Cited by 378Natural Language Processing TechniquesAuthorship Attribution and ProfilingLinguistic Variation and Morphology

Demographic dialectal variation in social media: a case study of African-American English

Open access
Blodgett, Su Lin, Green, Lisa, O'Connor, Brendan·2016·Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

Abstract

Though dialectal language is increasingly abundant on social media, few resources exist for developing NLP tools to handle such language.We conduct a case study of dialectal language in online conversational text by investigating African-American English (AAE) on Twitter.We propose a distantly supervised model to identify AAE-like language from demographics associated with geo-located messages, and we verify that this language follows well-known AAE linguistic phenomena.In addition, we analyze the quality of existing language identification and dependency parsing tools on AAE-like text, demonstrating that they perform poorly on such text compared to text associated with white speakers.We also provide an ensemble classifier for language identification which eliminates this disparity and release a new corpus of tweets containing AAE-like language.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/d16-1120

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Variations in language use were also observed across racial or ethnic groups.

    “Such variations were also observed across racial or ethnic groups”

    From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Blodgett et al., 2016

  • Content production biases affect tasks such as user classification, trending topics detection, language identification, or content filtering.

    “these biases raise additional concerns as they affect several popular tasks, such as user classification, trending topics detection, language identification, or content filtering”

    From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Blodgett et al., 2016

  • NLP tools for language identification and dependency parsing show racial disparity when textual content produced by users vary from mainstream or standard languages.

    “by focusing on African-American English dialect, Blodgett et al. (2016) show racial disparity when the textual content produced by users vary from the mainstream or standard languages.”

    From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Blodgett et al., 2016

  • Gaps between the purpose and the assumptions under which datasets and models are built and those under which they are being used can lead to performance disparities, affecting research validity and producing misleading results.

    “Gaps between the purpose and the assumptions under which these datasets and models are built and those under which they are being used can lead to performance disparities, affecting research validity and producing misleading results (e.g., Blodgett et al., 2016; Buolamwini and Gebru, 2018).”

    From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Blodgett et al., 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blodgett, S. L., Green, L., & O'Connor, B.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Published
2016
Pages
1119-1130
OpenAlex
W2508354372
Cited by
291
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15
FWCI
8.62
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Keywords
African American English, dialect variation, social media language, Twitter, language identification, dependency parsing, ensemble classifiers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review