Cited by 322Impact of Technology on AdolescentsDigital Media and PhilosophyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The Emerging Neuroscience of Social Media

Meshi, Dar, Tamir, Diana I., Heekeren, Hauke R.·2015·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Social media use is a global phenomenon, with almost two billion people worldwide regularly using these websites. As Internet access around the world increases, so will the number of social media users. Neuroscientists can capitalize on the ubiquity of social media use to gain novel insights about social cognitive processes and the neural systems that support them. This review outlines social motives that drive people to use social media, proposes neural systems supporting social media use, and describes approaches neuroscientists can use to conduct research with social media. We close by noting important directions and ethical considerations of future research with social media.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2015.09.004

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social media and its algorithms are successful because they build on ancient human needs for connection and status.

    “Social media and its algorithms are so successful because they build on ancient human needs for connection and status”

    From Social Drivers and Algorithmic Mechanisms on Digital Media. (2024) · cites this paper as Meshi et al., 2015

  • Connection and status motives strongly shape social interaction and interaction with algorithms on digital media.

    “Connection and status motives also strongly shape social interaction and interaction with algorithms on digital media (Eslinger et al., 2021; Meshi et al., 2015).”

    From Social Drivers and Algorithmic Mechanisms on Digital Media. (2024) · cites this paper as Meshi et al., 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bercovici, 2010, Who coined ‘social media’? Web pioneers compete for credit, Forbes

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meshi, D., Tamir, D. I., & Heekeren, H. R.
Affiliations
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Meshi, Dar
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
19
Issue
12
Pages
771-782
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2177056054
Cited by
322
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
social media use, social cognition, social motives, research ethics
MeSH terms
Brain, Cognition, Humans, Models, Neurological, Neurosciences, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review