Cited by 21Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesAncient Mediterranean Archaeology and HistoryBiblical Studies and Interpretation

Radiocarbon dating the Late Bronze Age: Cultural and Historical Considerations on Megiddo and Beyond

Martin, Mario A. S., Finkelstein, Israel, Piasetzky, Eli·2020·Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research

Abstract

Megiddo, with its tight stratigraphy and well-controlled ceramic typology, yielded more than half of the radiocarbon determinations for the time span of the Middle Bronze II to the Iron I in the southern Levant. Here we present two radiocarbon models for this entire sequence, focusing on the Late Bronze Age—1) for Megiddo; 2) for Megiddo and Beth-Shean—adding a third model for sites which provide results relevant to the Middle Bronze III/Late Bronze I transition. We then discuss the impact of the results on the material culture and history of Megiddo in particular and the southern Levant (and eastern Mediterranean) in general.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/709576

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The three Megiddo outliers were found in close proximity to each other at Level K-10, which is radiocarbon dated to 1581-1545 BCE (domestic occupation) and 1578-1421 BCE (burials; both ±1σ), while the bone of one of the three (I10100) was directly dated (1688-1535 BCE, ±2σ).

    “The three were found in close proximity to each other at Level K-10, which is radiocarbon dated to 1581–1545 BCE (domestic occupation) and 1578–1421 BCE (burials; both ±1σ) (Martin et al., 2020; Toffolo et al., 2014), while the bone of one of the three (I10100) was directly dated (1688–1535 BCE, ±2σ).”

    From The Genomic History of the Bronze Age Southern Levant (2020) · cites this paper as Martin et al., 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin, M. A. S., Finkelstein, I., & Piasetzky, E.
Venue
Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research
Published
2020-11-01
Volume
384
Pages
211-240
ISSN
  • 0003-097X (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-8062
OpenAlex
W3042611917
Cited by
20
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Keywords
Late Bronze Age, Megiddo, Beth Shean, radiocarbon chronology, Southern Levant, ceramic typology, stratigraphy, Eastern Mediterranean

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review