Cited by 1,187Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsOptimism, Hope, and Well-beingNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The optimism bias

Open access
Sharot, Tali·2011·Current Biology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.030

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharot, T.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Sharot, Tali
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
21
Issue
23
Pages
R941-R945
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4232964083
Cited by
1,187
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 82 · 2025: 109 · 2024: 134 · 2023: 111 · 2022: 126 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 167 · 2019: 97 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 6
FWCI
10.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Current Biology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
optimism bias, future expectations, overconfidence, self-projection, cognitive biases, decision-making, behavioral economics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review