Cited by 311Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structureRace, Genetics, and Society

Population Genetics Models of Local Ancestry

Open access
Gravel, Simon·2012·Genetics

Abstract

Migrations have played an important role in shaping the genetic diversity of human populations. Understanding genomic data thus requires careful modeling of historical gene flow. Here we consider the effect of relatively recent population structure and gene flow and interpret genomes of individuals that have ancestry from multiple source populations as mosaics of segments originating from each population. This article describes general and tractable models for local ancestry patterns with a focus on the length distribution of continuous ancestry tracts and the variance in total ancestry proportions among individuals. The models offer improved agreement with Wright–Fisher simulation data when compared to the state-of-the art and can be used to infer time-dependent migration rates from multiple populations. Considering HapMap African-American (ASW) data, we find that a model with two distinct phases of “European” gene flow significantly improves the modeling of both tract lengths and ancestry variances.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1534/genetics.112.139808

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both the paper's ancestry segments and prior results supported a model with an earlier date of Native American admixture.

    “Both our ancestry segments and prior results supported a model with an earlier date of Native American admixture.25,47”

    From The genetic ancestry of African Americans, Latinos, and European Americans across the United States (2015) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Abstract describes Native American ancestry as an example of a source-population label, but does not date Native American admixture. The Tract lengths section tests admixture models in African-American samples using European and West African reference panels; it does not report prior results supporting an earlier date of Native American admixture. Searches for that date and for Native American admixture timing found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Bercovici, S., and D. Geiger, 2009 Inferring ancestries efficiently in admixed populations with linkage disequilibrium. J. Comput. Biol. 16(8): 1141-1150.
  2. Bhatia, G., N. Patterson, B. Pasaniuc, N. Zaitlen, G. Genovese et al., 2011 Genome-wide comparison of African-ancestry popula- tions from CARe and other cohorts reveals signals of natural selection. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 89(3): 368-381.
  3. Brisbin, A., 2010 Linkage analysis for categorical traits and ancestry assignment in admixed individuals. Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell Uni- versity, Ithaca, NY.
  4. Ewens, W. J., and R. S. Spielman, 1995 The transmission/disequi- librium test: history, subdivision, and admixture. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 57(2): 455-464.
  5. Gravel, S., B. M. Henn, R. N. Gutenkunst, A. R. Indap, G. T. Marth et al., 2011 Demographic history and rare allele sharing among human populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 (29): 11983-11988.
  6. Griffiths, R. C., and P. Marjoram, 1996 Ancestral inference from samples of DNA sequences with recombination. J. Comput. Biol. 3(4): 479-502.
  7. Henn, B. M., L. R. Botigué, S. Gravel, W. Wang, A. Brisbin et al., 2012 Genomic ancestry of North Africans supports back-to- Africa migrations. PLoS Genet. 8(1): e1002397.
  8. Myers, S., C. Fefferman, and N. Patterson, 2008 Can one learn history from the allelic spectrum? Theor. Popul. Biol. 73(3): 342-348.
  9. Patterson, N., N. Hattangadi, B. Lane, K. E. Lohmueller, D. A. Hafler et al., 2004 Methods for high-density admixture mapping of disease genes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 74(5): 979-1000.
  10. Price, A. L., A. Tandon, N. Patterson, K. C. Barnes, N. Rafaels et al., 2009 Sensitive detection of chromosomal segments of distinct ancestry in admixed populations. PLoS Genet. 5(6): e1000519.
  11. Sankararaman, S., S. Sridhar, G. Kimmel, and E. Halperin, 2008 Estimating local ancestry in admixed populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 82(2): 290-303.
  12. Seldin, M. F., B. Pasaniuc, and A. L. Price, 2011 New approaches to disease mapping in admixed populations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12 (8): 523-528.
  13. Stewart, W., 1994 Introduction to the Numerical Solution of Mar- kov Chains, Vol. 41. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  14. Tang, H., M. Coram, P. Wang, X. Zhu, and N. Risch, 2006 Reconstructing genetic ancestry blocks in admixed indi- viduals. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 79(1): 1-12.
  15. Tang, H., S. Choudhry, R. Mei, M. Morgan, W. Rodriguez-Cintron et al., 2007 Recent genetic selection in the ancestral admixture of Puerto Ricans. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81(3): 626-633.
  16. Ungerer, M. C., S. J. Baird, J. Pan, and L. H. Rieseberg, 1998 Rapid hybrid speciation in wild sunflowers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95(20): 11757-11762.
  17. Wegmann, D., D. E. Kessner, K. R. Veeramah, R. A. Mathias, D. L. Nicolae et al., 2011 Recombination rates in admixed individu- als identified by ancestry-based inference. Nat. Genet. 43(9): 847-853.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gravel, S.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Gravel, Simon
Venue
Genetics
Published
2012-06-01
Volume
191
Issue
2
Pages
607-619
ISSN
  • 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2631
OpenAlex
W2154940281
Cited by
311
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 5
FWCI
11.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U01HG005715)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM090087)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
Keywords
local ancestry, population structure, gene flow, migration rate, population genetic models
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Black or African American, Computer Simulation, Humans, Models, Genetic, Population Dynamics, White People, Gene Flow, HapMap Project

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review