The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Benchmarking AlphaFold‐enabled molecular docking predictions for antibiotic discovery
Open accessAbstract
Efficient identification of drug mechanisms of action remains a challenge. Computational docking approaches have been widely used to predict drug binding targets; yet, such approaches depend on existing protein structures, and accurate structural predictions have only recently become available from AlphaFold2. Here, we combine AlphaFold2 with molecular docking simulations to predict protein‐ligand interactions between 296 proteins spanning Escherichia coli 's essential proteome, and 218 active antibacterial compounds and 100 inactive compounds, respectively, pointing to widespread compound and protein promiscuity. We benchmark model performance by measuring enzymatic activity for 12 essential proteins treated with each antibacterial compound. We confirm extensive promiscuity, but find that the average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (auROC) is 0.48, indicating weak model performance. We demonstrate that rescoring of docking poses using machine learning‐based approaches improves model performance, resulting in average auROCs as large as 0.63, and that ensembles of rescoring functions improve prediction accuracy and the ratio of true‐positive rate to false‐positive rate. This work indicates that advances in modeling protein‐ligand interactions, particularly using machine learning‐based approaches, are needed to better harness AlphaFold2 for drug discovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Within the chemoinformatics space, there are advances in computationally modeling how small molecules and proteins interact via docking.157–159”
From Connecting metabolome and phenotype: recent advances in functional metabolomics tools for the identification of bioactive natural products (2024) · cites this paper as [158]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis
Pettersen, E. F., Goddard, T. D., Huang, C. C., Couch, G. S., Greenblatt, D. M., Meng, E. C., & Ferrin, T. E. (2004) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20084 · Cited by 45,882 · cited 3×
“We used a Python script that employs the DockPrep function from UCSF Chimera (Pettersen et al , 2004; Allen, 2018) to add hydrogens and partial charges.”
MethodHighly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · cited 8×
“This is consistent with previous assessments of AlphaFold’s fidelity to experimentally determined protein structures (Jumper et al , 2021) and suggests that the weak performance of our model arises from the docking method, and not the quality of protein structures.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialBerman, H. M. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · Cited by 40,196 · cited 9×
“As positive controls for our docking simulations, we re-docked 11 experimentally evidenced protein-ligand complexes from the RCSB Protein Data Bank (Dataset EV2).”
MethodInfluentialAutoDock Vina 1.2.0: New Docking Methods, Expanded Force Field, and Python Bindings
Eberhardt, J., Santos‐Martins, D., Tillack, A. F., & Forli, S. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00203 · Cited by 8,292 · cited 5×
“Different software for performing molecular docking are widely available and commonly used platforms include AutoDock Vina (Eberhardt et al , 2021 ) and DOCK (Allen et al , 2015 ).”
MethodInfluentialThe complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12.
Blattner, F., Plunkett, G., Bloch, C., Perna, N., Burland, V., Riley, M., Collado-Vides, J., Glasner, J. D., Rode, C., Mayhew, G., et al. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5331.1453 · Cited by 7,996 · cited 2×
“We shortlisted genes identified in at least two of these three studies, resulting in a total of 295 genes out of ∼ 4,000 total genes in E. coli (Blattner et al , 1997).”
MethodVaradi, M., Anyango, S., Deshpande, M., Nair, S., Natassia, C., Yordanova, G., Yuan, D., Stroe, O., Wood, G., Laydon, A., et al. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · Cited by 7,850 · cited 3×
“As shown in the workflow here, in order to leverage AlphaFold 2 for docking, we first downloaded all 296 AlphaFold 2 -predicted E. coli essential protein structures from the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database (Jumper et al , 2021 ; Varadi et al , 2022 ).”
InfluentialAccurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a 3-track network
Baek, M., DiMaio, F., Anishchenko, I., Dauparas, J., Ovchinnikov, S., Lee, G. R., Wang, J., Cong, Q., Kinch, L. N., Schaeffer, R. D., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.06.14.448402 · Cited by 5,549 · cited 2×
“The advent of AlphaFold2 and other deep neural networks for protein folding, such as RoseTTAFold (Baek et al , 2021; Humphreys et al , 2021), has been widely anticipated and celebrated in structural biology.”
BackgroundDocking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications
Kitchen, D. B., Decornez, H. Y., Furr, J. R., & Bajorath, J. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1549 · Cited by 4,354 · cited 1×
“Various approaches to identifying molecular drug targets have been developed, including those based on biochemical assays, genetic interactions, and molecular docking (Kitchen et al , 2004; Schenone et al , 2013).”
BackgroundMolecular Docking: A Powerful Approach for Structure-Based Drug Discovery
Meng, X.-Y., Zhang, H.-X., Mezei, M., & Cui, M. (2011) · Current Computer Aided-Drug Design · doi:10.2174/157340911795677602 · Cited by 3,771 · cited 1×
“Model predictions based on the following rescoring functions were ensembled in sequence: RF-Score, NNScore, PLEC score, and RF-Score-VS.”
MethodHighly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome
Tunyasuvunakool, K., Adler, J., Wu, Z., Green, T., Zielinski, M., Žídek, A., Bridgland, A., Cowie, A., Meyer, C., Laydon, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · Cited by 3,025
A Deep Learning Approach to Antibiotic Discovery
Stokes, J. M., Yang, K., Swanson, K., Jin, W., Cubillos-Ruiz, A., Donghia, N. M., MacNair, C. R., French, S., Carfrae, L. A., Bloom-Ackermann, Z., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.021 · Cited by 2,463 · cited 4×
“These genes were manually mapped to corresponding UniProt identifiers based on the E. coli K-12 reference proteome (UniProt: UP000000625) and used to obtain the corresponding AlphaFold2-predicted protein structures.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationDirectory of useful decoys, enhanced (DUD-E): better ligands and decoys for better benchmarking.
Mysinger, M. M., Carchia, M., Irwin, J. J., & Shoichet, B. K. (2012) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm300687e · Cited by 2,412 · cited 4×
“For each protein, the protein-averaged pLDDT value shown in Fig EV3 was calculated as the average pLDDT value across all residues.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions
Kuntz, I. D., Blaney, J. M., Oatley, S. J., Langridge, R., & Ferrin, T. E. (1982) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(82)90153-x · Cited by 2,287 · cited 2×
“Model predictions based on the following rescoring functions were ensembled in sequence: RF-Score, NNScore, PLEC score, and RF-Score-VS.”
BackgroundMethodTarget identification and mechanism of action in chemical biology and drug discovery
Schenone, M., Dančík, V., Wagner, B. K., & Clemons, P. A. (2013) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.1199 · Cited by 1,147 · cited 1×
“Various approaches to identifying molecular drug targets have been developed, including those based on biochemical assays, genetic interactions, and molecular docking (Kitchen et al , 2004; Schenone et al , 2013).”
BackgroundWang, R., Fang, X., Lu, Y., & Wang, S. (2004) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm030580l · Cited by 1,137
Ballester, P. J., & Mitchell, J. B. O. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq112 · Cited by 1,015 · cited 7×
“These assessments of model performance indicate that certain machine learning-based scoring functions improve prediction accuracy.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialUltra-large library docking for discovering new chemotypes
Lyu, J., Wang, S., Balius, T. E., Singh, I., Levit, A., Moroz, Y. S., O’Meara, M. J., Che, T., Algaa, E., Tolmachova, K., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0917-9 · Cited by 998 · cited 3×
“In view of these observations, it is important to note that docking has been widely used in “one target, many compounds” approaches to enrich for screening hits (Lyu et al , 2019; Bender et al , 2021).”
BackgroundMethodDOCK 6: Impact of new features and current docking performance
Allen, W. J., Balius, T. E., Mukherjee, S., Brozell, S. R., Moustakas, D. T., Lang, P. T., Case, D. A., Kuntz, I. D., & Rizzo, R. C. (2015) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.23905 · Cited by 870 · cited 6×
“These assessments of model performance indicate that certain machine learning-based scoring functions improve prediction accuracy.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe OxyS regulatory RNA represses rpoS translation and binds the Hfq (HF‐I) protein
Zhang, A., Altuvia, S., Tiwari, A., Argaman, L., Hengge‐Aronis, R., & Storz, G. (1998) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/17.20.6061 · Cited by 785
A practical guide to large-scale docking
Bender, B. J., Gahbauer, S., Luttens, A., Lyu, J., Webb, C. M., Stein, R. M., Fink, E. A., Balius, T. E., Carlsson, J., Irwin, J. J., et al. (2021) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-021-00597-z · Cited by 546 · cited 4×
“In view of these observations, it is important to note that docking has been widely used in “one target, many compounds” approaches to enrich for screening hits (Lyu et al , 2019; Bender et al , 2021).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialComputed structures of core eukaryotic protein complexes
Humphreys, I. R., Pei, J., Baek, M., Krishnakumar, A., Anishchenko, I., Ovchinnikov, S., Zhang, J., Ness, T. J., Banjade, S., Bagde, S. R., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abm4805 · Cited by 542 · cited 2×
“The advent of AlphaFold2 and other deep neural networks for protein folding, such as RoseTTAFold (Baek et al , 2021; Humphreys et al , 2021), has been widely anticipated and celebrated in structural biology.”
BackgroundDeep Docking: A Deep Learning Platform for Augmentation of Structure Based Drug Discovery
Gentile, F., Agrawal, V., Hsing, M., Ton, A., Ban, F., Norinder, U., Gleave, M. E., & Cherkasov, A. R. (2020) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.0c00229 · Cited by 478 · cited 2×
“Model predictions based on the following rescoring functions were ensembled in sequence: RF-Score, NNScore, PLEC score, and RF-Score-VS.”
BackgroundMethodBoosting docking-based virtual screening with deep learning.
Pereira, J. C., Caffarena, E. R., & dos Santos, C. N. (2016) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00355 · Cited by 395 · cited 6×
“Con-comitantly, limitations to the development of more accurate docking methods are the use of rigid protein docking in this and other benchmarking studies (Durrant et al , 2013; Pereira et al , 2016) and the scarcity of benchmarking datasets.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTopoisomerase IV is a target of quinolones in Escherichia coli.
Khodursky, A. B., Zechiedrich, L., & Cozzarelli, N. R. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.25.11801 · Cited by 379 · cited 2×
“…dnaE , rpoABCEZ , murA , and murF ) of the 12 essential proteins tested for the inclusive binding affinity threshold of − 5 kcal/mol and for 9 essential proteins ( gyrAB , dnaG , dnaB , ligA , rpoABCEZ , glmU , murA , murD , and murF ) for the stringent binding affinity threshold of − 7 kcal/mol…”
BackgroundPerformance of machine-learning scoring functions in structure-based virtual screening.
Wójcikowski, M., Ballester, P. J., & Siedlecki, P. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep46710 · Cited by 364 · cited 4×
“…in integrating machine learning with docking have resulted in machine learning-based scoring functions, and their use to rescore poses generated by other docking platforms (Ballester & Mitchell, 2010 ; Durrant & McCammon, 2010 ; Pereira et al , 2016 ; W (cid:2) ojcikowski et al , 2017 , 2019 ).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialStructural basis for altered activity of M‐ and H‐isozyme forms of human lactate dehydrogenase
Read, J. A., Winter, V. J., Eszes, C. M., Sessions, R. B., & Brady, R. L. (2001) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/1097-0134(20010501)43:2 · Cited by 350
The Essential Genome of Escherichia coli K-12
Goodall, E. C. A., Robinson, A., Johnston, I. G., Jabbari, S., Turner, K. A., Cunningham, A. F., Lund, P. A., Cole, J. A., & Henderson, I. R. (2018) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.02096-17 · Cited by 324 · cited 3×
“We used AutoDock Vina 1.2.0 (Eberhardt et al , 2021) to dock each of our 218 antibacterial compounds with each of the 296 essential E. coli proteins.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialChen, L., Cruz, A., Ramsey, S., Dickson, C. J., Duca, J. S., Horn̆ák, V., Koes, D. R., & Kurtzman, T. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220113 · Cited by 299 · cited 2×
“Model predictions based on the following rescoring functions were ensembled in sequence: RF-Score, NNScore, PLEC score, and RF-Score-VS.”
BackgroundMethodDurrant, J. D., & McCammon, J. A. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci100244v · Cited by 261 · cited 12×
“…RF-Score (Ballester & Mitchell, 2010), RF-Score-VS (W (cid:2) ojcikowski et al , 2017), PLEC score (W (cid:2) ojcikowski et al , 2019), and NNScore (Durrant & McCammon, 2010) — we found improvements in performance, as measured by the auROC, with three of the four scoring functions (RF-Score,…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLi, H., Leung, K., Wong, M., & Ballester, P. J. (2015) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201400132 · Cited by 252
Multidrug binding properties of the AcrB efflux pump characterized by molecular dynamics simulations
Vargiu, A. V., & Nikaido, H. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1218348109 · Cited by 232 · cited 2×
“Long molecular dynamics simulations that focus on a specific protein of interest could account for protein conformational changes that, in certain cases like AcrB, might be important for ligand binding (Vargiu & Nikaido, 2012).”
BackgroundMethodMachine learning classification can reduce false positives in structure-based virtual screening
Adeshina, Y. O., Deeds, E. J., & Karanicolas, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2000585117 · Cited by 226 · cited 2×
“As computational docking approaches are known to predict many false positives (Adeshina et al , 2020), the predicted protein-ligand interactions could be experimentally interrogated, in part, using biochemical assays that measure enzymatic activity, with binding interactions supported by enzymatic…”
Open Drug Discovery Toolkit (ODDT): a new open-source player in the drug discovery field
Wójcikowski, M., Zielenkiewicz, P., & Siedlecki, P. S. (2015) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-015-0078-2 · Cited by 220
Genome-wide CRISPR-dCas9 screens in E. coli identify essential genes and phage host factors
Rousset, F., Cui, L., Siouve, E., Bécavin, C., Depardieu, F., & Bikard, D. (2018) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007749 · Cited by 214 · cited 3×
“Essential genes in E. coli were compiled from previous studies based on transposon-directed insertion site sequencing (Goodall et al , 2018) and CRISPR interference screening (Rousset et al , 2018, 2021).”
BackgroundMethodProfiling of β-Lactam Selectivity for Penicillin-Binding Proteins in Escherichia coli Strain DC2
Kocaoglu, O., & Carlson, E. E. (2015) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.04552-14 · Cited by 180
Wójcikowski, M., Kukiełka, M., Stepniewska-Dziubinska, M. M., & Siedlecki, P. S. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty757 · Cited by 167 · cited 6×
“The mean predicted local distance difference test (pLDDT) value of each protein was extracted and calculated from the B-factor column containing the pLDDT value per atom and per residue (Tunyasuvunakool et al , 2021).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialUsing reverse docking for target identification and its applications for drug discovery
Lee, A., Lee, K., & Kim, D. (2016) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2016.1190706 · Cited by 151 · cited 2×
“Although versatile, reverse docking requires a priori knowledge of the protein structures of interest, and its application to drug-target identification has been limited by the number and quality of target protein structures (Chen & Zhi, 2001; Kharkar et al , 2014; Lee et al , 2016).”
BackgroundReverse Docking: A Powerful Tool for Drug Repositioning and Drug Rescue
Kharkar, P. S., Warrier, S. B., & Gaud, R. S. (2014) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc.13.207 · Cited by 150 · cited 2×
“Although versatile, reverse docking requires a priori knowledge of the protein structures of interest, and its application to drug-target identification has been limited by the number and quality of target protein structures (Chen & Zhi, 2001; Kharkar et al , 2014; Lee et al , 2016).”
BackgroundComparing AutoDock and Vina in Ligand/Decoy Discrimination for Virtual Screening
Vieira, T. F., & Sousa, S. F. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9214538 · Cited by 150 · cited 1×
“We proceeded to dock all 218 active compounds against the 296 AlphaFold2-predicted essential protein structures using Auto-Dock Vina, a widely used and benchmarked open-source program for docking (Pereira et al , 2016; Vieira & Sousa, 2019; Eberhardt et al , 2021; Fig EV1).”
MethodThe impact of genetic diversity on gene essentiality within the Escherichia coli species
Rousset, F., Cabezas-Caballero, J., Piastra-Facon, F., Fernández-Rodríguez, J., Clermont, O., Denamur, É., Rocha, E. P. C., & Bikard, D. (2021) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-020-00839-y · Cited by 140 · cited 2×
“Essential genes in E. coli were compiled from previous studies based on transposon-directed insertion site sequencing (Goodall et al , 2018) and CRISPR interference screening (Rousset et al , 2018, 2021).”
BackgroundMethodTiwari, R., Mahasenan, K. V., Pavlovicz, R. E., Li, C., & Tjarks, W. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci900031y · Cited by 122 · cited 2×
“To enable docking of this compound, we replaced its boron atom with a carbon atom, as is often done in molecular docking (Tiwari et al , 2009).”
BackgroundMethodCytoplasmic condensation induced by membrane damage is associated with antibiotic lethality
Wong, F. J., Stokes, J. M., Cervantes, B., Penkov, S., Friedrichs, J., Renner, L. D., & Collins, J. J. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22485-6 · Cited by 118 · cited 1×
“Similar to previous work determining growth inhibition (Stokes et al , 2020; Wong et al , 2021a, 2021b), E. coli BW25113 was grown overnight in liquid LB medium in 14 ml Falcon tubes at 37 ° C with shaking at 300 rpm in a light-protected incubator, then diluted 1:10,000 in fresh liquid LB, and…”
ResultSelf-citationEDock: blind protein–ligand docking by replica-exchange monte carlo simulation
Zhang, W., Bell, E. W., Yin, M., & Zhang, Y. (2020) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-020-00440-9 · Cited by 103 · cited 1×
“The binding affinity ( pK d ) predictions generated by all rescoring methods are reported in Dataset EV5.”
MethodEquiBind: Geometric Deep Learning for Drug Binding Structure PredictionPreprint
Stärk, H., Ganea, O.-E., Pattanaik, L., Barzilay, R., & Jaakkola, T. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.05146 · Cited by 92 · cited 1×
“Model predictions based on the following rescoring functions were ensembled in sequence: RF-Score, NNScore, PLEC score, and RF-Score-VS.”
MethodSelf-citationAutoGridFR: Improvements on AutoDock Affinity Maps and Associated Software Tools
Zhang, Y., Forli, S., Omelchenko, A., & Sanner, M. F. (2019) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.26054 · Cited by 88 · cited 3×
“The predicted binding pose of each complex was superimposed with the experimentally determined structure using PyMol.”
MethodInfluentialWhat does AlphaFold mean for drug discovery?
Mullard, A. (2021) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/d41573-021-00161-0 · Cited by 76 · cited 4×
“A clear limitation to AlphaFold2 is that it is unable to distinguish between the active and inactive conformations of a protein (Mullard, 2021).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDurrant, J. D., Friedman, A. J., Rogers, K. E., & McCammon, J. A. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci400042y · Cited by 55 · cited 3×
“…AutoDock Vina, DOCK6, Schro¨dinger’s Glide, Surflex, and internal coordinate mechanics (ICM) have shown that performance is similar on the directory of useful decoys (DUD) dataset (Durrant et al , 2013; Pereira et al , 2016), suggesting that our findings do not depend on the docking software used.”
BackgroundMethodPharmacophore-Based Similarity Scoring for DOCK
Jiang, L., & Rizzo, R. C. (2014) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp506555w · Cited by 53 · cited 1×
“The binding affinity ( pK d ) predictions generated by all rescoring methods are reported in Dataset EV5.”
MethodUnderstanding Beta-Lactam-Induced Lysis at the Single-Cell Level
Wong, F. J., Wilson, S., Helbig, R., Hegde, S., Aftenieva, O., Zheng, H., Liu, C., Piližota, T., Garner, E. C., Amir, A., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.712007 · Cited by 40
Self-citationDrug design : cutting edge approaches
Flower, D. R. (2002) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · Cited by 36
(2007) · Special publication - Royal Society of Chemistry/Special publication · doi:10.1039/9781847550705 · Cited by 7
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Computational approaches streamlining drug discovery
Sadybekov, A., & Katritch, V. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05905-z · Cited by 1,424
“…targets lacking experimental structures, especially for target classes with less obvious structural homologies in the ligand-binding pocket, the performance of AlphaFold2 models in small-molecule docking showed disappointing results in recent assessments for GPCR and antibacterial targets 107,108 .”
BackgroundAlphaFold2 and its applications in the fields of biology and medicine
Yang, Z., Zeng, X., Zhao, Y. C., & Chen, R. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01381-z · Cited by 655
“Wong et al. 102 combined molecular docking simulations with AF2 for protein-ligand interactions prediction.”
BackgroundDiscovery of a structural class of antibiotics with explainable deep learning
Wong, F. J., Zheng, E. J., Valeri, J. A., Donghia, N. M., Anahtar, M. N., Omori, S., Li, A., Cubillos-Ruiz, A., Krishnan, A., Jin, W., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06887-8 · Cited by 530
Self-citationClustering predicted structures at the scale of the known protein universe
Barrio-Hernandez, I., Yeo, J., Jänes, J., Mirdita, M., Gilchrist, C. L. M., Wein, T., Varadi, M., Velankar, S., Beltrao, P., & Steinegger, M. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06510-w · Cited by 362
Leveraging artificial intelligence in the fight against infectious diseases
Wong, F. J., de la Fuente‐Núñez, C., & Collins, J. J. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adh1114 · Cited by 331
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wong, F., Krishnan, A., Zheng, E. J., Stärk, H., Manson, A. L., Earl, A. M., Jaakkola, T., & Collins, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Broad Institute (US)
- MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Collins, James J
- ORCID
- Venue
- Molecular Systems Biology
- Published
- 2022-09-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e11081-e11081
- ISSN
- 1744-4292 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9446081
- OpenAlex
- W4294719209
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 61 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 8
- FWCI
- 30.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Molecular Systems Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
- Flu Lab, LLC
- HHS¦NIH¦National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19AI110818, R01‐AI146194)
- HHS¦NIH¦National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P41‐GM103311)
- James S. McDonnell Foundation
- Rosamund Zander and Hansjorg Wyss
- Sea Grape Foundation
- Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF_ 203071)
- The Audacious Project
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Keywords
- AlphaFold2, molecular docking, protein-ligand interactions, antibiotic discovery, antibacterial agents, machine learning, drug target prediction, benchmarking
- MeSH terms
- Anti-Bacterial Agents, Ligands, Protein Binding, Proteins, Benchmarking, Molecular Docking Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review