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.3 The Dynamics of Human-Chicken RelationshipsModern chickens are seldom buried as individuals or together with people, and instead are often disposed of as fast-food refuse, littered in the street.
“They are seldom buried as individuals or together with people, and instead are often disposed of as fast-food refuse, littered in the street (Fig 5E).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ 2.4 Isotope analysisC:N ratios were not generated for samples CKN22 and CKN23 due to the graphitisation process during AMS analysis at the Leibniz Lab for Radiometric Dating (KIA).
“C:N ratios were not generated for samples CKN22 and CKN23 due to the graphitisation process during AMS analysis at the Leibniz Lab for Radiometric Dating (KIA).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ 2.4 Isotope analysisThere is an association between zooarchaeological representation and depositional context, ranging from individual burial to foodstuff to litter.
“The association between A) zooarchaeological representation (Skelton 2019) and depositional context.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Skelton 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ MoroccoIt is generally accepted that birds were present in the Horn of Africa by the eighth century BC, and it took approximately 1000 years for them to become established across the whole continent, especially the northwest.
“It is generally accepted that whilst the birds were present in the Horn of Africa by the eighth century BC, it took approximately 1000 years for them to become established across the whole continent, especially the northwest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites MacDonald 1992
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Mwacharo et al. 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Woldekiros and D'Angela 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductreasoning§ 2.4 Isotope analysisDue to isotopic fractionation resulting from this process, samples CKN22 and CKN23 were omitted from the stable isotope analysis.
“Due to the isotopic fractionation resulting from this process, these samples were omitted from the stable isotope analysis (see Figure 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ FranceThe presence of chickens from c. 600BC (and particularly 500-400 BC) in France is widely accepted but the security of their date of introduction is unclear.
“The presence of chickens from c. 600BC (and particularly 500-400 BC) in France is widely accepted but the security of their date of introduction is unclear”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Garcia-Petit 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lignereux and Obermaier 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Seigle 2016
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
The 23 dated bones are representative of the earliest claimed chicken specimens in Europe and northwest Africa.
“Twenty-three chicken bones were selected from 16 archaeological sites for direct radiocarbon dating”
“we directly radiocarbon dated many of the earliest claimed specimens in Europe and Northwest Africa.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Absence of butchery marks on chicken skeletons indicates the chickens were not consumed by humans.
“Importantly, none of these skeletons show evidence of butchery or human consumption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Complete articulated chicken skeletons indicate deliberate burial by humans.
“In many areas, chickens appear initially not in human burials, but as individually buried skeletons.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Medullary bone is a reliable indicator of female sex.
“Medullary bone, an endosteal layer of bone which serves as a rapidly mobile calcium reservoir during egg laying, is a reliable indicator of female sex and was recorded by macroscopic analysis.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Associated bone groups (ABGs) are less likely to have become stratigraphically displaced than isolated remains and provide more data on the individual bird.
“Where possible ABGs (associated bone groups) were targeted since these are less likely to have become stratigraphically displaced than isolated remains and provide more data on the individual bird.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Spurs, spur scars, and spur shields are a probable, but not definite, indicator of male sex.
“Spurs, spur scars, and spur shields were recorded and considered a probable, but not definite, indicator of male sex.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Direct radiocarbon dating revealed that all presumed Neolithic to Bronze Age chicken remains in Bulgaria, Greece, and France were intrusive, and the earliest sample dated to only 137 to 327 CE.
“A recent study reevaluated key specimens used to postulate early chicken husbandry, but direct radiocarbon dating of the remains revealed that all the presumed Neolithic to Bronze Age chicken remains in Bulgaria, Greece, and France were intrusive, and that of these, the earliest sample dated to only 137 to 327 CE (13).”
From The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
The Materials and Methods and Results report direct dating of selected specimens from Bulgaria, Greece, and France; the specimens proved later than their proposed prehistoric contexts. But Table 2 does not give 137–327 CE for the earliest of them: the earliest dated specimen proposed to be Neolithic or Bronze Age is from Galabovo, Bulgaria, at 215–338 cal AD. The study tested selected remains, not all presumed remains in those countries. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBy the late sixth/early fifth century BCE, chickens were present in the Upper Rhine and Danube River basins and in southeast England.
“By the late sixth/early fifth century BCE, chickens were present in the Upper Rhine and Danube River basins (76) (Fig. 2), and in southeast England (13).”
From The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
The paper’s discussion (section 4.1; page unavailable) says chickens were introduced into southern Britain by the sixth–fifth centuries BCE, supporting the broad timing and location. But the Results (section 3; page unavailable) place its earliest directly dated English specimen only as far back as the late fifth century BCE. The copy does not establish their presence specifically in southeast England by the late sixth or early fifth century BCE. The Upper Rhine and Danube claim is attached to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredCut marks on individual chicken bones found as refuse are not present until several centuries later.
“Cut marks on individual chicken bones found as refuse are not present until several centuries later”
From The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
Section 4.3 (page unavailable) says the early buried chicken skeletons show no evidence of butchery and describes a delay of several centuries before chickens were eaten in Britain and Italy. It does not establish the more specific claim that cut marks on individual bones found as refuse were absent throughout that interval. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredA recent program of radiocarbon dating demonstrated that numerous early claims for the first appearance of chickens in Europe were spurious.
“The latter can lead to invalid claims regarding their dating and cultural context, and a recent program of radiocarbon dating demonstrated that numerous early claims for the first appearance of chickens in Europe were spurious (13).”
From The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
Early chickens in European archaeological contexts appear as complete skeletons.
“A recent study (13) demonstrated that early chickens in European archaeological contexts appear as complete skeletons.”
From The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
The first chickens were initially revered rather than consumed.
“suggesting that the first chickens were initially revered rather than consumed.”
From The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Winklebury citation year differs from the reference list
MinorThe supplementary specimen table cites Jones 1997 for Winklebury, whereas the listed Jones publication about the Winklebury excavation is dated 1977.
“| CKN10 | Winklebury | England | 800-100 BC | Jones 1997 | Hillfort. Context: 987. Feature: 986. | Tibiotarsus from supposedly articulated skeleton. Female (medullary bone). Large. |”
“JONES, R. 1977. Animal bones, in K. SMITH, The excavation of Winklebury Camp, Basingstoke, Hampshire.”
Yabalkovo specimen cites the Hotnitsa publication
MinorThe supplementary specimen table cites Boev 2009b for Yabalkovo, but the paper's reference list identifies Boev 2009b as a publication about Hotnitsa.
“| CKN1 | Yabalkovo | Bulgaria | 4500 BC | Boev 2009b | Settlement site | Isolated adult humerus |”
“BOEV, Z. 2009b. Avian Remains from the Late Chalcolithic settlement near Hotnitsa Village (Veliko Tarnovo Region, CN Bulgaria).”
Hotnitsa specimen cites the Yabalkovo publication
MinorThe supplementary specimen table cites Boev 2009a for Hotnitsa, but the reference list identifies Boev 2009a as a publication about Yabalkovo.
“| CKN4 | Hotnitsa | Bulgaria | 5500 BC | Boev 2009a | Settlement site | Isolated adult tibiotarsus. Very large. Cuts and carnivore gnawing on distal end. |”
“BOEV, Z. 2009a. Avian remains from the Early Neolithic settlement near Yabalkovo village (Haskovo Region, South-East Bulgaria).”
Cites
Bayesian Analysis of Radiocarbon Dates
Bronk Ramsey, C. (2009) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/s0033822200033865 · Cited by 8,725 · see citing works
The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curve (0–55 cal kBP)
Reimer, P. J., Austin, W. E. N., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Blackwell, P. G., Bronk Ramsey, C., Butzin, M., Cheng, H., Edwards, R. L., Friedrich, M., et al. (2020) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/rdc.2020.41 · Cited by 7,900 · see citing works
Helms, M. W. (1993) · University of Texas Press eBooks · doi:10.7560/730748 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Thinking chickens: a review of cognition, emotion, and behavior in the domestic chicken
Marino, L. (2017) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-016-1064-4 · Cited by 281 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Given their modern ubiquity in the human food chain, it is easy to assume that chickens were domesticated primarily as a food source (e.g. Marino 2017).”
The broiler chicken as a signal of a human reconfigured biosphere
Bennett, C. E., Thomas, R., Williams, M., Zalasiewicz, J., Edgeworth, M., Miller, H., Coles, B., Foster, A., Burton, E. J., & Marume, U. (2018) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.180325 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Self-citationDid chickens go North? New evidence for domestication
West, B., & Zhou, B.-X. (1988) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/0305-4403(88)90080-5 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens
Peters, J., Lebrasseur, O., Irving-Pease, E. K., Paxinos, P. D., Best, J., Smallman, R., Callou, C., Gardeisen, A., Trixl, S., Frantz, L., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2121978119 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Self-citationWelfare, E. P. O. A. H. A. (2010) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1666 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
The History of African Village Chickens: an Archaeological and Molecular Perspective
Mwacharo, J. M., Bjørnstad, G., Han, J. L., & Hanotte, O. (2013) · African Archaeological Review · doi:10.1007/s10437-013-9128-1 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Establishing the validity of domestication genes using DNA from ancient chickens
Girdland Flink, L., Allen, R., Barnett, R., Malmström, H., Peters, J., Eriksson, J., Andersson, L., Dobney, K., & Larson, G. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1308939110 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Self-citationThe behavioural biology of chickens
(2015) · CABI eBooks · doi:10.1079/9781780642499.0000 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Reevaluation of early Holocene chicken domestication in northern China
Eda, M., Lu, P., Kikuchi, H., Li, Z., Li, F., & Yuan, J. (2016) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2016.01.012 · Cited by 85 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For example, re-analyses by Eda et al. (2016) and Peters et al. (2016) reveal that several bones originally identi fi ed as early chicken remains are actually from pheasants ( Phasianus sp.).”
Loog, L., Thomas, M. G., Barnett, R., Allen, R., Sykes, N., Paxinos, P. D., Lebrasseur, O., Dobney, K., Peters, J., Manica, A., et al. (2017) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msx142 · Cited by 82 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These differences are due to advances in poultry feeding and selective breeding that have resulted in signi fi cant genetic changes (Flink et al. 2014; Loog et al. 2017).”
Self-citationPerry-Gal, L., Erlich, A., Gilboa, A., & Bar-Oz, G. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1504236112 · Cited by 79 · cited 2× · see citing works
“2022), it was not until the fourth/third century BC that they became a commonly exploited source of meat (Perry-Gal et al. 2015).”
The Uley Shrines: Excavation of a Ritual Complex on West Hill, Uley: Gloucestershire, 1977-9
King, A. C., Woodward, A., & Leach, P. (1994) · Britannia · doi:10.2307/527031 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Peters, J., Lebrasseur, O., Deng, H., & Larson, G. (2016) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.04.004 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Self-citationvan der Plicht, J., Bruins, H. J., & Nijboer, A. J. (2009) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/s0033822200033786 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
A social perspective on the introduction of exotic animals: the case of the chicken
Sykes, N. (2012) · World Archaeology · doi:10.1080/00438243.2012.646104 · Cited by 59 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…there is an observable shift not only in the frequency of chicken remains within zooarchaeological assemblages (Figure 5A), but also towards human-chicken co-burials (Figure 5C) — a phenomenon seen in other areas of northern Europe at this time (Lauwerier 1993; Sykes 2012; Kunst & Doneus 2013).”
Self-citationWoldekiros, H. S., & D'Andrea, A. C. (2017) · International Journal of Osteoarchaeology · doi:10.1002/oa.2540 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
New perspectives on the ecology of early domestic fowl: An interdisciplinary approach
Pitt, J., Gillingham, P. K., Maltby, M., & Stewart, J. R. (2016) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2016.08.004 · Cited by 31 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Although these re fi ned dates have important implications for diffusion models (Pitt et al .”
Self-citationWas chicken domesticated in northern China? New evidence from mitochondrial genomes
Huang, X.-H., Wu, Y.-J., Miao, Y.-W., Peng, M.-S., Chen, X., He, D.-L., Suwannapoom, C., Du, B.-W., Li, X.-Y., Weng, Z.-X., et al. (2018) · Science Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.scib.2017.12.004 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Fodder for Change: Animals, Urbanisation, and Socio-Economic Transformation in Protohistoric Italy
Trentacoste, A. (2020) · Theoretical Roman Archaeology Journal · doi:10.16995/traj.414 · Cited by 21 · cited 3× · see citing works
“2022), with other possible eighth-century examples (see OSM) (De Grossi Mazzorin & Minniti 2019; Trentacoste 2020), although, crucially, none of these have been directly dated.”
Self-citationPrehistoric and historical insights in avian zooarchaeology, taphonomy and ancient bird use
Dirrigl, F. J., Brush, T., Muñiz, A. M., & Bartosiewicz, L. (2020) · Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12520-020-01016-2 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Counting Roman chickens: Multidisciplinary approaches to human-chicken interactions in Roman Britain
Maltby, M., Allen, M. G., Best, J., Fothergill, B. T., & Demarchi, B. (2018) · Journal of Archaeological Science Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.09.013 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationLedogar, S. H., Karsten, J., Madden, G., et al. (2018) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/rdc.2018.52 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Oueslati, T., Kbiri Alaoui, M., Ichkhakh, A., Callegarin, L., de Chazelle, C.-A., Rocca, E., & Carrato, E. C. (2020) · Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.102162 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Lauwerier, R. C. G. M. (1993) · Archaeofauna · doi:10.15366/archaeofauna1993.2.008 · Cited by 12 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…there is an observable shift not only in the frequency of chicken remains within zooarchaeological assemblages (Figure 5A), but also towards human-chicken co-burials (Figure 5C) — a phenomenon seen in other areas of northern Europe at this time (Lauwerier 1993; Sykes 2012; Kunst & Doneus 2013).”
The earliest evidence of chicken in Italy
Corbino, C. A., Mazzorin, J. D. G., Minniti, C., & Albarella, U. (2021) · Quaternary International · doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2021.04.006 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Walker, S. J., & Meijer, H. J. M. (2020) · Quaternary International · doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2020.03.008 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Doherty, S., Foster, A., Best, J., Hamilton‐Dyer, S., Morris, J., Sadler, P., Skelton, C., Smallman, R., Woldekiros, H. S., Thomas, R. M., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Osteoarchaeology · doi:10.1002/oa.2988 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationAnimalscapes and empire: new perspectives on the Iron Age/Romano British transition
Allen, M. G. (2011) · Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Birds in burials: the role of avifauna in Eneolithic Tripolye mortuary rituals
Ledogar, S. H., Karsten, J., & Sokhastskyi, M. (2017) · Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12520-017-0567-5 · Cited by 8 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Other studies (e.g. those cited by Ledogar et al. 2019) have proposed that chickens were not only established in Eastern Europe by the Neolithic, but that the species may even have been native to the region (Boev 1995).”
Best, J., & Mulville, J. (2013) · International Journal of Osteoarchaeology · doi:10.1002/oa.2381 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationBest, J. (2013) · ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationRoman graves and rural rubbish. Animal remains from the Roman cemetery of Halbturn, Austria
Kunst, G. K., & Doneus, N. (2013) · Anthropozoologica · doi:10.5252/az2013n2a15 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Faunal Introductions to the Balearic Islands in the Early 1st Millennium Cal BC
Ramis, D., Anglada, M., Ferrer, A., Massanet, L. P., & Strydonck, M. V. (2017) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/rdc.2017.79 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Mellink, M. J., & van Loon, M. N. (1984) · Journal of the American Oriental Society · doi:10.2307/602205 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Feider, M. P., Hambleton, E., & Maltby, M. (2020) · Oxbow Books · doi:10.2307/j.ctv13pk8qb.10 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Peters, 1998, Römische Tierhaltung und Tierzucht: eine Synthese aus archäozoologischer Untersuchung und schriftlich-bildlicher Überlieferung (Passauer Universitätsschriften zur Archäologie 5)
- White, 2007, TRAC 2006: proceedings of the sixteenth annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, Cambridge 2006, 115
- De Grossi Mazzorin, 2019, The exploitation and mobility of exotic animals: zooarchaeological evidence from Rome, Journal of Roman Archaeology, Supplementary Series, 107, 85
- Becker, 2013, Von Sylt bis Kastanas: Festschrift für Helmut Johannes Kroll, 225
- Boev, 1995, On the appearance of the domestic fowl (Gallus gallus domestica) in Bulgaria and the Balkan Peninsula and the question of domestication of junglefowls (genus Gallus Brisson, 1760) in south-east Europe, Historia Naturalis Bulgarica, 5, 37
- Sykes, 2018, Biogeography, in S.L. López Varela (ed.) The encyclopedia of archaeological sciences
- Baker, 2019, Animal bones and archaeology: recovery to archive
- Serjeantson, 2009, Birds
- Kyselý, 2010, Review of the oldest evidence of domestic fowl Gallus gallus f. domestica from the Czech Republic in its European context, Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, Series A: Vertebrata, 53
- Skelton, C. 2019. Food taboos and preferences: how can they be seen in the archaeological record? Unpublished MA dissertation, University of Exeter.
- Kitch, 2006, Animal bone from White Horse Stone, Aylesford, Kent (CTRL Specialist Report Series 2006)
- Edwards, 1989, Caesar: the Gallic War (Loeb Classical Library 72)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens
Peters, J., Lebrasseur, O., Irving-Pease, E. K., Paxinos, P. D., Best, J., Smallman, R., Callou, C., Gardeisen, A., Trixl, S., Frantz, L., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2121978119 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
“Given the propensity for chicken bones to move between stratigraphic boundaries (13), it’s possible these remains are recent intrusions.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationThe 10,000-year biocultural history of fallow deer and its implications for conservation policy
Baker, K. H., Miller, H., Doherty, S., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2310051121 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“To check issues of stratigraphic migration [which have been noted in smaller animals (50)] and refine the chro nology of fallow deer translocations, published radiocarbon dates were collated (n = 9) and key specimens (n = 23) were directly dated: 21 at the University of Oxford’s Radiocarbon…”
BackgroundSelf-citationA universally applicable definition for domestication
Lord, K. A., Larson, G., Allaby, R. G., & Karlsson, E. K. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2413207122 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“It took more than 500 y for chickens to become part of human diets (25).”
Self-citationLimited historical admixture between European wildcats and domestic cats
Jamieson, A. E., Carmagnini, A., Howard‐McCombe, J., Doherty, S., Hirons, A., Dimopoulos, E. A., Lin, A. T., Allen, R., Anderson-Whymark, H., Barnett, R., et al. (2023) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.08.031 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationArchaeological and molecular evidence for ancient chickens in Central Asia
Peters, C., Richter, K. K., Wilkin, S., Stark, S., Mir-Makhamad, B., Fernandes, R., Maksudov, F., Mirzaakhmedov, S., Rahmonov, H., Schirmer, S., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46093-2 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Brito-Mayor, A., Santana, J., García, M. M., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s10761-023-00708-4 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“The increase in chicken consumption seems to be a relatively recent phenomenon that was established during the Middle Ages (Best et al. 2022).”
BackgroundChicken metabolism, immobilization, and post-industrial production
Oliver, C. (2024) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/03063127241247022 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Zooarchaeology of Managed, Captive, Tame, and Domestic Birds: Shifts in Human–Avian Relationships
Yeomans, L. (2025) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/s10814-024-09206-5 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Knowledge about the spread of domestic fowl has undergone significant revision in the last couple of years (Best et al. 2022; Peters et al. 2022), illustrating the value in detailed investigation over claims based on small numbers of finds.”
Soncin, S., Amoretti, V., Comegna, C., et al. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-12156-7 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Compared to other terrestrial animals from Pompeii, and a large sample of domestic fowl from prehistoric Europe 35 , chicken samples exhibit more 13 C-enriched δ 13 C values indicative of C 4 plant consumption or marine products (Table 1; Fig.”
InfluentialSelf-citationThe dispersal of domestic cats from North Africa to Europe around 2000 years ago
Martino, M. D., Cupere, B. D., Rovelli, V., Serventi, P., Mouraud, B., Baldoni, M., Corcia, T. D., Geiger, S., Alhaique, F., Alves, P. C., et al. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adt2642 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationThe earliest evidence of domestic chickens in the Japanese Archipelago
Eda, M., Izumi, H., Yoneda, M., & Fujita, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Earth Science · doi:10.3389/feart.2023.1104535 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“It has been clarified that chicken bones reported from Chinese and European sites during the early and middle Holocene are often misidentified or belong to a later age (Eda et al., 2016b; Peters et al., 2016; Best et al., 2022; Peters et al., 2022).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialLaffranchi, Z., Zingale, S., Tecchiati, U., Amato, A., Coia, V., Paladin, A., Salzani, L., Thompson, S. R., Bersani, M., Dori, I., et al. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0293434 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“According to Best and colleagues [158], chickens could have been attributed to a psychopomp role (see e.g., Temple of Uley, Gloucestershire [159]).”
BackgroundWoodland Birds from Neolithic Settlements in Bulgaria
Boev, Z. N. (2025) · Diversity · doi:10.3390/d17020107 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationAncient dog mitogenomes support the dual dispersal of dogs and agriculture into South America
Manin, A., Debruyne, R., Lin, A. T., Lebrasseur, O., Dimopoulos, E. A., Venanzi, L. G., Charlton, S., Scarsbrook, L., Hogan, A. N., Linderholm, A. E., et al. (2025) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2024.2443 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationMeijer, H. J. M., Walker, S. J., Sutikna, T., Saptomo, E. W., & Tocheri, M. W. (2022) · International Journal of Osteoarchaeology · doi:10.1002/oa.3192 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Unwrapping the palimpsest of animal domestication through ancient nuclear genomes
Scarsbrook, L., Frantz, L., & Larson, G. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-99931-1.00155-0 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationSocial preferences in chickens–effects of domestication and tameness
Gjøen, J., & Jensen, P. (2024) · Frontiers in Animal Science · doi:10.3389/fanim.2024.1487688 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Birds for Isis: The evidence from Pompeii
Corbino, C. A., & Demarchi, B. (2023) · International Journal of Osteoarchaeology · doi:10.1002/oa.3224 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Lehmann, J., Küchelmann, H. C., Juhl, F., & Mutterlose, J. (2025) · The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology · doi:10.1080/15564894.2025.2485939 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Recently, the validity of the dating of some features at Mogador has been challenged by radiocarbon dates of four chicken ( Gallus gallus ) bones (Best et al. 2022, 871–6, tab.”
The Introduction of Chickens Into Norway and Their Early Use: New Evidence From the Borgund Kaupang
Walker, S. J., Meijer, H. J. M., Best, J., & Hansen, G. (2025) · International Journal of Osteoarchaeology · doi:10.1002/oa.70018 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationAlaica, A. K. (2023) · International Journal of Osteoarchaeology · doi:10.1002/oa.3251 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Olli, S., Gustavsson, R., Kivikero, H., Lõugas, L., Mannermaa, K., Piličiauskienė, G., Rannamäe, E., Searle, J. B., Kvist, L., & Honka, J. (2026) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/s41437-026-00842-9 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“The earliest chicken fi ndings from Europe are from Italy and have been dated to 780 – 540 cal BCE, indicating that chickens were introduced to Europe during the 1 st millennium BCE (Best et al. 2022).”
InfluentialCapasso, G., Prillo, V. G., Lotto, M. A. B. D., Lugli, F., Butler, C. O., Nederbragt, A. J., Nava, A., Bondioli, L., Gigante, M., Vidale, M. M. V., et al. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-51643-3 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Díaz, S. D. D., & Chuvileva, Y. E. (2022) · doi:10.15868/socialsector.41332
Hadjikoumis, A., Arbuckle, B. S., deFrance, S. D., Deshpande-Mukherjee, A., Eda, M., Gillis, R. E., Hongo, H., Janzen, A., Makarewicz, C. A., Thornton, E. K., et al. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-90799-6.00105-1
Carbon, J., & Zaccagnino, C. (2023) · Mouseion Journal of the Classical Association of Canada · doi:10.3138/mous.19.3.02
Close Encounters of the Feathered Kind: Orpheus and the Birds
Archibald, Z. H. (2024) · Arts · doi:10.3390/arts13050153
Doherty, S., Krajcarz, M., Carmagnini, A., Dimopoulos, E. A., Jamieson, A. E., Alves, J. M., Bălăşescu, A., Baker, P., Baranowski, P., Beglane, F., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.03.28.645877
Self-citationChoy, K., Kim, S., Bae, H., Chung, J. H., Yun, H. Y., & Won, E. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5341940
Before chickens became food for people, they were regarded as special exotica
Best, J., & Lebrasseur, O. (2022) · doi:10.64628/ab.j4usxr9wr
Self-citationHistory of the Archaeozoology in Bulgaria—Fields, Researchers and Achievements for 120 Years
Boev, Z. N. (2025) · Quaternary · doi:10.3390/quat8040073
“This was shown by the data from the study by [77].”
Self-citationKim, S., Bae, H., Chung, J. H., Yun, H. Y., Won, E.-J., & Choy, K. (2025) · Journal of Archaeological Science Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105561
301‘Oriental’ Religions Fostered the Custom of Bird Sacrifice in Europe in Antiquity
Pöllath, N., & Peters, J. (2025) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783112217177-024
Self-citationSeland, E. H. (2026) · Palgrave studies in ancient economies · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-90855-2_5
Rural production and land use at Iron Age Clazomenae, Ionia
Maltas, T., Tanzer, J., Akgeyik, I., et al. (2026) · Vegetation History and Archaeobotany · doi:10.1007/s00334-026-01088-5
“…period saw the increased presence and/or introduction of species like pomegranate and the chicken across the Aegean (Pag-noux and Zurbach 2020; Best et al. 2022), while a change in the size and shape of pig remains from Archaic Clazomenae points to the introduction of new breeds or rearing…”
- Authors
- Best, J., Doherty, S., Armit, I., Boev, Z., Büster, L., Cunliffe, B., Foster, A., Frimet, B., Hamilton-Dyer, S., Higham, T., Lebrasseur, O., Miller, H., Peters, J., Seigle, M., Skelton, C., Symmons, R., Thomas, R., Trentacoste, A., Maltby, M., Larson, G., & Sykes, N.
- Affiliations
- Cardiff University (GB)
- University of Exeter (GB)
- University of York (GB)
- Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BG)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Université de Lyon (FR)
- University of Leicester (GB)
- Bournemouth University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Sykes, Naomi
- ORCID
- Venue
- Antiquity
- Publisher
- Antiquity Publications
- Published
- 2022-06-07
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 388
- Pages
- 868-882
- ISSN
- 0003-598X (ISSN-L)
- 1745-1744
- OpenAlex
- W4281678786
- Semantic Scholar
- 52ffca2e2db0261d160ce60ea2aee47686dc8710
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 5.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Antiquity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University) (acceptedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Natural Environment Research Council (NF/2015/2/5)
- Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/L006979/1, AH/N004558/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil and Environmental Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
- Keywords
- chickens, domestication, animal introduction, spatiotemporal spread, radiocarbon dating, exotica, Europe, Maghreb, Eurasia, 1st millennium BC
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review