Cited by 24Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsTopic ModelingArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Style-Aware Radiology Report Generation with RadGraph and Few-Shot Prompting

Open access
Yan, Benjamin, Liu, Ruochen, Kuo, David, Adithan, Subathra, Reis, Eduardo, Kwak, Stephen, Venugopal, Vasantha, O’Connell, Chloe +3 more·2023·Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023

Abstract

Benjamin Yan, Ruochen Liu, David Kuo, Subathra Adithan, Eduardo Reis, Stephen Kwak, Vasantha Venugopal, Chloe O’Connell, Agustina Saenz, Pranav Rajpurkar, Michael Moor. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023. 2023.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.977

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Related works have instrumented quantitative (completeness, correctness, conciseness) and qualitative (content, language, structure) measurements to distinguish synthesized clinical reports from human reports.

    “Therefore, related works have instrumented quantitative (completeness, correctness, conciseness) and qualitative (content, language, structure) measurements to dissect the riveting characters that distinguish synthesized clinical reports from human reports46–49.”
  • The significance of the medical report writing style was also highlighted in an independent prompting study.

    “The significance of the medical report writing style was also highlighted in an independent prompting study47.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. 2020a. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877-1901.
  2. Gao Huang, Zhuang Liu, Laurens Van Der Maaten, and Kilian Q Weinberger. 2017. Densely connected con- volutional networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recogni- tion, pages 4700-4708.
  3. Fenglin Liu, Xian Wu, Shen Ge, Wei Fan, and Yuexian Zou. 2021. Exploring and distilling posterior and prior knowledge for radiology report generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on com- puter vision and pattern recognition, pages 13753- 13762.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yan, B., Liu, R., Kuo, D., Adithan, S., Reis, E., Kwak, S., Venugopal, V., O’Connell, C., Saenz, A., Rajpurkar, P., & Moor, M.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (IN)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Aligarh Muslim University (IN)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023
Published
2023
Pages
14676-14688
OpenAlex
W4389519798
Cited by
22
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3
FWCI
2.35
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
radiology report generation, few-shot prompting, medical report writing, clinical text generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review