Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Externalizing Metaphors Therapy: Outcomes Related to a Three-Session Treatment Model for Anxiety and Depression

McGuinty, Everett, Bird, Brian M., Carlson, Alain, Yarlasky, Kaitlyn, Morrow, Danielle, Armstrong, David·2017·Journal of Systemic Therapies

Abstract

Although effective treatments exist for transitional-aged youth presenting with dysphoria, treatment protocols often take much longer than the typical psychotherapy that clients receive. The authors proposed a three-session treatment protocol with an emphasis on the process of externalizing and shifting problem-focused identities using concrete metaphors. Trained clinicians from four post-secondary student counseling centers in Ontario, Canada, implemented externalizing metaphors therapy (EMT) to 50 participants who presented with anxiety and/or depression. Participating clients completed two self-report measures of dysphoria (DASS-21, STAI) before beginning and at the end of treatment. The results were then compared to a small sample of participants who engaged in treatment as usual (TAU). Differences on the DASS-21 between baseline and post-intervention revealed significant reductions in self-reported stress, depression, and anxiety. Additionally, data showed a significant and large reduction in trait anxiety on the STAI. No statistically significant differences were found between EMT and TAU, with limitations discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/jsyt.2017.36.3.52

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.176 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1037/0022-006X.67.2.201 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02321.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1037/0022-006X.66.1.7 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1177/0011000012460662 · DOI
  6. 10.1891/1933-3196.3.1.2 · DOI
  7. 10.1023/A:1009436617666 · DOI
  8. 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.05.001 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1993.tb05219.x · DOI
  11. 10.1002/cpp.1844 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1744-6171.2011.00305.x · DOI
  13. 10.1002/cpp.1953 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/j.1467-8438.1995.tb01023.x · DOI
  15. 10.1037/a0015158 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1037/0022-006X.69.5.814 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1348/147608305X60523 · DOI
  18. 10.1097/00004583-199911000-00016 · DOI
  19. 10.1521/jsyt.2012.31.1.38 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/10503301003591792 · DOI
  21. 10.1037/0022-006X.73.5.914 · DOI
  22. 10.1891/1933-3196.2.3.180 · DOI
  23. 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.629 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McGuinty, E., Bird, B. M., Carlson, A., Yarlasky, K., Morrow, D., & Armstrong, D.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Education, Graduate & Postdoctoral Studies, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
  • Psychology Department, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
  • University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Hands TheFamilyHelpNetwork.ca, North Bay, Ontario, Canada.
  • Private practice, North Bay, Ontario, Canada.
  • Upper Canada District School Board, Brockville, Ontario, Canada.
Venue
Journal of Systemic Therapies
Published
2017-09
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
52-71
ISSN
1195-4396
Cited by
9
References
8
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review