Cited by 13

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Acute Traumatic Brain Injury Does Not Exacerbate Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in the SOD1 G93A Rat Model

Thomsen, Gretchen M., Vit, Jean-Philippe, Lamb, Alexander, Gowing, Genevieve, Shelest, Oksana, Alkaslasi, Mor, Ley, Eric J., Svendsen, Clive N.·2015·eneuro

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal motor neuron disease in which upper and lower motor neurons degenerate, leading to muscle atrophy, paralysis, and death within 3 to 5 years of onset. While a small percentage of ALS cases are genetically linked, the majority are sporadic with unknown origin. Currently, etiological links are associated with disease onset without mechanistic understanding. Of all the putative risk factors, however, head trauma has emerged as a consistent candidate for initiating the molecular cascades of ALS. Here, we test the hypothesis that traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the SOD1 G93A transgenic rat model of ALS leads to early disease onset and shortened lifespan. We demonstrate, however, that a one-time acute focal injury caused by controlled cortical impact does not affect disease onset or survival. Establishing the negligible involvement of a single acute focal brain injury in an ALS rat model increases the current understanding of the disease. Critically, untangling a single focal TBI from multiple mild injuries provides a rationale for scientists and physicians to increase focus on repeat injuries to hopefully pinpoint a contributing cause of ALS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/eneuro.0059-14.2015

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 A, Coronal brain sections (420 µm apart, notched on the ipsilateral underside prior to sectioning) stained with cresyl violet from a rat that was administered a moderate CCI at P120. B, Quantitative analysis of the cortical lesion site after TBI revealed that this moderate CCI injury resulted in an ∼30% loss of tissue in both WT and SOD1 rats [30.5 ± 3.7% (SEM) in WT and 30.4 ± 1.1% in SOD1 rats, ipsilateral tissue loss, relative to the contralateral cortex]. C–F, This injury did not result in overt functional deficits in either WT or SOD1 rats, relative to their sham counterparts, during the early time points after injury (time points P126–P153) as assessed by (C) hindlimb and (D) forelimb grip strength, as well as (E) hindlimb and (F) forelimb BBB scores. C–H, Injured SOD1 rats showed no differences in strength or motor function relative to SOD1 sham rats at later time points (C–F) and there was no effect of TBI on (G) disease onset or (H) survival, supporting the idea that a one-time acute moderate TBI in rats close to disease onset does not predispose earlier onset or death. P.I.D. 1: post-injury day 1; Scale bar, 2 mm.
Figure 1 A, Coronal brain sections (420 µm apart, notched on the ipsilateral underside prior to sectioning) stained with cresyl violet from a rat that was administered a moderate CCI at P120. B, Quantitative analysis of the cortical lesion site after TBI revealed that this moderate CCI injury resulted in an ∼30% loss of tissue in both WT and SOD1 rats [30.5 ± 3.7% (SEM) in WT and 30.4 ± 1.1% in SOD1 rats, ipsilateral tissue loss, relative to the contralateral cortex]. C–F, This injury did not result in overt functional deficits in either WT or SOD1 rats, relative to their sham counterparts, during the early time points after injury (time points P126–P153) as assessed by (C) hindlimb and (D) forelimb grip strength, as well as (E) hindlimb and (F) forelimb BBB scores. C–H, Injured SOD1 rats showed no differences in strength or motor function relative to SOD1 sham rats at later time points (C–F) and there was no effect of TBI on (G) disease onset or (H) survival, supporting the idea that a one-time acute moderate TBI in rats close to disease onset does not predispose earlier onset or death. P.I.D. 1: post-injury day 1; Scale bar, 2 mm.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 A, Coronal brain sections (420 µm apart, notched on the contralateral underside prior to sectioning) stained with cresyl violet from a rat administered a severe CCI at P90. B, Quantitative analysis of the cortical lesion site after TBI revealed that this severe CCI injury resulted in an ∼45% loss of tissue in both WT and SOD1 rats [44.3 ± 3.3% (SEM) in WT and 48.4 ± 3.5% in SOD1, ipsilateral tissue volume loss, relative to the contralateral cortex]. C, This severe CCI injury resulted in significant early postinjury deficits (graph time points P91–P97) in both WT and SOD1 injured rats, relative to their sham counterparts in rotarod performance. D, E, Relative to SOD1 sham rats, injured SOD1 rats showed a significant overall decrease due to injury in (D) hindlimb, but not (E) forelimb, grip strength. F–I, However, measures of disease such as (F) onset, (G) survival, and (H) hindlimb and (I) forelimb BBB scores remained unchanged relative to SOD1 sham controls, indicating that a one-time severe acute TBI at an early presymptomatic time point does not affect the disease onset or death in these rats. P.I.D. 1: post-injury day 1; Scale bar, 2 mm.
Figure 2 A, Coronal brain sections (420 µm apart, notched on the contralateral underside prior to sectioning) stained with cresyl violet from a rat administered a severe CCI at P90. B, Quantitative analysis of the cortical lesion site after TBI revealed that this severe CCI injury resulted in an ∼45% loss of tissue in both WT and SOD1 rats [44.3 ± 3.3% (SEM) in WT and 48.4 ± 3.5% in SOD1, ipsilateral tissue volume loss, relative to the contralateral cortex]. C, This severe CCI injury resulted in significant early postinjury deficits (graph time points P91–P97) in both WT and SOD1 injured rats, relative to their sham counterparts in rotarod performance. D, E, Relative to SOD1 sham rats, injured SOD1 rats showed a significant overall decrease due to injury in (D) hindlimb, but not (E) forelimb, grip strength. F–I, However, measures of disease such as (F) onset, (G) survival, and (H) hindlimb and (I) forelimb BBB scores remained unchanged relative to SOD1 sham controls, indicating that a one-time severe acute TBI at an early presymptomatic time point does not affect the disease onset or death in these rats. P.I.D. 1: post-injury day 1; Scale bar, 2 mm.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.2466/pms.104.4.1251-1254 · DOI
  2. 2001, Immune reactivity in a mouse model of familial ALS correlates with disease progression., Neurology, 57, 1282, 10.1212/WNL.57.7.1282 · DOI
  3. 2014, Animal models of sports-related head injury: bridging the gap between pre-clinical research and clinical reality, J Neurochem, 129, 916, 10.1111/jnc.12690 · DOI
  4. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000616 · DOI
  5. 10.1089/neu.1995.12.1 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.3109/17482960903384283 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.04.007 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.09.020 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.011 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.mcn.2012.10.008 · DOI
  11. 1994, Lateral cortical impact injury in rats: pathologic effects of varying cortical compression and impact velocity., J Neurotrauma, 11, 587, 10.1089/neu.1994.11.587 · DOI
  12. 10.3109/21678421.2014.932383 · DOI
  13. 10.4161/pri.27602 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.032539299 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.04.016 · DOI
  16. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4690-13.2014 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.033 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1002/ana.23858 · DOI
  19. 10.3109/14653249.2011.613929 · DOI
  20. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000438229.56094.54 · DOI
  21. 10.1177/1759091414551782 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.011 · DOI
  23. 10.1159/000316800 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/ana.24150 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.010 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000156 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/362059a0 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000630 · DOI
  29. 2014, Prior medical conditions and the risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, J Neurol, 261, 1949, 10.1007/s00415-014-7445-1 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.12.004 · DOI
  31. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2037-14.2014 · DOI
  32. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000149513.82332.5C · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1038/nrn3407 · DOI
  34. 2002, Spinal cord contusion models., Prog Brain Res, 137, 231, 10.1016/S0079-6123(02)37019-5 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Thomsen, G. M., Vit, J.-P., Lamb, A., Gowing, G., Shelest, O., Alkaslasi, M., Ley, E. J., & Svendsen, C. N.
Venue
eneuro
Published
2015-05
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
ENEURO.0059-14.2015
ISSN
2373-2822
Cited by
13
References
5
Language
en
Funders
  • ALS Association
  • Board of Governors Regenerative Medicine Institute

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review