Cited by 9Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

How Characters Are Learned Leaves Its Mark on the Neural Substrates of Chinese Reading

Open access
Feng, Jieyin, Mak, Hoi Yan, Wang, Jing, Cai, Qing·2022·eneuro

Abstract

Understanding how the brain functions differently as one learns to read may shed light on the controversial nature of the reading ability of human being. Logographic writing system such as Chinese has been found to rely on specialized neural substrates beyond the reading network of alphabetic languages. The ability to read in Chinese has also been proposed to rely on writing skills. However, it was unclear whether the learning-related alteration of neural responses was language specific or resulted from the more reliance on writing practice during acquisition. This study investigated whether the emergence of typical logographic-specific regions relied on learning by writing. We taught proficient alphabetic language readers Chinese characters and used pre-test and post-test to identify changes in two critical stages of reading, namely, orthographic processing and orthographic-to-phonological mapping. Two typical left hemispheric areas for logographic reading showed increased responses to characters in the brains of proficient alphabetic readers after learning, regardless of whether the learning strategy involved writing practice. Moreover, learning strategy modulated the response magnitude or multivoxel patterns in the left superior parietal lobule, left middle frontal gyrus, and right fusiform gyrus, some of which were task dependent. The findings corroborated a limited role of writing in the emergence of logographic-specific reading network and suggested the heterogeneous nature of different brain regions in this network.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/eneuro.0111-22.2022

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cognitive demands of writing hieroglyphic characters may lead to enhanced visuospatial memory and motor coordination compared with alphabet-based writing.

    “The cognitive demands of writing hieroglyphic characters may lead to enhanced visuospatial memory and motor coordination compared with alphabet-based writing, highlighting significant differences in neural processing between these two systems [3].”

    From The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle? (2025) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Discussion (page not provided) reports that writing practice modulated neural responses during Chinese-character learning, supporting the sentence’s general point about neural processing. It does not report enhanced visuospatial memory or motor coordination, or compare those abilities with alphabet-based writing; the authors say the effect of learning strategy in alphabetic languages remains an open question. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Writing in logographic systems (e.g., Chinese, ancient Egyptian) engages different brain regions compared with alphabetic writing, involving increased right hemisphere activation in visuospatial processing areas.

    “Neuroimaging studies indicate that writing in logographic systems engages different brain regions compared with alphabetic writing. Specifically, writing Chinese characters or hieroglyphics involves increased activation of the right hemisphere, particularly in visuospatial processing areas, due to the intricate and non-linear nature of the script.”

    From The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle? (2025) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Introduction and Discussion describe neural regions involved in Chinese reading that differ from those associated with alphabetic reading. But this study examines learning to read Chinese, not writing logographic scripts: it reports increased activation chiefly in left-hemisphere regions and does not establish increased right-hemisphere visuospatial activation, address Egyptian hieroglyphics, or attribute such activation to script complexity. The indexed passages have no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Alphabetic writing systems predominantly engage the left hemisphere, particularly phonological processing areas.

    “This is in contrast with alphabetic systems, which predominantly engage the left hemisphere, particularly in phonological processing areas.”

    From The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle? (2025) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says alphabetic reading can use orthographic-to-phonological mapping and that phonological awareness is critical in English reading development. The Discussion (page unavailable) identifies the left posterior temporal and left angular gyri as typical alphabetic reading-related areas. These passages support the phonological emphasis and identify left-hemisphere regions, but do not establish that alphabetic systems predominantly engage the left hemisphere, particularly in phonological processing areas. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Bi Y, Han Z, Zhang Y (2009) Reading does not depend on writing, even in Chinese. Neuropsychologia 47: 1193– 1199. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.006 19056407 · DOI
  2. Bolger DJ, Perfetti CA, Schneider W (2005) Cross-cultural effect on the brain revisited: universal structures plus writing system variation. Hum Brain Mapp 25: 92– 104. 10.1002/hbm.20124 15846818 PMC6871743 · DOI
  3. Booth JR, Lu D, Burman DD, Chou TL, Jin Z, Peng DL, Zhang L, Ding GS, Deng Y, Liu L (2006) Specialization of phonological and semantic processing in Chinese word reading. Brain Res 1071: 197– 207. 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.097 16427033 PMC2626184 · DOI
  4. Brysbaert M, New B (2009) Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behav Res Methods 41: 977– 990. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977 19897807 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Cai Q, Brysbaert M (2010) SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS One 5: e10729. 10.1371/journal.pone.0010729 20532192 PMC2880003 · DOI
  6. Cao F, Perfetti CA (2016) Neural signatures of the reading-writing connection: greater involvement of writing in Chinese reading than English reading. PLoS One 11: e0168414. 10.1371/journal.pone.0168414 27992505 PMC5161366 · DOI
  7. Cao F, Vu M, Lung CD, Lawrence JM, Harris LN, Guan Q, Xu Y, Perfetti CA (2013) Writing affects the brain network of reading in Chinese: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Hum Brain Mapp 34: 1670– 1684. 10.1002/hbm.22017 22378588 PMC6870511 · DOI
  8. Cao F, Sussman BL, Rios V, Yan X, Wang Z, Spray GJ, Mack RM (2017) Different mechanisms in learning different second languages: evidence from English speakers learning Chinese and Spanish. Neuroimage 148: 284– 295. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.042 28110086 · DOI
  9. Dehaene S, Cohen L (2007) Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron 56: 384– 398. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.004 17964253 · DOI
  10. Dehaene S, Naccache L, Cohen L, Le Bihan D, Mangin J-F, Poline JB, Rivière D (2001) Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming. Nat Neurosci 4: 752– 758. 10.1038/89551 11426233 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Dehaene S, Pegado F, Braga LW, Ventura P, Filho GN, Jobert A, Dehaene-Lambertz G, Kolinsky R, Morais J, Cohen L (2010) How learning to read changes the cortical networks for vision and language. Science 330: 1359– 1364. 10.1126/science.1194140 21071632 · DOI
  12. Dong J, Li A, Chen C, Qu J, Jiang N, Sun Y, Hu L, Mei L (2021) Language distance in orthographic transparency affects cross-language pattern similarity between native and non-native languages. Hum Brain Mapp 42: 893– 907. 10.1002/hbm.25266 33112483 PMC7856648 · DOI
  13. Eden GF, Moats L (2002) The role of neuroscience in the remediation of students with dyslexia. Nat Neurosci 5: 1080– 1084. 10.1038/nn946 12403991 · DOI
  14. Feng XX, Altarelli I, Monzalvo K, Ding GS, Ramus F, Shu H, Dehaene S, Meng XZ, Dehaene-Lambertz G (2020) A universal reading network and its modulation by writing system and reading ability in French and Chinese children. Elife 9: e54591. 10.7554/eLife.54591 33118931 PMC7669264 · DOI
  15. Gollan TH, Weissberger GH, Runnqvist E, Montoya RI, Cera CM (2012) Self-ratings of spoken language dominance: a multilingual naming test (MINT) and preliminary norms for young and aging Spanish-English bilinguals. Biling (Camb Engl) 15: 594– 615. 10.1017/S1366728911000332 25364296 PMC4212892 · DOI
  16. Hu W, Lee HL, Zhang Q, Liu T, Geng LB, Seghier ML, Shakeshaft C, Twomey T, Green DW, Yang YM, Price CJ (2010) Developmental dyslexia in Chinese and English populations: dissociating the effect of dyslexia from language differences. Brain 133: 1694– 1706. 10.1093/brain/awq106 20488886 PMC2877905 · DOI
  17. Keuleers E, Stevens M, Mandera P, Brysbaert M (2015) Word knowledge in the crowd: measuring vocabulary size and word prevalence in a massive online experiment. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 68: 1665– 1692. 10.1080/17470218.2015.1022560 25715025 · DOI
  18. Kim SY, Qi T, Feng X, Ding G, Liu L, Cao F (2016) How does language distance between L1 and L2 affect the L2 brain network? An fMRI study of Korean–Chinese–English trilinguals. Neuroimage 129: 25– 39. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.068 26673115 · DOI
  19. Kochunov P, Fox P, Lancaster J, Tan LH, Amunts K, Zilles K, Mazziotta J, Gao JH (2003) Localized morphological brain differences between English-speaking Caucasians and Chinese-speaking Asians: new evidence of anatomical plasticity. Neuroreport 14: 961– 964. 12802183
  20. Kuo WJ, Yeh TC, Lee JR, Chen LF, Lee PL, Chen SS, Ho LT, Hung DL, Tzeng OJL, Hsieh JC (2004) Orthographic and phonological processing of Chinese characters: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 21: 1721– 1731. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.007 15050593 · DOI
  21. Kwok VPY, Matthews S, Yakpo K, Tan LH (2019) Neural correlates and functional connectivity of lexical tone processing in reading. Brain Lang 196: 104662. 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104662 31352216 · DOI
  22. Lagarrigue A, Longcamp M, Anton JL, Nazarian B, Prévot L, Velay J-L, Cao F, Frenck-Mestre C (2017) Activation of writing-specific brain regions when reading Chinese as a second language. Effects of training modality and transfer to novel characters. Neuropsychologia 97: 83– 97. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.026 28131811 · DOI
  23. Li A, Yang R, Qu J, Dong J, Gu L, Mei L (2022) Neural representation of phonological information during Chinese character reading. Hum Brain Mapp 43: 4013– 4029. 35545935 PMC9374885
  24. Li P, Zhang F, Tsai E, Puls B (2014) Language history questionnaire (LHQ 2.0): a new dynamic web-based research tool. Bilingualism 17: 673– 680. 10.1017/S1366728913000606 · DOI
  25. Liu L, Deng X, Peng D, Cao F, Ding G, Jin Z, Zeng Y, Li K, Zhu L, Fan N, Deng Y, Bolger DJ, Booth JR (2009) Modality- and task-specific brain regions involved in Chinese lexical processing. J Cogn Neurosci 21: 1473– 1487. 10.1162/jocn.2009.21141 18823229 PMC3277453 · DOI
  26. Liu Y, Dunlap S, Fiez J, Perfetti C (2007a) Evidence for neural accommodation to a writing system following learning. Hum Brain Mapp 28: 1223– 1234. 10.1002/hbm.20356 17274024 PMC6871335 · DOI
  27. Liu Y, Shu H, Li P (2007b) Word naming and psycholinguistic norms: Chinese. Behav Res Methods 39: 192– 198. 10.3758/bf03193147 17695344 · DOI
  28. Ma JW, Wu YJ, Sun T, Cai L, Fan XX, Li XH (2020) Neural substrates of bilingual processing in a logographic writing system: an fMRI study in Chinese Cantonese-Mandarin bilinguals. BRAIN Res 1738. 32234428
  29. Maisog JM, Einbinder ER, Flowers DL, Turkeltaub PE, Eden GF (2008) A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of dyslexia. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1145: 237– 259. 10.1196/annals.1416.024 19076401 · DOI · Paper page
  30. McArthur G, Sheehan Y, Badcock NA, Francis DA, Wang H-C, Kohnen S, Banales E, Anandakumar T, Marinus E, Castles A (2018) Phonics training for English-speaking poor readers. Cochrane database Syst Rev 11: CD009115. 10.1002/14651858.CD009115.pub3 30480759 PMC6517252 · DOI
  31. McLaughlin J, Osterhout L, Kim A (2004) Neural correlates of second-language word learning: minimal instruction produces rapid change. Nat Neurosci 7: 703– 704. 10.1038/nn1264 15195094 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Meade G (2020) The role of phonology during visual word learning in adults: an integrative review. Psychon Bull Rev 27: 15– 23. 10.3758/s13423-019-01647-0 31422528 · DOI
  33. Nakamura K, Kuo WJ, Pegado F, Cohen L, Tzeng OJL, Dehaene S (2012) Universal brain systems for recognizing word shapes and handwriting gestures during reading. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 20762– 20767. 10.1073/pnas.1217749109 23184998 PMC3528608 · DOI
  34. Nelson JR, Liu Y, Fiez J, Perfetti CA (2009) Assimilation and accommodation patterns in ventral occipitotemporal cortex in learning a second writing system. Hum Brain Mapp 30: 810– 820. 10.1002/hbm.20551 18381767 PMC5283558 · DOI
  35. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9: 97– 113. 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 5146491 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Paulesu E, McCrory E, Fazio F, Menoncello L, Brunswick N, Cappa SF, Cotelli M, Cossu G, Corte F, Lorusso M, Pesenti S, Gallagher A, Perani D, Price C, Frith CD, Frith U (2000) A cultural effect on brain function. Nat Neurosci 3: 91– 96. 10.1038/71163 10607401 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Raven J (2017) Raven progressive matrices. In: Handbook of nonverbal assessment (RS McCallum, ed). Boston: Springer.
  38. Richlan F, Kronbichler M, Wimmer H (2009) Functional abnormalities in the dyslexic brain: a quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp 30: 3299– 3308. 10.1002/hbm.20752 19288465 PMC2989182 · DOI
  39. Rueckl JG, Paz-Alonso PM, Molfese PJ, Kuo WJ, Bick A, Frost SJ, Hancock R, Wu DH, Mencl WE, Duñabeitia JA, Lee JR, Oliver M, Zevin JD, Hoeft F, Carreiras M, Tzeng OJL, Pugh KR, Frost R (2015) Universal brain signature of proficient reading: evidence from four contrasting languages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112: 15510– 15515. 10.1073/pnas.1509321112 26621710 PMC4687557 · DOI
  40. Siok WT, Perfetti CA, Jin Z, Tan LH (2004) Biological abnormality of impaired reading is constrained by culture. Nature 431: 71– 76. 10.1038/nature02865 15343334 · DOI
  41. Siok WT, Spinks JA, Jin Z, Tan LH (2009) Developmental dyslexia is characterized by the co-existence of visuospatial and phonological disorders in Chinese children. Curr Biol 19: R890– R892. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.08.014 19825347 · DOI
  42. Skirgård H, Roberts SG, Yencken L (2017) Why are some languages confused for others? Investigating data from the great language game. PLoS One 12: e0165934. 10.1371/journal.pone.0165934 28379970 PMC5381764 · DOI
  43. Tan LH, Liu HL, Perfetti CA, Spinks JA, Fox PT, Gao JH (2001) The neural system underlying Chinese logograph reading. Neuroimage 13: 836– 846. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0749 11304080 · DOI
  44. Tan LH, Laird AR, Li K, Fox PT (2005a) Neuroanatomical correlates of phonological processing of Chinese characters and alphabetic words: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 25: 83– 91. 10.1002/hbm.20134 15846817 PMC6871734 · DOI
  45. Tan LH, Spinks JA, Eden GF, Perfetti CA, Siok WT (2005b) Reading depends on writing, in Chinese. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 8781– 8785. 10.1073/pnas.0503523102 15939871 PMC1150863 · DOI
  46. Temple E, Deutsch GK, Poldrack RA, Miller SL, Tallal P, Merzenich MM, Gabrieli JDE (2003) Neural deficits in children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: evidence from functional MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 2860– 2865. 10.1073/pnas.0030098100 12604786 PMC151431 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Vellutino FR, Fletcher JM, Snowling MJ, Scanlon DM (2004) Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades? J Child Psychol Psychiatry 45: 2– 40. 10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x 14959801 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Wiley RW, Rapp B (2021) The effects of handwriting experience on literacy learning. Psychol Sci 32: 1086– 1103. 10.1177/0956797621993111 34184564 PMC8641140 · DOI
  49. Wong YK, Zhou YL (2022) Effects of metalinguistic awareness on Chinese as a second language spelling through the mediation of reading and copying. Read Writ 35: 853– 875. 10.1007/s11145-021-10167-0 · DOI
  50. Wu CY, Ho MHR, Chen SHA (2012) A meta-analysis of fMRI studies on Chinese orthographic, phonological, and semantic processing. Neuroimage 63: 381– 391. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.047 22759996 · DOI
  51. Wu J, Lu J, Zhang H, Zhang J, Yao C, Zhuang D, Qiu T, Guo Q, Hu X, Mao Y, Zhou L (2015) Direct evidence from intraoperative electrocortical stimulation indicates shared and distinct speech production center between Chinese and English languages. Hum Brain Mapp 36: 4972– 4985. 10.1002/hbm.22991 26351094 PMC6869327 · DOI
  52. Ye YY, Yan MG, Ruan YJ, Catherine M, Yeung CF (2021) Literacy learning in early Chinese-English bilinguals: the role of pure copying skill. Early Child Res Q 55: 263– 274. 10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.12.004 · DOI
  53. Zhai M, Fischer-Baum S (2019) Exploring the effects of knowledge of writing on reading Chinese characters in skilled readers. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 45: 724– 731. 10.1037/xlm0000604 29999402 PMC6330147 · DOI
  54. Zhao R, Fan R, Liu MX, Wang XJ, Yang JF (2017) Rethinking the function of brain regions for reading Chinese characters in a meta-analysis of fMRI studies. J Neurolinguistics 44: 120– 133. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.04.001 · DOI
  55. Zhou W, Xia ZC, Bi YC, Shu H (2015) Altered connectivity of the dorsal and ventral visual regions in dyslexic children: a resting-state fMRI study. Front Hum Neurosci 9: 495. 26441595 PMC4564758
  56. Ziegler JC, Goswami U (2005) Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychol Bull 131: 3– 29. 10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3 15631549 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feng, J., Mak, H. Y., Wang, J., & Cai, Q.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Shanghai Changning Mental Health Center (CN)
  • Haskins Laboratories (US)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Jing
  • Cai, Qing
Venue
eneuro
Published
2022-11
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
ENEURO.0111-22.2022
ISSN
2373-2822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4312102524
Cited by
9
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eNeuro (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CityU Scholars (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National nature science foundation of China (31970987, 32100857)
  • Basic Research Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (19JC1410101)
  • “Flower of Happiness” Fund Pilot Project of East China Normal University (2019JK2203)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
Chinese character reading, reading acquisition, orthographic processing, left hemisphere, superior parietal lobule, fusiform gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, writing practices
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Language, Learning, Linguistics, Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review