The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phase separation of 53 BP 1 determines liquid‐like behavior of DNA repair compartments
Open accessAbstract
The DNA damage response (DDR) generates transient repair compartments to concentrate repair proteins and activate signaling factors. The physicochemical properties of these spatially confined compartments and their function remain poorly understood. Here, we establish, based on live cell microscopy and CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated endogenous protein tagging, that 53BP1‐marked repair compartments are dynamic, show droplet‐like behavior, and undergo frequent fusion and fission events. 53BP1 assembly, but not the upstream accumulation of γH2AX and MDC1, is highly sensitive to changes in osmotic pressure, temperature, salt concentration and to disruption of hydrophobic interactions. Phase separation of 53BP1 is substantiated by optoDroplet experiments, which further allowed dissection of the 53BP1 sequence elements that cooperate for light‐induced clustering. Moreover, we found the tumor suppressor protein p53 to be enriched within 53BP1 optoDroplets, and conditions that disrupt 53BP1 phase separation impair 53BP1‐dependent induction of p53 and diminish p53 target gene expression. We thus suggest that 53BP1 phase separation integrates localized DNA damage recognition and repair factor assembly with global p53‐dependent gene activation and cell fate decisions. The DNA damage response effector 53BP1 forms characteristic foci at DNA breaks, which are here found to exhibit liquid droplet‐like self‐compartmentalization important for downstream activation of the p53 tumor suppressor. Self‐compartmentalization of the DNA double‐strand break response effector 53BP1 plays a key role in damage‐induced activation of p53 and its downstream targets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system
Ran, F. A., Hsu, P. D., Wright, J., Agarwala, V., Scott, D. A., & Zhang, F. (2013) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.143 · Cited by 11,133
Coactivator condensation at super-enhancers links phase separation and gene control
Sabari, B. R., Dall’Agnese, A., Boija, A., Klein, I. A., Coffey, E. L., Shrinivas, K., Abraham, B. J., Hannett, N. M., Zamudio, A. V., Manteiga, J. C., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar3958 · Cited by 2,595
The ATM protein kinase: regulating the cellular response to genotoxic stress, and more
Shiloh, Y., & Ziv, Y. (2013) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3546 · Cited by 1,649
Lukas, J., Lukas, C., & Bartek, J. (2011) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2344 · Cited by 645
Acetylation limits 53BP1 association with damaged chromatin to promote homologous recombination
Tang, J., Cho, N. W., Cui, G., Manion, E. M., Shanbhag, N. M., Botuyan, M. V., Mer, G., & Greenberg, R. A. (2013) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2499 · Cited by 521
Dynamics of DNA Double-Strand Breaks Revealed by Clustering of Damaged Chromosome Domains
Aten, J. A., Stap, J., Krawczyk, P. M., van Oven, C. H., Hoebe, R. A., Essers, J., & Kanaar, R. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1088845 · Cited by 491
Noon, A. T., Shibata, A., Rief, N., Löbrich, M., Stewart, G. S., Jeggo, P. A., & Goodarzi, A. A. (2010) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2017 · Cited by 339
BRCA1-associated exclusion of 53BP1 from DNA damage sites underlies temporal control of DNA repair
Chapman, J. R., Sossick, A. J., Boulton, S. J., & Jackson, S. P. (2012) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.105353 · Cited by 327
Fluctuations in p53 Signaling Allow Escape from Cell-Cycle Arrest
Reyes, J., Chen, J.-Y., Stewart-Ornstein, J., Karhohs, K. W., Mock, C. S., & Lahav, G. (2018) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.06.031 · Cited by 149
Cited by
A framework for understanding the functions of biomolecular condensates across scales
Lyon, A. S., Peeples, W. B., & Rosen, M. K. (2021) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-020-00303-z · Cited by 895
Pessina, F., Giavazzi, F., Yin, Y., Gioia, U., Vitelli, V., Galbiati, A., Barozzi, S., Garre, M., Oldani, A., Flaus, A., et al. (2019) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-019-0392-4 · Cited by 360
Nucleation landscape of biomolecular condensates
Shimobayashi, S. F., Ronceray, P., Sanders, D. W., Haataja, M. P., & Brangwynne, C. P. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03905-5 · Cited by 211
Lamin B1 sequesters 53BP1 to control its recruitment to DNA damage
Etourneaud, L., Moussa, A., Rass, E., Genet, D., Willaume, S., Chabance-Okumura, C., Wanschoor, P., Picotto, J., Thézé, B., Dépagne, J., et al. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb3799 · Cited by 54
Deacetylation induced nuclear condensation of HP1γ promotes multiple myeloma drug resistance
Li, X., Wang, S., Xie, Y., Jiang, H., Guo, J., Wang, Y., Peng, Z., Hu, M., Wang, M., Wang, J., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37013-x · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Kilic, S., Lezaja, A., Gatti, M., Bianco, E., Michelena, J., Imhof, R., & Altmeyer, M.
- Venue
- The EMBO Journal
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- e101379-e101379
- ISSN
- 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2075
- OpenAlex
- W2953749471
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 15.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
