Cited by 41Impact of Technology on AdolescentsGambling Behavior and TreatmentsSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Problematic Social Media Use and Impulsivity

Lewin, Kaitlin M., Kaur, Ardaman, Meshi, Dar·2023·Current Addiction Reports

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40429-023-00495-2

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Impulsivity can be broken down into facets of motor impulsivity and cognitive impulsivity.

    “Impulsivity can be further broken down into facets of motor impulsivity and cognitive impulsivity.”

    From Problematic social media use and inhibitory control among post-secondary students (2025) · cites this paper as Lewin et al., 2023

  • A lack of inhibitory control is closely related to impulsivity, which can include a lack of planning and careless decision-making.

    “A lack of inhibitory control is closely related to the concept of impulsivity, which can include a lack of planning and careless decision-making (Lewin et al., 2023).”

    From Problematic social media use and inhibitory control among post-secondary students (2025) · cites this paper as Lewin et al., 2023

  • Facets of cognitive impulsivity rather than motor impulsivity appear most relevant to PSMU and online behaviors such as social comparison.

    “Facets of cognitive impulsivity rather than motor impulsivity appear most relevant to PSMU and online behaviors such as social comparison (Lewin et al., 2023).”

    From Problematic social media use and inhibitory control among post-secondary students (2025) · cites this paper as Lewin et al., 2023

  • The unique relationship between negative social comparison and PSMU may explain the disparate findings regarding PSMU and inhibitory control, because impulsivity has largely been studied in isolation from online behaviors.

    “This unique relationship may explain the disparate findings regarding PSMU and inhibitory control, as impulsivity has been largely studied in isolation of online behaviors (Lewin et al., 2023).”

    From Problematic social media use and inhibitory control among post-secondary students (2025) · cites this paper as Lewin et al., 2023

  • The lack of significant Go-Nogo results supports growing evidence that cognitive impulsivity, rather than motor impulsivity, is more relevant to PSMU.

    “While task sensitivity is important to consider, a lack of significant Go-Nogo results does support growing evidence that cognitive impulsivity (rather than motor) is more relevant to PSMU (Lewin et al., 2023).”

    From Problematic social media use and inhibitory control among post-secondary students (2025) · cites this paper as Lewin et al., 2023

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lewin, K. M., Kaur, A., & Meshi, D.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Meshi, Dar
Venue
Current Addiction Reports
Published
2023-05-25
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
553-562
ISSN
2196-2952 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4378216561
Cited by
41
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 4
FWCI
14.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Addiction Reports (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
social media addiction, impulsivity, attentional impulsivity, impulsive choice, behavioral tasks, survey measures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review