The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integration of Visuospatial and Effector Information during Symbolically Cued Limb Movements in Monkey Lateral Intraparietal Area
Open accessAbstract
Natural behavior requires close but flexible coordination between attention, defined as selection for perception, and action. In recent years a distributed network including the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) has been implicated in visuospatial selection for attention and rapid eye movements (saccades), but the relation between the attentional and motor functions of this area remains unclear. Here we tested LIP neurons in a task that involved not an ocular but a manual operant response. Monkeys viewed a display containing one cue and several distractors and reported the orientation of the cue (right- or left-facing) by releasing one of two bars grasped, respectively, with the right or left hand. The movement in this task thus was associated with (cued by), but not directed toward, the visual stimulus. A large majority of neurons responded more when the cue rather than when a distractor was in their receptive field, suggesting that they contribute to the attentional selection of the cue. A fraction of these neurons also was modulated by limb release, thus simultaneously encoding cue location and the active limb. The results suggest that the LIP links behaviorally relevant visual information with motor variables relevant for solving a task in a wide range of circumstances involving goal-directed or symbolically cued movements and eye as well as limb movements. A central function of the LIP may be to coordinate visual and motor selection during a wide variety of behaviors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Monkeys had to perform the task while maintaining their gaze straight ahead (on the central fixation point), so that overt saccades had no value and would have been punished with a loss of reward - and indeed, monkeys actively suppressed the saccades.”
From Attention, learning, and the value of information (2012) · cites this paper as Oristaglio et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless the informative cue had value, and neurons in the lateral intraparietal area continued selecting the cue, showing much higher activity if the “E” rather than a distractor was in their receptive field (Balan and Gottlieb, 2009; Balan et al., 2008; Oristaglio et al., 2006) (Fig. 4B).”
From Attention, learning, and the value of information (2012) · cites this paper as Oristaglio et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“As I mentioned in the previous section, parietal neurons encoded the location of the relevant cue, and some of the cells had only a target selection response, responding more if the cue rather than a distractor was in the RF regardless of the manual release (Fig. 4B).”
From Attention, learning, and the value of information (2012) · cites this paper as Oristaglio et al., 2006
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,293
Computational modelling of visual attention
Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35058500 · Cited by 4,733
Roitman, J. D., & Shadlen, M. N. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-21-09475.2002 · Cited by 1,589 · cited 1×
“This finding is consistent with parallel processing models in which information about visuospatial, perceptual, and motor variables accumulates in parallel during the reaction time (Roitman and Shadlen, 2002).”
ResultThe role of attention in the programming of saccades
Kowler, E., Anderson, E., Dosher, B., & Blaser, E. (1995) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)00279-u · Cited by 1,302
Neural Control of Voluntary Movement Initiation
Hanes, D. P., & Schall, J. D. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5286.427 · Cited by 1,145
Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex
Snyder, L. H., Batista, A. P., & Andersen, R. A. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/386167a0 · Cited by 1,103
Mesulam, M.-M. (1999) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1999.0482 · Cited by 1,096
The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex
Gottlieb, J. P., Kusunoki, M., & Goldberg, M. E. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35135 · Cited by 1,078
Murata, A., Gallese, V., Luppino, G., Kaseda, M., & Sakata, H. (2000) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.2000.83.5.2580 · Cited by 841
Neuronal Activity in the Lateral Intraparietal Area and Spatial Attention
Bisley, J. W., & Goldberg, M. E. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1077395 · Cited by 821
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.1037/0096-1523.23.6.1708 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–101 of 101
Brigande, A. M., Krueger, J., Park, C., & Disney, A. A. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.01.26.701495
Metadata
- Authors
- Oristaglio, J., Schneider, D. M., Balan, P. F., & Gottlieb, J.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2006-08-09
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 8310-8319
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6673800
- OpenAlex
- W1978413093
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 4.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- McKnight Endowment Fund for Neuroscience
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- W. M. Keck Foundation
- McKnight Foundation
- National Institutes of Health (5r24ey015634-05)
- National Eye Institute (R24 EY-015634)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Keywords
- lateral intraparietal area, visuospatial attention, saccades, single-unit recording, cue selection, distractor suppression, goal-directed behavior
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Haplorhini, Cues, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Extremities, Interneurons, Movement, Parietal Lobe, Space Perception, Information Storage and Retrieval, Evoked Potentials, Motor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
