Cited by 208Action Observation and SynchronizationMotor Control and AdaptationFace Recognition and Perception

The Neural Basis of Imitation is Body Part Specific

Open access
Goldenberg, G., Karnath, H.-O.·2006·Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Imitation is an important constituent of the behavioral repertoire of human beings. We use imitation for learning motor skills, for facilitating comprehension of other persons' actions and mental states, and as a communicative reference to actions or people. Although some non-human species display imitative behaviors, none of them equals the versatility and perfection of human imitation. The versatility and apparent ease of human imitation is, however, not at all self-evident when one considers the neural and cognitive transformations that must be accomplished for successful imitation. Imitation of meaningless gestures poses a particular challenge for our brain, because similarity between the body of the model and one's own body must bridge fundamental differences between the perspective and modalities of perceiving and controlling one's own and other bodies. We analyzed the locations of left-hemisphere lesions disturbing imitation of meaningless gestures and found a clear-cut body part specificity. Disturbed imitation of finger postures was associated with anterior lesions including the opercular portion of the inferior frontal gyrus, whereas disturbed imitation of hand postures was associated with posterior lesions affecting the inferior parietal lobule and temporo-parieto-occipital junction. These locations do not correspond with known somatotopic maps of motor representations. Rather, they argue for an intermediate step of processing interpolated between perception and execution of gestures as has been suggested by the mirror neuron and the body part coding hypotheses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0638-06.2006

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Damage to inferior frontal cortex results in impairments in imitation of finger movements.

    “damage to inferior frontal cortex results in impairments in imitation of finger movements”

    From Mirror neurons: from origin to function (2014) · cites this paper as Goldenberg & Karnath, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldenberg, G., & Karnath, H.-O.
Affiliations
München Klinik Bogenhausen (DE)
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2006-06-07
Volume
26
Issue
23
Pages
6282-6287
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2055934086
Cited by
208
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 9
FWCI
17.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 550-A4, SFB 550)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
imitation, left hemisphere damage, inferior frontal gyrus, inferior parietal lobule, finger posture, hand posture, somatotopic map, motor learning, social cognition
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Diseases, Brain Mapping, Female, Fingers, Gestures, Hand, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Male, Middle Aged, Posture, Human Body

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review