Cited by 227Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Cognitive regulation during decision making shifts behavioral control between ventromedial and dorsolateral prefrontal value systems

Open access
Hutcherson, Cendri A., Plassmann, Hilke, Gross, James J., Rangel, Antonio·2012·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Cognitive regulation is often used to influence behavioral outcomes. However, the computational and neurobiological mechanisms by which it affects behavior remain unknown. We studied this issue using an fMRI task in which human participants used cognitive regulation to upregulate and downregulate their cravings for foods at the time of choice. We found that activity in both ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) correlated with value. We also found evidence that two distinct regulatory mechanisms were at work: value modulation, which operates by changing the values assigned to foods in vmPFC and dlPFC at the time of choice, and behavioral control modulation, which operates by changing the relative influence of the vmPFC and dlPFC value signals on the action selection process used to make choices. In particular, during downregulation, activation decreased in the value-sensitive region of dlPFC (indicating value modulation) but not in vmPFC, and the relative contribution of the two value signals to behavior shifted toward the dlPFC (indicating behavioral control modulation). The opposite pattern was observed during upregulation: activation increased in vmPFC but not dlPFC, and the relative contribution to behavior shifted toward the vmPFC. Finally, ventrolateral PFC and posterior parietal cortex were more active during both upregulation and downregulation, and were functionally connected with vmPFC and dlPFC during cognitive regulation, which suggests that they help to implement the changes to the decision-making circuitry generated by cognitive regulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.6387-11.2012

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both NAc and vmPFC have been shown to be important predictors of changes in appetitive and self-regulatory behaviors in the real world.

    “both regions have been shown to be important predictors of changes in appetitive and self-regulatory behaviors in the real world [45],[80],[81]”
  • One potential explanation for the DLPFC negative result is that DLPFC might only be involved in tasks involving the evaluation of sufficiently abstract stimuli or self-regulation.

    “One potential explanation for this negative result is that DLPFC might only be involved in tasks involving the evaluation of sufficiently abstract stimuli or self-regulation (Hutcherson et al., 2012), which are relatively uncommon in the existing literature.”

    From Informatic parcellation of the network involved in the computation of subjective value (2014) · cites this paper as Hutcherson et al., 2012

  • More patient behavior may come from control processes that shift attention away from immediate rewards or emphasize future goals.

    “more patient behavior may result from control processes that bias attention away from immediate rewards and/or emphasize the importance of future goals (24, 25).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hutcherson, C. A., Plassmann, H., Gross, J. J., & Rangel, A.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • INSEAD (FR)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2012-09-26
Volume
32
Issue
39
Pages
13543-13554
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1985867909
Cited by
227
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0926544, 0850840, 0851408)
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA018736)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
cognitive regulation, decision-making, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, food cravings, behavioral control, action selection, functional connectivity, posterior parietal cortex, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, food choice
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Reaction Time, Regression Analysis, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review