The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Low-Intensity Electrical Stimulation Affects Network Dynamics by Modulating Population Rate and Spike Timing
Open accessAbstract
Clinical effects of transcranial electrical stimulation with weak currents are remarkable considering the low amplitude of the electric fields acting on the brain. Elucidating the processes by which small currents affect ongoing brain activity is of paramount importance for the rational design of noninvasive electrotherapeutic strategies and to determine the relevance of endogenous fields. We propose that in active neuronal networks, weak electrical fields induce small but coherent changes in the firing rate and timing of neuronal populations that can be magnified by dynamic network activity. Specifically, we show that carbachol-induced gamma oscillations (25–35 Hz) in rat hippocampal slices have an inherent rate-limiting dynamic and timing precision that govern susceptibility to low-frequency weak electric fields (<50 Hz; <10 V/m). This leads to a range of nonlinear responses, including the following: (1) asymmetric power modulation by DC fields resulting from balanced excitation and inhibition; (2) symmetric power modulation by lower frequency AC fields with a net-zero change in firing rate; and (3) half-harmonic oscillations for higher frequency AC fields resulting from increased spike timing precision. These underlying mechanisms were elucidated by slice experiments and a parsimonious computational network model of single-compartment spiking neurons responding to electric field stimulation with small incremental polarization. Intracellular recordings confirmed model predictions on neuronal timing and rate changes, as well as spike phase-entrainment resonance at 0.2 V/m. Finally, our data and mechanistic framework provide a functional role for endogenous electric fields, specifically illustrating that modulation of gamma oscillations during theta-modulated gamma activity can result from field effects alone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2000) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x · Cited by 5,656
Simple model of spiking neurons
Izhikevich, E. M. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2003.820440 · Cited by 4,828
Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience: The Geometry of Excitability and Bursting
Izhikevich, E. M. (2006) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2526.001.0001 · Cited by 3,765
Theta oscillations in the hippocampus
Buzsáki, G. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00586-x · Cited by 3,332
Spiking Neuron Models: Single Neurons, Populations, Plasticity
Gerstner, W., & Kistler, W. M. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815706 · Cited by 3,080
Nunez, P. L., & Srinivasan, R. (2006) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195050387.001.0001 · Cited by 2,531
Synaptic mechanisms of synchronized gamma oscillations in inhibitory interneuron networks
Bartos, M., Vida, I., & Jonas, P. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2044 · Cited by 2,070
Gamma (40-100 Hz) oscillation in the hippocampus of the behaving rat
Bragin, A., Jando, G., Nadasdy, Z., Hetke, J., Wise, K., & Buzsaki, G. (1995) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.15-01-00047.1995 · Cited by 1,527
Datta, A., Bansal, V., Diaz, J., Patel, J., Reato, D., & Bikson, M. (2009) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2009.03.005 · Cited by 1,290
Self-citationGerstner, W. (2009) · Encyclopedia of Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/b978-008045046-9.01405-4 · Cited by 1,199
Cited by
Direct effects of transcranial electric stimulation on brain circuits in rats and humans
Vöröslakos, M., Takeuchi, Y., Brinyiczki, K., Zombori, T., Oliva, A., Fernández-Ruiz, A., Kozák, G., Kincses, Z. T., Iványi, B., Buzsáki, G., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-02928-3 · Cited by 735
Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects
Rahman, A., Reato, D., Arlotti, M., Gasca, F., Datta, A., Parra, L. C., & Bikson, M. (2013) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2012.247171 · Cited by 560
Self-citationTranscranial Alternating Current and Random Noise Stimulation: Possible Mechanisms
Antal, A., & Herrmann, C. S. (2016) · Neural Plasticity · doi:10.1155/2016/3616807 · Cited by 357
Krause, B., & Cohen Kadosh, R. (2014) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00025 · Cited by 339
Chase, H. W., Boudewyn, M. A., Carter, C. S., & Phillips, M. L. (2020) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-019-0499-9 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Reato, D., Rahman, A., Bikson, M., & Parra, L. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2010-11-10
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 45
- Pages
- 15067-15079
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2140398789
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 9.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low-Intensity Electrical Stimulation Affects Network Dynamics by Modulating Population Rate and Spike Timing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.2059-10.2010
- The paper
- Reato, D., Rahman, A., Bikson, M., & Parra, L. C. (2010). Low-Intensity Electrical Stimulation Affects Network Dynamics by Modulating Population Rate and Spike Timing. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2059-10.2010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.