Cited by 202Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsNeurological disorders and treatmentsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Frontal cortical and subcortical projections provide a basis for segmenting the cingulum bundle: implications for neuroimaging and psychiatric disorders

Open access
Heilbronner, S. R., Haber, S. N.·2014·Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The cingulum bundle (CB) is one of the brain's major white matter pathways, linking regions associated with executive function, decision-making, and emotion. Neuroimaging has revealed that abnormalities in particular locations within the CB are associated with specific psychiatric disorders, including depression and bipolar disorder. However, the fibers using each portion of the CB remain unknown. In this study, we used anatomical tract-tracing in nonhuman primates (Macaca nemestrina, Macaca fascicularis, Macaca mulatta) to examine the organization of specific cingulate, noncingulate frontal, and subcortical pathways through the CB. The goals were as follows: (1) to determine connections that use the CB, (2) to establish through which parts of the CB these fibers travel, and (3) to relate the CB fiber pathways to the portions of the CB identified in humans as neurosurgical targets for amelioration of psychiatric disorders. Results indicate that cingulate, noncingulate frontal, and subcortical fibers all travel through the CB to reach both cingulate and noncingulate targets. However, many brain regions send projections through only part, not all, of the CB. For example, amygdala fibers are not present in the caudal portion of the dorsal CB. These results allow segmentation of the CB into four unique zones. We identify the specific connections that are abnormal in psychiatric disorders and affected by neurosurgical interventions, such as deep brain stimulation and cingulotomy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.5459-13.2014

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Few, if any, connections extend the entire length of the cingulum tract.

    “Consequently, few, if any, connections extend the entire length of the tract (Heilbronner and Haber, 2014).”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Heilbronner and Haber, 2014

    The Abstract (page unavailable) says many brain regions send projections through only part of the cingulum bundle, supporting the general point that connections need not span it. But “few, if any” is stronger than the paper establishes: the Segmenting the CB section (page unavailable) says many fibers travel through all four segments, without establishing how many individual connections traverse the tract’s full length. (LLM, conf=0.81)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The problem of disentangling complex fibre architecture helps explain why the reconstructed cingulum sometimes appears to extend rostrally beyond the limit of the tract, suggesting that streamlines have jumped into adjacent pathways.

    “Meanwhile, the problem of disentangling complex fibre architecture (Fischer et al., 2012; Jeurissen et al., 2017) helps to explain why the reconstructed cingulum sometimes appears to extend rostrally beyond the limit of the tract (Heilbronner and Haber, 2014), suggesting that streamlines have jumped into adjacent pathways.”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Heilbronner and Haber, 2014

    The Results describe the cingulum bundle’s anatomical course and its proximity to the uncinate fasciculus, providing a basis for identifying the tract’s limits. They do not report that reconstructed cingulum streamlines extend rostrally beyond those limits or jump into adjacent pathways; that reconstruction-specific part is unsupported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The primate cingulum bundle contains some fibres from across almost all parts of the prefrontal cortex.

    “there is a marked extension as the tract contains some fibres from across almost all parts of the prefrontal cortex (Heilbronner and Haber, 2014)”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Heilbronner and Haber, 2014

  • The laterodorsal nucleus projects to area 23 and area 30, and both the laterodorsal and anterior thalamic nuclei also reach medial parietal area 7 m (precuneus), while laterodorsal fibres also extend to more lateral parietal areas.

    “The laterodorsal nucleus projects to area 23 (Shibata and Yukie, 2003) and 30 (Morris et al., 1999b), with both the laterodorsal and anterior thalamic nuclei also reaching medial parietal area 7 m (precuneus) (Heilbronner and Haber, 2014), while laterodorsal fibres also extend to more lateral parietal areas (Mufson and Pandya, 1984).”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Heilbronner and Haber, 2014

  • Heilbronner and Haber (2014) used monkey connectivity to subdivide the primate cingulum into four divisions: subgenual, rostral dorsal (anterior cingulate), caudal dorsal (retrosplenial), and temporal (parahippocampal).

    “Accordingly, Heilbronner and Haber (2014) used monkey connectivity to help subdivide the primate cingulum into four divisions; subgenual, rostral dorsal (anterior cingulate), caudal dorsal (retrosplenial), and temporal (parahippocampal).”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Heilbronner and Haber, 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Anand A, Li Y, Wang Y, Lowe MJ, Dzemidzic M (2009) Resting state corti- colimbic connectivity abnormalities in unmedicated bipolar disorder and unipolar depression. Psychiatry Res 171:189 -198. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  2. Baer L, Rauch SL, Ballantine HT Jr, Martuza R, Cosgrove R, Cassem E, Giriunas I, Manzo PA, Dimino C, Jenike MA (1995) Cingulotomy for intractable obsessive-compulsive disorder: prospective long-term follow-up of 18 pa- tients. Arch Gen Psychiatry 52:384 -392. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  3. Cotter D, Hudson L, Landau S (2005) Evidence for orbitofrontal pathology in bipolar disorder and major depression, but not in schizophrenia. Bi- polar Disord 7:358 -369. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  4. Geneser-Jensen FA, Blackstad TW (1971) Distribution of acetyl cholinest- erase in the hippocampal region of the guinea pig. Z Zellforsch 114:460 - 481. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  5. Goldman-Rakic PS, Selemon LD, Schwartz ML (1984) Dual pathways con- necting the dorsolateral prefronal cortex with the hippcampal formation and parahippocampal cortex in the rhesus monkey. Neuroscience 12: 719 -743. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  6. Haber SN, Lynd-Balta E, Mitchell SJ (1993) The organization of the de- scending ventral pallidal projections in the monkey. J Comp Neurol 329: 111-128. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  7. Haber SN, Kim KS, Mailly P, Calzavara R (2006) Reward-related cortical inputs define a large striatal region in primates that interface with asso- ciative cortical inputs, providing a substrate for incentive-based learning. J Neurosci 26:8368 -8376. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  8. Hamani C, Mayberg H, Snyder B, Giacobbe P, Kennedy S, Lozano AM (2009) Deep brain stimulation of the subcallosal cingulate gyrus for de- pression: anatomical location of active contacts in clinical responders and a suggested guideline for targeting. J Neurosurg 111:1209 -1215. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  9. Hastings RS, Parsey RV, Oquendo MA, Arango V, Mann JJ (2004) Volu- metric analysis of the prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and hippocampus in major depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 29:952-959. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  10. Jbabdi S, Lehman JF, Haber SN, Behrens TE (2013) Human and monkey ventral prefrontal fibers use the same organizational principles to reach their targets: tracing versus tractography. J Neurosci 33:3190 -3201. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  11. Johansen-Berg H, Gutman DA, Behrens TE, Matthews PM, Rushworth MF, Katz E, Lozano AM, Mayberg HS (2008) Anatomical connectivity of the subgenual cingulate region targeted with deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Cereb Cortex 18:1374 -1383. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  12. Keedwell PA, Chapman R, Christiansen K, Richardson H, Evans J, Jones DK (2012) Cingulum white matter in young women at risk of depression: the effect of family history and anhedonia. Biol Psychiatry 72:296 -302. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  13. Lehman JF, Greenberg BD, McIntyre CC, Rasmussen SA, Haber SN (2011) Rules ventral prefrontal cortical axons use to reach their targets: implica- tions for diffusion tensor imaging tractography and deep brain stimula- tion for psychiatric illness. J Neurosci 31:10392-10402. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  14. Lozano AM, Mayberg HS, Giacobbe P, Hamani C, Craddock RC, Kennedy SH (2008) Subcallosal cingulate gyrus deep brain stimulation for treatment- resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry 64:461-467. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  15. Mayberg HS, Lozano AM, Voon V, McNeely HE, Seminowicz D, Hamani C, Schwalb JM, Kennedy SH (2005) Deep brain stimulation for treatment- resistant depression. Neuron 45:651-660. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  16. Mettler R (1935) Corticofugal fiber connections of the cortex of Macaca mulatta: the frontal region. J Comp Neurol 61:509 -542. CrossRef · DOI
  17. Morris R, Pandya DN, Petrides M (1999) Fiber system linking the mid- dorsolateral frontal cortex with the retrosplenial/presubicular region in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol 407:183-192. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  18. Mufson EJ, Pandya DN (1984) Some observations on the course and com- position of the cingulum bundle in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol 225:31-43. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  19. Petrides M, Pandya DN (2007) Efferent association pathways from the ros- tral prefrontal cortex in the macaque monkey. J Neurosci 27:11573- 11586. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  20. Schmahmann J, Pandya D (2006) Fiber pathways of the brain. New York: Oxford UP.
  21. Sheline YI, Price JL, Yan Z, Mintun MA (2010) Resting-state functional MRI in depression unmasks increased connectivity between networks via the dorsal nexus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:11020 -11025. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  22. Siegle GJ, Thompson W, Carter CS, Steinhauer SR, Thase ME (2007) In- creased amygdala and decreased dorsolateral prefrontal BOLD responses in unipolar depression: related and independent features. Biol Psychiatry 61:198 -209. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  23. Steele JD, Christmas D, Eljamel MS, Matthews K (2008) Anterior cingu- lotomy for major depression: clinical outcome and relationship to lesion characteristics. Biol Psychiatry 63:670 -677. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  24. Szeszko PR, Ardekani BA, Ashtari M, Malhotra AK, Robinson DG, Bilder RM, Lim KO (2005) White matter abnormalities in obsessive- compulsive disorder: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Arch Gen Psychi- atry 62:782-790. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  25. Wang F, Jackowski M, Kalmar JH, Chepenik LG, Tie K, Qiu M, Gong G, Pittman BP, Jones MM, Shah MP, Spencer L, Papademetris X, Constable RT, Blumberg HP (2008) Abnormal anterior cingulum integrity in bi- polar disorder determined through diffusion tensor imaging. Br J Psychi- atry 193:126 -129. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  26. Yakovlev PI, Locke S (1961) Limbic nuclei of the thalamus and connections of limbic cortex: III. Corticocortical connections of the anterior cingulate gyrus, the cingulum, and the ubcallosal bundle in monkey. Arch Neurol 5:364 -400. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  27. Yin D, Valles FE, Fiandaca MS, Forsayeth J, Larson P, Starr P, Bankiewicz KS (2009) Striatal volume differences between nonhuman and human pri- mates. J Neurosci Methods 176:200 -205. CrossRef Medline · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heilbronner, S. R., & Haber, S. N.
Affiliations
University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2014-07-23
Volume
34
Issue
30
Pages
10041-10054
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2080985455
Cited by
202
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7
FWCI
9.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • National Institutes of Health (5p50mh086400-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P-50-MH-086400, MH086400, R01MH045573, MH045573)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
cingulum, white matter tracts, cingulate cortex, frontal cortex, subcortical projections, neural tracing, non-human primates, amygdala, cingulotomy, deep brain stimulation, depression, bipolar disorder
MeSH terms
Animals, Mental Disorders, Corpus Callosum, Frontal Lobe, Gyrus Cinguli, Macaca fascicularis, Macaca mulatta, Macaca nemestrina, Male, Neural Pathways, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review