Cited by 303Epilepsy research and treatmentNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Loss of astrocytic domain organization in the epileptic brain

Open access
Oberheim, Nancy Ann, Tian, Guo-Feng, Han, Xiaoning, Peng, Weiguo, Takano, Takahiro, Ransom, Bruce, Nedergaard, Maiken·2008·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Gliosis is a pathological hallmark of posttraumatic epileptic foci, but little is known about these reactive astrocytes beyond their high glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) expression. Using diolistic labeling, we show that cortical astrocytes lost their nonoverlapping domain organization in three mouse models of epilepsy: posttraumatic injury, genetic susceptibility, and systemic kainate exposure. Neighboring astrocytes in epileptic mice showed a 10-fold increase in overlap of processes. Concurrently, spine density was increased on dendrites of excitatory neurons. Suppression of seizures by the common antiepileptic, valproate, reduced the overlap of astrocytic processes. Astrocytic domain organization was also preserved in APP transgenic mice expressing a mutant variant of human amyloid precursor protein despite a marked upregulation of GFAP. Our data suggest that loss of astrocytic domains was not universally associated with gliosis, but restricted to seizure pathologies. Reorganization of astrocytes may, in concert with dendritic sprouting and new synapse formation, form the structural basis for recurrent excitation in the epileptic brain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4980-07.2008

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Each astrocyte is in contact with up to four capillaries and enwraps about four neuronal cell bodies and 105 synapses.

    “Interposed between neurons and the vasculature, each astrocyte is in contact with up to four capillaries and enwraps about four neuronal cell bodies and 105 synapses [395,396,397].”

    From Revisiting the Pathogenesis of X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy (2025) · cites this paper as [396]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) estimates that one astrocytic domain encompasses about 140,000 synapses in rodents, broadly supporting the claim’s 10^5-synapse figure; it gives a different estimate of 2,000,000 for humans. The passages found do not support the specific counts of up to four capillaries or about four neuronal cell bodies per astrocyte. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Frey LC (2003) Epidemiology of posttraumatic epilepsy: a critical review. Epilepsia 44 [Suppl 10]:11-17.
  2. Loscher W (2002) Basic pharmacology of valproate: a review after 35 years of clinical use for the treatment of epilepsy. CNS Drugs 16:669 -694.
  3. McGraw J, Hiebert GW, Steeves JD (2001) Modulating astrogliosis after neurotrauma. J Neurosci Res 63:109 -115.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oberheim, N. A., Tian, G.-F., Han, X., Peng, W., Takano, T., Ransom, B., & Nedergaard, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Nedergaard, Maiken
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2008-03-26
Volume
28
Issue
13
Pages
3264-3276
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2094240884
Cited by
303
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 21
FWCI
12.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM07356, T32GM007356)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS030007, R01NS038073, NS038073, NS030007, NS50315, P01NS050315)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
astrocytes, gliosis, epilepsy, post-traumatic epilepsy, kainate-induced epilepsy, genetic epilepsy model, glial fibrillary acidic protein, dendritic spine density, valproic acid, amyloid precursor protein, APP transgenic mice, recurrent excitation
MeSH terms
Amino Acids, Animals, Anticonvulsants, Astrocytes, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Dendrites, Disease Models, Animal, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Gene Expression Regulation, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Kainic Acid, Luminescent Proteins, Mice, Transgenic, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Time Factors, Valproic Acid, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Mice, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review