The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Mi’kmaw Perspective on Advancing Salmon Governance in Nova Scotia, Canada: Setting the Stage for Collaborative Co-Existence
Open accessAbstract
Issues related to fisheries governance are a source of debate and tension between the Indigenous Mi’kmaq people of Nova Scotia and the Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) in matters concerning Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. Within the context of the existing governance regime, this analysis compares the concept of salmon conservation and management from a Mi’kmaq perspective and proposes a collaborative co-existence approach for effective salmon governance in Nova Scotia. This approach begins by using co-management as a process, Two-Eyed Seeing as the design, and treaties as the model to achieve shared objectives of maintaining and improving abundances of salmon populations, in spite of differing mechanisms for addressing the interwoven complexities of multiple realities, conservation, and cultural identity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This is not to say that the other frameworks do not share similar motivations or implications of pre-existing guidelines as the application of these frameworks depends highly on the specific context and the receptiveness of all actors involved (Denny & Fanning, 2016).”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Denny & Fanning, 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In stark contrast to most small-scale, subsistence-oriented fisheries worldwide, the former relies on a positivistic epistemology (i.e. that there is one “knowable” truth; Berkes, 2003;Denny & Fanning, 2016) and adheres to an “illusion of certainty” in which nature is predictable and controllable (Charles, 2001).”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Denny & Fanning, 2016
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Frameworks such as Two-Eyed Seeing that enable parallel lines of inquiry to come together require an openness to other ways of being and knowing on both sides that historically has not been reflected in the mainstream approach to fisheries research and management (Denny & Fanning, 2016; Figure 3).”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Denny & Fanning, 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Devolution of environment and resources governance: trends and future
BERKES, F. (2010) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s037689291000072x · Cited by 377
Research works printed but not linked: 54
- 10.1007/s13412-012-0086-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.006 · DOI
- 10.1080/01944366908977225 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s13412-012-0086-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3138/jcs.37.1.15 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00077.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001 · DOI
- Berneshawi, S. (1997). Resource management and the Mi'kmaq nation. Canadian Journal of Native Studies, 17(1), 115-148.
- Bevir, M. (2009). Key concepts in governance. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.11.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1462-9011(01)00022-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.marpol.2007.03.013 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.18584/iipj.2015.6.4.4 · DOI
- Doubleday, N. C. (1989). Co-management provisions of the Inuvialuit final agreement. In E. Pinkerton (Ed.), Co-operative management of local fisheries: New directions for improved management and community development (pp. 209-229). Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
- 10.1007/s00267-014-0334-7 · DOI
- 10.1163/221160000X00080 · DOI
- 10.5117/9789089642424 · DOI
- 10.5117/9789089642424 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10745-016-9814-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/1-4020-3778-3 · DOI
- Harris, D. C., & Millerd, P. (2010). Food fish, commercial fish, and fish to support a moderate livelihood: Characterizing Aboriginal and treaty rights to Canadian fisheries. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 1(1), 82-107. · DOI
- 10.1007/s13412-012-0088-6 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1942661 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.17730/humo.68.1.h87q04245t63094r · DOI
- 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.12.002 · DOI · Paper page
- Kalland, A. (2009). Unveiling the whale: Discourses on whales and whaling (Vol. 12). New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
- Kearney, J. F. (1989). Co-management or co-optation?: The ambiguities of lobster fishery management in southwest Nova Scotia. In E. Pinkerton (Ed.), Co-operative management of local fisheries new directions for improved management and community development (pp. 85-102). Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
- 10.18584/iipj.2011.2.4.5 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0008423905040539 · DOI
- Morrell, M. (1989). The struggle to integrate traditional Indian systems and state management in the salmon fisheries of the Skeena River, British Columbia. In E. Pinkerton (Ed.), Co-operative management of local fisheries: New directions for improved management and community development (pp. 231-248). Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
- 10.17730/humo.64.3.23yfnkrl2ylapjxw · DOI
- Notzke, C. (1994). Aboriginal peoples and natural resources in Canada. Concord, Ontario: Captus Press.
- 10.3138/CHR.79.1.1 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0308-597X(97)00017-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0308-597X(97)00017-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0308-597X(97)00017-1 · DOI
- Popper, K. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery. New York, NY: Routledge.
- 10.18584/iipj.2011.2.4.7 · DOI · Paper page
- Rettig, R. B., Berkes, F., & Pinkerton, E. (1989). The future of fisheries co-management: A multidisciplinary assessment. In E. Pinkerton (Ed.), Co-operative management of local fisheries: New directions for improved management and community development (pp. 273-289). Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
- Richardson, M., & Green, B. (1989). The fisheries co-management initiative in Haida Gwaii. In E. Pinkerton (Ed.), Co-operative management of local fisheries: New directions for improved management and community development (pp. 249-261). Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
- 10.3390/soc4040672 · DOI
- 10.3390/soc4040672 · DOI
- Rosenau, J. N. (1995). Governance in the twenty-first century. Global Governance, 1, 13-43. · DOI
- 10.1177/0165551506070706 · DOI
- R. v. Simon (1985) 2 SCR 387, 1985 CanLII 11 (SCC).
- R. v. Sparrow (1990) 1 SCR 1075, 1990 CanLII 104 (SCC).
- 10.1080/11745398.2012.670965 · DOI
- 10.1080/07329113.2007.10756611 · DOI
- 10.1080/07329113.2007.10756611 · DOI
- Wildsmith, B. (1995). The Mi'kmaq and the fishery: Beyond food requirements. Dalhousie Law Journal, 18, 116-140.
- Wildsmith, B. H. (2001). Vindicating Mi'kmaq rights: The struggle before, during and after Marshall. Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, 19, 203-240.
Cited by
“Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management
Reid, A. J., Eckert, L. E., Lane, J., Young, N., Hinch, S. G., Darimont, C. T., Cooke, S. J., Ban, N. C., & Marshall, A. (2021) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12516 · Cited by 652
Metadata
- Authors
- Denny, S. K., & Fanning, L. M.
- Affiliations
- Dalhousie University (CA)
- Venue
- International Indigenous Policy Journal
- Published
- 2016-07-28
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1916-5781 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2521807837
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 25.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Indigenous Policy Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Partnership Grant #895-2011-1007, #895-2011-1007)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
- Keywords
- Mi'kmaq, Atlantic salmon, fisheries governance, Indigenous co-management, Two-Eyed Seeing, treaties, salmon conservation, cultural identity, Indigenous-settler relations, Nova Scotia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
