Cited by 34Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Cognitive Fusion, Experiential Avoidance, and Obsessive Beliefs as Predictors of Obsessive-Compulsive Symptom Dimensions

Reuman, Lillian, Jacoby, Ryan J., Abramowitz, Jonathan S.·2016·International Journal of Cognitive Therapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/ijct_2016_09_13

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reuman, L., Jacoby, R. J., & Abramowitz, J. S.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
International Journal of Cognitive Therapy
Published
2016-12
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
313-326
ISSN
1937-1209 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2473220335
Cited by
34
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
4.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Cognitive Therapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
cognitive fusion, experiential avoidance, obsessive beliefs, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, relational frame theory, psychological flexibility, unacceptable thoughts, intrusive thoughts, obsession

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review