CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 100Sports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Education and Training Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Classification and Determination Model of Resistance Training Status

Santos Junior, Evaldo Rui T., de Salles, Belmiro F., Dias, Ingrid, Ribeiro, Alex S., Simão, Roberto, Willardson, Jeffrey M.·2021·Strength & Conditioning Journal
DOI 10.1519/ssc.0000000000000627
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

An individual's training status is a key factor used to determine the volume, the intensity, and the selection of exercises for resistance training prescription. Interestingly, there are no objective parameters to assess training status, so there is ambiguity in determining the appropriate volume and other resistance training variables in this regard. Thus, the objective of this study was to propose a strategy for classification and determination of resistance training status. The following five parameters were identified and used: (a) current uninterrupted training time, (b) time of detraining, (c) previous training experience, (d) exercise technique, and (e) strength level. Moreover, 4 classification levels are proposed: beginner, intermediate, advanced, and highly advanced, which are determined by the mean score of the parameters used. The proposed model represents an important advancement in training status classification and can be used as a valid tool for training prescription and for researchers to better characterize a sample and reproduce results under the same conditions in future studies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/ssc.0000000000000627

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Matuszak, 2003, Effect of rest interval length on repeated 1 repetition maximum back squats, J Strength Cond Res, 17, 634

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Santos Junior, E. R. T., de Salles, B. F., Dias, I., Ribeiro, A. S., Simão, R., & Willardson, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Physical Education Post-Graduation Program, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;
  • Strength Training Lab Brazil (STLAB), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
  • Universidade Norte do Paraná (BR)
  • Montana State University Billings (US)
Corresponding author
Ribeiro, Alex S.
ORCID
Venue
Strength & Conditioning Journal
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2021-02-02
Volume
43
Issue
5
Pages
77-86
ISSN
  • 1073-6840 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-1602
DOI
10.1519/ssc.0000000000000627
OpenAlex
W3131803285
Semantic Scholar
0c7428b62a76f302f1a397d771a30100edca8e50
Cited by
100
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5
FWCI
13.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Strength and conditioning journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
Keywords
training prescription, detraining, training experience, exercise technique, strength level, training volume, exercise intensity, classification models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review