The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural plasticity underlies experience-dependent functional plasticity of cortical circuits.
Open accessAbstract
The stabilization of new spines in the barrel cortex is enhanced after whisker trimming, but its relationship to experience-dependent plasticity is unclear. Here we show that in wild-type mice, whisker potentiation and spine stabilization are most pronounced for layer 5 neurons at the border between spared and deprived barrel columns. In homozygote alphaCaMKII-T286A mice, which lack experience-dependent potentiation of responses to spared whiskers, there is no increase in new spine stabilization at the border between barrel columns after whisker trimming. Our data provide a causal link between new spine synapses and plasticity of adult cortical circuits and suggest that alphaCaMKII autophosphorylation plays a role in the stabilization but not formation of new spines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In αCaMKII-T286A defective mice, chessboard trimming failed to increase stabilization of new persistent spines at the border between spared and deprived barrels (Wilbrecht et al., 2010).”
From Spatiotemporal dynamics of dendritic spines in the living brain (2014) · cites this paper as Wilbrecht et al., 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Imaging Neuronal Subsets in Transgenic Mice Expressing Multiple Spectral Variants of GFP
Feng, G., Mellor, R. H., Bernstein, M., Keller-Peck, C., Nguyen, Q. T., Wallace, M., Nerbonne, J. M., Lichtman, J. W., & Sanes, J. R. (2000) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00084-2 · Cited by 3,042
SINGLE-CELL RESPONSES IN STRIATE CORTEX OF KITTENS DEPRIVED OF VISION IN ONE EYE
Wiesel, T. N., & Hubel, D. H. (1963) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1963.26.6.1003 · Cited by 2,628
Structural basis of long-term potentiation in single dendritic spines
Matsuzaki, M., Honkura, N., Ellis-Davies, G. C. R., & Kasai, H. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02617 · Cited by 2,483
The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (S I) of mouse cerebral cortex
Woolsey, T. A., & Van der Loos, H. (1970) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(70)90079-x · Cited by 2,254
Long-term in vivo imaging of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in adult cortex
Trachtenberg, J. T., Chen, B. E., Knott, G. W., Feng, G., Sanes, J. R., Welker, E., & Svoboda, K. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01273 · Cited by 1,927
Self-citationThe molecular basis of CaMKII function in synaptic and behavioural memory
Lisman, J., Schulman, H., & Cline, H. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn753 · Cited by 1,860
ScanImage: Flexible software for operating laser scanning microscopes
Pologruto, T. A., Sabatini, B. L., & Svoboda, K. (2003) · BioMedical Engineering OnLine · doi:10.1186/1475-925x-2-13 · Cited by 1,300
Self-citationLong-term dendritic spine stability in the adult cortex
Grutzendler, J., Kasthuri, N., & Gan, W.-B. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01276 · Cited by 1,198 · cited 1×
“In the adult barrel cortex, a subset of dendritic spines appear and disappear over days (Grutzendler et al., 2002; Trachtenberg et al., 2002; Holtmaat et al., 2005).”
BackgroundTransient and persistent dendritic spines in the neocortex in vivo
Holtmaat, A. J. G. D., Trachtenberg, J. T., Wilbrecht, L., Shepherd, G. M., Zhang, X., Knott, G. W., & Svoboda, K. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.01.003 · Cited by 1,131
Self-citationAutophosphorylation at Thr 286 of the α Calcium-Calmodulin Kinase II in LTP and Learning
Giese, K. P., Fedorov, N. B., Filipkowski, R. K., & Silva, A. J. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.279.5352.870 · Cited by 1,055
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Microglia: Dynamic Mediators of Synapse Development and Plasticity
Wu, Y., Dissing-Olesen, L., MacVicar, B. A., & Stevens, B. (2015) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2015.08.008 · Cited by 661
Structural and synaptic plasticity in stress-related disorders
Christoffel, D. J., Golden, S. A., & Russo, S. J. (2011) · Reviews in the Neurosciences · doi:10.1515/rns.2011.044 · Cited by 334
Experience-dependent structural plasticity in the cortex
Fu, M., & Zuo, Y. (2011) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2011.02.001 · Cited by 322
Dendritic spines: from structure to in vivo function
Rochefort, N. L., & Konnerth, A. (2012) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/embor.2012.102 · Cited by 299
Learning-related feedforward inhibitory connectivity growth required for memory precision
Ruediger, S., Vittori, C. G., Bednarek, E., Genoud, C., Strata, P., Sacchetti, B., & Caroni, P. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09946 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilbrecht, L., Holtmaat, A., Wright, N., Fox, K., & Svoboda, K.
- Affiliations
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- University of Geneva (CH)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2010-04-06
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 4927-4932
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC2910869
- OpenAlex
- W2012985621
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 7.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- National Institutes of Health
- Medical Research Council
- National Institute of Mental Health
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS038259)
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (F32HD047104)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- structural plasticity, experience-dependent plasticity, barrel cortex, whisker trimming, CaMKIIα, autophosphorylation, layer 5 neurons, barrel columns, cortical circuits, sensory deprivation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Learning, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Nerve Net, Neuronal Plasticity, Synapses, Vibrissae, Dendritic Spines, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review