The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Imaging Response Inhibition in a Stop-Signal Task: Neural Correlates Independent of Signal Monitoring and Post-Response Processing
Open accessAbstract
Execution of higher cortical functions requires inhibitory control to restrain habitual responses and meet changing task demands. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to show the neural correlates of response inhibition during a stop-signal task. The task has a frequent "go" stimulus to set up a pre-potent response tendency and a less frequent "stop" signal for subjects to withhold their response. We contrasted brain activation between successful and failed inhibition for individual subjects and compared groups of subjects with short and long stop-signal reaction times. The two groups of subjects did not differ in their inhibition failure rates or the extent of signal monitoring, error monitoring, or task-associated frustration ratings. The results showed that short stop-signal reaction time or more efficient response inhibition was associated with greater activation in the superior medial and precentral frontal cortices. Moreover, activation of these inhibitory motor areas correlated negatively with stop-signal reaction time. These brain regions may represent the neural substrata of response inhibition independent of other cognitive and affective functions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Recent studies using a variety of methods suggest that stopping is associated with activation of a fronto-basal-ganglia circuit that includes inferior frontal gyrus (IFG; ventrolateral prefrontal cortex), middle frontal gyrus (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex), medial frontal gyrus (MFG), and basal ganglia [14–18].”
From Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm (2008) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Event-related fMRI studies showed that (mainly) parietal and frontal brain regions are more activated when inhibition is unsuccessful [15, 16, 18, 19].”
From Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm (2008) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cites
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn755 · Cited by 12,881 · cited 1×
“These results suggest that the function of the IFC may extend beyond signal monitoring and mediate other aspects of attention function such as detection of behaviorally relevant, salient stimuli (Corbetta and Shulman, 2002; Yamasaki et al., 2002).”
BackgroundCo-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain
Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,798
Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. ‐., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460020402 · Cited by 9,688
Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex
Bush, G., Luu, P., & Posner, M. I. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01483-2 · Cited by 6,259 · cited 1×
“Activation in the anterior cingulate did not correlate with SSRT, EM effect, or frustrating rating, suggesting that this brain region probably plays a more complicated role that would require additional studies to understand (Bush et al., 2000; Rushworth et al., 2004).”
BackgroundTransformed Up-Down Methods in Psychoacoustics
Levitt, H. (1971) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1912375 · Cited by 5,505 · cited 2×
“With the staircase procedure, a “critical” SSD could be computed that represented the time delay required for the subject to succeed in withholding a response in the stop trials half of the time (Levitt, 1970).”
MethodThresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate
Genovese, C. R., Lazar, N. A., & Nichols, T. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.1037 · Cited by 4,923 · cited 4×
“05, corrected for false discovery rate (FDR) (Genovese et al., 2002) and an extent threshold of 10 voxels, successful inhibition was associated with greater bihemispheric activation of multiple cortical areas (Fig.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe cognitive control of emotion
OCHSNER, K., & GROSS, J. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.010 · Cited by 4,495 · cited 2×
“One would thus expect the anterior cingulate cortex to participate in a wide variety of cognitive and affective tasks in which inhibitory control assumes an integral position (Schall et al., 2002; Phillips et al., 2003; Dalley et al., 2004; Isomura and Takada, 2004; Nieuwenhuis et al., 2004; Ridderinkhof et al., 2004;…”
BackgroundSquire, L. R., Stark, C. E. L., & Clark, R. E. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144130 · Cited by 2,680
Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language
Carr, T. H., & Dagenbach, D. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,276
Neurobiology of emotion perception I: the neural basis of normal emotion perception
Phillips, M. L., Drevets, W. C., Rauch, S. L., & Lane, R. (2003) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00168-9 · Cited by 2,173 · cited 2×
“One would thus expect the anterior cingulate cortex to participate in a wide variety of cognitive and affective tasks in which inhibitory control assumes an integral position (Schall et al., 2002; Phillips et al., 2003; Dalley et al., 2004; Isomura and Takada, 2004; Nieuwenhuis et al., 2004; Ridderinkhof et al., 2004;…”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Brett M, Anton J-L, Valabregue R, Poline J-P (2002b) Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox. Paper presented at Eighth International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, Sendai, Japan, June.
- 1995, Hum Brain Mapp, 2, 165
- 1970, Exp Brain Res, 11, 376
- 1995, Adv Neurol, 67, 115
- 1985, Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 223, 339
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on
Aron, A. R., Robbins, T. W., & Poldrack, R. A. (2014) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.003 · Cited by 2,166
Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas
Nachev, P., Kennard, C., & Husain, M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2478 · Cited by 1,928
“Both change-of-plan and stop tasks for hand and eye movements have demonstrated pre-SMA and/or SEF activity that is related specifically to altering movement plan”
BackgroundInhibition and impulsivity: behavioral and neural basis of response control
Bari, A., & Robbins, T. W. (2013) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.06.005 · Cited by 1,921
The Neural Bases of Emotion Regulation: Reappraisal and Suppression of Negative Emotion
Goldin, P. R., McRae, K., Ramel, W., & Gross, J. J. (2008) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.05.031 · Cited by 1,886
“In particular, suppression produced significant responses in areas of right ventrolateral PFC previously related to inhibitory motor control (24-31).”
Verdejo‐García, A., Lawrence, A. J., & Clark, L. (2008) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.11.003 · Cited by 1,502
“, 2007), increased stop signal reaction time on the Stop Signal task (Fillmore and Rush, 2002; Li et al., 2006), and increased interference scores on the Stroop (Bolla et al.”
BackgroundResponse inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm
Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.005 · Cited by 1,373
“Event-related fMRI studies showed that (mainly) parietal and frontal brain regions are more activated when inhibition is unsuccessful [15,16,18,19].”
BackgroundThe role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control
Hampshire, A., Chamberlain, S. R., Monti, M. M., Duncan, J., & Owen, A. M. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.109 · Cited by 1,327
Simmonds, D. J., Pekar, J. J., & Mostofsky, S. H. (2008) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.015 · Cited by 1,015
Left inferior frontal gyrus is critical for response inhibition
Swick, D., Ashley, V., & Turken, A. U. (2008) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-9-102 · Cited by 745
“A recent fMRI study associated greater activation in left superior frontal gyrus (BA 8) with more efficient response inhibition [58].”
BackgroundSwick, D., Ashley, V., & Turken, U. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.070 · Cited by 638
“Other reported contrasts have included Successful Stop vs. Unsuccessful Stop trials (Li et al., 2006b; Padmala and Pessoa, 2010), groups of subjects with a short vs. long stop signal RT (Li et al., 2006a,b), and hard vs. easy to inhibit trials (Matthews et al., 2005).”
BackgroundResultDistinct frontal systems for response inhibition, attentional capture, and error processing
Sharp, D. J., Bonnelle, V., De Boissezon, X., Beckmann, C. F., James, S. G., Patel, M. C., & Mehta, M. A. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1000175107 · Cited by 535
McMorris, T., & Hale, B. J. (2012) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2012.09.001 · Cited by 516
Batterink, L. J., Yokum, S., & Stice, E. M. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.059 · Cited by 527
Response Inhibition and Response Selection: Two Sides of the Same Coin
Mostofsky, S. H., & Simmonds, D. J. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20500 · Cited by 514
“fMRI studies of stop-signal tasks reveal inhibitory-associated activation in the pre-SMA (Aron & Poldrack, 2006; Ramataur, Slagter, Kok, & Ridderinkhof, 2006; Rubia, Russell, et al., 2001), and one study demonstrated that individuals with better inhibitory performance activated the pre-SMA to a greater degree than ind…”
BackgroundInhibitory control in mind and brain: An interactive race model of countermanding saccades.
Boucher, L., Palmeri, T. J., Logan, G. D., & Schall, J. D. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.2.376 · Cited by 485
Swann, N., Tandon, N., Canolty, R., Ellmore, T. M., McEvoy, L. K., Dreyer, S., DiSano, M., & Aron, A. R. (2009) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3359-09.2009 · Cited by 474
“…(IFG) are critical regions for stopping (Aron et al., 2003; Chambers et al., 2006, 2007; Floden and Stuss, 2006; Chen et al., 2008), and functional MRI affirms this (Rubia et al., 2003; Aron and Poldrack, 2006; Li et al., 2006; Aron et al., 2007; Chevrier et al., 2007; Chamberlain et al., 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialDuann, J., Ide, J. S., Luo, X., & Li, C. R. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1300-09.2009 · Cited by 502
“We used a simple reaction time (RT) task in this stop signal paradigm (Logan and Cowan, 1984; Li et al., 2006a, 2008a,b).”
MethodInfluentialWessel, J. R., & Aron, A. R. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.013 · Cited by 409
Adolescent impulsivity phenotypes characterized by distinct brain networks
the IMAGEN Consortium, Whelan, R., Conrod, P. J., Poline, J.-B., Lourdusamy, A., Banaschewski, T., Barker, G. J., Bellgrove, M. A., Büchel, C., Byrne, M., et al. (2012) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3092 · Cited by 420
Effects of focal frontal lesions on response inhibition
Picton, T. W., Stuss, D. T., Alexander, M. P., Shallice, T., Binns, M. A., & Gillingham, S. (2006) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhk031 · Cited by 387
“does lesion overlap in patients with Broca’s aphasia indicates the cerebral source for fluency or syntax? As pointed out by Rorden and Karnath (2004), another problem is that the overlap is confounded by how often different regions of the brain are Figure 1.”
BackgroundCriaud, M., & Boulinguez, P. (2013) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.11.003 · Cited by 368
Microstructure Abnormalities in Adolescents with Internet Addiction Disorder
Yuan, K., Qin, W., Wang, G., Zeng, F., Zhao, L., Yang, X., Liu, P., Liu, J., Sun, J., von Deneen, K. M., et al. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020708 · Cited by 367
“detected that both simple and complex GO/NOGO tasks were involved in the SMA and they revealed the important role of the SMA in mediating cognitive control [46,60].”
BackgroundChikazoe, J., Jimura, K., Hirose, S., Yamashita, K., Miyashita, Y., & Konishi, S. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3645-09.2009 · Cited by 385
“Prior neuropsychology (Aron et al., 2003) and neuroimaging (Rubia et al., 2001; Aron and Poldrack, 2006; Li et al., 2006a; Leung and Cai, 2007) studies have revealed the neural basis of this function in brain regions including the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialLuijten, M., Machielsen, M. W. J., Veltman, D. J., Hester, R., de Haan, L., & Franken, I. H. A. (2014) · Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · doi:10.1503/jpn.130052 · Cited by 375
“19,20,115 Based on the postulated model it can be expected that improvement of dACC functioning, either through direct neuromodulation or indirect behavioural therapies would result in increased control over addictive behaviours.”
BackgroundThree key regions for supervisory attentional control: Evidence from neuroimaging meta-analyses
Cieslik, E. C., Mueller, V. I., Eickhoff, C. R., Langner, R., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2015) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.11.003 · Cited by 322
Top-Down Control of Motor Cortex Ensembles by Dorsomedial Prefrontal Cortex
Narayanan, N. S., & Laubach, M. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.10.021 · Cited by 311
“Recent evidence from human functional imaging studies shows that medial frontal areas are selectively activated when responses to external stimuli must be inhibited in stop-signal reaction-time tasks (Li et al., 2006).”
Theta burst stimulation dissociates attention and action updating in human inferior frontal cortex
Verbruggen, F., Aron, A. R., Stevens, M., & Chambers, C. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1001957107 · Cited by 335
Subcortical processes of motor response inhibition during a stop signal task
Li, C. R., Yan, P., Sinha, R., & Lee, T. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.023 · Cited by 323
“Isolating the neural correlates of response inhibition during the SST Previous neuroimaging studies employing the SST have examined the cortical processes of response inhibition (Aron and Poldrack, 2006; Li et al., 2006a; Liddle et al., 2001; Rubia et al., 2003, 2005).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationWessel, J. R. (2017) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12871 · Cited by 299
Executive functions and neurocognitive aging: dissociable patterns of brain activity
Turner, G. R., & Spreng, R. N. (2011) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.06.005 · Cited by 332
“…PFC (Chambers et al., 2009; Leung and Cai, 2007; Swann et al., 2009), presupplementary motor areas (Chen et al., 2009; Floden and Stuss, 2006; Li et al., 2006), as well as posterior parietal cortices, subthalamic nuclei, and cerebellar regions (see Chambers et al., 2009; Chikazoe, 2010 for…”
Functional organization of the medial frontal cortex
Rushworth, M. F., Buckley, M. J., Behrens, T. E., Walton, M. E., & Bannerman, D. M. (2007) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2007.03.001 · Cited by 353
Testing theories of post-error slowing
Dutilh, G., Vandekerckhove, J., Forstmann, B. U., Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & Wagenmakers, E. (2011) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0243-2 · Cited by 314
Functional Dissociation in Right Inferior Frontal Cortex during Performance of Go/No-Go Task
Chikazoe, J., Jimura, K., Asari, T., Yamashita, K., Morimoto, H., Hirose, S., Miyashita, Y., & Konishi, S. (2008) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn065 · Cited by 298
“Cerebral Cortex January 2009;19:146--152 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn065 Advance Access publication April 28, 2008”
BackgroundInfluentialUnconscious Activation of the Prefrontal No-Go Network
van Gaal, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Scholte, H. S., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2992-09.2010 · Cited by 291
“org as supplemental material) as well as in many previous experiments (Durston et al., 2002; Wager et al., 2005; Aron and Poldrack, 2006; Li et al., 2006; Aron et al., 2007; Boehler et al., 2008; Braet et al., 2009).”
Dodds, C. M., Morein-Zamir, S., & Robbins, T. W. (2011) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq187 · Cited by 270
“…(Kawashima et al. 1996; Garavan et al. 1999; Konishi et al. 1999; Menon et al. 2001; Rubia et al. 2001; Aron et al. 2003; Kelly et al. 2004; Aron and Poldrack 2006; Li et al. 2006; Hodgson et al. 2007; Leung and Cai 2007), suggesting that this region plays a specialized role in response inhibition.”
BackgroundInfluentialLi, C.-S. R., & Sinha, R. (2008) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.10.003 · Cited by 345
“Other studies on this same cohort of subjects indicate the important modulatory effect of personality traits and the synergistic effect of multiple substance use on stress-related brain activation (Li et al., 2005c; Li et al., 2006b; Li and Sinha, 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationChitosan Microneedle Patches for Sustained Transdermal Delivery of Macromolecules
Chen, M., Ling, M.-H., Lai, K.-Y., & Pramudityo, E. (2012) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm301293d · Cited by 260
Altered Impulse Control in Alcohol Dependence: Neural Measures of Stop Signal Performance
Li, C. R., Luo, X., Yan, P., Bergquist, K. L., & Sinha, R. (2009) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00891.x · Cited by 259
Self-citationFunctional neural networks underlying response inhibition in adolescents and adults
Stevens, M. C., Kiehl, K. A., Pearlson, G. D., & Calhoun, V. D. (2007) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2007.03.023 · Cited by 241
Hannestad, J., Gallezot, J.-D., Planeta-Wilson, B., Lin, S.-F., Williams, W. A., van Dyck, C. H., Malison, R. T., Carson, R. E., & Ding, Y.-S. (2010) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.06.017 · Cited by 236
Modulating behavioral inhibition by tDCS combined with cognitive training
Ditye, T., Jacobson, L., Walsh, V., & Lavidor, M. (2012) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3098-4 · Cited by 232
Modulating inhibitory control with direct current stimulation of the superior medial frontal cortex
Hsu, T., Tseng, L.-Y., Yu, J., Kuo, W., Hung, D. L., Tzeng, O. J. L., Walsh, V., Muggleton, N. G., & Juan, C.-H. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.059 · Cited by 258
“Modulation of neural activity using tDCS Although elevated SSRTs and increased error rates were observed as a consequence of TMS stimulation of Pre-SMA, it is unclear whether the underlying neurons were facilitated or inhibited by TMS (Chen et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTrait Impulsivity and the Externalizing Spectrum
Beauchaine, T. P., Zisner, A. R., & Sauder, C. L. (2017) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093253 · Cited by 265
“Neural correlates of more circumscribed measures of impulsivity overlap only partially with those of ADHD, and effect sizes linking such measures to neurobiological function tend to be smaller (e.g., Aron & Poldrack 2006, C.R. Li et al. 2006).”
BackgroundThe Right Superior Frontal Gyrus and Individual Variation in Proactive Control of Impulsive Response
Hu, S., Ide, J. S., Zhang, S., & Li, C. R. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1175-16.2016 · Cited by 237
“By contrasting stop and go trials or stop success and error trials, previous studies have implicated a wide array of cortical and subcortical regions in mediating intersubject variation in the SSRT (Li et al., 2006; Li et al., 2008c; Chao et al., 2009; Duann et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2015), highlighting a role of re…”
ResultHow to measure post-error slowing: A confound and a simple solution
Dutilh, G., van Ravenzwaaij, D., Nieuwenhuis, S., van der Maas, H. L. J., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. (2012) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2012.04.001 · Cited by 243
“…correlated with neurophysiological variables such as anterior cingulate activity (Danielmeier, Eichele, Forstmann, Tittgemeyer, & Ullsperger, 2011; Li, Huang, Constable, & Sinha, 2006), error-related negativity (ERN) and positivity (Pe; Hajcak, McDonald, & Simons, 2003b), and cortisol levels…”
Reliability and plasticity of response inhibition and interference control
Wöstmann, N. M., Aichert, D. S., Costa, A., Rubia, K., Möller, H.-J., & Ettinger, U. (2013) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2012.09.010 · Cited by 217
Jacobson, L., Javitt, D. C., & Michal Lavidor, B. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00020 · Cited by 238
“This is not to say that the rIFG is exclusively involved in response inhibition; it is part of a wider network of regions, for example, ACC (Garavan, Ross, Murphy, Roche, & Stein, 2002; Kiehl et al., 2000), and other cortical as well as subcortical regions (Aron & Poldrack, 2006; Li et al., 2006).”
Neurocognitive mechanisms of action control: resisting the call of the Sirens.
Richard Ridderinkhof, K., Forstmann, B. U., Wylie, S. A., Burle, B., & van den Wildenberg, W. P. M. (2011) · WIREs Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.99 · Cited by 215
Pinning down response inhibition in the brain — Conjunction analyses of the Stop-signal task
Boehler, C. N., Appelbaum, L. G., Krebs, R. M., Hopf, J., & Woldorff, M. G. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.276 · Cited by 227
“…study found such correlations in the right IFG and STN (Aron and Poldrack, 2006), another in superior frontal cortex and the left pre-central gyrus (Li et al., 2006, 2008), and a study investigating development of inhibitory function across different ages found a relationship between SSRT and…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialInteractions between cognition and emotion during response inhibition.
Pessoa, L., Padmala, S., Kenzer, A., & Bauer, A. J. (2011) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0024109 · Cited by 213
An adaptive orienting theory of error processing
Wessel, J. R. (2017) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13041 · Cited by 226
Resting-State Functional Connectivity of the Medial Superior Frontal Cortex
Zhang, S., Ide, J. S., & Li, C. R. (2011) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr088 · Cited by 212
“…of an anterior preSMA region (x = –4, y = 36, z = 56) in individuals with better inhibitory control as indexed by shorter stop signal reaction time (Li et al. 2006; Duann et al. 2009) and activation of a caudal locale (x = –4, y = 16, z = 44 and x = 4, y = 8, z = 54) during error processing in…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFernie, G., Cole, J. C., Goudie, A. J., & Field, M. (2010) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.05.011 · Cited by 201
Gender differences in the neural correlates of response inhibition during a stop signal task
Li, C. R., Huang, C. X., Constable, R. T., & Sinha, R. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.017 · Cited by 205
Self-citationDisentangling common and specific neural subprocesses of response inhibition
Sebastian, A., Pohl, M. F., Klöppel, S., Feige, B., Lange, T., Stahl, C., Voss, A., Klauer, K. C., Lieb, K., & Tüscher, O. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.020 · Cited by 193
“Some authors have, thus, argued that the pre-SMA rather than the rIFC might be critical for response inhibition (Chao et al., 2009; Duann et al., 2009; Floden and Stuss, 2006; Li et al., 2006; Sharp et al., 2010).”
BackgroundGreater activation of the “default” brain regions predicts stop signal errors
Li, C. R., Yan, P., Bergquist, K. L., & Sinha, R. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.021 · Cited by 204
“Forty healthy adults (20 males, 22–42 years of age, all righthanded and using their right hand to respond, including the 24 subjects we reported in Li et al., 2006) were paid to participate in the study.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationBayesian Prediction and Evaluation in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex
Ide, J. S., Shenoy, P., Yu, A. J., & Li, C.-S. R. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2201-12.2013 · Cited by 185
Functional networks for cognitive control in a stop signal task: Independent component analysis
Zhang, S., & Li, C. R. (2011) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21197 · Cited by 195
“…a median split for all of the behavioral parameters [GO%, SS%, median GO RT, stop signal RT (SSRT), posterror slowing, and FP effect] as in a previous study [Li et al., 2006] and did not observe any significant differences in any of the beta weights of the six components (all Ps >0.1, uncorrected).”
InfluentialControl of prepotent responses by the superior medial frontal cortex
CHEN, C., Muggleton, N. G., Tzeng, O. J. L., Hung, D. L., & Juan, C.-H. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.005 · Cited by 202
“Both of these measures are indices of inhibitory control, and so the results are related to a pattern of disruption consistent with the findings of Li et al. (2006b).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSupplementary Motor Area Exerts Proactive and Reactive Control of Arm Movements
Chen, X., Scangos, K. W., & Stuphorn, V. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2669-10.2010 · Cited by 185
“This hypothesis is in good agreement with neuroimaging studies that demonstrate robust activation of the medial frontal cortex, in particular of the pre-SMA, SMA, supplementary eye field, and anterior cingulate cortex in the countermanding paradigm (Curtis et al., 2005; Aron and Poldrack, 2006; Li et al., 2006; Aron e…”
BackgroundResultSchwabe, L., & Wolf, O. T. (2010) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.12.010 · Cited by 204
“This view is in line with our assumption that the SECPT affected primarily participants’ ability to inhibit learned responses since the PFC is also of central importance for cognitive control and response inhibition (Aron et al., 2004; Li et al., 2006).”
Gender differences in behavioral inhibitory control: ERP evidence from a two‐choice oddball task
Yuan, J., He, Y., Zhang, Q., Chen, A., & Li, H. (2008) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00693.x · Cited by 198
Leung, H.-C., & Cai, W. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2837-07.2007 · Cited by 185
“, 2006), fMRI data showed that VLPFC in both hemispheres as well as other frontal and parietal regions are involved in inhibition of manual responses (Garavan et al., 1999, Rubia et al., 2003; Li et al., 2006).”
BackgroundMethodA cerebellar thalamic cortical circuit for error-related cognitive control
Ide, J. S., & Li, C. R. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.042 · Cited by 186
“Also of note is that this area of SMAdid not overlap amore anterior region,which we labeled as anterior pre-SMA (MNI coordinate: x=−4; y=36; z=56) that our previous studies showed to mediate response inhibition in the stop signal task (Li et al., 2006, 2008a; Chao et al., 2009).”
MethodResultNeural Correlates of Impulse Control During Stop Signal Inhibition in Cocaine-Dependent Men
Li, C. R., Huang, C. X., Yan, P., Bhagwagar, Z., Milivojevic, V., & Sinha, R. (2007) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301568 · Cited by 185
“The Figure 2 (a) The dorsal medial frontal cortex (dmFC) as an ROI (Talairach coordinate: x¼ 4, y¼ 32, z¼ 51; Li et al, 2006a).”
InfluentialSelf-citationPerformance monitoring and stop signal inhibition in abstinent patients with cocaine dependence
Li, C. R., Milivojevic, V., Kemp, K. A., Hong, K., & Sinha, R. (2006) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.04.008 · Cited by 169
Self-citationEngagement of large-scale networks is related to individual differences in inhibitory control
Congdon, E. L., Mumford, J. A., Cohen, J. R., Galván, A., Aron, A. R., Xue, G., Miller, E. N., & Poldrack, R. A. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.062 · Cited by 170
“…relation between activation and stopping ability) have been observed in a number of regions including the right IFC and right STN (Aron and Poldrack, 2006), the left superior frontal gyrus (SFG) and left precentral gyrus (Li et al., 2006), as well as the pre-SMA and caudate (Li et al., 2008).”
InfluentialSelf-Regulatory Depletion Enhances Neural Responses to Rewards and Impairs Top-Down Control
Wagner, D. D., Altman, M., Boswell, R. G., Kelley, W. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797613492985 · Cited by 166
The Molecular Genetics of Executive Function: Role of Monoamine System Genes
Barnes, J. J. M., Dean, A. J., Nandam, L. S., O’Connell, R. G., & Bellgrove, M. A. (2011) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.12.040 · Cited by 176
“Functional imaging studies indicate that the right inferior frontal cortex is active during successful response inhibition, with increased activation associated with faster stop-signal reaction times (87).”
Backgroundde Ruiter, M. B., Oosterlaan, J., Veltman, D. J., van den Brink, W., & Goudriaan, A. E. (2011) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.08.010 · Cited by 160
“The joint results of these studies might indicate hat inferior frontal gyrus/ventrolateral prefrontal cortex activation ound during response inhibition tasks is associated to affective rocesses rather than response inhibition per se (for a similar sugestion, see Li et al., 2006).”
ResultInteractions between cognition and motivation during response inhibition
Padmala, S., & Pessoa, L. (2010) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.017 · Cited by 162
Fear and stop: A role for the amygdala in motor inhibition by emotional signals
Sagaspe, P., Schwartz, S., & Vuilleumier, P. O. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.027 · Cited by 173
Castellanos-Ryan, N., Rubia, K., & Conrod, P. J. (2011) · Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01331.x · Cited by 152
Li, C.-S. R., Huang, C. X., Yan, P., Paliwal, P., Constable, R. T., & Sinha, R. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20071 · Cited by 156
“D 2008 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20:6, pp. 1021–1029 ( Li, Huang, Constable, & Sinha, 2006; Li, Milivojevic, Kemp, Hong, & Sinha, 2006; Aron & Poldrack, 2005; Liotti, Pliszka, Perez, Kothmann, & Woldorff, 2005; Schachar et al., 2004; Logan & Cowan, 1984).,D 2008 Massachuse…”
Self-citationHughes, M. E., Fulham, W. R., Johnston, P., & Michie, P. T. (2011) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.10.013 · Cited by 154
Functional brain correlates of response time variability in children
SIMMONDS, D., FOTEDAR, S., SUSKAUER, S., PEKAR, J., DENCKLA, M., & MOSTOFSKY, S. (2007) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.01.013 · Cited by 143
fMRI of Intrasubject Variability in ADHD: Anomalous Premotor Activity With Prefrontal Compensation
Suskauer, S. J., Simmonds, D. J., Caffo, B. S., Denckla, M. B., Pekar, J. J., & Mostofsky, S. H. (2008) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/chi.0b013e3181825b1f · Cited by 143
Suppression of human cortico-motoneuronal excitability during the Stop-signal task
Badry, R., Mima, T., Aso, T., Nakatsuka, M., Abe, M., Fathi, D., Foli, N., Nagiub, H., Nagamine, T., & Fukuyama, H. (2009) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.06.027 · Cited by 146
“Publish : +81 75 751 3202. a). regions, especially the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) (Floden and Stuss, 2006; Li et al., 2006; Mostofsky and Schafer, 2003 Suskauer et al., 2008) in voluntary suppression.”
van Belle, J., Vink, M., Durston, S., & Zandbelt, B. B. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.014 · Cited by 141
“, 2008), and studies linking inter-individual differences in SSRT and fMRI activation levels (Congdon et al., 2010; Li et al., 2006) also endorse the idea that frontal regions in both the left and right hemisphere are critical for successful inhibitory control.”
The Key Locus of Common Response Inhibition Network for No-go and Stop Signals
Zheng, D., Oka, T., Bokura, H., & Yamaguchi, S. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20100 · Cited by 156
“The present study used a modified version of the stopsignal task described by Li et al. (2006).”
MethodAnnual research review: on the developmental neuropsychology of substance use disorders
J. Conrod, P., & Nikolaou, K. (2016) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12516 · Cited by 137
Forgetting of Emotional Information Is Hard: An fMRI Study of Directed Forgetting
Nowicka, A., Marchewka, A., Jednoróg, K., Tacikowski, P., & Brechmann, A. (2010) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq117 · Cited by 146
“Results are presented in Figure 1A.”
BackgroundDelay Activity in Rodent Frontal Cortex During a Simple Reaction Time Task
Narayanan, N. S., & Laubach, M. (2009) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.90615.2008 · Cited by 144
Dopamine and inhibitory action control: evidence from spontaneous eye blink rates
Colzato, L. S., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., van Wouwe, N. C., Pannebakker, M. M., & Hommel, B. (2009) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-009-1862-x · Cited by 150
“Given recent studies showing gender diVerences for EBR and for SSRT (Dreisbach et al. 2005; Li et al. 2006; Müller et al. 2007; Mulvihill et al. 1997), independent samples t tests were performed for analysis of EBR and SSRT diVerences between men and women.”
MethodSachs, M. E., Kaplan, J., Sarkissian, A. D., & Habibi, A. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187254 · Cited by 153
Spatiotemporal characterization of response inhibition
Albert, J., López‐Martín, S., Hinojosa, J. A., & Carretié, L. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.011 · Cited by 134
“Also in this case, effect sizes were determined by using the ƞ2p method.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialPawliczek, C. M., Derntl, B., Kellermann, T., Kohn, N., Gur, R. C., & Habel, U. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.104 · Cited by 138
“1) based on the work of Li et al. (2006, 2008, 2009).”
InfluentialChao, H. H., Luo, X., Chang, J. L., & Li, C.-S. R. (2009) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-10-75 · Cited by 133
“We employed a simple reaction time task in this stop-signal paradigm [9,13] (Figure 1).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationColzato, L. S., Hertsig, G., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., & Hommel, B. (2010) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.02.029 · Cited by 143
“Our observation that estrogen modulates inhibitory control may explain why Li et al. (2006) found gender differences in a stop-signal task with respect to some but not other measures.”
Dissociated neural substrates underlying impulsive choice and impulsive action
Wang, Q., Chen, C., Cai, Y., Li, S., Zhao, X. Q., Li, Z., Zhang, H., Liu, J., Chen, C., & Xue, G. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.010 · Cited by 136
“For impulsive action, existing studies have implicated distributed cortical and subcortical areas for response inhibition, including the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and adjacent anterior insula (AI), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), pre-SMA, and striatum (Aron et al., 2007b; Aron and Poldrack, 2005; Aron et al.…”
InfluentialImpulsivity in disorders of food and drug misuse
Mole, T. B., Irvine, M. A., Worbe, Y., Collins, P., Mitchell, S., Bolton, S., Harrison, N. A., Robbins, T. W., & Voon, V. (2014) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291714001834 · Cited by 134
Deep Brain Stimulation of Subthalamic Nuclei Affects Arm Response Inhibition In Parkinson's Patients
Mirabella, G., Iaconelli, S., Romanelli, P., Modugno, N., Lena, F., Manfredi, M., & Cantore, G. (2011) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr187 · Cited by 142
“It has been shown that medial frontal cortices are implicated in proactive control mechanisms (Brown and Braver 2005; Li et al. 2006; Forstmann et al. 2008; Chen et al. 2010; Domenech and Dreher 2010) and it is known that these regions project to the ventral portion of STN (Krack et al.”
Dissociable Brain Mechanisms Underlying the Conscious and Unconscious Control of Behavior
van Gaal, S., Lamme, V. A. F., Fahrenfort, J. J., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21431 · Cited by 127
“These studies have revealed a large fronto-parietal network involved in response inhibition, including middle, inferior, and superior frontal cortices, pre-supplementary motor areas, and anterior cingulate cortex (Zheng, Oka, Bokura, & Yamaguchi, 2008; Aron & Poldrack, 2006; Chambers et al., 2006; Li, Huang, Constable…”
Goswami, R., Dufort, P. A., Tartaglia, M. C., Green, R., Crawley, A. P., Tator, C. H., Wennberg, R. A., Mikulis, D. J., Keightley, M., & Davis, K. D. (2015) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-015-1012-0 · Cited by 131
“2013) as was faster reaction time (Li et al. 2006; Sakai et al. 2013).”
MethodSchaum, M., Pinzuti, E., Sebastian, A., Lieb, K., Fries, P., Mobascher, A., Jung, P., Wibral, M., & Tüscher, O. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.61679 · Cited by 146
“While a range of studies on response inhibition point toward a single inhibitory module within the IFC that directly initiates stopping (Aron et al., 2003), other studies assign this role to pre-SMA (Li et al., 2006; Nachev et al., 2007).”
BackgroundResultStructural connectivity of right frontal hyperactive areas scales with stuttering severity
Neef, N. E., Anwander, A., Bütfering, C., Schmidt‐Samoa, C., Friederici, A. D., Paulus, W., & Sommer, M. (2017) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awx316 · Cited by 135
“Part of the right posterior IFG implements the control of response inhibition, which comprises cognitive and motor inhibition (Aron and Poldrack, 2006; Chambers et al., 2006; Li et al., 2006, 2008; Aron et al., 2014; Cai et al., 2014b).”
BackgroundFrontal cortical thinning and subcortical volume reductions in early adulthood obesity
Marqués‐Iturria, I., Pueyo, R., Garolera, M., Segura, B., Junqué, C., García‐García, I., Palacios, M. J. S., Vernet‐Vernet, M., Narberhaus, A., Ariza, M., et al. (2013) · Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2013.06.004 · Cited by 123
Zandbelt, B. B., Bloemendaal, M., Bas‐Hoogendam, J. M., Kahn, R. S., & Vink, M. (2012) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00309 · Cited by 120
“Figure 4 (red and blue areas) shows that reactive inhibition elicited activation and deactivation in a widespread network of brain regions commonly reported in stop-signal tasks at baseline (Boehler et al., 2010; Zandbelt & Vink, 2010; Aron & Poldrack, 2006; Li et al., 2006), including activation in a mainly right-lat…”
BackgroundRamautar, J. R., Slagter, H. A., Kok, A., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2006) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.091 · Cited by 130
“Li et al. (2006), however, found more superior frontal areas to be correlated with SSRT. Vink et al. (2005) manipulated the likelihood of having to inhibit a response quasi-parametrically by varying the number of go trials (2–6) that immediately preceded a stop trial.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSwick, D., Honzel, N., Larsen, J., Ashley, V., & Justus, T. (2012) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617712000458 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Ray Li, C.-S., Huang, C., Constable, R. T., & Sinha, R.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2006-01-04
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 186-192
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6674298
- OpenAlex
- W2124906793
- Cited by
- 600
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 43
- FWCI
- 11.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Yale University
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (K02 DA17232, P50DA016556, K02DA017232, K12DA014038, K12-DA-14038, P50-DA16556)
- Office of Research on Women's Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- response inhibition, stop-signal task, inhibitory control, stop-signal reaction time, error monitoring, signal monitoring, frustration, neural correlates of inhibition
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Monitoring, Physiologic, Neural Pathways, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Regression Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review