Cited by 483D Printing in Biomedical ResearchAnimal testing and alternativesMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications

The future of skin toxicology testing–three-dimensional bioprinting meets microfluidics

Open access
Ng, Wei Long, Yeong, Wai Yee·2019·International Journal of Bioprinting

Abstract

Over the years, the field of toxicology testing has evolved tremendously from the use of animal models to the adaptation of in vitro testing models. In this perspective article, we aim to bridge the gap between the regulatory authorities who performed the testing and approval of new chemicals and the scientists who designed and fabricated these in vitro testing models. An in-depth discussion of existing toxicology testing guidelines for skin tissue models (definition, testing models, principle, and limitations) is first presented to have a good understanding of the stringent requirements that are necessary during the testing process. Next, the ideal requirements of toxicology testing platform (in terms of fabrication, testing, and screening process) are then discussed. We envisioned that the integration of three-dimensional bioprinting within miniaturized microfluidics platform would bring about a paradigm shift in the field of toxicology testing; providing standardization in the fabrication process, accurate, and rapid deposition of test chemicals, real-time monitoring, and high throughput screening for more efficient skin toxicology testing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18063/ijb.v5i2.1.237

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study published in the Journal of Toxicology in Vitro (2022) demonstrated that a 3D human skin model accurately predicted skin compatibility of various sunscreen formulations, reducing the need for animal testing and providing more reliable safety assessments.

    “For instance, a study published in the Journal of Toxicology in Vitro (2022) demonstrated the effectiveness of a 3D human skin model in assessing the safety of various sunscreen formulations. The model accurately predicted skin compatibility, reducing the need for animal testing and providing more reliable safety assessments (137).”

    From The dark side of beauty: an in-depth analysis of the health hazards and toxicological impact of synthetic cosmetics and personal care products (2024) · cites this paper as [137]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [27]Chua CK Yeong WY Leong KF 2005Rapid Prototyping in Tissue Engineering:A State-of-the-Art Report Proceeding 2nd International Conference on Advanced Research in Virtual and Rapid Prototyping 19 27

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ng, W. L., & Yeong, W. Y.
Affiliations
Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Corresponding author
Yeong, Wai Yee
Venue
International Journal of Bioprinting
Published
2019-09-20
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
237
ISSN
  • 2424-7723 (ISSN-L)
  • 2424-8002
OpenAlex
W2974118947
Cited by
48
References
69
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Bioprinting (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Hewlett-Packard Development Company
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Keywords
3D bioprinting, microfluidics, in vitro skin model, chemical safety assessment, high-throughput screening, real-time monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review