The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integration of Visuospatial and Effector Information during Symbolically Cued Limb Movements in Monkey Lateral Intraparietal Area
Open accessAbstract
Natural behavior requires close but flexible coordination between attention, defined as selection for perception, and action. In recent years a distributed network including the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) has been implicated in visuospatial selection for attention and rapid eye movements (saccades), but the relation between the attentional and motor functions of this area remains unclear. Here we tested LIP neurons in a task that involved not an ocular but a manual operant response. Monkeys viewed a display containing one cue and several distractors and reported the orientation of the cue (right- or left-facing) by releasing one of two bars grasped, respectively, with the right or left hand. The movement in this task thus was associated with (cued by), but not directed toward, the visual stimulus. A large majority of neurons responded more when the cue rather than when a distractor was in their receptive field, suggesting that they contribute to the attentional selection of the cue. A fraction of these neurons also was modulated by limb release, thus simultaneously encoding cue location and the active limb. The results suggest that the LIP links behaviorally relevant visual information with motor variables relevant for solving a task in a wide range of circumstances involving goal-directed or symbolically cued movements and eye as well as limb movements. A central function of the LIP may be to coordinate visual and motor selection during a wide variety of behaviors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Monkeys had to perform the task while maintaining their gaze straight ahead (on the central fixation point), so that overt saccades had no value and would have been punished with a loss of reward - and indeed, monkeys actively suppressed the saccades.”
From Attention, learning, and the value of information (2012) · cites this paper as Oristaglio et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless the informative cue had value, and neurons in the lateral intraparietal area continued selecting the cue, showing much higher activity if the “E” rather than a distractor was in their receptive field (Balan and Gottlieb, 2009; Balan et al., 2008; Oristaglio et al., 2006) (Fig. 4B).”
From Attention, learning, and the value of information (2012) · cites this paper as Oristaglio et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“As I mentioned in the previous section, parietal neurons encoded the location of the relevant cue, and some of the cells had only a target selection response, responding more if the cue rather than a distractor was in the RF regardless of the manual release (Fig. 4B).”
From Attention, learning, and the value of information (2012) · cites this paper as Oristaglio et al., 2006
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,293
Computational modelling of visual attention
Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35058500 · Cited by 4,733
Roitman, J. D., & Shadlen, M. N. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-21-09475.2002 · Cited by 1,589 · cited 1×
“This finding is consistent with parallel processing models in which information about visuospatial, perceptual, and motor variables accumulates in parallel during the reaction time (Roitman and Shadlen, 2002).”
ResultThe role of attention in the programming of saccades
Kowler, E., Anderson, E., Dosher, B., & Blaser, E. (1995) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)00279-u · Cited by 1,302
Neural Control of Voluntary Movement Initiation
Hanes, D. P., & Schall, J. D. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5286.427 · Cited by 1,145
Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex
Snyder, L. H., Batista, A. P., & Andersen, R. A. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/386167a0 · Cited by 1,103
Mesulam, M.-M. (1999) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1999.0482 · Cited by 1,096
The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex
Gottlieb, J. P., Kusunoki, M., & Goldberg, M. E. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35135 · Cited by 1,078
Murata, A., Gallese, V., Luppino, G., Kaseda, M., & Sakata, H. (2000) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.2000.83.5.2580 · Cited by 841
Neuronal Activity in the Lateral Intraparietal Area and Spatial Attention
Bisley, J. W., & Goldberg, M. E. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1077395 · Cited by 821
Modeling the influence of task on attention
Navalpakkam, V., & Itti, L. (2004) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.042 · Cited by 645
Visual, presaccadic, and cognitive activation of single neurons in monkey lateral intraparietal area
Colby, C. L., Duhamel, J. R., & Goldberg, M. E. (1996) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1996.76.5.2841 · Cited by 631
A visual salience map in the primate frontal eye field
Thompson, K. G., & Bichot, N. P. (2005) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(04)47019-8 · Cited by 431
Shape selectivity in primate lateral intraparietal cortex
Sereno, A. B., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/26752 · Cited by 431
Barash, S., Bracewell, R. M., Fogassi, L., Gnadt, J., & Andersen, R. A. (1991) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1991.66.3.1095 · Cited by 428
Intention-related activity in the posterior parietal cortex: a review
Snyder, L. H., Batista, A. P., & Andersen, R. A. (2000) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00052-3 · Cited by 352
Arbitrary associations between antecedents and actions
Wise, S. P., & Murray, E. A. (2000) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01570-8 · Cited by 276
Dynamic coding of behaviourally relevant stimuli in parietal cortex
Toth, L. J., & Assad, J. A. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415165a · Cited by 270
Activity of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area of the monkey during an antisaccade task
Gottlieb, J. P., & Goldberg, M. E. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/13209 · Cited by 247
Subcortical Modulation of Attention Counters Change Blindness
Cavanaugh, J. R., & Wurtz, R. H. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3724-04.2004 · Cited by 237
Deubel, H., Schneider, W. X., & Paprotta, I. (1998) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/713756776 · Cited by 228
Non-spatial, motor-specific activation in posterior parietal cortex
Calton, J. L., Dickinson, A. R., & Snyder, L. H. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn0602-862 · Cited by 205
Saccadic target selection deficits after lateral intraparietal area inactivation in monkeys
Wardak, C., Olivier, E., & Duhamel, J.-R. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-22-09877.2002 · Cited by 203
A Parallel Distributed Processing Model of Stimulus–Stimulus and Stimulus–Response Compatibility
Zhang, H., Zhang, J., & Kornblum, S. (1999) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0703 · Cited by 197
Goldberg, M. E., Bisley, J. W., Powell, K. D., Gottlieb, J. P., & Kusunoki, M. (2002) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb02820.x · Cited by 196
A Deficit in Covert Attention after Parietal Cortex Inactivation in the Monkey
Wardak, C., Olivier, E., & Duhamel, J. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(04)00185-0 · Cited by 186
Nakamura, H., Kuroda, T., Wakita, M., Kusunoki, M., Kato, A., Mikami, A., Sakata, H., & Itoh, K. (2001) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-20-08174.2001 · Cited by 158
Kermadi, I. (2000) · Somatosensory & Motor Research · doi:10.1080/08990220050117619 · Cited by 146
Movement Intention Is Better Predicted than Attention in the Posterior Parietal Cortex
Quiroga, R. Q., Snyder, L. H., Batista, A. P., Cui, H., & Andersen, R. A. (2006) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3468-05.2006 · Cited by 143
Eimer, M., Förster, B., van Velzen, J. L., & Prabhu, G. (2004) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.08.011 · Cited by 120
Cerebral Changes during Performance of Overlearned Arbitrary Visuomotor Associations
Grol, M. J., de Lange, F. P., Verstraten, F. A. J., Passingham, R. E., & Toni, I. (2006) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2786-05.2006 · Cited by 117
Saccade-Related Activity in the Parietal Reach Region
Snyder, L. H., Batista, A. P., & Andersen, R. A. (2000) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.2000.83.2.1099 · Cited by 113
Selection-for-action in visual search
Hannus, A., Cornelissen, F. W., Lindemann, O., & Harold Bekkering, A. (2004) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.10.010 · Cited by 82
Nonspatial Saccade-Specific Activation in area LIP of Monkey Parietal Cortex
Dickinson, A. R., Calton, J. L., & Snyder, L. H. (2003) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00788.2002 · Cited by 72
What Do Complex Spikes Signal about Limb Movements?
Ebner, T. J., Johnson, M. T. V., Roitman, A., & Fu, Q. (2002) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb07568.x · Cited by 61
Neuronal correlates of sensorimotor association in stimulus-response compatibility.
Riehle, A., Kornblum, S., & Requin, J. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.23.6.1708 · Cited by 60
Gottlieb, J. P., Kusunoki, M., & Goldberg, M. E. (2004) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi002 · Cited by 50
Non-spatial, motor-specific activation in posterior parietal cortex
Calton, J. L., Dickinson, A. R., & Snyder, L. H. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn862 · Cited by 45
Neural correlates of partial transmission of sensorimotor information in the cerebral cortex
Requin, J., & Alexa Riehle, C. (1995) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(95)00039-w · Cited by 33
Neuronal coding of stimulus-response association rules in the motor cortex
Riehle, A., Kornblum, S., & Requin, J. (1994) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-199412000-00014 · Cited by 28
Saccade Adaptation in Response to Altered Arm Dynamics
Nanayakkara, T., & Shadmehr, R. (2003) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00430.2003 · Cited by 28
Visual sensitivity in search tasks depends on the response requirement
Gilchrist, I. D., Heywood, C. A., & Findlay, J. M. (2003) · Spatial Vision · doi:10.1163/156856803322467536 · Cited by 16
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.1037/0096-1523.23.6.1708 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Attention, intention, and priority in the parietal lobe
Bisley, J. W., & Goldberg, M. E. (2010) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-152823 · Cited by 1,043
Information-seeking, curiosity, and attention: computational and neural mechanisms
Gottlieb, J., Oudeyer, P.-Y., Lopes, M., & Baranes, A. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.001 · Cited by 784
From Thought to Action: The Parietal Cortex as a Bridge between Perception, Action, and Cognition
Gottlieb, J. P. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.12.009 · Cited by 520
Reward value-based gain control: divisive normalization in parietal cortex
Louie, K., Grattan, L. E., & Glimcher, P. W. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1237-11.2011 · Cited by 308
“In addition to responses related to target selection and action value, LIP neurons also show activity associated with the allocation of covert attention, driven by intrinsic visual salience or task relevance (Bisley and Goldberg, 2003, 2010; Oristaglio et al., 2006).”
BackgroundDistinct neural mechanisms of distractor suppression in the frontal and parietal lobe
Suzuki, M., & Gottlieb, J. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3282 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Oristaglio, J., Schneider, D. M., Balan, P. F., & Gottlieb, J.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2006-08-09
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 8310-8319
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6673800
- OpenAlex
- W1978413093
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 4.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- McKnight Endowment Fund for Neuroscience
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- W. M. Keck Foundation
- McKnight Foundation
- National Institutes of Health (5r24ey015634-05)
- National Eye Institute (R24 EY-015634)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Keywords
- lateral intraparietal area, visuospatial attention, saccades, single-unit recording, cue selection, distractor suppression, goal-directed behavior
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Haplorhini, Cues, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Extremities, Interneurons, Movement, Parietal Lobe, Space Perception, Information Storage and Retrieval, Evoked Potentials, Motor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review