Cited by 88Impact of Technology on AdolescentsGambling Behavior and TreatmentsDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Excessive social media users demonstrate impaired decision making in the Iowa Gambling Task

Open access
Meshi, Dar, Elizarova, Anastassia, Bender, Andrew, Verdejo-Garcia, Antonio·2019·Journal of Behavioral Addictions

Abstract

Background and aims: Online social networking sites (SNSs) like Facebook provide users with myriad social rewards. These social rewards bring users back to SNSs repeatedly, with some users displaying maladaptive, excessive SNS use. Symptoms of this excessive SNS use are similar to symptoms of substance use and behavioral addictive disorders. Importantly, individuals with substance use and behavioral addictive disorders have difficulty making value-based decisions, as demonstrated with paradigms like the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT); however, it is currently unknown if excessive SNS users display the same decision-making deficits. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between excessive SNS use and IGT performance. Methods: We administered the Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale (BFAS) to 71 participants to assess their maladaptive use of the Facebook SNS. We next had them perform 100 trials of the IGT to assess their value-based decision making. Results: We found a negative correlation between BFAS score and performance in the IGT across participants, specifically over the last block of 20 trials. There were no correlations between BFAS score and IGT performance in earlier blocks of trials. Discussion: Our results demonstrate that more severe, excessive SNS use is associated with more deficient value-based decision making. In particular, our results indicate that excessive SNS users may make more risky decisions during the IGT task. Conclusion: This result further supports a parallel between individuals with problematic, excessive SNS use, and individuals with substance use and behavioral addictive disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1556/2006.7.2018.138

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social media addiction was linked to impaired decision-making and increased impulsivity, further highlighting its potential to disrupt executive functioning in youth.

    “Moreover, found that social media addiction was linked to impaired decision-making and increased impulsivity, further highlighting its potential to disrupt executive functioning in youth [21, 34].”

    From Impact of social media on cognitive development of children and young adults: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Abstract (Results and Discussion; page unavailable) links higher Facebook-addiction scores to poorer Iowa Gambling Task performance, supporting the impaired decision-making portion. The Discussion (page unavailable) says the task might assess impulsivity rather than risky decision-making, but does not establish increased impulsivity as a separate finding. Participants were 18–35 years old, so the study does not establish a disruption of executive functioning in youth generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A negative correlation between social media use and reward self-control has been observed, indicating that higher levels of social media engagement were associated with weaker self-control abilities.

    “Similarly, a negative correlation between social media use and reward self-control has been observed, indicating that higher levels of social media engagement were associated with weaker self-control abilities (Meshi et al., 2019).”

    From The impact of digital technology, social media, and artificial intelligence on cognitive functions: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Meshi et al., 2019

    The Results report a negative correlation between excessive Facebook use (BFAS score) and Iowa Gambling Task performance, but only in the final 20 trials. The Methods identify the task as a measure of value-based decision making, not reward self-control; BFAS measures excessive use rather than social media engagement generally. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Both Reed (2023) and Meshi et al. (2019) correlated PSMU with risky decisions on the IGT, while Meshi et al. (2019) found no such relationship during the BART.

    “Both Reed (2023) and Meshi et al. (2019) correlated PSMU with risky decisions on the IGT, while Meshi et al. (2019) found no such relationship during the BART.”

    From Problematic social media use and inhibitory control among post-secondary students (2025) · cites this paper as Meshi et al., 2019

    The Results report a significant correlation between excessive Facebook use and poorer IGT performance, but only in the final 20 trials. The Methods describe IGT testing, and our copy provides no BART results; it therefore does not support the claimed absence of a BART relationship. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Excessive social media use was associated with impaired decision-making skills.

    “Additionally, reported that excessive social media use was associated with impaired decision-making skills [21].”
  • Previous studies showed some evidence for impulsivity in excessive social media users.

    “Previous studies showed some evidence for impulsivity in excessive social media users ( 11 , 12 ).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meshi, D., Elizarova, A., Bender, A., & Verdejo-Garcia, A.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
  • 5 School of Psychological Sciences, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Corresponding author
Meshi, Dar
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Addictions
Published
2019-01-09
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
169-173
ISSN
  • 2062-5871 (ISSN-L)
  • 2063-5303
OpenAlex
W2910141392
Cited by
88
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 2
FWCI
21.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral Addictions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
excessive social media use, Facebook addiction, Iowa Gambling Task, value-based decision making, risky decision making, Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale, behavioral addiction, substance use disorders, social networking sites
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Risk-Taking, Behavior, Addictive, Young Adult, Social Networking, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review