The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 4 are not checked yet.
AcaWriter: A Learning Analytics Tool for Formative Feedback on Academic Writing
Open accessAbstract
Written communication is an important skill across academia, the workplace, and civic participation. Effective writing incorporates instantiations of particular text structures - rhetorical moves - that communicate intent to the reader. These rhetorical moves are important across a range of academic styles of writing, including essays and research abstracts, as well as in forms of writing in which one reflects on learning gained through experience. However, learning how to effectively instantiate and use these rhetorical moves is a challenge. Moreover, educators often struggle to provide feedback supporting this learning, particularly at scale. Where effective support is provided, the techniques can be hard to share beyond single implementation sites. We address these challenges through the open-source AcaWriter tool, which provides feedback on rhetorical moves, with a design that allows feedback customization for specific contexts. We introduce three example implementations in which we have customized the tool and evaluated it with regard to user perceptions, and its impact on student writing. We discuss the tool's general theoretical background and provide a detailed technical account. We conclude with four recommendations that emphasize the potential of collaborative approaches in building, sharing and evaluating writing tools in research and practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A further interesting area of work involves the use of feedback analytics to support student academic writing (Gibson et al., 2017; Knight et al., 2020).”
From A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in enhancing feedback practices in higher education (2022) · cites this paper as Knight et al., 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data
Thomas, D. R. (2006) · American Journal of Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1098214005283748 · Cited by 10,858
Brown, A. L. (1992) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2 · Cited by 4,000
Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments
Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02504682 · Cited by 2,634
Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach
Lea, M. R., & Street, B. (1998) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079812331380364 · Cited by 2,608
Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation
Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/0742-051x(94)00012-u · Cited by 2,314
Penetrating the Fog: Analytics in Learning and Education.
Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011) · Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) · Cited by 1,752
Research Genres: Explorations and Applications
Swales, J. M. (2004) · Cited by 1,675
Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society
Boud, D. (2000) · Studies in Continuing Education · doi:10.1080/713695728 · Cited by 1,545
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). What is reflection in learning. In D. Boud (Ed.), Reflection: Turning experience into learning (pp. 7-17). Kogan Page.
- Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (1993). The Powers of Literacy: A Genre Approach to Teaching Writing. Routledge.
- Elsevier. (2015). New open access resource will support text mining and natural language processing. Elsevier Connect. https://www.elsevier.com/connect/new-open-accessresource-will-support-text-mining-and-natural-language-processing
- Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing process. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive Processes in Writing (pp. 3-30). Erlbaum.
- LAK11. (2011). 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge 2011 | Connecting the technical, pedagogical, and social dimensions of learning analytics. LAK11. https://tekri.athabascau.ca/analytics/about
- Shibani, A., Knight, S., & Shum, S. B. (2019). Contextualizable Learning Analytics Design: A Generic Model and Writing Analytics Evaluations. Proceedings of the 9th International
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–149 of 149
Assessment Strategies in Empowering Self-Regulated Learning in Higher Education
Zakaria, Z., & Latif, A. B. A. (2023) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-6076-4.ch018 · Cited by 1
Understanding the Effect of Cohesion in Academic Writing Clarity Using Education Data Science
Shin, J., & Epp, C. D. (2023) · Big data management · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-0026-8_5 · Cited by 1
Thesis Writer: Digitale Anleitung zum wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten, Schreiben und Denken
Rapp, C., Kruse, O., & Ott, J. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-34698-0_7 · Cited by 1
Leijten, M., Vandermeulen, N., & Vangehuchten, L. (2022) · RLA. Revista de lingüística teórica y aplicada · doi:10.29393/rla60-5sbml30005 · Cited by 1
Towards meaning-making with interactive visualisations
Canizares, M., Gibson, A., Lovell, D. R., & Willis, J. (2023) · ASCILITE Publications · doi:10.14742/apubs.2023.487 · Cited by 1
Self-citationMaphoto, K. B. (2021) · Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa) · Cited by 1
Weidlich, J. (2025) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/4e3bh_v1 · Cited by 1
Developing your academic writing friend:an academic writing tool for independent use
Scherber, Y. H. (2021)
Frančíková, D., & Rosolová, K. E. (2021) · doi:10.31490/9788024845555
Laguna, M. V. G., & Redondo, R. F. (2021) · Magister · doi:10.17811/msg.33.1.2021.33-40
Bakla, A. (2022) · English for Specific Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.esp.2021.12.003
Fiacco, J., Jiang, S., Adamson, D., & Rosé, C. P. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.14012-6
Introducing Practicable Learning Analytics
Grönlund, Å., & Viberg, O. (2023) · Advances in analytics for learning and teaching · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-27646-0_1
Understanding the impact of the research writing tutor on graduate writers during revision
Bhrahmbhatt, C. (2019) · IAAR Journal of Education Peer-Reviewed Journal · doi:10.58213/education.v1i2.44
Operationalizing Learning Processes Through Learning Analytics
Patzak, A., & Vytasek, J. (2023) · Studies in big data · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29937-7_6
Ramos-Neyra, M. F., Andrade, R. F. F., Rodríguez, L. T. R., Tippe-Marmolejo, S., & Riega-Virú, Y. B. (2023) · LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education and Technology (LACCEI) · doi:10.18687/laccei2023.1.1.721
Analytic Techniques for Automated Analysis of Writing
Shibani, A. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-36033-6_20
Self-citationFinding the Right Words: Language Technologies to Support Formulation
Kruse, O., Chitez, M., & Rapp, C. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-36033-6_28
Open Educational Resources für die Germanistische Linguistik
Bäumer, B., Krüger, S., Machura, I. A., Sälzer, S., Schmallenbach, J., Steinsiek, S., & Wille, M. (2023) · Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik · doi:10.1515/zgl-2023-2027
Maton, K., Doran, Y. J., Howard, S. K., Nothman, J., & Quilpatay, M. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-60571-0_2
Link, S., Redmon, R., & Hagan, M. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5117045
Rose, R. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5109457
An Exploratory Study of AI Assisted Feedback and Formative Assessment of Writing Skills
Luhach, S. (2024) · Global AI Summit - International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technology (AI Summit) · doi:10.1109/globalaisummit62156.2024.10947841
Shultz, G. V., Dood, A. J., & Finkenstaedt-Quinn, S. A. (2025) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2025.2456.2.09
Chapter 20. Making the Case for Reading and Writing and Teaching and Research
Krebs, P. M. (2025) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2025.2456.2.2
Mau, B.-R., & Feng, H.-H. (2025) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2025.100984
Learning analytics for communication skills: A systematic review
Kew, S. N., Hussin, S. C., Tee, L.-T., Wei, L. T., & Lee, S. C. (2025) · Multidisciplinary Reviews · doi:10.31893/multirev.2026217
Seamless Learning : grenz- und kontextübergreifendes Lehren und Lernen in der Bodenseeregion
Dilger, B., Erlemann, J., Müller, C., & Rapp, C. (2022) · Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences) · doi:10.21256/zhaw-24036
Tracking Citation Practices Across Disciplines: A SourceMapper Analysis of MICUSP
Kane, M. (2025) · The Journal of Writing Analytics · doi:10.37514/jwa-j.2025.8.1.01
Perception of Using ChatGPT in Academic Writing in Peruvian University Students
Núñez-Pacheco, R., Barreda-Parra, A., Vidal, E., Castro-Gutiérrez, E., & Turpo-Gebera, O. (2026) · Smart innovation, systems and technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-09911-2_12
ClassInsight: Developing an Agentic AIEd Tool for Responsive Teaching and LearningPreprint
Berler, T., & Cohen‐Sasson, O. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8078768/v1
Educational ideals affect AI acceptance in learning environments
Richter, F., & Uhl, M. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00979-z
Rodrigues, L. F., Xavier, C., Ribeiro, F., da Costa, N. T., & MELLO, R. F. L. D. (2025) · doi:10.5753/wapla.2025.15852
Singh, J. K., Daniel, B. K., & Koh, J. H. L. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-1875-3_7
Re-Tooling Research Pedagogy in Higher Education Contexts
Al-Sowaidi, B. S. A., Kamalie, M., & Saif, H. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-4521-5.ch013
CrossLit: Connecting Visual and Textual Sensemaking for Literature Review
Choe, K., Kim, E., Kim, M. H., Hwang, S., Park, S., Kim, N. W., & Seo, J. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791418 · Cited by 3
Cognitive Process Frameworks in Academic Writing: A Systematic Review
Farahiba, A. S., Sodiq, S., Indarti, T., Yohanes, B., Mintowati, & Nurhadi, D. (2025) · Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review · doi:10.23887/ijerr.v8i3.95523
Prieto, L. P., & Villa-Torrano, C. (2026) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3785022.3785125
The Blind Spots in Automated Feedback Generation for Academic Writing
Sasaki, T., Conijn, R., & Willemsen, M. C. (2026) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3785022.3785120
Using GenRewrite to provide personalized feedback for form-function alignment in EAP writing
Wei, Y., Wang, Y., & Jin, T. (2026) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2026.101075
Kaya, F. C. I. (2026) · IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) · doi:10.1109/educon67543.2026.11574170
Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Digital Ecosystems in Research and Education
Chituc, C.-M. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-32335-4_15
PEUMO: An AI-based writing assessment and support tool for engineering report writing in Spanish
Canales, C. C., & René Venegas, V. (2026) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2026.101106
Toward More Effective Automated Writing Evaluation Through Relational Trust
Goldshtein, M., Chiou, E. K., & Roscoe, R. D. (2026) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-026-09999-y
Alnashiri, H., Raković, M., Nawaz, S., Li, X., Fernandez-Nieto, G. M., Qian, K., Lämsä, J., Lim, L., Bannert, M., Järvelä, S., et al. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70331
Mapping Review of Tools Developed for Teaching Academic Writing
Rybicki, J.-M., Malmi, L., & Pitkänen, K. K. (2026) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440261495194
Metadata
- Authors
- Knight, S., Shibani, A., Abel, S., Gibson, A., & Ryan, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Knight, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Writing Research
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- vol. 12 issue 1
- Pages
- 141-186
- ISSN
- 2030-1006 (ISSN-L)
- 2294-3307
- OpenAlex
- W3024117512
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10
- FWCI
- 30.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Journal of Writing Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Keywords
- learning analytics, formative feedback, academic writing, rhetorical moves, writing instruction, student writing, user perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
