Cited by 22Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchAxon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling

Amygdala EphB2 signaling regulates glutamatergic neuron maturation and innate fear

Open access
Zhu, Xiao-Na, Liu, Xian-Dong, Zhuang, Hanyi, Henkemeyer, Mark, Yang, Jing-Yu, Xu, Nan-Jie·2016·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The amygdala serves as emotional center to mediate innate fear behaviors that are reflected through neuronal responses to environmental aversive cues. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the initial neuron responses is poorly understood. In this study, we monitored the innate defensive responses to aversive stimuli of either elevated plus maze or predator odor in juvenile mice and found that glutamatergic neurons were activated in amygdala. Loss of EphB2, a receptor tyrosine kinase expressed in amygdala neurons, suppressed the reactions and led to defects in spine morphogenesis and fear behaviors. We further found a coupling of spinogenesis with these threat cues induced neuron activation in developing amygdala that was controlled by EphB2. A constitutively active form of EphB2 was sufficient to rescue the behavioral and morphological defects caused by ablation of ephrin-B3, a brain-enriched ligand to EphB2. These data suggest that kinase-dependent EphB2 intracellular signaling plays a major role for innate fear responses during the critical developing period, in which spinogenesis in amygdala glutamatergic neurons was involved. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Generation of innate fear responses to threat as an evolutionally conserved brain feature relies on development of functional neural circuit in amygdala, but the molecular mechanism remains largely unknown. We here identify that EphB2 receptor tyrosine kinase, which is specifically expressed in glutamatergic neurons, is required for the innate fear responses in the neonatal brain. We further reveal that EphB2 mediates coordination of spinogenesis and neuron activation in amygdala during the critical period for the innate fear. EphB2 catalytic activity plays a major role for the behavior upon EphB–ephrin-B3 binding and transnucleus neuronal connections. Our work thus indicates an essential synaptic molecular signaling within amygdala that controls synapse development and helps bring about innate fear emotions in the postnatal developing brain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0845-16.2016

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EphB receptors are critical for the development of innate fear in mice, whereby loss of EphB receptors disrupted normal axonal innervation in the amygdala.

    “Recently, EphB receptors were shown to be critical for the development of innate fear in mice, whereby loss of EphB receptors disrupted normal axonal innervation in the amygdala (40).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, X.-N., Liu, X.-D., Zhuang, H., Henkemeyer, M., Yang, J.-Y., & Xu, N.-J.
Affiliations
  • Shenyang Pharmaceutical University (CN)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2016-09-28
Volume
36
Issue
39
Pages
10151-10162
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2527561626
Cited by
22
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2016: 3
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (Program 973, 2014CB965002)
  • Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH066332)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
Keywords
EphB2, ephrin-B3, amygdala, innate fear, glutamatergic neurons, dendritic spine morphogenesis, synaptic development, receptor tyrosine kinase signaling, predator odor, elevated plus maze, neonatal brain development
MeSH terms
Aging, Amygdala, Animals, Defense Mechanisms, Fear, Glutamates, Instinct, Mice, Transgenic, Neurons, Signal Transduction, Mice, Knockout, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Receptor, EphB2, Mice, Neurogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review