Cited by 191Topic ModelingSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningNatural Language Processing Techniques

Learning to Generate Product Reviews from Attributes

Open access
Dong, Li, Huang, Shaohan, Wei, Furu, Lapata, Mirella, Zhou, Ming, Xu, Ke·2017·Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 1, Long Papers

Abstract

Li Dong, Shaohan Huang, Furu Wei, Mirella Lapata, Ming Zhou, Ke Xu. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 1, Long Papers. 2017.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/e17-1059

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early natural language generation work mainly relied on recurrent neural networks and often suffers from insufficient diversity due to limited model expressiveness.

    “Early work [139-141] mainly relied on recurrent neural networks (e.g., LSTM [142], GRU [143]). Limited by the model's expressiveness, they often suffer from the issue of insufficient diversity.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dong, L., Huang, S., Wei, F., Lapata, M., Zhou, M., & Xu, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Beihang University (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 1, Long Papers
Published
2017
Pages
623-632
OpenAlex
W2740167620
Cited by
190
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 6
FWCI
8.98
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
H2020 European Research Council (681760)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
product reviews, review generation, product attributes, text generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review