How Characters Are Learned Leaves Its Mark on the Neural Substrates of Chinese Reading
Open accessAbstract
Understanding how the brain functions differently as one learns to read may shed light on the controversial nature of the reading ability of human being. Logographic writing system such as Chinese has been found to rely on specialized neural substrates beyond the reading network of alphabetic languages. The ability to read in Chinese has also been proposed to rely on writing skills. However, it was unclear whether the learning-related alteration of neural responses was language specific or resulted from the more reliance on writing practice during acquisition. This study investigated whether the emergence of typical logographic-specific regions relied on learning by writing. We taught proficient alphabetic language readers Chinese characters and used pre-test and post-test to identify changes in two critical stages of reading, namely, orthographic processing and orthographic-to-phonological mapping. Two typical left hemispheric areas for logographic reading showed increased responses to characters in the brains of proficient alphabetic readers after learning, regardless of whether the learning strategy involved writing practice. Moreover, learning strategy modulated the response magnitude or multivoxel patterns in the left superior parietal lobule, left middle frontal gyrus, and right fusiform gyrus, some of which were task dependent. The findings corroborated a limited role of writing in the emergence of logographic-specific reading network and suggested the heterogeneous nature of different brain regions in this network.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cognitive demands of writing hieroglyphic characters may lead to enhanced visuospatial memory and motor coordination compared with alphabet-based writing.
“The cognitive demands of writing hieroglyphic characters may lead to enhanced visuospatial memory and motor coordination compared with alphabet-based writing, highlighting significant differences in neural processing between these two systems [3].”
From The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle? (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
The Discussion (page not provided) reports that writing practice modulated neural responses during Chinese-character learning, supporting the sentence’s general point about neural processing. It does not report enhanced visuospatial memory or motor coordination, or compare those abilities with alphabet-based writing; the authors say the effect of learning strategy in alphabetic languages remains an open question. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredWriting in logographic systems (e.g., Chinese, ancient Egyptian) engages different brain regions compared with alphabetic writing, involving increased right hemisphere activation in visuospatial processing areas.
“Neuroimaging studies indicate that writing in logographic systems engages different brain regions compared with alphabetic writing. Specifically, writing Chinese characters or hieroglyphics involves increased activation of the right hemisphere, particularly in visuospatial processing areas, due to the intricate and non-linear nature of the script.”
From The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle? (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
The Introduction and Discussion describe neural regions involved in Chinese reading that differ from those associated with alphabetic reading. But this study examines learning to read Chinese, not writing logographic scripts: it reports increased activation chiefly in left-hemisphere regions and does not establish increased right-hemisphere visuospatial activation, address Egyptian hieroglyphics, or attribute such activation to script complexity. The indexed passages have no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAlphabetic writing systems predominantly engage the left hemisphere, particularly phonological processing areas.
“This is in contrast with alphabetic systems, which predominantly engage the left hemisphere, particularly in phonological processing areas.”
From The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle? (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
The Introduction (page unavailable) says alphabetic reading can use orthographic-to-phonological mapping and that phonological awareness is critical in English reading development. The Discussion (page unavailable) identifies the left posterior temporal and left angular gyri as typical alphabetic reading-related areas. These passages support the phonological emphasis and identify left-hemisphere regions, but do not establish that alphabetic systems predominantly engage the left hemisphere, particularly in phonological processing areas. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Language‐specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area
Cohen, L., Lehéricy, S., Chochon, F., Lemer, C., Rivaud, S., & Dehaene, S. (2002) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awf094 · Cited by 1,254 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…preexisting functions and thus have universal neurobiological basis regardless of writing system (Paulesu et al., 2000; Dehaene et al., 2001, 2010; Cohen et al., 2002; Bolger et al., 2005; Dehaene and Cohen, 2007; Nakamura et al., 2012; Rueckl et al., 2015; Feng et al., 2020; Verhoeven and…”
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., Hecht, S. A., Barker, T. A., Burgess, S. R., Donahue, J., & Garon, T. (1997) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.33.3.468 · Cited by 1,077 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 56
- Bi Y, Han Z, Zhang Y (2009) Reading does not depend on writing, even in Chinese. Neuropsychologia 47: 1193– 1199. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.006 19056407 · DOI
- Bolger DJ, Perfetti CA, Schneider W (2005) Cross-cultural effect on the brain revisited: universal structures plus writing system variation. Hum Brain Mapp 25: 92– 104. 10.1002/hbm.20124 15846818 PMC6871743 · DOI
- Booth JR, Lu D, Burman DD, Chou TL, Jin Z, Peng DL, Zhang L, Ding GS, Deng Y, Liu L (2006) Specialization of phonological and semantic processing in Chinese word reading. Brain Res 1071: 197– 207. 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.097 16427033 PMC2626184 · DOI
- Brysbaert M, New B (2009) Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behav Res Methods 41: 977– 990. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977 19897807 · DOI · Paper page
- Cai Q, Brysbaert M (2010) SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS One 5: e10729. 10.1371/journal.pone.0010729 20532192 PMC2880003 · DOI
- Cao F, Perfetti CA (2016) Neural signatures of the reading-writing connection: greater involvement of writing in Chinese reading than English reading. PLoS One 11: e0168414. 10.1371/journal.pone.0168414 27992505 PMC5161366 · DOI
- Cao F, Vu M, Lung CD, Lawrence JM, Harris LN, Guan Q, Xu Y, Perfetti CA (2013) Writing affects the brain network of reading in Chinese: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Hum Brain Mapp 34: 1670– 1684. 10.1002/hbm.22017 22378588 PMC6870511 · DOI
- Cao F, Sussman BL, Rios V, Yan X, Wang Z, Spray GJ, Mack RM (2017) Different mechanisms in learning different second languages: evidence from English speakers learning Chinese and Spanish. Neuroimage 148: 284– 295. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.042 28110086 · DOI
- Dehaene S, Cohen L (2007) Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron 56: 384– 398. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.004 17964253 · DOI
- Dehaene S, Naccache L, Cohen L, Le Bihan D, Mangin J-F, Poline JB, Rivière D (2001) Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming. Nat Neurosci 4: 752– 758. 10.1038/89551 11426233 · DOI · Paper page
- Dehaene S, Pegado F, Braga LW, Ventura P, Filho GN, Jobert A, Dehaene-Lambertz G, Kolinsky R, Morais J, Cohen L (2010) How learning to read changes the cortical networks for vision and language. Science 330: 1359– 1364. 10.1126/science.1194140 21071632 · DOI
- Dong J, Li A, Chen C, Qu J, Jiang N, Sun Y, Hu L, Mei L (2021) Language distance in orthographic transparency affects cross-language pattern similarity between native and non-native languages. Hum Brain Mapp 42: 893– 907. 10.1002/hbm.25266 33112483 PMC7856648 · DOI
- Eden GF, Moats L (2002) The role of neuroscience in the remediation of students with dyslexia. Nat Neurosci 5: 1080– 1084. 10.1038/nn946 12403991 · DOI
- Feng XX, Altarelli I, Monzalvo K, Ding GS, Ramus F, Shu H, Dehaene S, Meng XZ, Dehaene-Lambertz G (2020) A universal reading network and its modulation by writing system and reading ability in French and Chinese children. Elife 9: e54591. 10.7554/eLife.54591 33118931 PMC7669264 · DOI
- Gollan TH, Weissberger GH, Runnqvist E, Montoya RI, Cera CM (2012) Self-ratings of spoken language dominance: a multilingual naming test (MINT) and preliminary norms for young and aging Spanish-English bilinguals. Biling (Camb Engl) 15: 594– 615. 10.1017/S1366728911000332 25364296 PMC4212892 · DOI
- Hu W, Lee HL, Zhang Q, Liu T, Geng LB, Seghier ML, Shakeshaft C, Twomey T, Green DW, Yang YM, Price CJ (2010) Developmental dyslexia in Chinese and English populations: dissociating the effect of dyslexia from language differences. Brain 133: 1694– 1706. 10.1093/brain/awq106 20488886 PMC2877905 · DOI
- Keuleers E, Stevens M, Mandera P, Brysbaert M (2015) Word knowledge in the crowd: measuring vocabulary size and word prevalence in a massive online experiment. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 68: 1665– 1692. 10.1080/17470218.2015.1022560 25715025 · DOI
- Kim SY, Qi T, Feng X, Ding G, Liu L, Cao F (2016) How does language distance between L1 and L2 affect the L2 brain network? An fMRI study of Korean–Chinese–English trilinguals. Neuroimage 129: 25– 39. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.068 26673115 · DOI
- Kochunov P, Fox P, Lancaster J, Tan LH, Amunts K, Zilles K, Mazziotta J, Gao JH (2003) Localized morphological brain differences between English-speaking Caucasians and Chinese-speaking Asians: new evidence of anatomical plasticity. Neuroreport 14: 961– 964. 12802183
- Kuo WJ, Yeh TC, Lee JR, Chen LF, Lee PL, Chen SS, Ho LT, Hung DL, Tzeng OJL, Hsieh JC (2004) Orthographic and phonological processing of Chinese characters: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 21: 1721– 1731. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.007 15050593 · DOI
- Kwok VPY, Matthews S, Yakpo K, Tan LH (2019) Neural correlates and functional connectivity of lexical tone processing in reading. Brain Lang 196: 104662. 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104662 31352216 · DOI
- Lagarrigue A, Longcamp M, Anton JL, Nazarian B, Prévot L, Velay J-L, Cao F, Frenck-Mestre C (2017) Activation of writing-specific brain regions when reading Chinese as a second language. Effects of training modality and transfer to novel characters. Neuropsychologia 97: 83– 97. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.026 28131811 · DOI
- Li A, Yang R, Qu J, Dong J, Gu L, Mei L (2022) Neural representation of phonological information during Chinese character reading. Hum Brain Mapp 43: 4013– 4029. 35545935 PMC9374885
- Li P, Zhang F, Tsai E, Puls B (2014) Language history questionnaire (LHQ 2.0): a new dynamic web-based research tool. Bilingualism 17: 673– 680. 10.1017/S1366728913000606 · DOI
- Liu L, Deng X, Peng D, Cao F, Ding G, Jin Z, Zeng Y, Li K, Zhu L, Fan N, Deng Y, Bolger DJ, Booth JR (2009) Modality- and task-specific brain regions involved in Chinese lexical processing. J Cogn Neurosci 21: 1473– 1487. 10.1162/jocn.2009.21141 18823229 PMC3277453 · DOI
- Liu Y, Dunlap S, Fiez J, Perfetti C (2007a) Evidence for neural accommodation to a writing system following learning. Hum Brain Mapp 28: 1223– 1234. 10.1002/hbm.20356 17274024 PMC6871335 · DOI
- Liu Y, Shu H, Li P (2007b) Word naming and psycholinguistic norms: Chinese. Behav Res Methods 39: 192– 198. 10.3758/bf03193147 17695344 · DOI
- Ma JW, Wu YJ, Sun T, Cai L, Fan XX, Li XH (2020) Neural substrates of bilingual processing in a logographic writing system: an fMRI study in Chinese Cantonese-Mandarin bilinguals. BRAIN Res 1738. 32234428
- Maisog JM, Einbinder ER, Flowers DL, Turkeltaub PE, Eden GF (2008) A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of dyslexia. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1145: 237– 259. 10.1196/annals.1416.024 19076401 · DOI · Paper page
- McArthur G, Sheehan Y, Badcock NA, Francis DA, Wang H-C, Kohnen S, Banales E, Anandakumar T, Marinus E, Castles A (2018) Phonics training for English-speaking poor readers. Cochrane database Syst Rev 11: CD009115. 10.1002/14651858.CD009115.pub3 30480759 PMC6517252 · DOI
- McLaughlin J, Osterhout L, Kim A (2004) Neural correlates of second-language word learning: minimal instruction produces rapid change. Nat Neurosci 7: 703– 704. 10.1038/nn1264 15195094 · DOI · Paper page
- Meade G (2020) The role of phonology during visual word learning in adults: an integrative review. Psychon Bull Rev 27: 15– 23. 10.3758/s13423-019-01647-0 31422528 · DOI
- Nakamura K, Kuo WJ, Pegado F, Cohen L, Tzeng OJL, Dehaene S (2012) Universal brain systems for recognizing word shapes and handwriting gestures during reading. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 20762– 20767. 10.1073/pnas.1217749109 23184998 PMC3528608 · DOI
- Nelson JR, Liu Y, Fiez J, Perfetti CA (2009) Assimilation and accommodation patterns in ventral occipitotemporal cortex in learning a second writing system. Hum Brain Mapp 30: 810– 820. 10.1002/hbm.20551 18381767 PMC5283558 · DOI
- Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9: 97– 113. 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 5146491 · DOI · Paper page
- Paulesu E, McCrory E, Fazio F, Menoncello L, Brunswick N, Cappa SF, Cotelli M, Cossu G, Corte F, Lorusso M, Pesenti S, Gallagher A, Perani D, Price C, Frith CD, Frith U (2000) A cultural effect on brain function. Nat Neurosci 3: 91– 96. 10.1038/71163 10607401 · DOI · Paper page
- Raven J (2017) Raven progressive matrices. In: Handbook of nonverbal assessment (RS McCallum, ed). Boston: Springer.
- Richlan F, Kronbichler M, Wimmer H (2009) Functional abnormalities in the dyslexic brain: a quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp 30: 3299– 3308. 10.1002/hbm.20752 19288465 PMC2989182 · DOI
- Rueckl JG, Paz-Alonso PM, Molfese PJ, Kuo WJ, Bick A, Frost SJ, Hancock R, Wu DH, Mencl WE, Duñabeitia JA, Lee JR, Oliver M, Zevin JD, Hoeft F, Carreiras M, Tzeng OJL, Pugh KR, Frost R (2015) Universal brain signature of proficient reading: evidence from four contrasting languages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112: 15510– 15515. 10.1073/pnas.1509321112 26621710 PMC4687557 · DOI
- Siok WT, Perfetti CA, Jin Z, Tan LH (2004) Biological abnormality of impaired reading is constrained by culture. Nature 431: 71– 76. 10.1038/nature02865 15343334 · DOI
- Siok WT, Spinks JA, Jin Z, Tan LH (2009) Developmental dyslexia is characterized by the co-existence of visuospatial and phonological disorders in Chinese children. Curr Biol 19: R890– R892. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.08.014 19825347 · DOI
- Skirgård H, Roberts SG, Yencken L (2017) Why are some languages confused for others? Investigating data from the great language game. PLoS One 12: e0165934. 10.1371/journal.pone.0165934 28379970 PMC5381764 · DOI
- Tan LH, Liu HL, Perfetti CA, Spinks JA, Fox PT, Gao JH (2001) The neural system underlying Chinese logograph reading. Neuroimage 13: 836– 846. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0749 11304080 · DOI
- Tan LH, Laird AR, Li K, Fox PT (2005a) Neuroanatomical correlates of phonological processing of Chinese characters and alphabetic words: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 25: 83– 91. 10.1002/hbm.20134 15846817 PMC6871734 · DOI
- Tan LH, Spinks JA, Eden GF, Perfetti CA, Siok WT (2005b) Reading depends on writing, in Chinese. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 8781– 8785. 10.1073/pnas.0503523102 15939871 PMC1150863 · DOI
- Temple E, Deutsch GK, Poldrack RA, Miller SL, Tallal P, Merzenich MM, Gabrieli JDE (2003) Neural deficits in children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: evidence from functional MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 2860– 2865. 10.1073/pnas.0030098100 12604786 PMC151431 · DOI · Paper page
- Vellutino FR, Fletcher JM, Snowling MJ, Scanlon DM (2004) Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades? J Child Psychol Psychiatry 45: 2– 40. 10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x 14959801 · DOI · Paper page
- Wiley RW, Rapp B (2021) The effects of handwriting experience on literacy learning. Psychol Sci 32: 1086– 1103. 10.1177/0956797621993111 34184564 PMC8641140 · DOI
- Wong YK, Zhou YL (2022) Effects of metalinguistic awareness on Chinese as a second language spelling through the mediation of reading and copying. Read Writ 35: 853– 875. 10.1007/s11145-021-10167-0 · DOI
- Wu CY, Ho MHR, Chen SHA (2012) A meta-analysis of fMRI studies on Chinese orthographic, phonological, and semantic processing. Neuroimage 63: 381– 391. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.047 22759996 · DOI
- Wu J, Lu J, Zhang H, Zhang J, Yao C, Zhuang D, Qiu T, Guo Q, Hu X, Mao Y, Zhou L (2015) Direct evidence from intraoperative electrocortical stimulation indicates shared and distinct speech production center between Chinese and English languages. Hum Brain Mapp 36: 4972– 4985. 10.1002/hbm.22991 26351094 PMC6869327 · DOI
- Ye YY, Yan MG, Ruan YJ, Catherine M, Yeung CF (2021) Literacy learning in early Chinese-English bilinguals: the role of pure copying skill. Early Child Res Q 55: 263– 274. 10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.12.004 · DOI
- Zhai M, Fischer-Baum S (2019) Exploring the effects of knowledge of writing on reading Chinese characters in skilled readers. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 45: 724– 731. 10.1037/xlm0000604 29999402 PMC6330147 · DOI
- Zhao R, Fan R, Liu MX, Wang XJ, Yang JF (2017) Rethinking the function of brain regions for reading Chinese characters in a meta-analysis of fMRI studies. J Neurolinguistics 44: 120– 133. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.04.001 · DOI
- Zhou W, Xia ZC, Bi YC, Shu H (2015) Altered connectivity of the dorsal and ventral visual regions in dyslexic children: a resting-state fMRI study. Front Hum Neurosci 9: 495. 26441595 PMC4564758
- Ziegler JC, Goswami U (2005) Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychol Bull 131: 3– 29. 10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3 15631549 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle?
Marano, G., Kotzalidis, G. D., Lisci, F. M., Anesini, M. B., Rossi, S., Barbonetti, S., Cangini, A., Ronsisvalle, A., Artuso, L., Falsini, C., et al. (2025) · Life · doi:10.3390/life15030345 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Feng, J., Mak, H. Y., Wang, J., & Cai, Q.
- Affiliations
- University of Connecticut (US)
- City University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Shanghai Changning Mental Health Center (CN)
- Haskins Laboratories (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Jing
- Cai, Qing
- ORCID
- Venue
- eneuro
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2022-11
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- ENEURO.0111-22.2022
- ISSN
- 2373-2822 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9787807
- OpenAlex
- W4312102524
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 1.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- eNeuro (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CityU Scholars (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National nature science foundation of China (31970987, 32100857)
- Basic Research Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (19JC1410101)
- “Flower of Happiness” Fund Pilot Project of East China Normal University (2019JK2203)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- Chinese character reading, reading acquisition, orthographic processing, left hemisphere, superior parietal lobule, fusiform gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, writing practices
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Language, Learning, Linguistics, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review