Cited by 897Identity, Memory, and TherapyMemory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and Memory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 119 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Self and Autobiographical Memory: Correspondence and Coherence

Abstract

A modified version of Conway and Pleydell-Pearce's Self Memory System (SMS) account of autobiographical memory and the self is introduced. Modifications include discussion of a fundamental tension between adaptive correspondence (experience-near sensory-perceptual records of goal activity) and self-coherence (a more abstracted and conceptually-rich long-term store of conceptual and remembered knowledge). This tension is examined in relation to each SMS component—the episodic memory system, long-term self, and the working self. The long-term self, a new aspect of the model, consists of the interaction of the autobiographical knowledge base and the conceptual self. The working self, depending on goal activity status, mediates between episodic memory and the long-term self. Applications of the SMS to personality and clinical psychology are provided through analysis of self-defining memories and adult attachment categories, as well as case histories of traumatic memory. The SMS's role in imagination is examined through a brief discussion of Wordsworth's poetry.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/soco.22.5.491.50768

Cites

119 of 119 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 120 references

1 of the 120 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1037/0033-2909.92.1.111 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Conway, 2004, Journal of Memory and Language
  3. Conway, 2004, Memory
  4. Jardine, 1999, Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social-Sciences, 59, 4068
  5. Singer, 1995, Journal of Personality, 51, 206
  6. Thorne, 1995, Journal of Personality, 63, 138

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 894

Metadata

Authors
Conway, M. A., Singer, J. A., & Tagini, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Connecticut College (US)
  • Durham University (GB)
Venue
Social Cognition
Published
2004-10
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
491-529
ISSN
0278-016X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062593487
Cited by
897
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 41
FWCI
25.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons @ Connecticut College (Connecticut College) (submittedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
autobiographical memory, self, self-coherence, episodic memory, self-defining memories, adult attachment, traumatic memory, imagination, William Wordsworth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review