Cited by 113Cellular transport and secretionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchExtracellular vesicles in disease

A Gain-of-Function Mutation in Synaptotagmin-1 Reveals a Critical Role of Ca 2+ -Dependent Soluble N -Ethylmaleimide-Sensitive Factor Attachment Protein Receptor Complex Binding in Synaptic Exocytosis

Open access
Pang, Zhiping P., Shin, Ok-Ho, Meyer, Alexander C., Rosenmund, Christian, Südhof, Thomas C.·2006·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Synaptotagmin-1, the Ca 2+ sensor for fast neurotransmitter release, was proposed to function by Ca 2+ -dependent phospholipid binding and/or by Ca 2+ -dependent soluble N -ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complex binding. Extensive in vivo data support the first hypothesis, but testing the second hypothesis has been difficult because no synaptotagmin-1 mutation is known that selectively interferes with SNARE complex binding. Using knock-in mice that carry aspartate-to-asparagine substitutions in a Ca 2+ -binding site of synaptotagmin-1 (the D232N or D238N substitutions), we now show that the D232N mutation dramatically increases Ca 2+ -dependent SNARE complex binding by native synaptotagmin-1, but leaves phospholipid binding unchanged. In contrast, the adjacent D238N mutation does not significantly affect SNARE complex binding, but decreases phospholipid binding. Electrophysiological recordings revealed that the D232N mutation increased Ca 2+ -triggered release, whereas the D238N mutation decreased release. These data establish that fast vesicle exocytosis is driven by a dual Ca 2+ -dependent activity of synaptotagmin-1, namely Ca 2+ -dependent binding both to SNARE complexes and to phospholipids.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3804-06.2006

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Syt1 interacts with the neuronal SNARE complex.

    “Syt1 also interacts with the neuronal SNARE complex based on immunoprecipitation and pull-downs24–27, single molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET)28, and nuclear magnetic resonance29,30 experiments.”
  • A gain-of-function mutation in the Ca2+-binding region of the C2A domain suggested that the Syt1-SNARE interaction may be functionally important.

    “A gain-of-function mutation in the Ca2+-binding region of the C2A domain suggested that the Syt1-SNARE interaction may be functionally important26, but the molecular basis and the significance of the interaction between Syt1 and the SNARE complex remain unknown.”
  • The gain-of-function mutation D232N in the Ca2+-binding region of the C2A domain is close to the tertiary interface and is also part of the C2A-C2B interface.

    “Interestingly, the gain-of-function mutation D232N in the Ca2+-binding region of the C2A domain26 is close to the tertiary interface and it is also part of the C2A-C2B interface (Fig. 1b).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pang, Z. P., Shin, O.-H., Meyer, A. C., Rosenmund, C., & Südhof, T. C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry (DE)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2006-11-29
Volume
26
Issue
48
Pages
12556-12565
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1969421890
Cited by
113
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS050655, NS-050655)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
Keywords
synaptotagmin-1, phospholipid binding, synaptic vesicle exocytosis, knock-in mice, calcium sensor
MeSH terms
Animals, Calcium, Cells, Cultured, Exocytosis, Hippocampus, Mutation, Neuronal Plasticity, Protein Binding, Solubility, Synapses, SNARE Proteins, Synaptotagmin I, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review