The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanisms of Deafferentation-Induced Plasticity in Human Motor Cortex
Open accessAbstract
Deafferentation induces rapid plastic changes in the cerebral cortex, probably via unmasking of pre-existent connections. Several mechanisms may contribute, such as changes in neuronal membrane excitability, removal of local inhibition, or various forms of short- or long-term synaptic plasticity. To understand further the mechanisms involved in cortical plasticity, we tested the effects of CNS-active drugs in a plasticity model, in which forearm ischemic nerve block (INB) was combined with low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the deafferented human motor cortex. rTMS was used to upregulate the plastic changes caused by INB. We studied six healthy subjects. In two control sessions without drug application, INB plus rTMS increased the motor-evoked potential (MEP) size and decreased intracortical inhibition (ICI) measured with single- and paired-pulse TMS in the biceps brachii muscle proximal to INB. A single oral dose of the benzodiazepine lorazepam (2 mg) or the voltage-gated Na+ and Ca2+ channel blocker lamotrigine (300 mg) abolished these changes. The NMDA receptor blocker dextromethorphan (150 mg) suppressed the reduction in ICI but not the increase in MEP size. With sleep deprivation, used to eliminate sedation as a major factor of these drug effects, INB plus rTMS induced changes similar to that seen in the control sessions. The findings suggest that (1) the INB plus rTMS-induced increase in MEP size involves rapid removal of GABA-related cortical inhibition and short-term changes in synaptic efficacy dependent on Na+ or Ca2+ channels and that (2) the long-lasting (>60 min) reduction in ICI is related to long-term potentiation-like mechanisms given its duration and the involvement of NMDA receptor activation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collingridge, G. L., Kehl, S. J., & McLennan, H. (1983) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014478 · Cited by 2,413
Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation
Chen, R., Classen, J., Gerloff, C., Celnik, P., Wassermann, E. M., Hallett, M., & Cohen, L. G. (1997) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.48.5.1398 · Cited by 2,128 · cited 2×
“Low-frequency rTMS at 0.1 Hz does not induce plastic changes in the absence of INB (Chen et al., 1997a; Ziemann et al., 1998).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationFunctional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning
Kami, A., Meyer, G., Jezzard, P., Adams, M. M., Turner, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/377155a0 · Cited by 1,883
Two components of long-term potentiation induced by different patterns of afferent activation
Grover, L. M., & Teyler, T. J. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/347477a0 · Cited by 708
Functional anatomy of human procedural learning determined with regional cerebral blood flow and PET
Grafton, S., Mazziotta, J., Presty, S., Friston, K., Frackowiak, R., & Phelps, M. (1992) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.12-07-02542.1992 · Cited by 607 · cited 2×
“, 1998) or as a consequence of motor learning (Grafton et al., 1992; Recanzone et al., 1992; Pascual-Leone et al., 1994, 1995; Karni et al., 1995; Donoghue et al., 1996; Nudo et al., 1996).”
BackgroundBear, M., Kleinschmidt, A., Gu, Q., & Singer, W. (1990) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.10-03-00909.1990 · Cited by 488
The glutamate antagonist Riluzole suppresses intracortical facilitation
Liepert, J., Schwenkreis, P., Tegenthoff, M., & Malin, J. P. (1997) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/bf01294721 · Cited by 274
Effects of phenytoin on cortical excitability in humans
Chen, R., Samii, A., Caños, M., Wassermann, E. M., & Hallett, M. (1997) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.49.3.881 · Cited by 204
Self-citationBenzodiazepines block long-term potentiation in slices of hippocampus and piriform cortex
del Cerro, S., Jung, M., & Lynch, G. (1992) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(92)90071-9 · Cited by 106
Cited by
Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2000) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x · Cited by 5,656
Liebetanz, D. (2002) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awf238 · Cited by 1,383
Plasticity of motor systems after incomplete spinal cord injury
Raineteau, O., & Schwab, M. E. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35067570 · Cited by 803
Is there a future for therapeutic use of transcranial magnetic stimulation?
Ridding, M. C., & Rothwell, J. C. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2169 · Cited by 687
Consensus: Motor cortex plasticity protocols
Ziemann, U., Paulus, W., Nitsche, M. A., Pascual-Leone, A., Byblow, W. D., Berardelli, A., Siebner, H. R., Classen, J., Cohen, L. G., & Rothwell, J. C. (2008) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.006 · Cited by 639
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ziemann, U., Hallett, M., & Cohen, L. G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1998-09-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 7000-7007
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2152833537
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 7.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms of Deafferentation-Induced Plasticity in Human Motor Cortex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.18-17-07000.1998
- The paper
- Ziemann, U., Hallett, M., & Cohen, L. G. (1998). Mechanisms of Deafferentation-Induced Plasticity in Human Motor Cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.18-17-07000.1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.