Demographic dialectal variation in social media: a case study of African-American English
Open accessAbstract
Though dialectal language is increasingly abundant on social media, few resources exist for developing NLP tools to handle such language.We conduct a case study of dialectal language in online conversational text by investigating African-American English (AAE) on Twitter.We propose a distantly supervised model to identify AAE-like language from demographics associated with geo-located messages, and we verify that this language follows well-known AAE linguistic phenomena.In addition, we analyze the quality of existing language identification and dependency parsing tools on AAE-like text, demonstrating that they perform poorly on such text compared to text associated with white speakers.We also provide an ensemble classifier for language identification which eliminates this disparity and release a new corpus of tweets containing AAE-like language.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Variations in language use were also observed across racial or ethnic groups.
“Such variations were also observed across racial or ethnic groups”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Blodgett et al., 2016
Content production biases affect tasks such as user classification, trending topics detection, language identification, or content filtering.
“these biases raise additional concerns as they affect several popular tasks, such as user classification, trending topics detection, language identification, or content filtering”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Blodgett et al., 2016
NLP tools for language identification and dependency parsing show racial disparity when textual content produced by users vary from mainstream or standard languages.
“by focusing on African-American English dialect, Blodgett et al. (2016) show racial disparity when the textual content produced by users vary from the mainstream or standard languages.”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Blodgett et al., 2016
Gaps between the purpose and the assumptions under which datasets and models are built and those under which they are being used can lead to performance disparities, affecting research validity and producing misleading results.
“Gaps between the purpose and the assumptions under which these datasets and models are built and those under which they are being used can lead to performance disparities, affecting research validity and producing misleading results (e.g., Blodgett et al., 2016; Buolamwini and Gebru, 2018).”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Blodgett et al., 2016
Cites
Monroe, B. L., Colaresi, M. P., & Quinn, K. M. (2008) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpn018 · Cited by 542 · see citing works
The social impact of natural language processing
Hovy, D., & Spruit, S. L. (2016) · Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-2096 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Toward a Description of African American Vernacular English Dialect Regions Using “Black Twitter”
Jones, T. (2015) · American Speech · doi:10.1215/00031283-3442117 · Cited by 144 · cited 5× · see citing works
“, 2016) and sociolinguistic (Stewart, 2014; Eisenstein, 2015; Jones, 2015) research.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258 · Cited by 2,676 · see citing works
Sagawa, S., Koh, P. W., Hashimoto, T., & Liang, P. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.08731 · Cited by 563 · see citing works
“However, models that are highly accurate on average can still consistently fail on rare and atypical examples (Hovy & Sgaard, 2015; Blodgett et al., 2016; Tatman, 2017; Hashimoto et al., 2018; Duchi et al., 2019).”
BackgroundA Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Models
Naveed, H., Khan, A. U., Qiu, S., Saqib, M., Anwar, S., Usman, M., Akhtar, N., Barnes, N., & Mian, A. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3744746 · Cited by 1,257 · see citing works
“Type Datasets/Benchmarks Multi-Task MMLU [242], SuperGLUE [3], BIG-bench [243], GLUE [244], BBH [243], CUGE [245], ZeroCLUE [246], FewCLUE [247], Blended Skill Talk [248], HELM [249], KLUE-STS [250] Language Understanding CoQA [251], WiC [252], Wikitext103 [253], PG19 [254], LCQMC [255], QQP [256], WinoGender [257], C…”
Gorwa, R., Binns, R., & Katzenbach, C. (2020) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951719897945 · Cited by 1,097 · see citing works
“…used for recommendation, ranking, or blocking, may be more or less favourable to content associated with gender, race and other protected categories (Blodgett et al., 2016; Ekstrand et al, 2018; Zehlike et al., 2017), and thus entrench forms of representational harm against such groups (Barocas et…”
BackgroundLanguage (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of “Bias” in NLP
Blodgett, S. L., Barocas, S., Daumé III, H., & Wallach, H. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.485 · Cited by 1,050 · see citing works
“Other representational harms Hovy and Søgaard (2015); Blodgett et al. (2016); Bolukbasi et al. (2016b); Hovy and Spruit (2016); Blodgett and O’Connor (2017); Larson (2017); Schnoebelen (2017); Blodgett et al. (2018); Curry and Rieser (2018); Díaz et al. (2018); Dixon et al. (2018); Kiritchenko and…”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Risk of Racial Bias in Hate Speech Detection
Sap, M., Card, D., Gabriel, S., Choi, Y., & Smith, N. A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1163 · Cited by 817 · see citing works
“In the dialect priming condition, we explicitly include the tweet’s dialect as measured by Blodgett et al. (2016), as well as extra instructions priming workers to think of tweet dialect as a proxy for the author’s race.”
MethodInfluentialJust Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group InformationPreprint
Liu, E. Z., Haghgoo, B., Chen, A., Raghunathan, A., Koh, P. W., Sagawa, S., Liang, P., & Finn, C. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.09044 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
“The standard approach of empirical risk minimization (ERM)—training machine learning models to minimize average training loss—can produce models that achieve low test error on average but still incur high error on certain groups of examples (Hovy & Søgaard, 2015; Blodgett et al., 2016; Tatman, 2017; Hashimoto et al.,…”
BackgroundRacial disparities in automated speech recognition
Koenecke, A., Nam, A., Lake, E., Nudell, J., Quartey, M., Mengesha, Z., Toups, C., Rickford, J. R., Jurafsky, D., & Goel, S. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1915768117 · Cited by 765 · see citing works
Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries
Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Kıcıman, E. (2019) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2019.00013 · Cited by 763 · see citing works
“Such variations were also observed across racial or ethnic groups (Blodgett et al., 2016).”
BackgroundInfluentialTaxonomy of Risks posed by Language Models
Weidinger, L., Uesato, J., Rauh, M., Griffin, C., Huang, P.-S., Mellor, J., Glaese, A., Cheng, M., Balle, B., Kasirzadeh, A., et al. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533088 · Cited by 764 · see citing works
“Disparate performance can also occur based on slang, dialect, sociolect, and other aspects that vary within a single language [23].”
BackgroundRealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Models
Gehman, S., Gururangan, S., Sap, M., Choi, Y., & Smith, N. A. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020 · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.301 · Cited by 693 · see citing works
Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss MinimizationPreprint
Hashimoto, T., Srivastava, M., Namkoong, H., & Liang, P. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.08010 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
“Jurgens et al., 2017), dependency parsing (Blodgett et al., 2016), part-of-speech tagging (Hovy & Sgaard, 2015), academic recommender systems (Sapiezynski et al., 2017), and automatic video captioning (Tatman, 2017).”
BackgroundInfluentialSocial Bias Frames: Reasoning about Social and Power Implications of Language
Sap, M., Gabriel, S., Qin, L., Jurafsky, D., Smith, N. A., & Choi, Y. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.486 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
“We fnd that our dataset is predominantly written in White-aligned English (78% of posts), as measured by a lexical dialect detector by Blodgett et al. (2016), with <10% of posts having indicators of African-American English.”
BackgroundLearning models with uniform performance via distributionally robust optimization
Duchi, J. C., & Namkoong, H. (2021) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/20-aos2004 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
“In numerous other applications—such as facial recognition, automatic video captioning, language identification, academic recommender systems— performance varies significantly over different demographic groupings, such as race, gender, or age [46, 50, 20, 80, 91].”
BackgroundLast Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious CorrelationsPreprint
Kirichenko, P., Izmailov, P., & Wilson, A. (2022) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.02937 · Cited by 533 · see citing works
“Furthermore, spurious correlations can disproportionately affect different population groups (each with their own data distribution), leading to poor performance on the minority groups and unfair decisions [13, 39, 10, 94, 32, 20, 17, 79].”
BackgroundEthical and social risks of harm from Language Models
Weidinger, L., Mellor, J., Rauh, M., Griffin, C., Uesato, J., Huang, P.-S., Cheng, M., Glaese, M., Balle, B., Kasirzadeh, A., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.04359 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detection
Sap, M., Swayamdipta, S., Vianna, L., Zhou, X., Choi, Y., & Smith, N. A. (2021) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.431 · Cited by 463 · see citing works
“First, we select posts that are automatically detected as AAE and/or vulgar from Founta et al. (2018), using the lexical detector of AAE by (Blodgett et al., 2016) and the vulgar wordlist by Zhou et al. (2021).”
MethodInfluentialAn Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious CorrelationsPreprint
Sagawa, S., Raghunathan, A., Koh, P. W., & Liang, P. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.04345 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
“Copyright 2020 by the author(s). with low average error can still fail on particular groups of data points (Blodgett et al., 2016; Hashimoto et al., 2018; Buolamwini & Gebru, 2018).”
BackgroundRacial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasets
Davidson, T., Bhattacharya, D., & Weber, I. (2019) · Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Abusive Language Online · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-3504 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
“We find evidence of systematic racial biases across all of the classifiers, with AAE tweets predicted as belonging to negative classes like hate speech or harassment significantly more frequently than SAE tweets.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGradient Matching for Domain Generalization
Shi, Y., Seely, J., Torr, P. H. S., Siddharth, N., Hannun, A., Usunier, N., & Synnaeve, G. (2021) · Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.09937 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
“Using vanilla ERM is theoretically unfounded (Hashimoto et al., 2018; Blodgett et al., 2016; Tatman, 2017) since ERM is guaranteed to work only when train and test distributions match.”
Examining Gender and Race Bias in Two Hundred Sentiment Analysis Systems
Kiritchenko, S., & Mohammad, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the Seventh Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics · doi:10.18653/v1/s18-2005 · Cited by 384 · see citing works
“This paper does not examine the differences in accuracies of systems on text produced by different races or genders, as was done by Hovy (2015); Blodgett et al. (2016); Jurgens et al. (2017); Buo-lamwini and Gebru (2018).”
BackgroundAdversarial Removal of Demographic Attributes from Text Data
Elazar, Y., & Goldberg, Y. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1002 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
“…race, gender, and many other social factors of the author (Kop-pel et al., 2002; Burger et al., 2011; Nguyen et al., 2013; Weren et al., 2014; Verhoeven and Daele-mans, 2014; Rangel et al., 2016; Verhoeven et al., 2016; Blodgett et al., 2016), or even the audience of the text (Voigt et al., 2018).”
BackgroundStyle transfer through back-translation
Prabhumoye, S., Tsvetkov, Y., Salakhutdinov, R., & Black, A. W. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1080 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
“Moreover, prior work has shown that the quality of language identification and POS tagging degrades significantly on African American Vernacular English (Blodgett et al., 2016; Jørgensen et al., 2015); YouTube’s automatic captions have higher error rates for women and speakers from Scotland (Rudinger et al.”
BackgroundGender and Dialect Bias in YouTube’s Automatic Captions
Tatman, R. (2017) · Proceedings of the First ACL Workshop on Ethics in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/w17-1606 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpus
Dodge, J., Sap, M., Marasović, A., Agnew, W., Ilharco, G., Groeneveld, D., Mitchell, M., & Gardner, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.98 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
“We use a dialect-aware topic model from Blodgett et al. (2016), which was trained on 60M geolocated tweets and relies on US census race/ethnicity data as topics.”
MethodHate speech detection and racial bias mitigation in social media based on BERT model
Mozafari, M., Farahbakhsh, R., & Crespi, N. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237861 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
“[49] including a demographically associated dialectal language named African American English (AAE), known as Black English, which is a dialect of American English spoken by millions of black people across the United States.”
BackgroundReformulating Unsupervised Style Transfer as Paraphrase Generation
Krishna, K., Wieting, J., & Iyyer, M. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.55 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
“To create CDS, we obtain data (Table 5) from existing academic research datasets (Godfrey et al., 1992; Blodgett et al., 2016) and public APIs or online collections like Project Gutenberg (Hart, 1992).”
BackgroundMethodNull It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projection
Ravfogel, S., Elazar, Y., Gonen, H., Twiton, M., & Goldberg, Y. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.647 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
“We follow the setup of Elazar and Goldberg (2018) which used a twitter dataset, collected by Blodgett et al. (2016), where each tweet is associated with “race” information and a sentiment which was determined by their belonging to some emoji group.”
BackgroundMethodxLSTM: Extended Long Short-Term Memory
Beck, M., Pöppel, K., Spanring, M., Auer, A., Prudnikova, O., Kopp, M., Klambauer, G., Brandstetter, J., & Hochreiter, S. (2024) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 · doi:10.52202/079017-3417 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts
Koh, P. W., Sagawa, S., Marklund, H., Xie, S. M., Zhang, M., Balsubramani, A., Hu, W., Yasunaga, M., Phillips, R. L., Gao, I., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.07421 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
“…worse performance on African-American Vernacular English compared to Standard American English on part-of-speech tagging (Jørgensen et al., 2015), dependency parsing (Blodgett et al., 2016), language identification (Blodgett and O’Connor, 2017), and auto-correct systems (Hashimoto et al., 2018).”
Fairness in Deep Learning: A Computational Perspective
Du, M., Yang, F., Zou, N., & Hu, X. (2020) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2020.3000681 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
“Examples include the language identification systems perform significantly worse when processing text produced by people belonging to certain races [3, 23], health care applications including ICU mortality and psychiatric 30-day readmission model prediction accuracy is significantly different across gender and insuran…”
BackgroundCorrect-N-Contrast: A Contrastive Approach for Improving Robustness to Spurious CorrelationsPreprint
Zhang, M. S., Sohoni, N., Zhang, H., Finn, C., & Ré, C. (2022) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.01517 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
“This issue is critical to address in fields ranging from algorithmic fairness to medical ML (Blodgett et al., 2016; Buolamwini & Gebru, 2018; Hashimoto et al., 2018).”
AI generates covertly racist decisions about people based on their dialect
Hofmann, V., Kalluri, P. R., Jurafsky, D., & King, S. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07856-5 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
“To evaluate the familiarity of the models with AAE, we measured their perplexity on the datasets used for the two evaluation settings 83,87 .”
InfluentialTowards generalisable hate speech detection: a review on obstacles and solutions
Yin, W., & Zubiaga, A. (2021) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.598 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Branch-Train-Merge: Embarrassingly Parallel Training of Expert Language ModelsPreprint
Li, M., Gururangan, S., Dettmers, T., Lewis, M., Althoff, T., Smith, N. A., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2208.03306 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
“…that stems from factors such as vocabulary differences (Blitzer et al., 2006), sociolinguistic (Biber, 1988) or demographic (Rickford, 1985; Blodgett et al., 2016) variables, community membership (Lucy and Bamman, 2021), end-tasks (Gururangan et al., 2020), or temporal shifts (Lazaridou…”
The Importance of Modeling Social Factors of Language: Theory and Practice
Hovy, D., & Yang, D. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.49 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
“Dialectal areas still play an important role, even in online communication (Hovy and Purschke, 2018), and identifying and integrating them can be vital for fairer NLP tools (Jørgensen et al., 2016; Blodgett et al., 2016; Dorn, 2019).”
BackgroundDifferential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracy
Bagdasaryan, E., & Shmatikov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.12101 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
“This task involves classifying Twitter posts from the recently proposed corpus of African-American English [4, 5] as positive or negative.”
BackgroundFoundation metrics for evaluating effectiveness of healthcare conversations powered by generative AI
Abbasian, M., Khatibi, E., Azimi, I., Oniani, D., Shakeri Hossein Abad, Z., Thieme, A., Sriram, R., Yang, Z., Wang, Y., Lin, B., et al. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01074-z · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Garrido-Muñoz, I., Montejo-Ráez, A., Martínez-Santiago, F., & Ureña-López, L. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.20944/preprints202103.0049.v1 · Cited by 191
“2020 [79] Etnicity GPT-2 (small), DISTILBERT TwitterAAE [80], Amazon Mechanical Turk annotators (SAE) English (AAVE/SAE) Text generation, BLEU, ROUGE, Sentiment Classification, VADER [75] -”
BackgroundDiverse Weight Averaging for Out-of-Distribution GeneralizationPreprint
Ramé, A., Kirchmeyer, M., Rahier, T., Rakotomamonjy, A., Gallinari, P., & Cord, M. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.09739 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“It could be useful in medicine [1, 2] or to tackle fairness issues related to under-representation [57, 86, 87].”
BackgroundPilán, I., Lison, P., Øvrelid, L., Papadopoulou, A. I., Sánchez, D., & Batet, M. (2022) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00458 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
“This problem of attribute disclosure has been investigated in several NLP studies, in particular for the purpose of obfuscating documents to conceal sensitive social categories such as gender (Reddy and Knight 2016) or race (Blodgett, Green, and O’Connor 2016).”
BackgroundBlodgett, S. L., & O'Connor, B. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.00061 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
“In the rest of this paper, we focus on the dialect of African-American English as used on Twier, which previous work [3, 9, 11] has established is very prevalent and sometimes quite dierent than mainstream American English.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationA taxonomy and review of generalization research in NLP
Hupkes, D., Giulianelli, M., Dankers, V., Artetxe, M., Elazar, Y., Pimentel, T., Christodoulopoulos, C., Lasri, K., Saphra, N., Sinclair, A. J., et al. (2022) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00729-y · Cited by 167 · see citing works
“One category of studies driven by these concepts, often ethical in nature, asks questions about how well models generalise to diverse demographics, typically considering minority or marginalised groups (e.g. Bender et al., 2021; Blodgett et al., 2016; Koh et al., 2021), or investigates to what extent models perpetuate…”
BackgroundChallenges in Automated Debiasing for Toxic Language Detection
Zhou, X., Sap, M., Swayamdipta, S., Choi, Y., & Smith, N. A. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.274 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
“In our experiments, we estimate the dialect of a tweet using a topic model from Blodgett et al. (2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAlgorithmic fairness datasets: the story so far
Fabris, A., Messina, S., Silvello, G., & Susto, G. A. (2022) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-022-00854-z · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Farrand, T., Mireshghallah, F., Singh, S., & Trask, A. (2020) · PPMLP@CCS · doi:10.1145/3411501.3419419 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
“Similar results were also found when performing sentiment analysis on a corpus of African-American English tweets [6, 7], species classification on iNaturalist nature images [32], and federated learning of a language model on a public Reddit comments dataset [22].”
ResultA Survey of Race, Racism, and Anti-Racism in NLP
Field, A., Blodgett, S. L., Talat, Z., & Tsvetkov, Y. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.149 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
“…a set of tweets with inferred probabilistic topic labels based on alignment with U.S. census race/ethnicity groups (or the provided inference model) (Blodgett et al., 2016 While these commonly-used data sets can identify performance disparities, they only capture a narrow subset of the multiple…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationHandling Bias in Toxic Speech Detection: A Survey
Garg, T., Masud, S., Suresh, T., & Chakraborty, T. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3580494 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
“• Blodgett LM and dataset [8] : This language model was trained on tweets located in the USA and matched them with the USA census’ demographic data for the four largest racial/ethnic groups (namely, those of non-Hispanic Whites (NHW), non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB), Hispanics, and Asians).”
BackgroundMethodDemoting Racial Bias in Hate Speech Detection
Xia, M., Field, A., & Tsvetkov, Y. (2020) · International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media (SocialNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.socialnlp-1.2 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
“Blodgett et al. (2016) generate a AAE-aligned corpus comprising tweets from users labelled with at least 80% posterior probability as using AAE-associated terms.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialOn Measures of Biases and Harms in NLP
Dev, S., Sheng, E., Zhao, J., Amstutz, A., Sun, J., Hou, Y., Sanseverino, M., Kim, J., Nishi, A., Peng, N., et al. (2022) · AACL/IJCNLP · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-aacl.24 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Benigni, M., Joseph, K., & Carley, K. M. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181405 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Fairness and Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: A Multidisciplinary Survey
Fabris, A., Baranowska, N., Dennis, M. J., Graus, D., Hacker, P., Saldivar, J., Zuiderveen Borgesius, F., & Biega, A. J. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3696457 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Garrido-Muñoz, I., Montejo-Ráez, A., Martínez-Santiago, F., & Ureña-López, L. A. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11073184 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Challenges in Detoxifying Language Models
Welbl, J., Glaese, A., Uesato, J., Dathathri, S., Mellor, J., Hendricks, L. A., Anderson, K., Kohli, P., Coppin, B., & Huang, P.-S. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021 · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.210 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
“To study the social bias amplification, we use the BOLD dataset (Dhamala et al., 2021) and TWITTERAAE dataset (Blodgett et al., 2016).”
MethodNatural Language Processing for Dialects of a Language: A Survey
Joshi, A., Dabre, R., Kanojia, D., Li, Z., Zhan, H., Haffari, G., & Dippold, D. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3712060 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
“Natural Language Processing for Dialects of a Language: A Survey 149:5 [Blodgett et al. 2016] Language detection shows lower performance for African-American English.”
InfluentialWhose Language Counts as High Quality? Measuring Language Ideologies in Text Data Selection
Gururangan, S., Card, D., Dreier, S. K., Gade, E. K., Wang, L. Z., Wang, Z., Zettlemoyer, L., & Smith, N. A. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.165 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
“Because natural language varies with social and demographic variables (Rickford, 1985; Eckert, 1989; Labov, 2006; Blodgett et al., 2016; Hovy and Yang, 2021; Lucy and Bamman, 2021, inter alia ), we can also ask whose language will be excluded.”
BackgroundIncorporating Dialectal Variability for Socially Equitable Language Identification
Jurgens, D., Tsvetkov, Y., & Jurafsky, D. (2017) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-2009 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
“As a result, these systems systematically misclassify texts from populations with millions of speakers whose local speech differs from the majority dialects (Hovy and Spruit, 2016; Blodgett et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialInvestigating Bias in LLM-Based Bias Detection: Disparities between LLMs and Human PerceptionPreprint
Lin, L., Wang, L.-Z., Guo, J.-S., & Wong, K.-F. (2024) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.14896 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
“Biases manifest in various forms, including representational biases depicting certain social groups negatively (Beukeboom and Burgers, 2019), disparate system performance leading to misclassifications (Blodgett et al., 2016), and reinforcement of normativity (Bender et al., 2021).”
Robustness to Spurious Correlations via Human AnnotationsPreprint
Srivastava, M., Hashimoto, T. B., & Liang, P. (2020) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.06661 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
“The increasing use of machine learning in socioeconomic problems as well as high-stakes decision-making emphasizes the importance of designing models that can perform well over a wide range of users and conditions (Barocas & Selbst, 2016; Blodgett et al., 2016; Hovy & Sgaard, 2015; Tatman, 2017).”
BackgroundGroenwold, S., Ou, L.-H., Parekh, A., Honnavalli, S., Levy, S., Mirza, D., & Wang, W. Y. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.473 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
“Sample Identification TwitterAAE (Blodgett et al., 2016) collects AAVE tweets by using a distantly supervised mixed-membership model on samples that are geolocated to African-American blockgroups, as defined by the U.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialClarke, I., & Grieve, J. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0222062 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
“In addition, following standard practice in MDA [48], we also searched for a variety of features related specifically to Twitter, including hashtags [65], initial and non-initial mentions [66], laughter acronyms [67], abbreviations [68], interjections [69], emoticons [70], emojis [71], capitalisation [70], punctuation…”
BackgroundContrastive Adapters for Foundation Model Group Robustness
Zhang, M. S., & Ré, C. (2022) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.07180 · Cited by 96
Overcoming Language Variation in Sentiment Analysis with Social Attention
Yang, Y., & Eisenstein, J. (2017) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00062 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
“In natural language processing (NLP), social media data has brought variation to the fore, spurring the development of new computational techniques for characterizing variation in the lexicon (Eisenstein et al., 2010), orthography (Eisenstein, 2015), and syntax (Blodgett et al., 2016).”
MethodDistributionally Robust Losses for Latent Covariate Mixtures
Duchi, J. C., Hashimoto, T., & Namkoong, H. (2022) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.2022.2363 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“In the face of this need, a number of authors observe that optimizing average performance often yields models that perform poorly on minority subpopulations [3, 34, 39, 16, 63, 73].”
BackgroundxLSTM: Extended Long Short-Term Memory
Beck, M., Pöppel, K., Spanring, M., Auer, A., Prudnikova, O., Kopp, M., Klambauer, G., Brandstetter, J., & Hochreiter, S. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.04517 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Measure and Improve Robustness in NLP Models: A Survey
Wang, X., Wang, H., & Yang, D. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.339 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
“els’ performance should not degrade due to the differences in grammar errors, dialects, speakers, languages (Craig and Washington, 2002; Blodgett et al., 2016; Demszky et al., 2021), or newly collected datasets for the same task but in different”
BackgroundOn Transferability of Bias Mitigation Effects in Language Model Fine-Tuning
Jin, X., Barbieri, F., Kennedy, B., Davani, A. M., Neves, L., & Ren, X. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.296 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“For FDCL, we extract 50 words with largest coefficient in the bag-of-words linear classifier with a AAE dialect probability higher than 60% (given by the off-the-shelf AAE dialect predictor (Blodgett et al., 2016)) on”
MethodExamining and Combating Spurious Features under Distribution Shift
Zhou, C., Ma, X., Michel, P., & Neubig, G. (2021) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.07171 · Cited by 86
“Since the dataset does not contain the dialect information, we follow Sap et al. (2019) and use annotations predicted by the dialect classifier in Blodgett et al. (2016) to label each example as one of four English varieties: A = { White-aligned, African American (AAE), Hispanic, and Other } .”
MethodAnonymisation Models for Text Data: State of the art, Challenges and Future Directions
Lison, P., Pilán, I., Sanchez, D., Batet, M., & Øvrelid, L. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.323 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
“Beyond de-identification, several research efforts have looked at detecting and obfuscating social media texts based on quasi-identifying categories such as gender (Reddy and Knight, 2016) or race (Blodgett et al., 2016).”
BackgroundA Systematic Investigation of Commonsense Knowledge in Large Language Models
Li, X. L., Kuncoro, A., Hoffmann, J., d’Autume, C. D. M., Blunsom, P., & Nematzadeh, A. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.812 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“Furthermore, the enormous size of the training data does not necessarily guarantee diversity: We expect the training data to contain a smaller proportion of vernacular or regional English that is used by underrepresented communities (Blodgett et al., 2016; Bender et al., 2021).”
BackgroundMapping the Americanization of English in space and time
Gonçalves, B., Loureiro-Porto, L., Ramasco, J., & Sánchez, D. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0197741 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
“investigation of lexical alternations unveils hierarchical dialect regions in the United States [33]. Twitter can be also employed in the study of specific varieties departing from the standard form [34]. However, online social media are more suitable for a synchronic approximation to language variation. If one aims a…”
BackgroundMulti-VALUE: A Framework for Cross-Dialectal English NLP
Ziems, C., Held, W. B., Yang, J., Dhamala, J., Gupta, R., & Yang, D.-Y. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.08011 · Cited by 78
“, 2019) across dialects from topical shifts found in data collected using non-linguistic criteria such as geolocation (Blodgett et al., 2016).”
BackgroundBroaden the Vision: Geo-Diverse Visual Commonsense Reasoning
Yin, D., Li, L. H., Hu, Z.-N., Peng, N., & Chang, K.-W. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.162 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
“For example, it underlies natural language processing (Blodgett et al., 2016; Jurgens et al., 2017; Ghosh et al., 2021) and automatic speech recognition (Tatman, 2017; Koenecke et al.”
BackgroundTwitter Universal Dependency Parsing for African-American and Mainstream American English
Blodgett, S. L., Wei, J. T.-Z., & O'Connor, B. T. (2018) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1131 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
“3 Each tweet in that corpus is accompanied by a model’s demographically-aligned topic model probabilities jointly inferred from Census demographics and word likelihood by Blodgett et al. (2016), including the African-American and White topics.”
BackgroundSelf-citationVALUE: Understanding Dialect Disparity in NLU
Ziems, C., Chen, J., Harris, C., Anderson, J., & Yang, D.-Y. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.03031 · Cited by 76
“…synonyms (e.g., mash/press; homie/friend; paper/money) and orthographic variants (e.g., da/the; wit/with; sista/sister) In a method inspired by Shoemark et al. (2018), we trained a skip-gram word embedding model1 (Mikolov et al., 2013) on the public TwitterAAE dataset of Blodgett et al. (2016).”
BackgroundMethodTowards Last-layer Retraining for Group Robustness with Fewer Annotations
LaBonte, T., Muthukumar, V. K., & Kumar, A. (2023) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.08534 · Cited by 75
“This behavior can lead to bias against demographic minorities [25, 6, 67, 23, 8] or failure in high-consequence applications [42, 9, 79, 51].”
BackgroundDiverse Adversaries for Mitigating Bias in Training
Han, X., Baldwin, T., & Cohn, T. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.239 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“Data We experiment with the dataset of Blodgett et al. (2016), which contains tweets that are either African American English (AAE)like or Standard American English (SAE)-like (following Elazar and Goldberg (2018) and Ravfogel et al. (2020)).”
Characteristics of Harmful Text: Towards Rigorous Benchmarking of Language ModelsPreprint
Rauh, M., Mellor, J. F. J., Uesato, J., Huang, P.-S., Welbl, J., Weidinger, L., Dathathri, S., Glaese, A., Irving, G., Gabriel, I., et al. (2022) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.08325 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“Blodgett et al. [13] collect Tweets that exhibit common characteristics of African American English (AAE) as well as language associated with white speakers.”
BackgroundIntersectional Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language DatasetsPreprint
Kim, J., Ortiz, C., Nam, S., Santiago, S., & Datta, V. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.05921 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Selective Classification Can Magnify Disparities Across GroupsPreprint
Jones, E., Sagawa, S., Koh, P. W., Kumar, A., & Liang, P. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.14134 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“The problem of models performing poorly on some groups of data has been widely reported (e.g., Hovy & Søgaard (2015); Blodgett et al. (2016); Corbett-Davies et al. (2017); Tatman (2017); Hashimoto et al. (2018)).”
BackgroundFederated Learning: Privacy and Incentive
Yang, Q., Fan, L., & Yu, H. (2020) · Federated Learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63076-8 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Balancing out Bias: Achieving Fairness Through Balanced Training
Han, X., Baldwin, T., & Cohn, T. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.779 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
“M OJI : This sentiment analysis dataset was collected by Blodgett et al. (2016), and contains tweets that are either African American English (AAE)- like or Standard American English (SAE)-like.”
MethodInvestigation on Performance of Neural Networks Using Quadratic Relative Error Cost Function
Zhang, N., Shen, S., Zhou, A., & Xu, Y. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2930520 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Equity Beyond Bias in Language Technologies for Education
Mayfield, E., Madaio, M., Prabhumoye, S., Gerritsen, D., McLaughlin, B., Dixon-Román, E., & Black, A. W. (2019) · Proceedings of the Fourteenth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-4446 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
“The relative sparsity of data for these variations may have resulted in unacceptable modeling accuracy in the past (Blodgett et al., 2016), but we are now closing that gap (Dalmia et al., 2018; Sitaram et al., 2019).”
BackgroundConsistent Estimators for Learning to Defer to an Expert
Mozannar, H., & Sontag, D. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.01862 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
“We create a synthetic expert that has differing error rates according to the demographic of the tweet’s author, using the probabilistic language model of (Blodgett et al., 2016) we predict that a tweet is in African-American English (AAE) if the probability predicted by the model is higher than 0.”
MethodEvaluation of African American Language Bias in Natural Language Generation
Deas, N., Grieser, J. A., Kleiner, S., Patton, D., Turcan, E., & McKeown, K. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.14291 · Cited by 60
“The remaining subsets of the data (TwitterAAE, CORAAL) span a variety of topics and structures.”
InfluentialRepairing the Cracked Foundation: A Survey of Obstacles in Evaluation Practices for Generated Text
Gehrmann, S., Clark, E., & Sellam, T. (2023) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.13715 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
“…using large web-scraped datasets, and to Luccioni and Viviano (2021) and Dodge et al. (2021) for analyses of such large-scale web-scraped corpora and their representational, legal, consent, and PII issues. text with AAVE features (Jørgensen et al., 2015, 2016; Blodgett et al., 2016, among others).”
BackgroundTheory In, Theory Out: The Uses of Social Theory in Machine Learning for Social Science
Radford, J., & Joseph, K. (2020) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2020.00018 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
“For example, Blodgett et al. [13] show that language identification tools shown to perform well on a wide array of text corpora [76] suffer significantly at distinguishing African-American English as English in social media texts.”
BackgroundEvaluating model performance under worst-case subpopulations
Li, M., Mittal, D., Namkoong, H., & Xia, S. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.01316 · Cited by 58
“More generally, model performance degrades across demographic attributes such as race, gender, or age, in facial recognition, video captioning, language identification, and academic recommender systems [41, 46, 17, 72, 81, 19].”
BackgroundLi, A., Guo, J., Yang, H., Salim, F. D., & Chen, Y. (2021) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Internet-of-Things Design and Implementation (IoTDI) · doi:10.1145/3450268.3453519 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“For example, we replace the CNN architecture with LSTM-based architecture in DeepObfuscator, and then evaluate performance on TwitterAAE dataset described in [3].”
MethodWe Don't Speak the Same Language: Interpreting Polarization through Machine Translation
KhudaBukhsh, A. R., Sarkar, R., Kamlet, M., & Mitchell, T. M. (2020) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i17.17748 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
“While work focusing on dialectical variants of English and their detection challenges exists [36, 37], to the best of our knowledge, treating two US news networks’ discussions as two distinct languages and leveraging modern machine translation literature [38] to detect mismatched translation pairs…”
Towards Argument Mining for Social Good: A Survey
Vecchi, E. M., Falk, N., Jundi, I., & Lapesa, G. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.107 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“Other work has also dealt with building nonEnglish datasets (Lindahl, 2020; Bauwelinck and Lefever, 2020; Schaefer and Stede, 2020; Zotova et al., 2020), but there still seems to be a focus on Indo-European languages (and sometimes Chinese) with a lack of datasets and analysis extending to other languages.”
BackgroundLi, A., Duan, Y., Yang, H., Chen, Y., & Yang, J. (2020) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3394486.3403125 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
“We adopt CelebA [23], LFW [18] and the dialectal tweets dataset (DIAL) [4] for the training and testing of TIPRDC.”
MethodA Novel Estimator of Mutual Information for Learning to Disentangle Textual Representations
Colombo, P., Piantanida, P., & Clavel, C. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.511 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“The dataset has been automatically constructed from DIAL corpus (Blodgett et al., 2016) which contained race annotations over 50 Million of tweets.”
MethodHarris, C., Johnson, A. G., Palmer, S., Yang, D.-Y., & Bruckman, A. (2023) · Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact. · doi:10.1145/3610169 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
“Prior research Black social media users are more likely to have their speech be classified as hate speech or otherwise offensive speech by content moderation systems [27, 28, 46], more likely to be classified as negative sentiment in sentiment analysis systems [31], have higher word error rates in speech-to-text capti…”
BackgroundCan AI Relate: Testing Large Language Model Response for Mental Health SupportPreprint
Gabriel, S., Puri, I., Xu, X., Malgaroli, M., & Ghassemi, M. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.12021 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Probing Classifiers are Unreliable for Concept Removal and Detection
Kumar, A., Tan, C., & Sharma, A. (2022) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.04153 · Cited by 53
“We use three datasets: MultiNLI [46], Twitter-PAN16 [31] and Twitter-AAE [6].”
BackgroundMethodContrastive Learning for Fair RepresentationsPreprint
Shen, A., Han, X., Cohn, T., Baldwin, T., & Frermann, L. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.10645 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“This kind of unfairness has been identified in various tasks, such as twitter sentiment analysis (Blodgett, Green, and O’Connor 2016; Han, Baldwin, and Cohn 2021b), part-of-speech tagging (Hovy and Søgaard 2015; Li, Baldwin, and Cohn 2018; Han, Baldwin, and Cohn 2021a), and image activity…”
Challenges in Applying Explainability Methods to Improve the Fairness of NLP Models
Balkir, E., Kiritchenko, S., Nejadgholi, I., & Fraser, K. C. (2022) · TRUSTNLP · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.03945 · Cited by 52
“Examples include performance disparities between standard and African American English (Blodgett and O’Connor, 2017), stereotypical associations between gendered pronouns and occupations in coreference resolution (Rudinger et al., 2018) and machine translation (Stanovsky et al., 2019), and false positives in hate spee…”
BackgroundBalancing Learning Model Privacy, Fairness, and Accuracy With Early Stopping Criteria
Zhang, T., Zhu, T., Gao, K., Zhou, W., & Yu, P. S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2021.3129592 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
“The sensitive attribute is ethnicity, given by the method in [27] and [28], where reviews are labeled as standard American English (SAE) or other American English (OAE).”
Method
- Authors
- Blodgett, S. L., Green, L., & O'Connor, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 1119-1130
- OpenAlex
- W2508354372
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15
- FWCI
- 8.62
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
- Keywords
- African American English, dialect variation, social media language, Twitter, language identification, dependency parsing, ensemble classifiers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review