The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genomic Variation in Natural Populations of Drosophila melanogaster
Open accessAbstract
This report of independent genome sequences of two natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster (37 from North America and 6 from Africa) provides unique insight into forces shaping genomic polymorphism and divergence. Evidence of interactions between natural selection and genetic linkage is abundant not only in centromere- and telomere-proximal regions, but also throughout the euchromatic arms. Linkage disequilibrium, which decays within 1 kbp, exhibits a strong bias toward coupling of the more frequent alleles and provides a high-resolution map of recombination rate. The juxtaposition of population genetics statistics in small genomic windows with gene structures and chromatin states yields a rich, high-resolution annotation, including the following: (1) 5′- and 3′-UTRs are enriched for regions of reduced polymorphism relative to lineage-specific divergence; (2) exons overlap with windows of excess relative polymorphism; (3) epigenetic marks associated with active transcription initiation sites overlap with regions of reduced relative polymorphism and relatively reduced estimates of the rate of recombination; (4) the rate of adaptive nonsynonymous fixation increases with the rate of crossing over per base pair; and (5) both duplications and deletions are enriched near origins of replication and their density correlates negatively with the rate of crossing over. Available demographic models of X and autosome descent cannot account for the increased divergence on the X and loss of diversity associated with the out-of-Africa migration. Comparison of the variation among these genomes to variation among genomes from D. simulans suggests that many targets of directional selection are shared between these species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features
Quinlan, A. R., & Hall, I. M. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 · Cited by 27,437
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency
Benjamini, Y., & Yekutieli, D. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013699998 · Cited by 10,490
<tt>BLAT</tt> —The <tt>BLAST</tt> -Like Alignment Tool
Kent, W. J. (2002) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.229202 · Cited by 8,480
Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. II. Error Probabilities
Ewing, B., & Green, P. (1998) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.8.3.186 · Cited by 5,439
Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry
Bentley, D. R., Balasubramanian, S., Swerdlow, H. P., Smith, G. P., Milton, J., Brown, C. G., Hall, K. P., Evers, D. J., Barnes, C. L., Bignell, H. R., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07517 · Cited by 3,684
Self-citationThe hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene
Smith, J. M., & Haigh, J. (1974) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672300014634 · Cited by 3,415
Inference of human population history from individual whole-genome sequences
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10231 · Cited by 2,590
Lee, J. A., Carvalho, C. M. B., & Lupski, J. R. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.037 · Cited by 914
Drive Against Hotspot Motifs in Primates Implicates the PRDM9 Gene in Meiotic Recombination
Myers, S., Bowden, R., Tumian, A., Bontrop, R. E., Freeman, C., MacFie, T. S., McVean, G., & Donnelly, P. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1182363 · Cited by 683
Cited by
Genomic signatures of selection at linked sites: unifying the disparity among species
Cutter, A. D., & Payseur, B. A. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3425 · Cited by 461
Pool, J. E., Corbett-Detig, R. B., Sugino, R. P., Stevens, K. A., Cardeno, C. M., Crepeau, M. W., Duchen, P., Emerson, J. J., Saelao, P., Begun, D. J., et al. (2012) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003080 · Cited by 316
Self-citationNew Gene Evolution: Little Did We Know
Long, M., VanKuren, N. W., Chen, S., & Vibranovski, M. D. (2013) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-111212-133301 · Cited by 307
Genome-Wide Fine-Scale Recombination Rate Variation in Drosophila melanogaster
Chan, A. H., Jenkins, P. A., & Song, Y. S. (2012) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003090 · Cited by 290
Self-citationGagnaire, P., Broquet, T., Aurelle, D., Viard, F., Souissi, A., Bonhomme, F., Arnaud‐Haond, S., & Bierne, N. (2015) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.12288 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Langley, C. H., Stevens, K., Cardeno, C., Lee, Y. C. G., Schrider, D. R., Pool, J. E., Langley, S. A., Suarez, C., Corbett-Detig, R. B., Kolaczkowski, B., Fang, S., Nista, P. M., Holloway, A. K., Kern, A. D., Dewey, C. N., Song, Y. S., Hahn, M. W., & Begun, D. J.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-10-01
- Volume
- 192
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 533-598
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2138007075
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 20.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomic Variation in Natural Populations of Drosophila melanogaster. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1534/genetics.112.142018
- The paper
- Langley, C. H., Stevens, K., Cardeno, C., Lee, Y. C. G., Schrider, D. R., Pool, J. E., Langley, S. A., Suarez, C., Corbett-Detig, R. B., Kolaczkowski, B., Fang, S., Nista, P. M., Holloway, A. K., Kern, A. D., Dewey, C. N., Song, Y. S., Hahn, M. W., & Begun, D. J. (2012). Genomic Variation in Natural Populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.112.142018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.