The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Imaging Response Inhibition in a Stop-Signal Task: Neural Correlates Independent of Signal Monitoring and Post-Response Processing
Open accessAbstract
Execution of higher cortical functions requires inhibitory control to restrain habitual responses and meet changing task demands. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to show the neural correlates of response inhibition during a stop-signal task. The task has a frequent "go" stimulus to set up a pre-potent response tendency and a less frequent "stop" signal for subjects to withhold their response. We contrasted brain activation between successful and failed inhibition for individual subjects and compared groups of subjects with short and long stop-signal reaction times. The two groups of subjects did not differ in their inhibition failure rates or the extent of signal monitoring, error monitoring, or task-associated frustration ratings. The results showed that short stop-signal reaction time or more efficient response inhibition was associated with greater activation in the superior medial and precentral frontal cortices. Moreover, activation of these inhibitory motor areas correlated negatively with stop-signal reaction time. These brain regions may represent the neural substrata of response inhibition independent of other cognitive and affective functions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Recent studies using a variety of methods suggest that stopping is associated with activation of a fronto-basal-ganglia circuit that includes inferior frontal gyrus (IFG; ventrolateral prefrontal cortex), middle frontal gyrus (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex), medial frontal gyrus (MFG), and basal ganglia [14–18].”
From Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm (2008) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Event-related fMRI studies showed that (mainly) parietal and frontal brain regions are more activated when inhibition is unsuccessful [15, 16, 18, 19].”
From Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm (2008) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cites
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn755 · Cited by 12,881 · cited 1×
“These results suggest that the function of the IFC may extend beyond signal monitoring and mediate other aspects of attention function such as detection of behaviorally relevant, salient stimuli (Corbetta and Shulman, 2002; Yamasaki et al., 2002).”
BackgroundCo-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain
Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,798
Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. ‐., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460020402 · Cited by 9,688
Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex
Bush, G., Luu, P., & Posner, M. I. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01483-2 · Cited by 6,259 · cited 1×
“Activation in the anterior cingulate did not correlate with SSRT, EM effect, or frustrating rating, suggesting that this brain region probably plays a more complicated role that would require additional studies to understand (Bush et al., 2000; Rushworth et al., 2004).”
BackgroundTransformed Up-Down Methods in Psychoacoustics
Levitt, H. (1971) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1912375 · Cited by 5,505 · cited 2×
“With the staircase procedure, a “critical” SSD could be computed that represented the time delay required for the subject to succeed in withholding a response in the stop trials half of the time (Levitt, 1970).”
MethodThresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate
Genovese, C. R., Lazar, N. A., & Nichols, T. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.1037 · Cited by 4,923 · cited 4×
“05, corrected for false discovery rate (FDR) (Genovese et al., 2002) and an extent threshold of 10 voxels, successful inhibition was associated with greater bihemispheric activation of multiple cortical areas (Fig.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe cognitive control of emotion
OCHSNER, K., & GROSS, J. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.010 · Cited by 4,495 · cited 2×
“One would thus expect the anterior cingulate cortex to participate in a wide variety of cognitive and affective tasks in which inhibitory control assumes an integral position (Schall et al., 2002; Phillips et al., 2003; Dalley et al., 2004; Isomura and Takada, 2004; Nieuwenhuis et al., 2004; Ridderinkhof et al., 2004;…”
BackgroundSquire, L. R., Stark, C. E. L., & Clark, R. E. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144130 · Cited by 2,680
Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language
Carr, T. H., & Dagenbach, D. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,276
Neurobiology of emotion perception I: the neural basis of normal emotion perception
Phillips, M. L., Drevets, W. C., Rauch, S. L., & Lane, R. (2003) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00168-9 · Cited by 2,173 · cited 2×
“One would thus expect the anterior cingulate cortex to participate in a wide variety of cognitive and affective tasks in which inhibitory control assumes an integral position (Schall et al., 2002; Phillips et al., 2003; Dalley et al., 2004; Isomura and Takada, 2004; Nieuwenhuis et al., 2004; Ridderinkhof et al., 2004;…”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Brett M, Anton J-L, Valabregue R, Poline J-P (2002b) Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox. Paper presented at Eighth International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, Sendai, Japan, June.
- 1995, Hum Brain Mapp, 2, 165
- 1970, Exp Brain Res, 11, 376
- 1995, Adv Neurol, 67, 115
- 1985, Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 223, 339
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 600
Cortical Hemodynamic Response Associated with Spatial Coding: A Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study
Derbie, A. Y., Chau, B. K. H., Lam, B. Y., Fang, Y., Ting, K. H., Wong, C. H. Y., Tao, J., Chen, L., & Chan, C. C. H. (2021) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-021-00821-9 · Cited by 11
Is cortical inhibition in primary motor cortex related to executive control?
Loomes, M., Tran, D. M. D., Chowdhury, N. S., Birney, D. P., Harris, J. A., & Livesey, E. J. (2023) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2022.12.013 · Cited by 13
Neural differences of food-specific inhibitory control in people with healthy vs higher BMI
Liu, X., Turel, O., Xiao, Z., Lv, C., & He, Q. (2023) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2023.106759 · Cited by 11
Perigenual anterior cingulate event-related potential precedes stop signal errors
Chang, A., Chen, C., Li, H.-H., & Li, C. R. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.017 · Cited by 12
“Indeed, the inferior frontal cortex, which responds to a contrast of stop versus go trials or SS versus SE trials, is a part of the ventral attention system (Cai et al., 2014; Corbetta and Shulman, 2011; Frank and Sabatinelli, 2012; Li et al., 2006).”
Selective perturbation of cognitive conflict in the human brain–A combined fMRI and rTMS study
Peschke, C., Koster, R., Korsch, M., Frühholz, S., Thiel, C. M., Herrmann, M., & Hilgetag, C. C. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep38700 · Cited by 11
Edalati, H., Doucet, C., & Conrod, P. (2018) · Seminars in Pediatric Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.spen.2018.03.005 · Cited by 11
Wei, L., Guo, N., Baeken, C., Bi, M., Wang, X., Qiu, J., & Wu, G. (2018) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-018-0676-1 · Cited by 11
Practice-induced functional plasticity in inhibitory control interacts with aging
Hartmann, L., Wachtl, L., Marzia De Lucia, E., & Spierer, L. (2019) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2019.02.004 · Cited by 12
“Importantly, preSMA activity is a determinant of inhibition performance, with evidence for greater preSMA activity in participants with efficient vs slower inhibition (Ray Li et al., 2006).”
Oscillatory brain mechanisms supporting response cancellation in selective stopping strategies
Sánchez‐Carmona, A. J., Santaniello, G., Capilla, A., Hinojosa, J. A., & Albert, J. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.066 · Cited by 10
Anxious arousal alters prefrontal cortical control of stopping
Roxburgh, A. D., White, D., & Cornwell, B. R. (2020) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.14976 · Cited by 10
“Functional MRI studies have also reported the activation of left IFG/aIns in SSTs (Hung et al., 2018; Li et al., 2006; McNab et al., 2008; Padmala & Pessoa, 2010; Rubia et al., 2007), and thus there is some debate about the extent to which the underlying processes are predominantly right lateralized.”
BackgroundTesting Theories of Post-Error Slowing
Dutilh, G., Vandekerckhove, J., Forstmann, B. U., Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & Wagenmakers, E. (2011) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e520602012-241 · Cited by 12
Pharmacological cognitive enhancers
Peltier, M. R., & Sofuoglu, M. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-815298-0.00023-x · Cited by 9
Pulferer, H. S., Kostoglou, K., & Müller-Putz, G. (2023) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120144 · Cited by 10
Using Psycho-physiological Interaction Analysis with fMRI Data in IS Research: A Guideline
Hubert, M., Linzmajer, M., Riedl, R., Hubert, M., Kenning, P. H., & Weber, B. (2017) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.04009 · Cited by 12
“…literature about information processing (Dux, Ivanoff, Asplund, & Marois, 2006; Marois & Ivanoff, 2005), as well as inhibition processes (Li, Huang, Constable, & Sinha, 2006; Simmonds, Pekar, & Mostofsky, 2008; Swick, Ashley, & Turken, 2011), a first step could be again to localize…”
Yoo, P. E., Oxley, T. J., Hagan, M. A., John, S. E., Ronayne, S. M., Rind, G. S., Brinded, A., Opie, N. L., Moffat, B. A., & Wong, Y. T. (2020) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00077 · Cited by 12
“Previous decision-making and executive-function studies have shown that SMC is involved in complex motor response tasks that require inhibition of distracting stimuli (Curtis et al., 2005; Nachev et al., 2005; Aron and Poldrack, 2006; Li et al., 2006; Sumner et al., 2007) or changes in motor goals in reaction to incom…”
BackgroundChen, C., Yao, J., Lv, Y., Zhao, X., Zhang, X., Lei, J., Li, Y., & Sui, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.922272 · Cited by 10
“The study of impulsivity and hostility in patients with excited symptoms may provide new ideas for understanding the neuropathological mechanisms of SZ (25).”
BackgroundtES Stimulation as a Tool to Investigate Cognitive Processes in Healthy Individuals
Lavidor, M. (2016) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000248 · Cited by 9
Cortical network mechanisms of response inhibitionPreprint
Schaum, M., Pinzuti, E., Sebastian, A., Lieb, K., Fries, P., Mobascher, A., Jung, P., Wibral, M., & Tüscher, O. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.02.09.940841 · Cited by 10
“While a range of studies on response inhibition point towards a single inhibitory module within the IFC that directly initiates stopping (Aron et al., 2003, 2014), other studies assign this role to pre-SMA (Li et al., 2006; Nachev et al., 2007).”
BackgroundDecoupling countermands nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping
Wadsley, C. G., Cirillo, J., Nieuwenhuys, A., & Byblow, W. D. (2021) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00495.2021 · Cited by 9
Nouchi, R., Takeuchi, H., Taki, Y., Sekiguchi, A., Kotozaki, Y., Nakagawa, S., Miyauchi, C. M., Iizuka, K., Yokoyama, R., Shinada, T., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep31231 · Cited by 10
Sanz-Esteban, I., Cano‐de‐la‐Cuerda, R., San-Martín-Gómez, A., Jiménez‐Antona, C., Monge‐Pereira, E., Estrada-Barranco, C., Sánchez, P. C. G., & Serrano, J. I. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2021.3120369 · Cited by 9
Cao, M., Luo, Y., Wu, Z., Wu, K., & Li, X. (2022) · Brain Communications · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcac011 · Cited by 8
Feizpour, A., Buckley, M. J., Mundiñano, I.-C., Rosa, M. G. P., & Mansouri, F. A. (2024) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2024.102671 · Cited by 7
“Another functional imaging study has reported higher activation in area 10 cortex when trials with successful inhibition were compared with failed inhibitions (Li et al., 2006).”
BackgroundSenderecka, M., Kossowska, M., Sekerdej, M., & Szewczyk, J. (2018) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.12.007 · Cited by 8
Berginström, N., Johansson, J., Nordström, P., & Nordström, A. (2015) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2015.1063695 · Cited by 9
Passive perceptual learning modulates motor inhibitory control in superior frontal regions
Friedrich, J., & Beste, C. (2019) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24835 · Cited by 7
“…part of BA6 (i.e., pre-SMA and SMA) has repeatedly been shown to be involved in response inhibition (Bari & Robbins, 2013; Chen et al., 2009; C. R. Li et al., 2006; Swick et al., 2011) and has also been associated with conflict monitoring processes (Rushworth, Kennerley, & Walton, 2005;…”
BackgroundWang, B., Hao, Y., Zhan, Q., Zhao, S., Li, D., Imtiaz, S., Xiang, J., Wu, J., Fukuyama, H., & Yan, T. (2020) · Brain Imaging and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11682-019-00203-7 · Cited by 9
“In contrast, in the stop trials, only the nodal efficiency of the right PCUN was correlated with SSRT.”
BackgroundInfluentialRen, Z., Yang, J., & Yuan, J. (2019) · PsyCh Journal · doi:10.1002/pchj.299 · Cited by 8
Rodriguez-Manrique, D., Ruan, H., Winkelmann, C., Haun, J., Gigl, S., Berberich, G., Zimmer, C., & Koch, K. (2025) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-025-03381-9 · Cited by 7
“…mainly the presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA), the motor cortex including the precentral gyrus, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), the subthalamic nucleus, the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) [9 – 11].”
Albert, J., Rincón‐Pérez, I., Sánchez‐Carmona, A. J., Arroyo‐Lozano, S., Olmos, R., Hinojosa, J. A., Fernández‐Jaén, A., & López‐Martín, S. (2021) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.13210 · Cited by 8
Hu, X., Shi, Y.-D., Chen, J., You, Z., Pan, Y., Ling, Q., Wei, H., Zou, J., Ying, P., Liao, X., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2022.967794 · Cited by 7
“change the existing combined eye movement state (36).”
BackgroundPsychiatric Symptoms, Personality Profile, and Takotsubo Syndrome: Clinical Considerations
Wittstein, I. S., Proietti, R., & Compare, A. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-5650-7_6 · Cited by 7
Cognitive Hierarchies and Emotions in Behavioral Game Theory
Camerer, C. F., & Smith, A. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0018 · Cited by 7
Guerrero-Apolo, J. D., Navarro, J. B., Bulbena, A., & Gabarre-Mir, J. (2018) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2018.03.042 · Cited by 8
Authoritarian Parenting Effect on Children's Executive Control and Individual Alpha Peak Frequency
Zhang, J., Yan, Z., Nan, W., & Cai, D. (2021) · Mind Brain and Education · doi:10.1111/mbe.12295 · Cited by 13
Cao, M., Halperin, J. M., & Li, X. (2021) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci11101348 · Cited by 7
“has been proven to be significantly involved in response inhibition function [67].”
BackgroundEnhancing Human Action Inhibition Through Cortico–Cortical Paired Associative Stimulation
Però, L., Arlati, N., Lenzi, L., Quettier, T., Battaglia, S., & Borgomaneri, S. (2025) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.70077 · Cited by 6
“Indeed, the specific involvement of the preSMA in an SST has been demonstrated by [115], in which authors used the SSRT as an index of action suppression, and they found that higher activation in the preSMA was associated with shorter SSRTs (i.e., more efficient performance).”
Zhang, L., Zhang, H., Cao, X., Wang, L., Gan, C., Sun, H., Shan, A., Yuan, Y., & Zhang, K. (2024) · Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.21037/qims-23-1673 · Cited by 6
“Apart from the action selection role in the start of behavior, inhibitory control is also frequently related to the SFGmed (52-56).”
Does Rare Error Count in Impulsivity?
Takács, Á., Kóbor, A., Honbolygó, F., & Csépe, V. (2015) · Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1027/0269-8803/a000135 · Cited by 6
“As a behavioral index of adaptive control, post-error slowing is a tendency to slow down after an error has occurred (Li et al., 2006, Farr et al., 2012, Simons, 2010).”
Bases neurales de las emociones negativas: reevaluación y supresión de las emociones negativas
Goldin, P. R., McRae, K., Ramel, W., & Gross, J. J. (2009) · Psiquiatría Biológica · doi:10.1016/s1134-5934(09)71894-9 · Cited by 6
Yi, K., & Kim, C. (2020) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135111 · Cited by 6
Chavan, C. F., Manuel, A. L., Mouthon, M., & Spierer, L. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00238 · Cited by 7
RetractedProgress in PET Imaging of the Norepinephrine Transporter System
Ding, Y. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-42014-6_19 · Cited by 6
High-Level Cognitive Functions in Healthy Subjects
Sela, T., & Lavidor, M. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-404704-4.00011-9 · Cited by 8
Magnard, J., Cornu, C., Berrut, G., & Deschamps, T. (2017) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2017.10.018 · Cited by 6
Li, C.-S. R. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-397025-1.00248-7 · Cited by 8
Kalhan, S., Chen, L. P. E., Garrido, M. I., & Hester, R. (2022) · Addiction Biology · doi:10.1111/adb.13159 · Cited by 6
Capistrano, C. G., Grande, L. A., McRae, K., Phan, K. L., & Kim, P. (2022) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2022.2082521 · Cited by 8
Lei, H., Zhong, M., Fan, J., Zhang, X., Cai, L., & Zhu, X. (2017) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.02.063 · Cited by 6
“Each subject completed neuropsychological assessments of response inhibition using a the SST (Krikorian et al., 2004; Li et al., 2006a, b; Duann et al., 2009).”
Zhao, S., Yuan, R., Gao, W., Liu, Q., & Yuan, J. (2023) · Psychoradiology · doi:10.1093/psyrad/kkad012 · Cited by 8
Evidence for selective adjustments of inhibitory control in a variant of the stop signal task
Xu, K. Z., Mayse, J. D., & Courtney, S. M. (2018) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021818768721 · Cited by 6
“Successful inhibitory control can be achieved through both proactive and reactive control strategies, respectively, involving preparation to stop prior to stimulus onset and stimulus-driven processing at the time of stimulus onset (Aron, 2011; Li et al., 2006; Li et al., 2008).”
The neural basis of the continued influence effect of misinformation
Jin, H., Jia, L., Xiao-juan, Y. I. N., Shizhen, Y. A. N., Shilin, W. E. I., & Juntao, C. H. E. N. (2022) · Acta Psychologica Sinica · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1041.2022.00343 · Cited by 5
Korponay, C. H. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916221120033 · Cited by 5
“The laboratory task that comes closest to modeling the overriding of a habit in real time is the stop-signal task (Li et al., 2006; Logan et al., 1984).”
BackgroundZhong, S., Choi, J. W., Hashoush, N. G., Babayan, D., Malekmohammadi, M., Pouratian, N., & Christopoulos, V. (2022) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010111 · Cited by 5
“79 Recent studies have also explored the mechanisms underlying pausing or abandon80 ing actions using functional MRI [20, 21], local field potential (LFP) recordings [22, 23], 81 electroencephalography (EEG) recordings [24,25], as well as single-unit recordings in hu82 mans [26, 27], non-human primates (NHPs) [28, 29]…”
BackgroundFarshad, M., Artemenko, C., Cipora, K., Svaldi, J., & Schroeder, P. A. (2024) · Journal of Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1002/jnr.25304 · Cited by 4
“Further activations in the left presupplementary motor area are taken to reflect response preparation (Nachev et al., 2005; Ray Li, 2006).”
BackgroundThe Effects of Response Readiness and Error Monitoring on Saccade Countermanding
Tseng, Y., & Li, C.-S. R. (2008) · The Open Psychology Journal · doi:10.2174/1874350100801010018 · Cited by 5
“In an anti-saccade task, there are pro-saccade trials, in which subjects make a visually guided saccadic eye movement toward to a peripheral target, and anti-saccade trials, in which subjects make an eye movement in the opposite direction.”
BackgroundTraining response inhibition to reduce food consumption
Adams, R. C. (2014) · ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) · Cited by 5
Frontal Cortex Gates Distractor Stimulus Encoding in Sensory CortexPreprint
Zhang, Z., & Zagha, E. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.03.31.486430 · Cited by 5
“In healthy human subjects, enhanced activation of the frontal cortex correlates with enhanced distractor response suppression (Carter et al., 1998; Li et al., 2006; Rubia et al., 2001).”
BackgroundTan, J., Iyer, K. K., Nitsche, M. A., Puri, R., Hinder, M. R., & Fujiyama, H. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.11.30.518460 · Cited by 5
“The centre coordinates of the preSMA region (left preSMA; area = 28 vertices/ 6.52 cm2) were based on the regional activations recorded during stop-signal inhibition by Li et al. (2006): x = -4, y = 36, z = 56 (conversion from Talairach to MNI coordinates by Duann et al., 2009).”
MethodInfluentialDamiani, S., La‐Torraca‐Vittori, P., Tarchi, L., Tosi, E., Ricca, V., Scalabrini, A., Politi, P., & Fusar‐Poli, P. (2024) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120585 · Cited by 4
“…( n = 107). evidence that SMA has been linked to performance-monitoring and the dynamic update of motor schemes (Cao and Cannon, 2021; Fauth-Bühler et al., 2012; Hughes et al., 2013), while IPL influences working memory and response inhibition (Chambers et al., 2009; Ray Li et al., 2006).”
BackgroundCarther-Krone, T. A., McAllister, Z. A., Choi, E. H., Ryner, L. N., & Ko, J. H. (2025) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.70218 · Cited by 4
Araújo, A. C., Duarte, I. C., Sousa, T., Oliveira, J. M., Pereira, A. T., Macedo, A., & Castelo-Branco, M. S. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-56161-8 · Cited by 4
Aerobic fitness as a moderator of acute aerobic exercise effects on executive function
Dai, Y., Zhong, X., Gao, X.-Y., Huang, C., Leng, W.-W., Chen, H.-Z., & Jiang, C. (2024) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhae141 · Cited by 4
Self-citationCortical Contributions to Attentional Orienting and Response Cancellation in Action Stopping
Kemp, S. A., Salomoni, S. E., Bazin, P., Pash, L., George, R. J. S., & Hinder, M. R. (2026) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.70397 · Cited by 4
Kwashie, A. N. D., Ma, Y., Barch, D. M., Chafee, M. V., Ragland, J. D., Silverstein, S. M., Carter, C. S., Gold, J. M., & MacDonald, A. W. (2022) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-022-01036-6 · Cited by 4
Olszewska, A. M., Droździel, D., Gaca, M., Kulesza, A., Obrębski, W., Kowalewski, J., Widlarz, A., Marchewka, A., & Herman, A. M. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17877 · Cited by 4
dos Santos, J. D. S., Savii, R. M., Ide, J. S., Li, C. R., Quiles, M. G., & Basgalupp, M. P. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-62392-4_22 · Cited by 4
“1 Data Acquisition and Pre-processing One-hundred and sixty-eight subjects were recruited from the New Haven area, and MRI data were collected while subjects performed the stop signal task (SST), a common task used to study inhibition control [17].”
MethodProgress in PET Imaging of the Norepinephrine Transporter System
Ding, Y. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-53176-8_20 · Cited by 5
Cieslik, E. C., Ullsperger, M., Gell, M., Eickhoff, S., & Langner, R. (2023) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.05.10.540136 · Cited by 13
“Importantly, if the same participants or a subsample of the same participants was used in several studies, only one of the studies was included (e.g. Ray Li et al., 2006a,b) to control for possible sample-specific effects.”
Choi, I. S., Kim, J., Choi, J. H., Kim, E.-M., Choi, J.-W., & Rah, J. (2025) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2025.102761 · Cited by 3
Dynamical Change of Signal Complexity in the Brain During Inhibitory Control Processes
Huang, S.-L., Tseng, P. H., & Liang, W. (2015) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e17106834 · Cited by 3
Information fusion for cocaine dependence recognition using fMRI
Faria, F. A., Cappabianco, F. A. M., Li, C. R., & Ide, J. S. (2016) · Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition/Proceedings/International Conference on Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/icpr.2016.7899784 · Cited by 4
“Imaging data were collected while subjects performed a cognitive paradigm known as the stopsignal task [16], [15].”
MethodInfluentialSchroeder, P. A., Artemenko, C., Cipora, K., & Svaldi, J. (2019) · Journal of Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1002/jnr.24559 · Cited by 3
Jacobson, L., & Michal Lavidor, B. (2011) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(11)60435-5 · Cited by 3
“As the delay increases, the probability of successful inhibition decreases as critical neuronal systems become committed to the go decision ( Li, Huang, Constable, & Sinha, 2006 ).,This is not to say that the rIFG is exclusively involved in response inhibition; it is part of a wider network of regions, for example, AC…”
BackgroundWei, H., Wang, L., Peng, L., Li, C., Ma, T., & Hu, D. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app132011471 · Cited by 2
Jeon, S., Kang, J.-E., Hwang, J., Calhoun, V. D., & Lee, J. (2025) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.06.002 · Cited by 2
Zhi, Y., Chen, K.-D., You, Y.-P., Ji, Y., Cheng, W., Ji, W., Shi, G., Fang, X.-M., Wang, F., Chen, K.-F., et al. (2025) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2025.107008 · Cited by 2
Zhou, J. A., & Xuan, B. (2018) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2018.01976 · Cited by 2
Martínez-Maldonado, A., Rubio, G., Sión, A., Centeno, I. D., & Barba, R. J. (2020) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.08.013 · Cited by 2
Prescribing Psychotropics: Misuse, Abuse, Dependence, Withdrawal and Addiction
(2021) · Frontiers research topics · doi:10.3389/978-2-88966-940-0 · Cited by 2
Mas‐Cuesta, L., Baltruschat, S., Cándido, A., & Catena, A. (2022) · Behavioural Neurology · doi:10.1155/2022/1775777 · Cited by 4
KRAKOWSKI, M. I., Hoptman, M. J., & Czobor, P. (2023) · Schizophrenia Bulletin Open · doi:10.1093/schizbullopen/sgad009 · Cited by 2
“22 The medial prefrontal regions, and particularly the medial orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), play a prominent role in behavioral inhibition, 19,23 as does the middle PFC and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC).”
BackgroundLee, S. H., Hyun, J. S., & Kwon, O. (2010) · Korean journal of urology · doi:10.4111/kju.2010.51.8.550 · Cited by 2
Knotková, H., Nitsche, M. A., & Polanía, R. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95948-1_5 · Cited by 2
To Go or Not to Go: Exploring brain activation during response inhibition reading tasks
Craig, J., Ostevik, A. V., Westover, L., Hodgetts, W. E., & Cummine, J. (2019) · Spectrum · doi:10.29173/spectrum52 · Cited by 2
“One of the more commonly-used approaches to assess response inhibition is through the use of go/no-go or stop-signal tasks (Li et al., 2006).”
MethodMcNaughton, N., & Gray, J. A. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198843313.003.0012 · Cited by 2
Predicting Arithmetic Performance from Age and Executive Function Skills
Molzhon, A. (2010) · VCU Scholars Compass (Virginia Commonwealth University) · doi:10.25772/g5hj-gb29 · Cited by 2
Terenzi, D., Simon, N., Gachomba, M. J. M., de Peretti, J.-L., Nazarian, B., Sein, J., Anton, J., Grandjean, D., Baunez, C., & Chaminade, T. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.09.06.556336 · Cited by 2
“Actor-critic” dichotomous hyperactivation and hypoconnectivity in obsessive–compulsive disorder
Araújo, A. C., Duarte, I. C., Sousa, T., Meneses, S., Pereira, A. T., Robbins, T. W., Macedo, A., & Castelo-Branco, M. S. (2024) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103729 · Cited by 1
Saracaydin, G., van Rooij, D., Deters, R. K., Messchendorp, M., Naaijen, J., Penzol, M. J., Rosa, M., Aggensteiner, P.-M., Baumeister, S., Holz, N. E., et al. (2025) · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s00787-025-02638-4 · Cited by 1
“Besides, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex has long been recognized as being critical to response inhibition and attentional processing [64–66].”
Zhao, Y., Luo, X., Sobel, M. E., Lindquist, M. A., & Caffo, B. S. (2024) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxaf019 · Cited by 1
Afonso, A. D. S., Machado‐Pinheiro, W., & Carreiro, L. R. R. (2025) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.70098 · Cited by 2
“Since previous studies indicated that stop-signal trials activate specific brain regions depending on the success of motor inhibition (Li et al. 2006), future studies should investigate this further.”
Neural markers in excoriation disorder: Systematic review of neuroimaging evidence
Hodgdon, E. A., Sivils, C. A., Smith, J. E., Witherington, D. C., & Ciesielski, K. T. R. (2025) · Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2025.112075 · Cited by 1
Hiwaki, O., Ishimaru, N., & Fukuda, H. (2011) · International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering · doi:10.1109/ner.2011.5910629 · Cited by 1
“The previous studies with fMRI have identified inferior prefrontal cortex (IFC) [10-12] and anterior pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA) [13,14] as the cortical sites of inhibitory motor control.”
Result袭, 玉. (2017) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.12677/ap.2017.71016 · Cited by 1
Targeting Mechanisms of Typical Indications of Acupuncture
Liu, Z., Tang, Z., & Tian, J. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-4914-9_3 · Cited by 1
Neuronale Korrelate von Frustration und Impulsivität
Pawliczek, C. M. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25476-5_16 · Cited by 1
The Study of Behavioral Inhibitory Control and Its Neuromechanism in Emotional Context
任, 子. (2019) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.12677/ap.2019.92027 · Cited by 1
The Influence of Emotion on Inhibition Control: An ERP Study
Zhu, Z., Ma, X., & Tao, Y. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Educational Informatization (CSEI) · doi:10.1109/csei50228.2020.9142477 · Cited by 1
“For example, Some researchers have found that the medial superior frontal cortex and central anterior frontal cortex is the main neural basis for inhibition control [8], the anterior cingulate gyrus and orbitofrontal cortex also play an important role in the inhibition control [9].”
BackgroundMochizuki, K., & Funahashi, S. (2016) · Innovations in cognitive neuroscience · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3846-5_7 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Ray Li, C.-S., Huang, C., Constable, R. T., & Sinha, R.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2006-01-04
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 186-192
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6674298
- OpenAlex
- W2124906793
- Cited by
- 600
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 43
- FWCI
- 11.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Yale University
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (K02 DA17232, P50DA016556, K02DA017232, K12DA014038, K12-DA-14038, P50-DA16556)
- Office of Research on Women's Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- response inhibition, stop-signal task, inhibitory control, stop-signal reaction time, error monitoring, signal monitoring, frustration, neural correlates of inhibition
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Monitoring, Physiologic, Neural Pathways, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Regression Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review