CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 136

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adverse Impact of Textile Dyes on the Aquatic Environment as well as on Human Beings

Mehra, Sukanya, Singh, Mandeep, Chadha, Pooja·2021·Toxicology International
DOI 10.18311/ti/2021/v28i2/26798
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Dyeing stages involved in textile processing are considered to be one of the major contributors to aquatic pollution. Dyes being highly persistent due to the chemical composition are considered to be one of the most detrimental groups. Textile dyes essentially affect the exquisite aspect of aquatic bodies by enhancing biochemical as well as chemical oxygen demand. It also attenuates photosynthesis, hinders the growth of plants and invades the food chain. The bioaccumulating potential promotes toxicity, carcinogenicity and mutagenicity. Therefore, the present review article aims to focus on the predominant effects of textile dye on in the aquatic environment particularly on algae, fish and ultimately on humans being.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18311/ti/2021/v28i2/26798

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ingestion of dyes by fish and other creatures can lead to the metabolic conversion of these substances into hazardous intermediates inside their systems, exerting detrimental effects on the well-being of both the fish and their predators.

    “Moreover, the ingestion of dyes by fish and other creatures can lead to the metabolic conversion of these substances into hazardous intermediates inside their systems, so exerting detrimental effects on the well-being of both the fish and their predators [78].”

    From Recent Advances in the Remediation of Textile-Dye-Containing Wastewater: Prioritizing Human Health and Sustainable Wastewater Treatment (2024) · cites this paper as [78]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 93

  1. Yang Q, Li Z, Lu X, Duan Q, Huang L, Bi J. A review of soil heavy metal pollution from industrial and agricultural regions in China: Pollution and risk assessment. Sci Total Environ. 2018; 642:690–700. PMid:29909337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.068 · DOI
  2. Gupta S, Satpati S, Nayek S, Garai D. Effect of wastewater irrigation on vegetables in relation to bioaccumulation of heavy metals and biochemical changes. Environ Monit Assess. 2010; 165(1-4):169–77. PMid: 19430920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-0936-3 · DOI
  3. Hassan M, Hassan R, Anik Mahmud M, Israt Pia H, Arafat Hassan M, Uddin M. Sewage waste water characteristics and its management in urban areas - A case study at Pagla Sewage Treatment Plant. Dhaka Urban Reg Plan. 2017; 2(3):13–6. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20170203.11 · DOI
  4. Desore A, Narula SA. An overview on corporate response towards sustainability issues in textile industry. Environ Dev Sustain. 2018; 20(4):1439–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9949-1 · DOI
  5. Bhatia SC. Pollution control in textile industry. Devraj S, ed. Woodhead Publishing India Pvt. Ltd. 2017. p. 340. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315148588 · DOI
  6. Hossain MS, Das SC, Islam JMM, Al Mamun MA, Khan MA. Reuse of textile mill ETP sludge in environmental friendly bricks - effect of gamma radiation. Radiat Phys Chem. 2018; 151:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.05.020 · DOI
  7. Muthu SS. Introduction. Muthu SS, ed. Sustainability in the Textile Industry. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2017. p. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10- 2639-3_1 · DOI
  8. Nigam P, Banat IM, Singh D, Marchant R. Microbial process for the decolorization of textile effluent containing azo, diazo and reactive dyes. Process Biochem. 1996; 31(5):435–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-9592(95)00085-2 · DOI
  9. Robinson T, McMullan G, Marchant R, Nigam P. Remediation of dyes in textile effluent: A critical review on current treatment technologies with a proposed alternative. Bioresour Technol. 2001; 77(3):247–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00080-8 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Guaratini CCI, Zanoni MVB. Textile Dyes Corantes texteis. Quim Nova. 2000; 23(1):71–8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422000000100013 · DOI
  11. Chequer FMD, Angeli JPF, Ferraz ERA, Tsuboy MS, Marcarini JC, Mantovani MS, et al. The azo dyes Disperse Red 1 and Disperse Orange 1 increase the micronuclei frequencies in human lymphocytes and in HepG2 cells. Mutat Res - Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2009; 676(1):83–6. PMid: 19442572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2009.04.004 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gita S, Shukla SP, Saharan N, Prakash C, Deshmukhe G. Toxic effects of selected textile dyes on elemental composition, photosynthetic pigments, protein content and growth of a freshwater chlorophycean alga chlorella vulgaris. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2019; 102(6):795–801. PMid: 30927019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-019-02599-w · DOI
  13. Bento RMF, Almeida MR, Bharmoria P, Freire MG, Tavares APM. Improvements in the enzymatic degradation of textile dyes using ionic-liquid-based surfactants. Sep Purif Technol. 2020; 235:116191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116191 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Mishra S, Maiti A. Applicability of enzymes produced from different biotic species for biodegradation of textile dyes. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2019; 21(4):763– 81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01681-5 · DOI
  15. Benkhaya S, M'rabet S, El Harfi A. A review on classifications, recent synthesis and applications of textile dyes. Vol. 115. Inorganic Chemistry Communications. Elsevier B.V.; 2020. p. 107891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2020.107891 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Wang DM. Environmental protection in clothing industry. Sustainable Development. World Scientific; 2016. p. 729-35. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814749916_0076 · DOI
  17. Orts F, del Rí­o AI, Molina J, Bonastre J, Cases F. Electrochemical treatment of real textile wastewater: Trichromy Procion HEXL. J Electroanal Chem. 2018; 808:387–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.06.051 · DOI
  18. Berradi M, Hsissou R, Khudhair M, Assouag M, Cherkaoui O, El Bachiri A, et al. Textile finishing dyes and their impact on aquatic environs. Heliyon. 2019; 5(11):e02711. PMid: 31840123 PMCid: PMC6893069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02711 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Zaharia C, Suteu D, Muresan A, Muresan R, Popescu A. Textile wastewater treatment by homogenous oxidation with hydrogen peroxide. Environ Eng Manag J. 2009; 8(6):1359–69. https://doi.org/10.30638/ eemj.2009.199 · DOI
  20. Aquino JM, Rocha-Filho RC, Ruotolo LAM, Bocchi N, Biaggio SR. Electrochemical degradation of a real textile wastewater using β-PbO2 and DSA anodes. Chem Eng J. 2014; 251:138–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.04.032 · DOI
  21. Lopes de Sousa M, Bueno de Moraes P, Matos Lopes PR, Nallin Montagnolli R, De Angelis D de F, Dino Bidoia E. Contamination by Remazol red brilliant dye and its impact in aquatic photosynthetic microbiota. Environ Manag Sustain Dev. 2012; 1(2):129–38. https://doi.org/10.5296/emsd.v1i2.2512 · DOI
  22. Chia MA, Musa RI. Effect of indigo dye effluent on the growth, biomass production and phenotypic plasticity of Scenedesmus quadricauda (Chlorococcales). An Acad Bras Cienc. 2014; 86(1):419-28. PMid: 24676177. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201420130225 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Khatri J, Nidheesh PV, Anantha Singh TS, Suresh Kumar M. Advanced oxidation processes based on zero-valent aluminium for treating textile wastewater. Chem Eng J. 2018; 348:67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cej.2018.04.074 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Sandhya S. Biodegradation of Azo dyes under anaerobic condition: Role of Azoreductase. Atacag Erkurt H, ed. Biodegradation of Azo Dyes. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2010. p. 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2009_43 · DOI
  25. Newman MC. Fundamentals of Ecotoxicology -The Science of Pollution. CRC Press; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17658 · DOI
  26. Rehman K, Shahzad T, Sahar A, Hussain S, Mahmood F, Siddique MH, et al. Effect of Reactive Black 5 azo dye on soil processes related to C and N cycling. Peer J. 2018; 2018(5):e4802. PMid: 29844965 PMCid: PMC5969049. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4802 · DOI
  27. Imran M, Crowley DE, Khalid A, Hussain S, Mumtaz MW, Arshad M. Microbial biotechnology for decolorization of textile wastewaters. Rev Environ Sci Bio/Technology. 2015; 14(1):73–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-014-9344-4 · DOI
  28. Santana RM da R, Charamba LCV, do Nascimento GE, de Oliveira JGC, Sales DCS, Duarte MMMB, et al. Degradation of textile dyes employing advanced oxidative processes: Kinetic, Equilibrium Modeling and Toxicity Study of Seeds and Bacteria. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2019; 230(6):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-019-4178-x · DOI
  29. O'Neill C, Hawkes FR, Hawkes DL, Lourenço ND, Pinheiro HM, Delée W. Color in textile effluents - Sources, measurement, discharge consents and simulation: A review. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 1999; 74(11):1009–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199911)74:11<1009::AID-JCTB153>3.0.CO;2-N · DOI
  30. Khan S, Malik A. Environmental and health effects of textile industry wastewater. Malik A, Grohmann E, Akhtar R, eds. Environmental Deterioration and Human Health: Natural and anthropogenic determinants. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2014. p. 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7890-0_4 · DOI
  31. Tkacz RJ, Maguire RJ. Occurrence of Dyes in the Yamaska River, Quebec. Water Qual Res J. 1991; 26(2):145–62. http://iwaponline.com/wqrj/article-pdf/26/2/145/233407/wqrj0260145.pdf https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrj.1991.009 · DOI
  32. Al-Sabti K. Chlorotriazine reactive Azo Red 120 textile dye induces micronuclei in fish. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2000; 47(2):149–55. PMid: 11023693. https://doi. org/10.1006/eesa.2000.1931 · DOI
  33. Karthikeyan S, Jambulingam M, Sivakumar P, Shekhar AP, Krithika J. Impact of textile effluents on fresh water fish Mastacembelus Armatus (Cuv. and Val) . J Chem. 2006; 3(4):303–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2006/701612 · DOI
  34. Gita S, Hussan A, Choudhury TG. Impact of textile dyes waste on aquatic environments and its treatment. Environ Ecol. 2017; 35(22):2349–53.
  35. Hernandez-Zamora M, Martinez-Jeronimo F. Exposure to the azo dye Direct blue 15 produces toxic effects on microalgae, cladocerans and zebrafish embryos. Ecotoxicology. 2019; 28(8):890–902. PMid: 31392637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-019-02087-1 · DOI
  36. Dwivedi S. Effect of textile dyes on Spirulina platensis. J Chem Pharm Res. 2013; 5(4):66–80.
  37. Croce R, Cina F, Lombardo A, Crispeyn G, Cappelli CI, Vian M, et al. Aquatic toxicity of several textile dye formulations: Acute and chronic assays with Daphnia magna and Raphidocelis subcapitata. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2017; 144:79–87. PMid:28601520. http:// www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014765131730324X https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv. 2017.05.046 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Cai H, Liang J, Ning X, Lai X, Li Y. Algal toxicity induced by effluents from textile-dyeing wastewater treatment plants. J Environ Sci. 2020; 91:199–208. PMid: 32172968. http://www.sciencedirect.com/scie nce/article/pii/S1001074220300048 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.01.004 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Athira N, Jaya DS. The use of fish biomarkers for assessing textile effluent contamination of aquatic ecosystems: A review. Nat Environ Pollut Technol. 2018; 17(1):25–34. www.neptjournal.com
  40. Kaur H, Kalotra R, Walia GK, Handa D. Dyeing industry effluent induced behavioral and morphological changes in the fish, Cirrhinus mrigala. Int J Zool Res. 2013; 3(3):13–20.
  41. Amwele HR, Papirom P, Chukanhom K, Beamish FHW, Petkam R. Acute and subchronic toxicity of metal complex Azo acid dye and anionic surfactant oil on fish Oreochromis niloticus. J Environ Biol. 2015; 36(1):199–205.
  42. Barot J, Bahadur A. Toxic impacts of C.I. acid Orange 7 on behavioural, haematological and some biochemical parameters of Labeo rohita fingerlings. Int J Sci Res Environ Sci. 2015; 3(8):284–90. https:// doi.org/10.12983/ijsres-2015-p0284-0290 · DOI
  43. Kaur K, Kaur S, Kaur A. A review on ecotoxic potential of pollutants in fish. J Appl Nat Sci. 2019; 11(1):48–53. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v11i1.1948 · DOI
  44. Parmar TK, Rawtani D, Agrawal YK. Bioindicators: the natural indicator of environmental pollution. Front Life Sci. 2016; 9(2):110–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/21553769.2016.1162753 · DOI
  45. Parmar A, Barot J. Determination of genotoxic effect of azo dye C. I. RR 120 on fish Catla catla. Biotechnol Res. 2016; 2(2):77–80.
  46. Parmar A, Shah A. Cytogenotoxicity of azo dye Reactive Red 120 (RR120) on fish Catla catla. Environ Exp Biol. 2019; 17(3):151–5. https://doi.org/10.22364/ eeb.17.15 · DOI
  47. Rishin A, Priyatha CV, Chitra KC. Induction of genetic damage in peripheral erythrocytes of the fish, Anabas testudineus exposed to sublethal concentration of Acid Orange 7. Res Rev A J Life Sci. 2019; 9(2):1–10.
  48. Soni P, Sharma S, Sharma S, Kumar S, Sharma KP. A comparative study on the toxic effects of textile dye wastewaters (untreated and treated) on mortality and RBC of a freshwater fish Gambusia affinis (Baird and Gerard). J Environ Biol. 2006; 27(4):623–8.
  49. Gadagbui BKM, Goksoyr A. CYP1A and other biomarker responses to effluents from a textile mill in the Volta River (Ghana) using caged tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and sediment-exposed mudfish (Clarias anguillaris). Biomarkers. 1996; 1(4):252–61. PMid: 23888992, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/13547509609079365 https://doi.org/10.3109/13547509609079365 · DOI
  50. Leme DM, De Oliveira GAR, Meireles G, Brito LB, Rodrigues L de B, Palma De Oliveira D. Eco - and genotoxicological assessments of two reactive textile dyes. J Toxicol Environ Heal - Part A Curr Issues. 2015; 78(5):287–300. PMid: 25734625. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2014.971208 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Ensink JHJ, van der Hoek W, Amerasinghe FP. Giardia duodenalis infection and wastewater irrigation in Pakistan. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006; 100(6):538–42. PMid: 16336984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trstmh.2005.08.014 · DOI
  52. Faryal R, Tahir F, Hameed A. Effect of wastewater irrigation on soil along with its micro and macro flora. Pakistan J Bot. 2007; 39(1):193.
  53. Garg VK, Kaushik P. Influence of textile mill wastewater irrigation on the growth of sorghum cultivars. Appl Ecol Environ Res. 2008; 6(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/0601_001012 · DOI
  54. Zhou Q. Chemical pollution and transport of organic dyes in water-soil-crop systems of the Chinese Coast. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2001; 66(6):0784–93. PMid: 11353382. http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00128/bibs/1066006/10660784.htm https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-001-0077-z · DOI
  55. Imran M, Shaharoona B, Crowley DE, Khalid A, Hussain S, Arshad M. The stability of textile azo dyes in soil and their impact on microbial phospholipid fatty acid profiles. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2015; 120:163–8. PMid: 26074308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecoenv.2015.06.004 · DOI
  56. Khan S, Malik A. Toxicity evaluation of textile effluents and role of native soil bacterium in biodegradation of a textile dye. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018; 25(5):4446–58. PMid: 29185221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0783-7 · DOI
  57. Vikrant K, Giri BS, Raza N, Roy K, Kim KH, Rai BN, et al. Recent advancements in bioremediation of dye: Current status and challenges. Bioresour Technol. 2018; 253:355–67. PMid: 29352640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.029 · DOI
  58. Ito T, Adachi Y, Yamanashi Y, Shimada Y. Long-term natural remediation process in textile dye-polluted river sediment driven by bacterial community changes. Water Res. 2016; 100:458–65. PMid: 27232990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.050 · DOI
  59. Rawat D, Mishra V, Sharma RS. Detoxification of azo dyes in the context of environmental processes. Chemosphere. 2016; 155:591–605. PMid: 27155475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.04.068 · DOI
  60. Vargas AMM, Paulino AT, Nozaki J. Effects of daily nickel intake on the bio-accumulation, body weight and length in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Toxicol Environ Chem. 2009; 91(4):751-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02772240802541353 · DOI
  61. Christie R. Colour chemistry. Royal Society of Chemistry; 2001. · DOI
  62. Christie RM. Environmental aspects of textile dyeing. Elsevier; 2007. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439823941 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Clark M. Handbook of textile and industrial dyeing: principles, processes and types of dyes. Elsevier; 2011. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857093974 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Lellis B, Favaro-Polonio CZ, Pamphile JA, Polonio JC. Effects of textile dyes on health and the environment and bioremediation potential of living organisms. Biotechnol Res Innov. 2019; 3(2):275–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biori.2019.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Copaciu F, Opris O, Coman V, Ristoiu D, Niinemets U, Copolovici L. Diffuse water pollution by anthraquinone and azo dyes in environment importantly alters foliage volatiles, carotenoids and physiology in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Water Air Soil Pollut. 2013; 224(3):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-013-147 8-4 · DOI
  66. Hanger K. Industrial dyes: Chemistry, properties and applications, health and safety aspects. Germany: Wiley-VCH; 2003. · DOI
  67. Haq I, Raj A, Markandeya. Biodegradation of Azure-B dye by Serratia liquefaciens and its validation by phytotoxicity, genotoxicity and cytotoxicity studies. Chemosphere. 2018; 196:58–68. PMid: 29291515. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0045653517321318 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemos phere.2017.12.153 · DOI
  68. Khan AY, Suresh Kumar G. Spectroscopic studies on the binding interaction of phenothiazinium dyes, azure A and azure B to double stranded RNA polynucleotides. Spectrochim Acta - Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2016; 152:417–25. PMid: 26241827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2015.07.091 · DOI
  69. Petzer A, Harvey BH, Wegener G, Petzer JP. Azure B, a metabolite of methylene blue, is a high-potency, reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2012; 258(3):403–9. PMid: 22197611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2011.12.005 · DOI
  70. Paul P, Suresh Kumar G. Thermodynamics of the DNA binding of phenothiazinium dyes toluidine blue O, azure A and azure B. J Chem Thermodyn. 2013; 64:50– 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2013.04.023 · DOI
  71. Mittal A, Thakur V, Gajbe V. Adsorptive removal of toxic azo dye Amido Black 10B by hen feather. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2013; 20(1):260-9. PMid: 22407416. http://www.chemialland21.com/specialtychem/ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-0843-y · DOI
  72. Chequer FMD, Lizier TM, de Felí­cio R, Zanoni MVB, Debonsi HM, Lopes NP, et al. Analyses of the genotoxic and mutagenic potential of the products formed after the biotransformation of the azo dye Disperse Red 1. Toxicol Vitr. 2011; 25(8):2054–63. PMid: 21907275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2011.05.033 · DOI
  73. Fernandes FH, Bustos-Obregon E, Salvadori DMF. Disperse Red 1 (textile dye) induces cytotoxic and genotoxic effects in mouse germ cells. Reprod Toxicol. 2015; 53:75–81. PMid: 25883024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2015.04.002 · DOI
  74. Will Y, McDuffie JE, Olaharski AJ, Jeffy BD. Drug discovery toxicology: From target assessment to translational biomarkers. John Wiley and Sons; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119053248 · DOI
  75. Manzar MS, Waheed A, Qazi IW, Blaisi NI, Ullah N. Synthesis of a novel epibromohydrin modified crosslinked polyamine resin for highly efficient removal of methyl orange and eriochrome black T. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2019; 97:424–32. http://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S1876107019300446 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2019.01.027 · DOI
  76. Barka N, Abdennouri M, Makhfouk MEL. Removal of methylene blue and eriochrome black T from aqueous solutions by biosorption on Scolymus hispanicus L.: Kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamics. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2011; 42(2):320–6. http://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S1876107010001264 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2010.07.004 · DOI
  77. Park JH, Wang JJ, Tafti N, Delaune RD. Removal of eriochrome black T by sulfate radical generated from Fe-impregnated biochar/persulfate in Fenton-like reaction. J Ind Eng Chem. 2019; 71:201–9. http://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S1226086X18305148 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2018.11.026 · DOI
  78. Vaiano V, Sacco O, Libralato G, Lofrano G, Siciliano A, Carraturo F, et al. Degradation of anionic azo dyes in aqueous solution using a continuous flow photocatalytic packed-bed reactor: Influence of water matrix and toxicity evaluation. J Environ Chem Eng. 2020; 8(6):104549. http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S2213343720308988 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104549 · DOI
  79. National Toxicology Program. Carcinogenesis bioassay of C.I. Solvent Yellow 14 (CAS No. 842-07- 9) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Feed Study). Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser. 1982; 226:1–164. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12778210
  80. Petrakis EA, Cagliani LR, Tarantilis PA, Polissiou MG, Consonni R. Sudan dyes in adulterated saffron (Crocus sativus L.): Identification and quantification by 1H NMR. Food Chem. 2017; 217:418–24. PMid: 27664653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.08.078 · DOI
  81. Duman O, Tunc S, Gürkan Polat T. Adsorptive removal of triarylmethane dye (Basic Red 9) from aqueous solution by sepiolite as effective and low-cost adsorbent. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2015; 210:176–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.02.040 · DOI
  82. Foguel MV, Ton XA, Zanoni MVB, Sotomayor MDPT, Haupt K, Tse Sum Bui B. A molecularly imprinted polymer-based evanescent wave fiber optic sensor for the detection of basic red 9 dye. Sensors Actuators, B Chem. 2015; 218:222–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2015.05.007 · DOI
  83. Pohanish RP. Sittig's Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens. Elsevier Science; 2011. · DOI
  84. Ali HM, Shehata SF, Ramadan KMA. Microbial decolorization and degradation of crystal violet dye by Aspergillus niger. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2016; 13(12):2917–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-1117-x · DOI
  85. Bharagava RN, Mani S, Mulla SI, Saratale GD. Degradation and decolourization potential of an ligninolytic enzyme producing Aeromonas hydrophila for crystal violet dye and its phytotoxicity evaluation. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018; 156:166–75. PMid: 29550434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.03.012 · DOI
  86. Rao KVK. Inhibition of DNA synthesis in primary rat hepatocyte cultures by malachite green: a new liver tumor promoter. Toxicol Lett. 1995; 81(2-3):107–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4274(95)03413-7 · DOI
  87. Gouranchat C. Malachite green in fish culture (state of the art and perspectives). Bibliographic study. Ec natl Vet ENVT, Nantes (France) 142. 2000; 142:2000.
  88. Cha CJ, Doerge DR, Cerniglia CE. Biotransformation of malachite green by the fungus Cunninghamella elegans. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001; 67(9):4358–60. PMid: 11526047 PMCid: PMC93171. http://aem.asm.org/ https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.9.4358-4360.2001 · DOI
  89. Oplatowska M, Donnelly RF, Majithiya RJ, Glenn Kennedy D, Elliott CT. The potential for human exposure, direct and indirect, to the suspected carcinogenic triphenylmethane dye Brilliant Green from green paper towels. Food Chem Toxicol. 2011; 49(8):1870– 6. PMid: 21596089. http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0278691511001931 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2011.05.005 · DOI
  90. Sreedharan V, Bhaskara Rao KV. Biodegradation of textile azo dyes. Gothandam KM, Ranjan S, Dasgupta N, Lichtfouse E, eds. Nanoscience and Biotechnology for Environmental Applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 115–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97922-9_5 · DOI
  91. Eren HA, Yigit ć°, Eren S, Avinc O. Sustainable textile processing with zero water utilization using super critical carbon dioxide technology. Springer, Cham; 2020. p. 179–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030- 38545-3_8 · DOI
  92. Blanquez A, Rodriguez J, Brissos V, Mendes S, Martins LO, Ball AS, et al. Decolorization and detoxification of textile dyes using a versatile Streptomyces laccasenatural mediator system. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019; 26(5):913–20. PMid: 31303819 PMCid: PMC6600735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.05.020 · DOI
  93. Bayburt C, Karaduman AB, Yenice Gursu B, Tuncel M, Yamac M. Decolourization and detoxification of textile dyes by Lentinus arcularius in immersion bioreactor scale. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2020; 17(2):945–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02519-9 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mehra, S., Singh, M., & Chadha, P.
Venue
Toxicology International
Publisher
Informatics Publishing Limited
Published
2021-05-31
Pages
165-176
ISSN
  • 0976-5131
  • 0971-6580
DOI
10.18311/ti/2021/v28i2/26798
Cited by
136
References
1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review