Cited by 58Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchStress Responses and Cortisol

Bidirectional Modulation of Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation under Stress and No-Stress Conditions in Basolateral Amygdala-Lesioned and Intact Rats

Open access
Korz, Volker, Frey, Julietta U.·2005·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP) is widely considered as a cellular model for learning and memory formation. We have shown previously that protein synthesis-independent, early dentate gyrus (DG) LTP, lasting approximately 4-5 h, can be transformed into a late-LTP with a duration of > or = 24 h by a brief acute swim stress experience (high-stress condition). This reinforcement requires the activation of mineralocorticoid receptors and protein synthesis. The basolateral amygdala (BLA) is known to modulate glucocorticoid effects on the consolidation of spatial/contextual memory via a beta-adrenergic mechanism. Interestingly, hippocampal DG-LTP can also be indirectly modulated by beta-adrenergic and cholinergic/muscarinergic processes. Here, we show that the reinforcement of early-DG-LTP under high-stress conditions depends on the processing of novel spatial/contextual information. Furthermore, this reinforcement was blocked in BLA-lesioned animals compared with sham-operated and intact controls; however, it was not dependent on beta-adrenergic or cholinergic/muscarinergic receptor activation. In contrast, under low-stress conditions, the induction of late-LTP in BLA-lesioned animals is facilitated, and this facilitation, again, was dependent on beta-adrenergic activation. The data suggest that DG-LTP maintenance can be influenced by the BLA through different mechanisms: a short-lasting corticosterone-dependent and beta-adrenergic-independent mechanism and a long-lasting mechanism that facilitated hippocampal beta-adrenergic mechanisms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0910-05.2005

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Korz, V., & Frey, J. U.
Affiliations
University of Bayreuth (DE)
Corresponding author
Korz, Volker
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2005-08-10
Volume
25
Issue
32
Pages
7393-7400
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2170655355
Cited by
58
References
9
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
hippocampal long-term potentiation, basolateral amygdala, stress, dentate gyrus, beta-adrenergic receptors, corticosterone, contextual memory, spatial memory, memory consolidation, amygdala lesions
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Brain Diseases, Corticosterone, Electric Stimulation, Hippocampus, Male, Receptors, Adrenergic, beta, Receptors, Muscarinic, Reinforcement, Psychology, Stress, Physiological, Swimming, Rats, Wistar, Long-Term Potentiation, Dentate Gyrus, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review