Cited by 711Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predictability Modulates Human Brain Response to Reward

Open access

Abstract

Certain classes of stimuli, such as food and drugs, are highly effective in activating reward regions. We show in humans that activity in these regions can be modulated by the predictability of the sequenced delivery of two mildly pleasurable stimuli, orally delivered fruit juice and water. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, the activity for rewarding stimuli in both the nucleus accumbens and medial orbitofrontal cortex was greatest when the stimuli were unpredictable. Moreover, the subjects' stated preference for either juice or water was not directly correlated with activity in reward regions but instead was correlated with activity in sensorimotor cortex. For pleasurable stimuli, these findings suggest that predictability modulates the response of human reward regions, and subjective preference can be dissociated from this response.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.21-08-02793.2001

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–107 of 107

Metadata

Authors
Berns, G. S., McClure, S. M., Pagnoni, G., & Montague, P. R.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2001-04-15
Volume
21
Issue
8
Pages
2793-2798
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2096684870
Cited by
711
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 37
FWCI
9.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (K08 DA00367, K08DA000367, R01-DA11723, R01DA011723)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
reward, predictability, nucleus accumbens, medial orbitofrontal cortex, sensorimotor cortex, subjective preference, food reward
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Computer Simulation, Corpus Striatum, Deglutition, Food Preferences, Frontal Lobe, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Nucleus Accumbens, Reward, Somatosensory Cortex, Stimulation, Chemical, Taste, Neural Networks, Computer, Prefrontal Cortex, Intuition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review