The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attention, Reward, and Information Seeking
Open accessAbstract
Decision making is thought to be guided by the values of alternative options and involve the accumulation of evidence to an internal bound. However, in natural behavior, evidence accumulation is an active process whereby subjects decide when and which sensory stimulus to sample. These sampling decisions are naturally served by attention and rapid eye movements (saccades), but little is known about how saccades are controlled to guide future actions. Here we review evidence that was discussed at a recent symposium, which suggests that information selection involves basal ganglia and cortical mechanisms and that, across different contexts, it is guided by two central factors: the gains in reward and gains in information (uncertainty reduction) associated with sensory cues.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Research has shown that because agents find pleasure in reducing manageable uncertainty, they are attracted to just-uncertain-enough environments”
From Active inference goes to school: the importance of active learning in the age of large language models (2024) · cites this paper as [53]
Citations
Cites
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779
The Neural Basis of Decision Making
Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2007) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113038 · Cited by 3,764
Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice
Krajbich, I., Armel, C., & Rangel, A. (2010) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2635 · Cited by 1,408
Self-citationRole of the Basal Ganglia in the Control of Purposive Saccadic Eye Movements
Hikosaka, O., Takikawa, Y., & Kawagoe, R. (2000) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2000.80.3.953 · Cited by 1,334
Self-citationSharot, T. (2011) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.030 · Cited by 1,187
Value-driven attentional capture
Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1104047108 · Cited by 1,098
The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex
Gottlieb, J. P., Kusunoki, M., & Goldberg, M. E. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35135 · Cited by 1,078
Self-citationLongitudinal topography and interdigitation of corticostriatal projections in the rhesus monkey
Selemon, L. D., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1985) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.05-03-00776.1985 · Cited by 1,074
Attention, intention, and priority in the parietal lobe
Bisley, J. W., & Goldberg, M. E. (2010) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-152823 · Cited by 1,043
The Neurobiology of Decision: Consensus and Controversy
Kable, J. W., & Glimcher, P. W. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.09.003 · Cited by 928
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diffusion decision model: Current issues and history
Ratcliff, R., Smith, P. L., Brown, S. D., & McKoon, G. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.007 · Cited by 1,630
“This and other diffusion models have been used to account for, among other things, value-based decision, social choice, and purchasing decisions [150,152,153,157,207–210].”
MethodThe Psychology and Neuroscience of Curiosity
Kidd, C., & Hayden, B. Y. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.010 · Cited by 1,026
Towards a neuroscience of active sampling and curiosity
Gottlieb, J., & Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2018) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-018-0078-0 · Cited by 494
Self-citationA Closer Look at the Hippocampus and Memory
Voss, J. L., Bridge, D. J., Cohen, N. J., & Walker, J. A. (2017) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.05.008 · Cited by 272
Triple dissociation of attention and decision computations across prefrontal cortex
Hunt, L. T., Malalasekera, W. M. N., de Berker, A. O., Miranda, B., Farmer, S. F., Behrens, T. E. J., & Kennerley, S. W. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0239-5 · Cited by 222
Metadata
- Authors
- Gottlieb, J., Hayhoe, M., Hikosaka, O., & Rangel, A.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2014-11-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 46
- Pages
- 15497-15504
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC4228145
- OpenAlex
- W2022076766
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (R21AG038866)
- National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH094258)
- National Eye Institute (R01EY005729)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- attention, reward, information seeking, decision-making, evidence accumulation, saccades, rapid eye movements, basal ganglia, cortical control, uncertainty reduction
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Attention, Basal Ganglia, Cerebral Cortex, Choice Behavior, Humans, Reward, Saccades, Information Seeking Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
