A Social Media Study on the Effects of Psychiatric Medication Use
Open accessAbstract
Understanding the effects of psychiatric medications during mental health treatment constitutes an active area of inquiry. While clinical trials help evaluate the effects of these medications, many trials suffer from a lack of generalizability to broader populations. We leverage social media data to examine psychopathological effects subject to self-reported usage of psychiatric medication. Using a list of common approved and regulated psychiatric drugs and a Twitter dataset of 300M posts from 30K individuals, we develop machine learning models to first assess effects relating to mood, cognition, depression, anxiety, psychosis, and suicidal ideation. Then, based on a stratified propensity score based causal analysis, we observe that use of specific drugs are associated with characteristic changes in an individual’s psychopathology. We situate these observations in the psychiatry literature, with a deeper analysis of pre-treatment cues that predict treatment outcomes. Our work bears potential to inspire novel clinical investigations and to build tools for digital therapeutics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 51 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Drug effectiveness is associated with individuals' psycholinguistic attributes on social media.
“Studying the individual-specific outcomes, our analyses help associate drug effectiveness with individuals’ psycholinguistic attributes on social media.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There are varying effects both within and between drug families on psychopathological symptoms including depression, anxiety, psychosis, and suicidal ideation.
“We find varying effects both within and between the drug families on psychopathological symptoms (depression, anxiety, psychosis, and suicidal ideation).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Use of specific psychiatric drugs is associated with characteristic changes in an individual's psychopathology, based on a stratified propensity score causal analysis.
“Then, based on a stratified propensity score based causal analysis, we observe that use of specific drugs are associated with characteristic changes in an individual’s psychopathology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For most of these top medications, the likelihood of positive affect and cognition decreased.
“However, that the likelihood of positive affect and cognition also decrease for most of these medications”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Relative Treatment Effect across outcomes averages at 1.28 with a standard deviation of 0.61.
“We find that the RTE across the outcomes averages at 1.28 (stdev=0.61).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
Drugs with similar pharmacological composition, such as Escitalopram and Citalopram, and Desvenlafaxine and Venlafaxine, show similar trends in symptomatic outcomes.
“We also observe that those drugs with similar pharmacological composition, such as Escitalopram and Citalopram, and Desvenlafaxine and Venlafaxine show similar trends in the symptomatic outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The higher strata included users who typically showed lower affect and cognition than the rest.
“The higher strata included users who typically showed lower affect and cognition than the rest (see Figure 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The propensity score model distributed users such that those with a greater tendency to use affective and cognitive words mostly occur in the lower and middle strata, whereas those with a lower tendency predominantly occur in the higher strata.
“The propensity score model distributed these users in such a way that the users with a greater tendency to use affective and cognitive words mostly occur in the lower and middle strata, whereas those with a lower tendency to use these words predominantly occur in the higher strata.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The magnitude of Cohen's d averages at 0.75.
“We find that the magnitude of Cohen’s d averages at 0.75 (see Figure 5a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For most top medications and drug families, the likelihood of negative affect increased.
“Figure 6 and Table 4 together indicate that the top medications and families are associated with an increase in the likelihood of negative affect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
SSRIs rank highest in the distribution of the top 20 drugs in the dataset.
“We find that SSRIs (eg. Sertraline, Escitalopram, Fluoxetine) rank highest in the distribution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Symptoms improved for TCAs including Dosulepin, Imipramine, and Clomipramine.
“On the other hand, we find improving symptoms in TCAs such as Dosulepin, Imipramine, and Clomipramine.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fluoxetine had improving effects in some lower-valued strata.
“In contrast, Fluoxetine showed improving effects in a few lower valued strata.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Duloxetine was associated with positive symptomatic outcomes.
“Duloxetine was associated with positive symptomatic outcomes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cipriani et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
For SSRIs, more than 90% of users belonged to strata with higher anxiety and suicidal ideation.
“In fact, our dataset reveals that within SSRIs, over 90% of the users were in strata that showed increased anxiety and suicidal ideation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Sertraline shows the opposite effect in individuals with greater usage of cognitive words.
“but Sertraline shows the opposite effect in them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Antidepressant effects varied across individuals in different strata.
“that these antidepressants have varying effects on individuals across strata finds support in clinical trials which report varying efficacy of antidepressants on different cohorts (Coupland et al. 2011)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Coupland et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Sertraline had poor outcomes for people with depression-like attributes.
“Sertraline showed poor effects for individuals exhibiting attributes of depression”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For most medications, self-reported use was linked to worsening in depression, anxiety, psychosis, and suicidal ideation.
“We observe that reported use of most of the medications are associated with worsening of these outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Our results showed TCAs had the best responses relative to other antidepressant classes.
“our results demonstrate their effectiveness with the most favorable responses reported, compared to the other classes of anti-depressants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Signals of mental health before treatment seem linked to, or predictive of, whether a drug works for an individual.
“Our analysis of individual treatment effects shows that the pre-treatment signals of mental health states appear to be linked to or predictive of individual drug success”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For Duloxetine, effects were minimal in the middle region, the high-cognition stratum.
“For example, in case of Duloxetine, we find minimal effects in the middle region, the one that showed high cognition (Figure 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After taking drugs, people's online behavior shifts in some surprising ways that may not match the drugs' listed side effects.
“our empirical findings include the discovery that people’s online behaviors change in some unexpected ways following drug intake, and these may differ from the named side-effects of these drugs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Escitalopram and Duloxetine worked better for people with more pre-occupation and less social integration.
“In contrast, Escitalopram and Duloxetine shows better efficacy in those individuals who have greater pre-occupation and lower social integration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Antidepressants had only a minor effect on cognitive symptoms.
“Figure 6 indicates a small impact of antidepressants on cognitive symptoms”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rosenblat et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The findings suggest that when people self-report using these drugs, those with lower affective expressiveness and cognitive processing tend to show ineffective or worsening outcomes.
“Together, our findings suggest that the self-reported use of these medications is associated with ineffective (or worsening) effects on individuals with lower affective expressiveness and cognitive processing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Frustration with treatment and side effects often causes treatment discontinuation.
“Un-surprisingly, frustration with treatment and side effects often causes treatment discontinuation (Bull et al. 2002).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bull et al. 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Observational study design enables researchers to conduct subset analyses that can help precisely identify which patients benefit from each treatment.
“The advantage here is that they enable the researchers to conduct subset analyses that can help to precisely identify which patients benefit from each treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hannan 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Without biological markers to match patients with the most appropriate medication, drug treatment selection is based primarily on trial-and-error.
“Without any biological markers to match patients with the most appropriate medication, the selection of drug treatments is based primarily on trial-and-error (Cipriani et al. 2018; Trivedi et al. 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cipriani et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Trivedi et al. 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
All covariates satisfied the balance condition of standardized mean difference lower than 0.2.
“Two groups are considered to be balanced if all the covariates reveal SMD lower than 0.2 (Kıcıman et al. 2018), a condition which all our covariates satisfied.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kıcıman et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
There is an inverse relationship between the occurrence of positive affect and cognition attributes and mental health symptoms.
“aligns with literature about the inverse relationship observed in the occurrence of these attributes and mental health symptoms (Pennebaker, Mehl, and Niederhoffer 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pennebaker, Mehl, and Niederhoffer 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The similarity in effects across outcomes could be attributed to the comorbidity of the symptomatic outcomes and the clinical presentation of many mood and psychotic disorders.
“The similarity in effects across outcomes could be attributed to the comorbidity of the symptomatic outcomes and the clinical presentation of many moods and psychotic disorders (Rosenblat et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rosenblat et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The work shows the potential of novel technologies in digital therapeutics, powered by large-scale social media analyses, to support digital therapeutics.
“Technologically, we show the potential of novel technologies in digital therapeutics, powered by large-scale social media analyses, to support digital therapeutics (Vieta 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vieta 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A causal inference framework based on matching simulates a randomized controlled trial setting by controlling for as many covariates as possible.
“Specifically, we adopt a causal inference framework based on matching, which simulates an RCT setting by controlling for as many covariates as possible (Imbens and Rubin 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Imbens and Rubin 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
When conditioned on high-dimensional covariate data, matching is known to significantly minimize bias compared to naive correlational analyses.
“When conditioned on high-dimensional covariate data, matching is known to significantly minimize bias compared to naive correlational analyses (Imbens and Rubin 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Imbens and Rubin 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
With a threshold of at least 50 users per group in a stratum, the propensity score approach gave 63 strata consisting of 23,163 Treatment and 122,941 Control individuals.
“With a threshold of at least 50 users per group in a stratum, this approach gave 63 strata that consisted of 23,163 Treatment and 122,941 Control individuals (Figure 3c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Existing inclusion criteria for most clinical trials would exclude 75% of individuals with major depressive disorders.
“For example, an analysis found that existing inclusion criteria for most trials would exclude 75% of individuals with major depressive disorders (Blanco et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Blanco et al. 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductcitation
The matching approach controls for a variety of covariates so that the compared Control and Treatment groups show similar pre-treatment online behavior.
“Our approach controls for a variety of covariates so that the compared Control and Treatment groups show similar pre-treatment online behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Observational studies are weaker than randomized controlled trials in making conclusive causal claims.
“We do acknowledge that observational studies are weaker than RCTs in making conclusive causal claims like ones needed to accomplish the goals of this paper, but they provide complementary advantages over RCTs in many aspects (Hannan 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hannan 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
There was a significant drop in mean standardized mean difference from 0.029 (max=0.31) in unmatched datasets to 0.009 (max=0.05) in matched datasets.
“We also find a significant drop in the mean SMD from 0.029 (max=0.31) in the unmatched datasets to 0.009 (max=0.05) in the matched datasets (Figure 3d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
Matching on pre-treatment symptoms should capture and account for the individual's already existing mental health condition.
“Therefore, matching on these pre-treatment symptoms should capture and account for the individual’s already existing mental health condition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
For depression and similar conditions, drug repurposing has mainly targeted biological mechanisms.
“So far drug repurposing efforts in mental illnesses like depression have focused on biological targets (Powell et al. 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Powell et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductcitation
This paper's data covers only a subset of social media users.
“even though it only represents a subpopulation of those who use social media (Saha et al. 2017b)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Saha et al. 2017b
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning
Without additional offline data, we cannot determine the clinical nature of the mental health outcomes we observe.
“Without complementary offline information (e.g., the people’s physiologies), we cannot ascertain the clinical nature of the mental health outcomes in our data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Social media can serve as a scalable sensor for behavioral changes in people who start psychiatric medication, as self-reported.
“we show a proof of concept that social media is useful as an effective sensor to scalably detect behavioral changes in individuals who initiate treatment via (self-reported) use of psychiatric medication”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Psychiatrists often know a patient's health only through self-reports and in-person visits.
“Psychiatrists’ view and knowledge of a patient’s health is often limited to self-reports and information gathered during in-person therapeutic visits (Vieta 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vieta 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Sertraline may be less effective for people with more pre-occupation and self-attentional focus.
“indicating that this drug might not be effective in those with greater pre-occupation and self-attentional focus”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
Selection bias among people who publicly report medication use on social media probably affects our findings on varied drug effects.
“Our results on the varied effects of psychiatric medications are likely to be influenced by selection bias in those who choose to publicly self-report their medication use on social media.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
This work is the first to examine social media's potential for finding new drug repurposing targets.
“This is the first research to explore how social media may serve to identify novel targets as well.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The drugs' apparent lack of effectiveness may be partly due to how severe the individuals' mental illness is.
“and the observed ineffectiveness of the drugs is likely influenced by the severity of their mental illness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
We cannot confirm that self-reported medication use matched actual use.
“We cannot verify if self-reports of medication use corresponded to their actual use (Ernala et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ernala et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Social media can add useful complementary information about how psychiatric drugs affect people.
“Our findings show that social media can provide valuable complementary insights into the effects of psychiatric drugs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The FDA's Sentinel Initiative has not replaced traditional reporting by physicians or drug companies.
“has still not superseded traditional reporting directly from physicians or pharmaceutical companies (Kuehn 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kuehn 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Few new psychiatric drugs are in development, except for ongoing work on ketamine and other possible antidepressants.
“Presently the pipeline for new pharmacological agents for mental illnesses is sparse (Dubovsky 2018), apart from ongoing research on ketamine and other potential new antidepressants (Dubovsky 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dubovsky 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
People in our data who self-reported medication use may be an unusual group with fewer inhibitions.
“Therefore, the users in our data who chose to self-report their medication usage may represent unique populations with lowered inhibitions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The severity of individuals' clinical condition may plausibly affect our results.
“and our results are plausibly influenced by the severity in the clinical condition of the individuals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Our methods show that large real-time datasets can provide inexpensive, high-volume assessments of what people report and perceive about antidepressant use.
“Our methods highlight how large quantities of real-time data can offer low cost and high volume assessments of people’s own reports and perceptions related to antidepressants’ use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Mental illness stigma is known to hinder people from getting mental healthcare.
“given the stigma around mental illness (Corrigan 2004), which is a known obstacle to connecting individuals with mental healthcare.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Corrigan 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning
Even with a causal framework that reduces confounding, we cannot prove true causality.
“Despite adopting a causal framework that minimizes confounding effects, we cannot establish true causality”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
There are no guidelines yet for handling social media signals or using them to monitor drug effects.
“guidelines on how social media signals should be handled, and their use in the surveillance of the effects of drugs do not yet exist.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Users were matched on multiple characteristics.
“even though we match users based on several characteristics”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The study adopted a causal framework intended to reduce confounding.
“Despite adopting a causal framework that minimizes confounding effects”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Propensity score matching was used to account for many confounders.
“While we considered many confounders in our propensity score matching approach”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 35
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 30
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost psychiatric drugs are linked to a post-treatment increase in negative affect and a decrease in positive affect and cognition.
“Our results show that most drugs are linked to a post-treatment increase in negative affect and decrease in positive affect and cognition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSSRIs are associated with worsening symptoms, whereas TCAs lead to improvements.
“Clinically speaking, SSRIs are associated with worsening symptoms, whereas TCAs lead to improvements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationThe distribution of top drugs in the dataset aligns with external surveys on the most prescribed psychiatric drugs, which found that the top 5 antidepressants captured over 70% of prescription volumes.
“This aligns with external surveys on the most prescribed psychiatric drugs in that time which found that the top 5 antidepressants captured over 70% of the prescription volumes (Scripts 2018; Gohol 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Scripts 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gohol 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data91% of Cohen's d values fall outside the small-difference range, suggesting the Treatment group significantly differed from the Control group.
“We find that 91% of our values fall outside this range, suggesting the Treatment significantly differed from the Control group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost medications lead to similar directionality of effects on all outcomes; depression, anxiety, psychosis, and suicidal ideation increase for Treatment users in the After period of reported medication use.
“We observe many interesting patterns here, such as most medications lead to similar directionality of effects on all the outcomes, e.g., all of the outcomes, depression, anxiety, psychosis, and suicidal ideation increase for the Treatment users in the After period of reported medication use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTCAs had the largest improvement in these measures among drug families; roughly half of their users had higher positive affect and cognition.
“Among the drug families, we find that the TCAs show the greatest improvement in these measures, with about half of their users showing increased positive affect and cognition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn Figure 7, the affect and cognition outcome measures decreased mostly in lower-valued strata and increased in higher-valued strata.
“Next, Figure 7 shows that these outcome measures decrease mostly in the lower-valued strata and increase in the higher valued ones (Figure 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAn independent sample t-test reveals statistical significance in the differences (t in [-9.87, 10.96]; p<0.001), confirming that after self-reported medication use, Treatment users showed significant changes in outcomes.
“An independent sample t-test further reveals statistical significance in these differences (tϵ[−9.87,10.96]; p¡0.001), confirming that after the self-reported use of medications, the Treatment users showed significant changes in outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFluoxetine and Duloxetine were more effective for people who used more cognitive words, a group usually with less cognitive impairment.
“Similarly, Fluoxetine and Duloxetine shows better efficacy in those individuals with greater usage of cognitive words—typically those who show lower cognitive impairment”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn Sertraline models, first-person singular and auxiliary verb usage had negative coefficients linking ITEs to psycholinguistic attributes.
“For Sertraline, the use of first person singular and auxiliary verb shows negative coefficients”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTCAs and TeCAs had the strongest improving effects; most of their users were in strata where outcome measures decreased.
“From the perspective of drug families, the TCAs and the TeCAs show the greatest improving effects, with the majority of their users belonging to strata with decreased effects in the outcome measures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataSertraline, Escitalopram, and Fluoxetine-the most popular medications-were linked to worsening in these outcomes.
“These also include the most popular medications such as Sertraline, Escitalopram, and Fluoxetine.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost medications looked similar when aggregated, but their effects differed across strata.
“Although most medications show similar effects at an aggregated level, we find differences in their strata-wise effects distributions (Figure 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong drug families, SSRIs had the greatest worsening for depression, anxiety, psychosis, and suicidal ideation.
“All of these are classified as SSRIs—the family which shows the most worsening in these outcomes among the drug families.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe study developed machine learning models to assess psychopathological states including mood, cognition, depression, anxiety, psychosis, and suicidal ideation, and these models were expert-validated.
“We first develop expert-validated machine learning models to assess psychopathological states known to be affected by psychiatric medications, including mood, cognition, depression, anxiety, psychosis, and suicidal ideation, as given in the literature (Coupland et al. 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Coupland et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe findings reveal signals of the most common effects of psychiatric medications over a large population, with potential for improved characterization of their occurrence.
“Clinically, our findings reveal signals of the most common effects of the psychiatric medications over a large population, with the potential for improved characterization of their occurrence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe classifiers were tuned using k-fold cross-validation with k=5.
“We use a balanced number of examples for the two classes in training, and we tune the parameters of the classifiers using k-fold (k=5) cross-validation (Chandrasekharan et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chandrasekharan et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA major weakness of randomized controlled trials is that they are often conducted on individuals who may significantly differ from actual patients and are often not externally validated to a larger, more representative population.
“A major weakness of these trials is that they are often conducted on individuals who may significantly differ from actual patients, and often, they are not externally validated to a larger and a more representative population (Hannan 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hannan 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWeb search logs improve detection of adverse effects by 19% compared to an offline approach.
“White et al. (2016) found that web search logs improve detection of adverse effects by 19%, compared to an offline approach.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites White et al. (2016)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe classifiers show mean cross-validation accuracy between 0.79 and 0.88 and mean test accuracy between 0.81 and 0.91.
“These classifiers show a mean cross-validation accuracy ranging between 0.79 and 0.88 and mean test accuracy ranging between 0.81 and 0.91.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe personal medication intake classifier uses an SVM model with a linear kernel and shows a mean k-fold cross-validation accuracy and F1-score of 0.82 each.
“The classifier uses an SVM model with linear kernel and shows a mean k-fold (k=5) cross-validation accuracy and F1-score of 0.82 each.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTCAs have a broad spectrum of neurotransmitter affinities, which may often lead to undesirable side effects such as liver toxicity, excessive sleepiness, and sexual dysfunction.
“However, TCAs have a broad spectrum of neurotransmitter affinities, which may often lead to undesirable side effects, such as liver toxicity, excessive sleepiness, and sexual dysfunction (Frommer et al. 1987).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Frommer et al. 1987
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataA linguistic equivalence test between the Reddit training dataset and the Twitter unseen dataset found a vector similarity of 0.95 for the top 500 n-grams, showing high content similarity and justifying the transfer approach.
“Using word-vectors (pre-trained on Google News dataset of over 100 billion tokens), we find the vector similarity of the top 500 n-grams in the Reddit and Twitter corpuses to be 0.95. This shows high content similarity across the two platforms, in turn justifying the transfer approach.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe top features of the classifiers align with similar mental health classifiers built on Twitter, indicating construct validity of the transferred classifiers.
“Second, we find that the top features of these classifiers align with that of similar mental health classifiers built on Twitter to identify depression (De Choudhury et al. 2013), anxiety (Dutta et al. 2018), stress (Lin et al. 2014), psychosis (Birnbaum et al. 2017), and suicidal ideation (Burnap et al. 2015). This indicates the construct validity of the transferred classifiers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites De Choudhury et al. 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dutta et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lin et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationThe study uses the well-validated Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count lexicon to quantify psycholinguistic shifts in affect and cognition.
“In particular, we use the changes in the normalized occurrences of words in these categories per the well-validated Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) lexicon (Tausczik and Pennebaker 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tausczik and Pennebaker 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIncreasing the selectivity of the target of action to individual neurotransmitters would, in theory, limit the incidence of side effects while maintaining the effectiveness of TCAs.
“Several other compounds have since been introduced whose development was guided by the idea that increasing the selectivity of the target of action to individual neurotransmitters would, in theory, limit the incidence of side effects while maintaining the effectiveness of TCAs (Lopez-Munoz and Alamo 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lopez-Munoz and Alamo 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThese symptoms are comorbid with mood disorders.
“Interestingly, these symptoms are also comorbid with mood disorders (Rosenblat et al. 2016)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rosenblat et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe clinician co-author established the validity and relevance of the final list of psychiatric drugs.
“Our clinician co-author established the validity and relevance of this final list.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationClinical trials suffer from limitations such as non-standardized study design, confounding factors, and restrictive eligibility criteria.
“In addition, these clinical trials suffer from limitations such as non-standardized study design, confounding factors, and restrictive eligibility criteria (Lexchin et al. 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lexchin et al. 2003
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationClinical trials can be biased because they are conducted and funded by pharmaceutical companies, and they are rarely replicated in large populations.
“However, these trials can be biased, being conducted and funded by pharmaceutical companies, and are rarely replicated in large populations (Lexchin et al. 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lexchin et al. 2003
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataSeveral top n-gram features such as depression, stress, hope, help, and feel are contextually related to mental health.
“Several top n-gram features such as depression, stress, hope, help, and feel, are contextually related to mental health.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe findings were corroborated with a co-author who is a board-certified psychiatrist.
“Our findings were corroborated with our co-author who is a board-certified psychiatrist.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe treatment and placebo dates follow similar distributions, with a Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic of 0.06 indicating similarity.
“We measure the similarity in their distribution using Kolmogorov–Smirnov test to obtain an extremely low statistic of 0.06, indicating similarity in the probability distribution of treatment and placebo dates (Figure 3b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataTwo researchers manually inspected 170 randomly selected Twitter posts and found high agreement of 87% between manual ratings and the classifiers' labels.
“Two researchers manually inspected 170 randomly selected Twitter posts on mental health symptoms, spanning both user samples. Using the methodology outlined in Bagroy et al. (2017) that draws up the DSM-5 clinical framework, they rated each Twitter post on a binary Likert scale (high/low) to assess levels of expressed depression, anxiety, stress, psychosis, or suicidal ideation. We find high (87%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bagroy et al. (2017)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenDigital pharmacovigilance studies, particularly those using social media, have largely targeted named adverse effects of drugs and have not measured broader forms of symptomatic changes longitudinally.
“Nevertheless, we observe a gap that digital pharmacovigilance studies, particularly those using social media, have largely targeted the named adverse effects of drugs (e.g., “headache”, “palpitations”, “nausea”), and have not measured broader forms of symptomatic changes longitudinally.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningEven with a psychiatrist's corroboration, our view is limited to what an individual's social media data shows.
“Despite corroboration by a psychiatrist, we are limited by what can be observed from an individual’s social media data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAdding this information to drug safety monitoring could supplement traditional sources and raise awareness of new safety problems.
“Including this information in technologies for drug safety monitoring can therefore complement traditional sources, and improve awareness regarding emerging safety issues in a spontaneous fashion”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningSelf-report bias complicates which effects we see, and we can only observe effects typical of the people in our data.
“Self-report bias further complicates the types of effects that we observed—different individuals respond differently, as shown in our results, however, our observations are limited to only the types of effects that characterize the individuals in our data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningWe advise against generalizing our findings on psychiatric medication effects to whole populations.
“For these same reasons of sampling bias, we caution against drawing population-wide generalizations of the effects of psychiatric medication usage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenSocial media has no placebo concept, which trials use to remove the confound that merely perceiving treatment causes non-specific effects.
“First, we do not have the notion of a placebo, used to eliminate the confound that simply the perception of receiving a treatment produces non-specific effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe paper offers a new source of collateral information for digital therapeutics and more personalized, evidence-based drug treatment.
“This paper provides a new source of collateral information to support digital therapeutics (Fisher and Appelbaum 2017) and enhance evidence-based, personalized pharmacological treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fisher and Appelbaum 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Study design and conductreasoningOur symptom measures, like depression or suicidal ideation, require further clinical validation, such as against DSM-5 or RDoC.
“Further, the symptomatic outcomes themselves, such as measures of depression or suicidal ideation, need additional clinical validation, e.g., based on DSM-5 criteria (APA and others 2013), or the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) introduced by the National Institutes of Mental Health (Insel et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites APA and others 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Insel et al. 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningFor public health, our methods could enable technologies that detect early warnings of adverse effects from psychiatric drugs.
“From a public health perspective, our methods offer the potential to build technologies that surface early warning signs of adverse effects related to psychiatric drug use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe FDA issued two social media guidelines for prescription drug risk-benefit analysis, but they concern promotion and create no enforceable rights or duties.
“Although the FDA has released two guidelines on the use of social media for the risk-benefit analysis of prescription drugs (Sarker et al. 2015), they focus on product promotion and “do not establish legally enforceable rights or responsibilities” (FDA 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Sarker et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites FDA 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningBecause the literature conflicts, we cannot make definitive claims about our findings' validity.
“These conflicting findings in the literature prevent us from drawing conclusive claims about the validity of our findings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGeddes and colleagues reported no substantial efficacy difference between SSRIs and TCAs.
“Geddes et al. found no major differences in the efficacy of SSRIs and TCAs”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Geddes et al.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOther studies reported that one antidepressant class outperformed others.
“whereas other studies found one kind to perform better than others (Cipriani et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cipriani et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPsychiatric medications are still chosen by trial and error or by their side effect profiles.
“in psychiatry, medications are still prescribed by trial-and-error, or based on side effect profiles of these medications (Trivedi et al. 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Trivedi et al. 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationImipramine and Clomipramine, both TCAs, are rarely prescribed now due to severe toxicity that can be fatal in overdose.
“While TCAs (Imipramine, Clomipramine) are not often prescribed today because of serious toxicity issues that may be fatal in overdose (Kerr, McGuffie, and Wilkie 2001)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kerr, McGuffie, and Wilkie 2001
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe FDA aims to rely more on real-world evidence alongside pre-market clinical trial data.
“The FDA seeks to advance its approach to regulate and rely more on real-world evidence in addition to pre-market clinical studies data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites fda.gov
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningOur findings provide a tool for generating real-world evidence that regulators such as the FDA could use.
“Our results offer an important tool in generating “real-world evidence” for incorporation into technologies that can be used by regulatory bodies like the FDA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningUnlike clinical trials, social media analysis cannot closely monitor treatment, so the number of measurements per person varies widely.
“Last, social media analysis does not allow us to closely monitor the treatment, unlike a clinical trial, which results in high variance in the number of measurements that each individual contributes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationUsing first-person singular and auxiliary verbs are known traits often seen in depressed people.
“the known characteristics of these two attribute usage, typically prevalent in depressed individuals (De Choudhury et al. 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites De Choudhury et al. 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSome studies found placebos or non-drug care did better than certain antidepressants.
“Other studies found placebos or non-pharmacological care to have outperformed certain antidepressants (Szegedi et al. 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Szegedi et al. 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenMedication self-report bias can cause treatment leakage: some controls may use drugs without mentioning it on Twitter.
“Additionally, self-reporting bias about medications can lead to treatment leakage, where some control individuals may be taking medications, but not mentioning it on Twitter.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningPropensity score matching accounted for many confounders, but other hidden factors-such as duration, history, dosage, compliance, and additional treatments-could still affect the outcomes.
“While we considered many confounders in our propensity score matching approach, there are other latent factors that could impact the effects considered here; e.g., duration, history, dosage, and compliance of using self-reported medications; additional medications or adjuvant treatments one might be using.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAlthough we match users on several traits, we do not preselect people likely to benefit from a drug.
“Second, even though we match users based on several characteristics, we do not pre-qualify individuals as potential beneficiaries of a medication.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe paper presents a new technological approach that could serve the FDA's changing needs by detecting medication uses and effects from self-reports on social media.
“This paper offers a novel technological approach that may meet the evolving needs of the FDA, by being able to identify the uses and effects of various medications as self-reported by people on social media.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationOur work offers a new dynamic perspective on mental health, capturing real-time variation and incorporating dynamic systems, network, and instability theories.
“our work represents a novel dynamic viewpoint onto mental health— limitations notwithstanding, it captures the real-time variation and accounts for dynamic systems theory, network theory, and instability mechanisms (Nelson et al. 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nelson et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Study design and conductreasoningWe caution against making direct clinical inferences.
“Without dampening the clinical potentials, we caution against making direct clinical inferences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThis new perspective contrasts with the traditional static view of psychiatric medication effects.
“Such a new window onto the field clearly contrasts the traditional static viewpoint on the effects of psychiatric medications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningA clinician coauthor identified the most salient patterns from the regression coefficients using clinical literature and experience.
“We summarize a few distinct patterns below, noted by our clinician coauthor to be most salient, based on the clinical literature and experience:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The mechanisms by which psychiatric medications modify brain operation are poorly understood.
“One reason behind the mixed success of psychiatric medications stems from the fact that the mechanisms by which they modify the brain operation are poorly understood.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Even well-designed clinical trials can suffer from low statistical power or limited observability of effects due to short monitoring and study periods.
“Even well-designed clinical trials can suffer from low statistical power, or limited observability of effects due to short monitoring and study periods, spanning just weeks or months”
The paper relies on this without support.
Self-reported first-person medication intake posts accurately indicate actual psychiatric medication use.
“Since mentioning a medication in a tweet does not necessarily indicate its usage, we filter out those posts that were first-person reports of using these medications.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The date of a user's first self-reported medication-intake post approximates the start of their treatment.
“For every Treatment user, we assign the date of their first medication-intake post as their treatment date.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Control users who did not self-report psychiatric medication use did not use such medications.
“Additionally, we build a Control dataset of users who did not self-report using psychiatric medication.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A two-year period is long enough to avoid confounds by idiosyncratic events and seasonal changes, but short enough to avoid major changes in social media use and drug prescription policies.
“A two year period balances concerns about being long enough to avoid confounds by idiosyncratic events and seasonal changes, but short enough to avoid major changes in social media use and drug prescription policies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
For outcomes other than positive affect and cognition, an increase in the outcome measure indicates a worsened observable mental health condition, while a decrease indicates improvement.
“For all these outcomes other than positive affect and cognition (in which case it is the opposite), an increase in the outcome measure also translates to worsened observable mental health condition of the individuals, whereas a decrease suggests an improvement in their mental health condition, as gleaned from Twitter.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The clinical and technological implications depend on the medication names not being anonymized.
“Note that the clinical and technological implications rest upon the names of the medications not being anonymized.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The classifiers yield high-performance accuracy of approximately 0.90 on average and transfer well on Twitter with 87% agreement between machine-predicted labels and expert appraisal.
“These classi fi ers have been found to yield a high-performance accuracy of approximately 0.90 on average and transfer well on Twitter with an 87% agreement between machine-predicted labels and expert appraisal (Saha et al., 2019b).”
From Impacts of school shooter drills on the psychological well-being of American K-12 school communities: a social media study (2021) · cites this paper as Saha et al., 2019b
In Methods > Defining and Measuring Symptomatic Outcomes (page unavailable), the paper reports mean cross-validation accuracies of 0.79–0.88 and mean test accuracies of 0.81–0.91, not an overall average of approximately 0.90. It supports the Twitter-transfer portion with 87% agreement between classifier labels and manual ratings of 170 Twitter posts, but describes the raters as two researchers rather than identifying them as experts. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe machine-learning classifiers for stress, anxiety, and depression were built and validated in prior work.
“We quanti fi ed symptomatic expressions of stress, anxiety, and depression using machine-learning classi fi ers that were built and validated in prior work (Saha et al., 2019b).”
From Impacts of school shooter drills on the psychological well-being of American K-12 school communities: a social media study (2021) · cites this paper as Saha et al., 2019b
Saha et al's machine learning classifiers for mental health symptomatic expressions perform at a high accuracy of approximately 0.90 on average on held-out test data.
“These classifiers perform at a high accuracy of approximately 0.90 on average on held-out test data [25].”
From Psychosocial Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Large-scale Quasi-Experimental Study on Social Media (2020) · cites this paper as [25]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Abstract dataset size conflicts with the reported datasets
MajorThe abstract describes 300M posts from 30K individuals, but the study description reports 112M treatment posts and 707M control posts-about 819M posts in total, from roughly 330K individuals. The abstract's figures do not match either reported population or their combination.
“Using a list of common approved and regulated psychiatric drugs and a Twitter dataset of 300M posts from 30K individuals, we develop machine learning models to first assess effects relating to mood, cognition, depression, anxiety, psychosis, and suicidal ideation.”
“Our analysis is conducted using two years of Twitter data from two populations: 112M posts from 30K self-reported users of psychiatric medications and 707M posts from 300K users who did not.”
Reported data span exceeds two years
MinorThe contributions section calls the treatment and control post data two years of Twitter data. The data section says the timelines were collected from January 2014 through February 2018, a span of more than four years; the two-year window applies to medication-mention queries, not those timelines.
“Our analysis is conducted using two years of Twitter data from two populations: 112M posts from 30K self-reported users of psychiatric medications and 707M posts from 300K users who did not.”
“For the remaining 34,518, we collect the timeline data between January 01, 2014 and February 15, 2018, to obtain a total of 112,025,496 posts.”
Cites
1 retracted
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) versus other antidepressants for depression
Geddes, J. R., Freemantle, N., Mason, J. M., Eccles, M., & Boynton, J. R. (1999) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001851 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
RetractedDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/springerreference_121117 · Cited by 20,769 · see citing works
Insel, T., Cuthbert, B., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K., Sanislow, C., & Wang, P. (2010) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379 · Cited by 7,067 · see citing works
The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods
Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x09351676 · Cited by 5,774 · see citing works
Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction
Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (2015) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139025751 · Cited by 4,210 · see citing works
Trivedi, M. H., Rush, A. J., Wisniewski, S. R., Nierenberg, A. A., Warden, D., Ritz, L., Norquist, G., Howland, R. H., Lebowitz, B., McGrath, P. J., et al. (2006) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.28 · Cited by 3,879 · see citing works
How stigma interferes with mental health care.
Corrigan, P. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.7.614 · Cited by 3,648 · see citing works
The Neuroendocrinology of Stress: A Never Ending Story
Lightman, S. L. (2008) · Journal of Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01711.x · Cited by 3,570 · see citing works
Cipriani, A., Furukawa, T. A., Salanti, G., Chaimani, A., Atkinson, L. Z., Ogawa, Y., Leucht, S., Ruhe, H. G., Turner, E. H., Higgins, J. P. T., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32802-7 · Cited by 3,541 · see citing works
Psychological Aspects of Natural Language Use: Our Words, Our Selves
Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R., & Niederhoffer, K. G. (2003) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041 · Cited by 2,624 · see citing works
Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review
Lexchin, J., Bero, L. A., Djulbegovic, B., & Clark, O. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7400.1167 · Cited by 2,147 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In addition, these clinical trials suffer from limitations such as non-standardized study design, confounding factors, and restrictive eligibility criteria (Lexchin et al. 2003).”
BackgroundCipriani, A., Furukawa, T. A., Salanti, G., Geddes, J. R., Higgins, J. P., Churchill, R., Watanabe, N., Nakagawa, A., Omori, I. M., McGuire, H., et al. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60046-5 · Cited by 1,654 · see citing works
Hasin, D. S., Goodwin, R. D., Stinson, F. S., & Grant, B. F. (2005) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.10.1097 · Cited by 1,645 · see citing works
Predicting Depression via Social Media
Choudhury, M. D., Gamon, M., Counts, S., & Horvitz, E. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v7i1.14432 · Cited by 1,583 · see citing works
Blanco, C., Okuda, M., Wright, C., Hasin, D. S., Grant, B. F., Liu, S.-M., & Olfson, M. (2008) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.65.12.1429 · Cited by 1,582 · see citing works
Battle, D. E. (2013) · CoDAS · doi:10.1590/s2317-17822013000200017 · Cited by 1,569 · see citing works
The Drug Repurposing Hub: a next-generation drug library and information resource
Corsello, S. M., Bittker, J. A., Liu, Z., Gould, J., McCarren, P. R., Hirschman, J., Johnston, S. E., Vrcic, A., Wong, B., Khan, M., et al. (2017) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4306 · Cited by 1,028 · see citing works
Antidepressant use and risk of adverse outcomes in older people: population based cohort study
Coupland, C., Dhiman, P., Morriss, R., Arthur, A., Barton, G., & Hippisley-Cox, J. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d4551 · Cited by 833 · see citing works
Shippee, N. D., Shah, N. D., May, C. R., Mair, F. S., & Montori, V. M. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.05.005 · Cited by 728 · see citing works
Tricyclic antidepressant pharmacology and therapeutic drug interactions updated
Gillman, P. K. (2007) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0707253 · Cited by 694 · see citing works
Discovering Shifts to Suicidal Ideation from Mental Health Content in Social Media
Choudhury, M. D., Kıcıman, E., Dredze, M. H., Coppersmith, G., & Kumar, M. (2016) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858207 · Cited by 682 · see citing works
Self-citationNikfarjam, A., Sarker, A., O’Connor, K., Ginn, R., & Gonzalez‐Hernandez, G. (2015) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocu041 · Cited by 543 · see citing works
Utilizing social media data for pharmacovigilance: A review
Sarker, A., Ginn, R., Nikfarjam, A., O’Connor, K., Smith, K. L., Jayaraman, S., Upadhaya, T., & Gonzalez‐Hernandez, G. (2015) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2015.02.004 · Cited by 497 · see citing works
Lopez-Munoz, F. J., & Álamo, C. (2009) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/138161209788168001 · Cited by 476 · see citing works
Moving From Static to Dynamic Models of the Onset of Mental Disorder
Nelson, B., McGorry, P. D., Wichers, M., Wigman, J. T. W., & Hartmann, J. (2017) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0001 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Discontinuation of Use and Switching of Antidepressants
Bull, S. A., Hu, X. H., Hunkeler, E. M., Lee, J. Y., Ming, E. E., Markson, L. E., & FIREMAN, B. H. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.11.1403 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Tricyclic antidepressant overdose: a review
Kerr, G. W. (2001) · Emergency Medicine Journal · doi:10.1136/emj.18.4.236 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Measuring post traumatic stress disorder in Twitter
Coppersmith, G., Harman, C., & Dredze, M. (2014) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14574 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Rosenblat, J. D., Kakar, R., & McIntyre, R. S. (2016) · International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyv082 · Cited by 315 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Given the pervasiveness of their use, psychiatric medications can either alleviate or exacerbate mental illness burden on both personal and societal levels (Rosenblat et al. 2016).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialRandomized Clinical Trials and Observational Studies
Hannan, E. L. (2008) · JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2008.01.008 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Chandrasekharan, E., Samory, M., Jhaver, S., Charvat, H., Bruckman, A., Lampe, C., Eisenstein, J., & Gilbert, E. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3274301 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Szegedi, A., Kohnen, R., Dienel, A., & Kieser, M. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38356.655266.82 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Tricyclic antidepressant overdose. A review
Frommer, D. A. (1987) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.257.4.521 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Quantifying and Predicting Mental Illness Severity in Online Pro-Eating Disorder Communities
Chancellor, S., Lin, Z. J., Goodman, E. L., Zerwas, S. C., & Choudhury, M. D. (2016) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2818048.2819973 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
User-level psychological stress detection from social media using deep neural network
Lin, H., Jia, J., Guo, Q., Xue, Y., Li, Q., Jie, H. J., Cai, L., & Feng, L. (2014) · ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) · doi:10.1145/2647868.2654945 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
The importance of pharmacovigilance
Mehta, R. M. (2017) · Drug Designing Open Access · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Birnbaum, M. L., Ernala, S. K., Rizvi, A. F., De Choudhury, M., & Kane, J. M. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.7956 · Cited by 168 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…that the top features of these classifiers align with that of similar mental health classifiers built on Twitter to identify depression (De Choudhury et al. 2013), anxiety (Dutta et al. 2018), stress (Lin et al. 2014), psychosis (Birnbaum et al. 2017), and suicidal ideation (Burnap et al. 2015).”
BackgroundErnala, S., Birnbaum, M., Candan, K. A., Rizvi, A., Sterling, W. A., Kane, J., & de Choudhury, M. (2019) · International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300364 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Machine Classification and Analysis of Suicide-Related Communication on Twitter
Burnap, P., Colombo, W., & Scourfield, J. (2015) · ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT) · doi:10.1145/2700171.2791023 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Multi-class machine classification of suicide-related communication on Twitter
Burnap, P., Colombo, G. B., Amery, R., Hodorog, A., & Scourfield, J. (2017) · Online Social Networks and Media · doi:10.1016/j.osnem.2017.08.001 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Oliver, D., Davies, C., Crossland, G., Lim, S., Gifford, G., McGuire, P., & Fusar-Poli, P. (2018) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbx166 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Modeling Stress with Social Media Around Incidents of Gun Violence on College Campuses
Saha, K., & De Choudhury, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3134727 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Self-citationAdverse Drug Reaction Identification and Extraction in Social Media: A Scoping Review
Lardon, J., Abdellaoui, R., Bellet, F., Asfari, H., Souvignet, J., Texier, N., Jaulent, M., Beyens, M., Burgun, A., & Cédric Bousquet, B. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4304 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
A Social Media Based Index of Mental Well-Being in College Campuses
Bagroy, S., Kumaraguru, P., & De Choudhury, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025909 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Linguistic Markers Indicating Therapeutic Outcomes of Social Media Disclosures of Schizophrenia
Ernala, S. K., Rizvi, A. F., Birnbaum, M. L., Kane, J. M., & De Choudhury, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3134678 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
A computational study of mental health awareness campaigns on social media
Saha, K., Torous, J., Ernala, S. K., Rizuto, C., Stafford, A., & De Choudhury, M. (2019) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/tbm/ibz028 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Self-citationLa medicina personalizada aplicada a la salud mental: la psiquiatría de precisión
Vieta, E. (2015) · Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental · doi:10.1016/j.rpsm.2015.03.003 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Maclean, D. L., Gupta, S., Lembke, A., Manning, C. D., & Heer, J. (2015) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2675133.2675146 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Discovering Alternative Treatments for Opioid Use Recovery Using Social Media
Chancellor, S., Nitzburg, G. C., Hu, A., Zampieri, F., & Choudhury, M. D. (2019) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300354 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Inferring Mood Instability on Social Media by Leveraging Ecological Momentary Assessments
Saha, K., Chan, L., De Barbaro, K., Abowd, G. D., & De Choudhury, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3130960 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Self-citationIdentification of predicted individual treatment effects in randomized clinical trials
Lamont, A. E., Lyons, M. D., Jaki, T., Stuart, E. A., Feaster, D. J., Tharmaratnam, K., Oberski, D. L., Ishwaran, H., Wilson, D. K., & Horn, M. L. V. (2016) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280215623981 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
How do psychiatric drugs work?
Moncrieff, J., & Cohen, D. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b1963 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Trends in antidepressant overdoses
McKenzie, M. S., & McFarland, B. H. (2007) · Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety · doi:10.1002/pds.1355 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
More emojis, less :) The competition for paralinguistic function in microblog writing
Pavalanathan, U., & Eisenstein, J. (2016) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v21i11.6879 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Early identification of adverse drug reactions from search log data
White, R. W., Wang, S., Pant, A., Harpaz, R., Shukla, P., Sun, W., DuMouchel, W., & Horvitz, E. (2015) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2015.11.005 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Personalized medicine applied to mental health: Precision psychiatry
Vieta, E. (2015) · Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/j.rpsmen.2015.03.007 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Klein, A., Sarker, A., Rouhizadeh, M., O'Connor, K., & Gonzalez, G. (2017) · Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/w17-2316 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Saha, K., Weber, I. G., & Choudhury, M. D. (2018) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.15016 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationSelective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) versus other antidepressants for depression
Geddes, J. R., Freemantle, N., Mason, J. M., Eccles, M., & Boynton, J. R. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001851.pub2 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Distilling the Outcomes of Personal Experiences
Olteanu, A., Varol, O., & Kıcıman, E. (2017) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2998181.2998353 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationSocial Media as a Passive Sensor in Longitudinal Studies of Human Behavior and Wellbeing
Saha, K., Bayraktaroglu, A. E., Campbell, A. T., Chawla, N. V., Choudhury, M. D., D’Mello, S. K., Dey, A. K., Gao, G., Gregg, J. M., Jagannath, K., et al. (2019) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3290607.3299065 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationAssessing Behavior Stage Progression From Social Media Data
Liu, J., Weitzman, E. R., & Chunara, R. (2017) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2998181.2998336 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Using Longitudinal Social Media Analysis to Understand the Effects of Early College Alcohol Use
Kıcıman, E., Counts, S., & Gasser, M. L. (2018) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.15012 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationUsing matched samples to estimate the effects of exercise on mental health from twitter
Landeiro, V., & Culotta, A. (2015) · National Conference on Artificial Intelligence · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Beyond Googling: The Ethics of Using Patients' Electronic Footprints in Psychiatric Practice
Fisher, C., & Appelbaum, P. (2017) · Harvard Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/hrp.0000000000000145 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Toward multimodal signal detection of adverse drug reactions
Harpaz, R., DuMouchel, W., Schuemie, M. J., Bodenreider, O., Friedman, C., Horvitz, E., Ripple, A., Sorbello, A. F., White, R. W., Winnenburg, R., et al. (2017) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2017.10.013 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Saha, K., Weber, I. G., Birnbaum, M. L., & Choudhury, M. D. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.6815 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationWhat Is New about New Antidepressants?
Dubovsky, S. L. (2018) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000488945 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Measuring the Impact of Anxiety on Online Social Interactions
Dutta, S., Ma, J. S., & Choudhury, M. D. (2018) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.15081 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Designing Dashboard for Campus Stakeholders to Support College Student Mental Health
Yoo, D. W., & Choudhury, M. D. (2019) · International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare · doi:10.1145/3329189.3329200 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Powell, T. R., Murphy, T., Lee, S. H., Price, J., Thuret, S., & Breen, G. D. (2017) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881117691467 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Monoamine Hypotheses of Mood Disorders
Barchas, J. D., & Altemus, M. M. (1999) · Cited by 15 · see citing works
FDA’s Foray Into Big Data Still Maturing
Kuehn, B. M. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.2752 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Gaur, M., Kursuncu, U., Alambo, A., Sheth, A., Daniulaityte, R., Thirunarayan, K., & Pathak, J. (2019) · CORE Scholar (Wright State University) · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 77 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Imbens GW, and Rubin DB 2015. Causal inference in statistics, social, and biomedical sciences. Cambridge.
- MacLean D; Gupta S; Lembke A; Manning C; and Heer J 2015. Forum77: An analysis of an online health forum dedicated to addiction recovery. In CSCW.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Torous, J., Bucci, S., Bell, I. H., Kessing, L. V., Faurholt‐Jepsen, M., Whelan, P., Carvalho, A. F., Keshavan, M., Linardon, J., & Firth, J. (2021) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20883 · Cited by 1,199 · see citing works
Self-citationPrevalence and Psychological Effects of Hateful Speech in Online College Communities
Saha, K., Chandrasekharan, E., & Choudhury, M. D. (2019) · ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci) · doi:10.1145/3292522.3326032 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Self-citation"Did You Suspect the Post Would be Removed?"
Jhaver, S., Appling, D. S., Gilbert, É., & Bruckman, A. S. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359294 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Psychosocial Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Large-scale Quasi-Experimental Study on Social Media
Saha, K., Torous, J., Caine, E. D., & De Choudhury, M. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/22600 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Self-citationExamining the impact of sharing COVID-19 misinformation online on mental health
Verma, G., Bhardwaj, A., Aledavood, T., Choudhury, M. D., & Kumar, S. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-11488-y · Cited by 113 · see citing works
The Language of LGBTQ+ Minority Stress Experiences on Social Media
Saha, K., Kim, S. C., Reddy, M. D., Carter, A. J., Sharma, E., Haimson, O. L., & Choudhury, M. D. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3361108 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Self-citationGooding, P., & Kariotis, T. (2021) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/24668 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Text and Causal Inference: A Review of Using Text to Remove Confounding from Causal Estimates
Keith, K. A., Jensen, D. D., & O’Connor, B. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.474 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Naslund, J. A., Gonsalves, P. P., Gruebner, O., Pendse, S. R., Smith, S. L., Sharma, A., & Raviola, G. J. (2019) · Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s40501-019-00186-8 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Charting the Sociotechnical Gap in Explainable AI: A Framework to Address the Gap in XAI
Ehsan, U., Saha, K., Choudhury, M. D., & Riedl, M. O. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3579467 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Self-citationBenefits and Harms of Large Language Models in Digital Mental Health
De Choudhury, M., Pendse, S. R., & Kumar, N. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/y8ax9 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Causal Factors of Effective Psychosocial Outcomes in Online Mental Health Communities
Saha, K., & Sharma, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7326 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantifying the Causal Effect of Individual Mobility on Health Status in Urban Space
Zhang, Y., Xu, F., Xia, T., & Li, Y. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3494990 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
The Effect of Moderation on Online Mental Health Conversations
Wadden, D., August, T., Li, Q., & Althoff, T. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v15i1.18100 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Pendse, S. R., Lalani, F. M., De Choudhury, M., Sharma, A., & Kumar, N. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376465 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Understanding Moderation in Online Mental Health Communities
Saha, K., Ernala, S. K., Dutta, S., Sharma, E., & Choudhury, M. D. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49576-3_7 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationUnderstanding Side Effects of Antidepressants: Large-scale Longitudinal Study on Social Media Data
Saha, K., Torous, J. B., Kıcıman, E., & Choudhury, M. D. (2021) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/26589 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Self-citationSocial Media Discussions Predict Mental Health Consultations on College Campuses
Saha, K., Yousuf, A., Boyd, R. L., Pennebaker, J., & Choudhury, M. D. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-03423-4 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Self-citationWhat Makes People Join Conspiracy Communities?
Phadke, S., Samory, M., & Mitra, T. (2020) · Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact. · doi:10.1145/3432922 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
What Life Events are Disclosed on Social Media, How, When, and By Whom?
Saha, K., Seybolt, J., Mattingly, S. M., Aledavood, T., Konjeti, C., Martinez, G. J., Grover, T., Mark, G. J., & Choudhury, M. D. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445405 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationElSherief, M., Saha, K., Gupta, P., Mishra, S., Seybolt, J., Xie, J., O’Toole, M., Burd-Sharps, S., & De Choudhury, M. (2021) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-021-00993-6 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“These approaches are motivated from prior work (Saha and De Choudhury, 2017; Saha et al., 2018), and they essentially minimize confounding effects of social media expressions such as changes due to seasonal, local, and other coincidental factors on our outcomes of interest.”
BackgroundSelf-citationYoo, D. W., Birnbaum, M., Meter, A. V., Ali, A. F., Arenare, E., Abowd, G., & de Choudhury, M. (2020) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/16969 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Causal Effects of Linguistic Properties
Pryzant, R., Card, D., Jurafsky, D., Veitch, V., & Sridhar, D. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.323 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
What Makes People Join Conspiracy Communities?: Role of Social Factors in Conspiracy EngagementPreprint
Phadke, S., Samory, M., & Mitra, T. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.04527 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Exploring hate speech dynamics: The emotional, linguistic, and thematic impact on social media users
Ghenai, A., Noorian, Z., Moradisani, H., Abadeh, P., Erentzen, C. A., & Zarrinkalam, F. (2025) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104079 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Saha, K., Reddy, M. D., Mattingly, S. M., Moskal, E., Sirigiri, A., & de Choudhury, M. (2019) · Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact. · doi:10.1145/3359239 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-citationImputing Missing Social Media Data Stream in Multisensor Studies of Human Behavior
Saha, K., Mulukutla, R., Nies, K., Robles-Granda, P., Sirigiri, A., Yoo, D. W., Audia, P. G., Campbell, A. T., Chawla, N. V., D’Mello, S. K., et al. (2019) · International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and workshops · doi:10.1109/acii.2019.8925479 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationMental Health Coping Stories on Social Media: A Causal-Inference Study of Papageno Effect
Yuan, Y., Saha, K., Keller, B., Isometsä, E. T., & Aledavood, T. (2023) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3543507.3583350 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationGong, C., Saha, K., & Chancellor, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3476039 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationA Computational Linguistic Approach to Study Border Theory at Scale
Douglas, T., Capra, L., & Musolesi, M. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3640998 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Lymelight: forecasting Lyme disease risk using web search data
Sadilek, A., Hswen, Y., Bavadekar, S., Shekel, T., Brownstein, J. S., & Gabrilovich, E. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-0222-x · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Supporters First: Understanding Online Social Support on Mental Health from a Supporter Perspective
Kim, M., Saha, K., Choudhury, M. D., & Choi, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3579525 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationSequeira, R., Gayen, A., Ganguly, N., Dandapat, S. K., & Chandra, J. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2019.2943238 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Sleep disorders related to index and comorbid mental disorders and psychotropic drugs
Merrill, R. M., Ashton, M. K., & Angell, E. (2023) · Annals of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12991-023-00452-3 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Bystanders of Online Moderation: Examining the Effects of Witnessing Post-Removal Explanations
Jhaver, S., Rathi, H., & Saha, K. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642204 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationWeld, G., West, P., Glenski, M., Arbour, D. T., Rossi, R. A., & Althoff, T. (2022) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19362 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
A Social Media Study on Mental Health Status Transitions Surrounding Psychiatric Hospitalizations
Ernala, S., Kashiparekh, K., Bolous, A., Ali, A. F., Kane, J., Birnbaum, M., & de Choudhury, M. (2021) · Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact. · doi:10.1145/3449229 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
AdverTiming Matters: Examining User Ad Consumption for Effective Ad Allocations on Social Media
Saha, K., Liu, Y., Vincent, N., Chowdhury, F. A., Neves, L., Shah, N., & Bos, M. W. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445394 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationPapoutsaki, A., So, S., Kenderova, G., Shapiro, B. B., & Epstein, D. A. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3479564 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Analysis of Automated Clinical Depression Diagnosis in a Chinese Corpus
Mao, K., Wang, D. B., Zheng, T., Jiao, R., Zhu, Y., Wu, B., Lei, Q., Lyu, W., Chen, J., & Ye, M. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tbcas.2023.3291554 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Using Online Memes to Communicate About Health: A Systematic Review
Occa, A., Chen, H.-Y., & Teffeteller, K. L. (2024) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.1177/08901171241272075 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Out-of-Distribution Generalization in Natural Language Processing: Past, Present, and Future
Yang, L., Song, Y., Ren, X., Lyu, C., Wang, Y., Zhuo, J., Liu, L., Wang, J., Foster, J., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.276 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Observer Effect in Social Media Use
Saha, K., Gupta, P., Mark, G. J., Kıcıman, E., & Choudhury, M. D. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642078 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Power of Social Media: Stigmatizing Content Affects Perceptions of Mental Health Care
Competiello, S. K., Bizer, G. Y., & Walker, D. C. (2023) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051231207847 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Tušl, M., Thelen, A., Marcus, K., Peters, A., Shalaeva, E. V., Scheckel, B., Sykora, M. D., Elayan, S., Naslund, J. A., Shankardass, K., et al. (2022) · Discover Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s44192-022-00017-y · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Yoo, D. W., Ernala, S. K., Saket, B., Weir, D., Arenare, E., Ali, A. F., Meter, A. V., Birnbaum, M. L., Abowd, G. D., & Choudhury, M. D. (2021) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/25455 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Social Media Reveals Psychosocial Effects of the COVID-19 PandemicPreprint
Saha, K., Torous, J. B., Caine, E. D., & Choudhury, M. D. (2020) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.08.07.20170548 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Gift that Keeps on Giving: Generosity is Contagious in Multiplayer Online Games
Bisberg, A. J., Jiang, J., Zeng, Y., Chen, E., & Ferrara, E. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555120 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Koss, J., & Bohnet-Joschko, S. (2022) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/39582 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Ethics of the Use of Social Media as Training Data for AI Models Used for Digital Phenotyping
Jaiswal, A., Shah, A., Harjadi, C., Windgassen, E., & Washington, P. (2024) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/59794 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Jiang, J., Dotsch, R., Roura, M. T., Liu, Y., Silva, V., Bos, M., & Barbieri, F. (2022) · International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580990 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Cameron, E. E., Simpson, K. M., Pierce, S. K., Penner, K. E., Beyak, A., Gomez, I., Bowes, J.-M., Reynolds, K., Tomfohr‐Madsen, L. M., & Roos, L. E. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20054408 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Impact of Online Health Awareness Campaign: Case of National Eating Disorders Association
Mejova, Y., & Suárez-Lledó, V. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-60975-7_15 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Natural Language Processing in Mental Health Research and Practice
Henry, S., Yetişgen, M., & Uzuner, Ö. (2021) · Health informatics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-70558-9_13 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Cascalheira, C. J., Flinn, R. E., Zhao, Y., Klooster, D., Laprade, D., Hamdi, S. M., Scheer, J. R., González, A., Lund, E. M., Gomez, I. N., et al. (2023) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/47256 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationAutomation of Protocoling Advanced MSK Examinations Using Natural Language Processing Techniques.
Eghbali, N., Siegal, D. S., Klochko, C. L., & Ghassemi, M. M. (2023) · PubMed Central · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Social Alignment Contagion in Online Social Networks
Mirlohi, A., Mahdavimoghaddam, J., Jovanović, J., Al-Obeidat, F. N., Khani, M., Ghorbani, A. A., & Bagheri, E. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2022.3226346 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Behavior Change Around an Online Health Awareness Campaign: A Causal Impact Study
Suárez-Lledó, V., & Mejova, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.857531 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Event Mining Driven Context-Aware Personal Food Preference Modelling
Pandey, V., Rostami, A., Nag, N., & Jain, R. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68821-9_52 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Pendse, S. R., Kumar, N., & Choudhury, M. D. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642477 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Post Approvals in Online Communities
Ribeiro, M. H., Cheng, J., & West, R. (2022) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19296 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Yuan, Y., Kasson, E. M., Taylor, J., Cavazos‐Rehg, P. A., Choudhury, M. D., & Aledavood, T. (2024) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/54433 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-reported side effects of semaglutide and tirzepatide in online communities
Sehgal, N. K. R., Tronieri, J. S., Ungar, L., & Guntuku, S. C. (2026) · Nature Health · doi:10.1038/s44360-026-00108-y · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Gómez-Zará, D., Liu, Y., Neves, L., Shah, N., & Bos, M. W. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.108014 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
A large-scale observational comparison of antidepressants and their effects
Heinz, M. V., Yom‐Tov, E., Mackin, D. M., Matsumura, R., & Jacobson, N. C. (2024) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.08.001 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Social networks use in the context of Schizophrenia: a review of the literature
Suárez-Llevat, C., Jiménez-Gómez, B., Ruíz-Núñez, C., Fernández-Quijano, I., Rodríguez-González, E., de-la-Torre-Domingo, C., & Herrera-Peco, I. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1255073 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Probing Public Perceptions of Antidepressants on Social Media: Mixed Methods Study
Zhu, J., Zhang, X., Jin, R., Jiang, H., & Kenne, D. R. (2024) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/62680 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Effect of Feedback on Drug Consumption Disclosures on Social Media
Jangra, H., Shah, R. R., & Kumaraguru, P. (2023) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22158 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Lambert, C., Saha, K., & Chandrasekharan, E. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713830 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationAbdalla, M., Abadeh, P., Noorian, Z., Ghenai, A., Zarrinkalam, F., & Alavijeh, S. Z. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2025.3561073 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Mental Health Consultations on College Campuses: Examining the Predictive Ability of Social MediaPreprint
Saha, K., Yousuf, A., Boyd, R. L., Pennebaker, J., & Choudhury, M. D. (2021) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-196605/v1 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationCameron, E. E., Simpson, K. M., Pierce, S. K., Penner, K. E., Beyak, A., Gomez, I., Bowes, J.-M., Reynolds, K., Tomfohr‐Madsen, L. M., & Roos, L. E. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/fdh7k · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Observer Effect in Social Media UsePreprint
Saha, K., Gupta, P., Mark, G. J., Kıcıman, E., & Choudhury, M. D. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2492994/v1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationZahid, A., Kamiran, F., Abbas, S., Qureshi, B., & Karim, A. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3557468 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Mittal, J., Belorkar, A., Jakhetiya, V., Pokuri, V., & Guntuku, S. C. (2023) · Web Science Conference · doi:10.1145/3578503.3583600 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Chen, J., Card, D., & Jurafsky, D. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.288 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Leveraging Causal Inference to Measure the Impact of a Mental Health App on Users’ Well-being
de Villa, A. R., Sottocornola, G., Çoba, L., Maffei, G., Lucchesi, F., Guerreiro, J., & Skorulski, B. (2023) · ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP) · doi:10.1145/3565472.3592967 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Exploring Causal Effect of Personal Financial Activities by Social Media Influences
Ferdows, R., Ahmed, F., Islamy, M. R., & Kamal, A. R. M. (2021) · International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) · doi:10.1109/iccit54785.2021.9689892 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Turjo, M. D., Mundada, K. S., Haque, N. J., Ahmed, N., & Ahmed, N. (2024) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/55511 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
The Cyberpsychology Influence on Modern Computing
Ancis, J. R. (2025) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3720535 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Exploring negative experiences in psychotherapy using an NLP approach on online forum data
Steinbrenner, T., Lalk, C., Kabjesz, A., Ferizaj, D., Loray, J. S. P., Iovoli, F., & Rubel, J. A. (2025) · npj Mental Health Research · doi:10.1038/s44184-025-00172-4 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Zhang, R. J., Kennard, N. N., Smith, D. S., McFarland, D. A., McCallum, A., & Keith, K. A. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.83 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Observer Effect in Social Media UsePreprint
Saha, K., Gupta, P., Mark, G. J., Kıcıman, E., & Choudhury, M. D. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2492994/v2 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationSteinbrenner, T., Lalk, C., Kabjesz, A., Loray, J. S. P., Iovoli, F., & Rubel, J. A. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-6766808/v1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
A Survey of Online Hate Speech through the Causal Lens
Founta, A.-M., & Specia, L. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.cinlp-1.6 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
HERBAL DRUG TREATMENT ON KRODH (ANGER) – A REVIEW STUDY
Pandit, S. R., & Kolarkar, R. S. (2021) · International Ayurvedic Medical Journal · doi:10.46607/iamj08p5042021
Mental Health Consultations on College Campuses: Examining the Predictive Ability of Social MediaPreprint
Saha, K., Yousuf, A., Boyd, R. L., Pennebaker, J. W., & Choudhury, M. D. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-162266/v1
Self-citationmHealth for mental health during quarantine
(2023) · International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science · doi:10.56726/irjmets43689
SenteCon: Leveraging Lexicons to Learn Human-Interpretable Language Representations
Lin, V., & Morency, L. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.264
Observer Effect in Social Media UsePreprint
Saha, K., Gupta, P., Mark, G. J., Kıcıman, E., & Choudhury, M. D. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2492994/v3
Self-citationZhu, J., Zhang, X., Jin, R., Jiang, H., & Kenne, D. R. (2024) · doi:10.2196/preprints.62680
Jiménez-Galina, A., Olmos-Sánchez, K. M., Maldonado-Macías, A. A., Licona-Olmos, J. G., & Sánchez-Solís, J. P. (2024) · Programming and Computer Software · doi:10.1134/s0361768824700725
Lu, F., Lin, A., & Luo, Z. (2026) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-026-10577-8
Shimgekar, S. R., Zhao, R., Goyal, A., Rodriguez, V. J., Bloom, P. A., Kumar, N., Sundaram, H., & Saha, K. (2026) · ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci) · doi:10.1145/3795766.3799758 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationSelf-Reported Side Effects Among Reddit Users Taking Nonapproved RetatrutidePreprint
Sehgal, N. K. R., Tronieri, J. S., Rader, B. M., Ungar, L., & Guntuku, S. C. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.05.28.26352819
Self-Reported Adverse Effects Among Social Media Users Taking Nonapproved Retatrutide
Sehgal, N. K. R., Tronieri, J., Rader, B., Kulkarni, P. V., & Guntuku, S. (2026) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.38929
- Authors
- Saha, K., Sugar, B., Torous, J., Abrahao, B., Kıcıman, E., & De Choudhury, M.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
- Published
- 2019-07-06
- Volume
- 13
- Pages
- 440-451
- ISSN
- 2162-3449 (ISSN-L)
- 2334-0770
- PMC
- PMC7152507
- OpenAlex
- W2953417263
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7
- FWCI
- 20.25
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Microsoft Research
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61850410536)
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH116130)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM112697)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Keywords
- psychiatric medication, psychopathology, mood, cognition, depression, anxiety, psychosis, suicidal ideation, Twitter, social media data, propensity score matching, causal inference, digital therapeutics, treatment outcomes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review