CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 200American Environmental and Regional HistoryEnvironmental Movements and Political EcologyNonprofit Sector and Volunteering

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Organizational Structure of Local Environmentalism

Andrews, Kenneth, Edwards, Bob·2005·Mobilization: An International Quarterly
DOI 10.17813/maiq.10.2.028028u600744073
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Based on a survey of the population of local environmental organizations in North Carolina, this article addresses fundamental questions about how local organizations are structured, their orientation toward strategy and social change, their activities, and their perceived impacts. By comparing subsets of local organizations in terms of their geographic scope, degree of professionalization, and tactical repertoires, we identify important patterns. First, locally oriented organizations that focus on a neighborhood, city, or county are more likely to be affiliated with a national organization than regional or state organizations, but they are less likely to participate in coalitions than groups working at the regional or state level. Second, organizations relying on a mixture of volunteers and professionals are more formalized and report higher levels of success at mobilizing people than those that rely exclusively on volunteers or professionals. However, groups that are volunteer-based are more likely to engage in partisan activity and have diverse environmental philosophies, but less likely to use conventional advocacy tactics like lobbying and less likely to have a nonprofit tax status. Finally, organizations engaging in disruptive and routinized protest strategies tend to be more similar to one another than they are to organizations that rely exclusively on moderate tactical repertoires such as lobbying or environmental education.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17813/maiq.10.2.028028u600744073

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 200

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Andrews, K., & Edwards, B.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • East Carolina University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Mobilization: An International Quarterly
Publisher
Mobilization Journal
Published
2005-06-01
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
213-234
ISSN
1086-671X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.17813/maiq.10.2.028028u600744073
OpenAlex
W35084577
Cited by
200
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
13.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mobilization An International Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › American Environmental and Regional History
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Environmental Movements and Political Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Keywords
organizational structure, professionalization, volunteer-based organizations, protest tactics, lobbying, coalition building, environmental advocacy, North Carolina

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review