Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 171

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The contribution of NMDA and non-NMDA receptors to fast and slow transmission of sensory information in the rat SI barrel cortex

Open access
Armstrong-James, M, Welker, E, Callahan, CA·1993·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to establish the contribution of NMDA receptors to natural processing of somatosensory information within rat SI barrel cortex. Responses of 52 cells in layers I-IV of the rat barrel cortex were analyzed by PSTH (peristimulus histogram) analysis of evoked spikes in reply to brief deflections of the principal whisker in animals anesthetized with urethane. Short and longer peak latency responses within PSTHs were compared in the presence and absence of the specific NMDA and non-NMDA antagonists D(-)- 2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid and 6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione, which were administered locally to neurons by iontophoresis and additionally tested against their putative specific agonists, NMDA and quisqualate, respectively. The results suggest the following. (1) The generation of most spikes from cells in layers I-IV is dependent upon activation of NMDA receptors. However, NMDA receptors do not contribute to responses at very short latencies commensurate with monosynaptic thalamocortical relay for layer IV cells. These appear to be entirely mediated through non-NMDA receptors. (2) In the absence of transmission through NMDA receptors, non-NMDA receptors do not generate significant spike activity in later (10–100 msec latency) discharges. (3) NMDA receptor participation in first spike generation is directly dependent upon the latency of response of the cell to principal whisker deflection. (4) Latency of response, non-NMDA receptor-mediated spike generation and laminar location were powerfully covariant. (5) In addition, it was found that cells exhibiting short-duration spikes ( < 0.7 msec; “fast-spike units”) in layer IV responded powerfully at short latencies, first spikes being entirely dependent upon non-NMDA but not NMDA receptor action, later spikes (10–100 msec poststimulus) being > 80% dependent upon NMDA receptor action. It is concluded that most sensorially driven spike activity in layers I-IV is dependent upon NMDA receptor action. This appears to be enabled by contingent subthreshold depolarization largely through non-NMDA receptor action, whereas the earliest thalamocortical discharges are evoked solely through non-NMDA receptors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.13-05-02149.1993

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Armstrong-James, M., Welker, E., & Callahan, C.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1993-05-01
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
2149-2160
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1873050758
Cited by
171
References
3
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The contribution of NMDA and non-NMDA receptors to fast and slow transmission of sensory information in the rat SI barrel cortex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.13-05-02149.1993
The paper
Armstrong-James, M., Welker, E., & Callahan, C. (1993). The contribution of NMDA and non-NMDA receptors to fast and slow transmission of sensory information in the rat SI barrel cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.13-05-02149.1993

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.